Видео

Hi please do watch the next episodes in the series. They are already up. The question has been answered.

Thanks! 🙏 greatly appreciated.

I am disgusted by your thinking.

It seems you have not watched the video and generally commented. This guy is producing research from before 1947 on the history of why Muslim businessmen did not do well. It includes views by sir Syed ahmed khan etc.

@@dustydrives Before 1947 Parsis and Hindus got business from British, by pleasing and boot licking them. They supported British in their occupation and exploitation of natural resources of India.

Some Parsis indeed did work closely with the British on opium trade. But not all did. And no Hindu or Jain entrepreneur did. Read detailed research by global and Indian researchers on the subject from the enclosed link on why Hindus and Jains succeeded vs Muslims. And why Muslims did not do well beyond trading enterprises anywhere in the Middle East too. Also what about 1500-1800 when Hindus and Jains dominated business. There were no British then. You will shortly get their stories too on this channel. Also why Khojas, Bohras and Memons continued to dominate business vs other Muslims despite being 0.4 percent of Muslim population. Why other Muslims failed? Sorry this channel is for serious conversation on such topics and not ignorant face buried in the sand type people who make sweeping generalisations.

​@@kaafirnama The Ambani family put all their efforts to prevent a book from publishing and those who know why , they know 😂

Thanks Somnath! Indeed very valid suggestion. I usually include a Google Sheet link to all content sources (and any image credits if required) in the video description. But put it back due to time pressure for last two videos. Have done so now. I don't include page numbers though....but will try to do so in the future. Thanks for your encouraging words🙏Please do look up other videos on the channel.

@@kaafirnama 👍

Correct! Actually even going up to Peshawar. part of Muslim families stayed behind in UP and the other part migrated to Pakistan, having the best of both worlds. But to be fair, many ordinary Muslims who migrated lost their belongings in India.....but they were given the property of Hindus who had left under the Enemy Property Act. India too had the same act but Gandhi resisted/protested when the properties of Muslims who left India was being handed over to Hindu refugees.

Thanks for your comment. Indeed so. More interestingly, the education levels of Muslims in these provinces was actually higher than most other provinces.. more on that in a later episode.

​@@kaafirnamaYes Chelmsford reforms of 1919 were neglected in these provinces.

True…you are right on the first part. As regards Arab league… ask any Arab what Arabs call subcontinent Muslims(you can look it on google too)…and if they consider them to be of Arab descent?!

@@kaafirnama Somalians and Morrocans are not Arabs.. but as they speak Arabic they are members of Arab League.. Same would have happened to Pakistan. Arab League is based on linguistic grounds not ethnic.

Correction - Moroccans are largely Arabs (and some Berbers). Somalis speak Somali… very few Somalis speak Arabic. Even today- it was less 50 years back. Arab league was a Muslim grouping among others that came up post 1945… and had little to no political significance or solidarity. All Arab league nations including the biggest Arab country - Egypt - have been thrown out of the league from time to time. The Saudi run OIC was relatively powerful since it was backed by Saudi oil revenues..Pakistan could not do much with OIC.. what would they have done with Arab league?

@@kaafirnama yes it is also true

You are correct on the Portuguese conversion part… it was brutal..I have closely studied Goan history (descend from that state)…only small point I want to add is Mughals did no such thing… they never fought against any colonial power. Portuguese and French lost to the British on the Indian Ocean…. A control that the Anglo Saxons continue to maintain with the US navy. The handover officially happened around 1950 when the British went bankrupt post the Second World War..

All states in the past were military controlled too… Pakistan is run by an elite that comprises the Army at the helm. And the army privately owns enterprises like the Mughals did despite living off the state treasury like the Mughals did. Plus all other theories of the decline of the Mughals (have done a separate episode) corresponds to the scenario in Pakistan

Sure. Please write into kaafirnama at gmail.com

i could understand English but most of listener not.

बिल्कुल सही कहा आपने!! हिंदी चैनल दिसंबर ६ को लॉंच होगा। 🙏 आपके प्रोत्साहन के लिए धन्यवाद!

Sid you are very creative!! I am doing a series on currency a few weeks down. Will use your thought and give you a shoutout.

Thanks Ashish

Thanks Sunil🙏

जय भारत! 🙏

Information sources for this video are mentioned in the link in the description. They are history papers taught at the Aligarh Muslim Univ etc, presented at the Indian History Congress and other global history forums. The authenticity of their information can be checked with any history prof at AMU, JNU or any other eminent university of choice. The history papers give detailed references to Mughal court documents and other sources from the period that are also available in the public domain.

@@stormshadow5283 😂

@@stormshadow5283 🙏

@@stormshadow5283 thank you very much. Greatly appreciate🙏

Information is as real as it can get. All based on research into Mughals and presented as research papers by eminent historians at AMU, Indian History Congress etc. Sarcastic-yes indeed! But these similarities are real. Watch out for next two series in the series!

@@srajanchouhan5215 🙏 thanks! Need your support and encouragement. Started only a month back.

Thanks Naveen!

@@mojorisin08 true. More on that in a later episode maybe … this one is solely on how economies of Pakistan and India compared on some aspects in 1947 and just before partition. (I covered the liberalisation program in 1992-93 as a journalist with the Economic Times and subsequently with the Business Standard)

@@shenoyn thanks!🙏

Thanks Rohit!

Thanks 🙏

Thanks a ton