Видео

Thank you for your research and enlightenment concerning the festival of Hanukkah!

The lack of support Denis received shows that atheists sure are scared of this god they don’t believe in. In other words, they claim to *know* there is no god, but they are not willing to support Denis’ rational argument because it would “bring god back in”. How illogical. What happened to letting ideas stand on their own merit?

People often ask the question "then who created God?". In Christian theological tradition, the creator IS the uncaused cause, existing outside of time and space. If the universe was eternal, the universe would be the uncaused cause. But the universe is not eternal (as evidenced by the expansion of the universe), and the principle of causality tells us that if the universe had a beginning, it must have a cause. In other words, space and time had a beginning (the singularity theorems by Roger Penrose and Stephen Hawking describe this). It follows that the creator must reside outside of space and time, and must be eternal. The additional argument from design comes into play like this. *Given* that we have to deal with origins questions (e.g., the origin of the universe, the origin of the first form of life, etc...) this emergence of information, based on our knowledge of cause and effect, is a strong indicator of the activity of intelligence. In other words, the fine tuning of the universe, the fact that type of information that DNA carries is functional information, the fact that this information cannot be explained chemically by differential bonding affinities, the fact that DNA provides the instructions for building proteins but proteins are necessary for replicating DNA (meaning that the cell is irreducibly complex), all point to intelligent design like the Rosetta Stone points to a scribe, or a painting points to a painter, or code points to a programmer. These ideas form part of the Intelligence Design hypothesis (which differs from Creationism) and are expanded upon by people like Stephen Meyer, John Lennox, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, etc. Intelligence Design often gets labeled as pseudoscience simply because it does not adhere to a naturalistic worldview. But people like Stephen Meyer often argue that the naturalistic worldview actually limits intellectual freedom because it forces you to reject, a priori, any evidence of mind. For example, if you held tight to a materialist worldview, you would be forced to conclude that completely materialistic processes created a painting you see at a museum. If on the other hand you are open to considering evidence of a mind, you can speak about the increased likelihood of there being a painter (even if you can't see him).

Good gosh an open mind, rare amongst atheists and religous bigots.

Denis Noble is a scientist who I come to respect the most. He is the embodiment of what a true scientist should be.

See Spinoza and Pantheism. "God" = Nature = ultimate "substance". There is no god that thinks and has attributes like humans. Humans made gods in their image.

The obvious presence of intelligence in all creation is evidence of a very intelligent Creator, (Yahweh). This Creator told us in Genesis 1: 1 who He is and what he did. If you think evolution is the way; life coming from dead inanimate matter; surely any sincere intelligent person would say this is utter nonsense.

If you're so concerned about things like "meaning" and "purpose" why don't you go to church and preach those things there? What does any of that has to do with science?

Primo Levi, Auschwitz survivor and chemist said, “Chemistry led us to the heart of Matter, and Matter was our ally, precisely because Spirit, dear to Fascists, was our enemy.” And that is correct. The Laws of Matter must be discovered, the Laws of Spirit are issued by the most powerful. Which these days is The Mob.

Interesting parallels. Buddhist have a particular flavour of atheism in that the god they deny is the one that is immortal and the creator of all. Other gods they're okay with, they're just not that relevent. When innovative practices and ideas came in such as visualising enlightened beings or countenancing Buddha-nature many buddhists were concerned that god was being sneaked in through the back door.

I would recommend Matthew 12:35-37.

Theism is a fiction to create a community with shared perception of good and evil.

Of course that other colleague was concerned about God entering the picture. God cannot be objectively studied, analyzed, quantified or proven by any metric provided by any religion. So what's the point of a man of science allowing God to enter the picture unless *EVERY OTHER POSSIBILITY* has been exhausted? The entire point of science is to explain, not to believe. Any scientist worth their salt would be careful of arguments that bring a God into the picture because then the entire discussion becomes all about interpretation instead of careful observation, development of theory, and so on. Ridiculous arguments here, but maybe that's just his grift.

I'm afraid science is actually blinkered by Christian ideology. Science can never embrace the logical fallacy of invisible beings.

Reality is biased against the supernatural because the supernatural isn’t reality.

Atheism is not reductionism, atheism is pointing out there's no good reason to believe god claims.

Finally, an atheist who makes some sense.

Such a profound state at the end , people are throwing the baby with the water just to make their ground high than others . . . Just so that few ones can be anti theist and live their entire life building while mocking the people of theism and die someday without a satisfactory explanation as did sir mentioned that science cannot give u the answers to the creative force within us and how we give meaning to the prospects of our life .these problems within us cannot be solved in itself without an interference of some creative power outside us. As its going to some kind of ultimate reality to us. It would be better to be safe than sorry

Hi, How are you

Hi, How are you

Yo, that donation was incredibly kind

❤️

Very interesting. Proffesing to be wise they became fools. The evidence for creation is all around us

Do you believe Paul is a true or false disciple?

Fabulous sound for a Trio!

As expected .Real gems here . Much appreciated . Thank you bro..Trinidad here.

very nice.