Видео

Thanks 👍

Thank you!

Thanks 👍

Thank you for the comment. Yes this is a very good considering the age and price. Excellent choice for beginners too Personally I don’t spend a lot of time on trying to make it historically correct. If someone really looking for a kit with good details Tamiya also has the 1/48 zero with newer tools. It’s a bit more expensive but it comes with rivets and more details

Thank you. Yes it’s a very nice kit considering the age and price

Thank you

Thank you hope you will enjoy it like you used to

Hello yes I used the same color as the one I use for bottom fuselage

Thanks

Thank you

Thanks!

Yep and for the price you can’t find anything else like this

Thank you. That model display thing really cranks me up lol. Yes I think there were a lot of changes throughout the years. Kits got higher quality, and all kinds of new products making everything easier

thank you！

Thank you for the correction :)

Thank you it's always a learning process to me and it's great to see someone found something helpful from the videos :)

Thank you this is kit is very enjoyable to build and very valuable learning process for me.

Thank you! And appreciate for the tips. Yes I should have done some tests before trying new stuff. And also because I had limited materials and didn’t want to order and wait, I ended up making this with everything I got in a hurry. This is a valuable lesson and learning process through out the build to me

Thank you. Yes I was grad that I was able to make the “mud” at least not so bad eventually. It’s a learning process to me though This kit is old but very enjoyable to build I hope you like it too

Yes one of the most famous birds in The history

Thank you I’m grad you found it helpful

Thank you grad you find this helpful. I think this hobby is never about age it’s more about patience and practicing. This one is my second build of the hobby I highly recommend it it’s cheap but well made very comfortable to build

@@yippeescalemodel1151 indeed and that is why I was so excited to see how great this kit can look because I have the same one in my stash. Practice first though on advice from a master. Thank you.

At this moment I don't have a lot of time for the hobby because of my full time job. But I will try to put it on my list in the future :)

Thank you I'm grad you found this helpful. Hope you enjoy the build! Gracias!

Thank you I got a lot of those Tamiya older kits for practicing. Cheap and less details but good fitting

Thank you for the info will try to do better next time

Thank you glad you found it helpful. Ive stoped doing this for year so far because of my full-time job I really miss that

@@yippeescalemodel1151 I am coming back to the hobby, airplanes from the WWII, I am trying to work on the models on my time off. It's not easy, but I really enjoy it.

Hi that’s Tamiya putty I use it to fill big gaps

Yeah Zero is a beautiful bird

Nice boat 👍

Hello yes those decals on the weapons are a pain Ive ruined some of them so I finally gave up. And yes they are quite thick even though I put a layer of clearcoat on top you can still see some of the edges of details

Some of this is a nonsense. The A6M3 Model 32 had a higher speed than the A6M2b Model 21. Importantly when considering it in the context of US fighters of the same period, e.g. Wildcat, P-40, it had a significntly increased dive speed. It also had a two-speed supercharger which meant it had and maintained higher performance at altitude. Circular 1 on 1 dogfighting was obsolete in terms of combat efficiacy by 1943 given than the US used diving hit and run or 'Thatch Weave' tactics thus avoiding fighting with the Zero in a turning azimuth contest at all costs as they'd lose to any model Zero including the Model 32. All things being equal (aerofoil) a higher wing loading (clipped wings less area) will make the aircraft faster not slower. Less drag. Lift coefficient comes into play in terms of importance climbing and turning. The comment about reduced fuel range is true, but due to the significantly reduced fuselage tank capacity. The wing tanks capacity was actually increased, but overall the aircraft carried significantly less fuel internally. That said, the engine didn't "drank fuel". Aircraft aren't flown at combat power 100% of the time. Leaned to best range cruise consumption, altitude dependent at reduced (cruise) power I very much doubt the Sakae 21's fuel consumption was much if at all higher than that of the Sakae 12. I'd have to see the fuel/power performance charts to verify. And just over a 20% max rated power increase from the Sakae 12 to 21 in essentially the same weight airframe is nothing to be sneezed at in terms of overall performance -other than top speed which is a pretty vague & simplified reference reference for the Wikipedia layperson. The particular Achilles' Heel for the Model 32 was its necessary redeployment from Rabaul after the Japanese lost Wewak in May and Lae in September 1943. Land based out of PNG fighting local forces in Port Morsby et al, range wasn't an issue. All that said, the A6M3 Model 22 was clearly an improved variant than the A6M2 Model 21 or A6M3 Model 32 as history illustrates. However, also pertinent, the introduction of the turbo-supercharged P-38 into the Pacific Theatre in mid 1942 had given all Zeros a wake-up call, particularly at altitude. And just months after the Model 22's introduction, all Zeros (much as I love the type 0) were outclassed by newer US types coming on line. e.g. Marine Corsairs from Feb 43, and the Navy's superlative Hellcat from Sept 43. P.S. You can buy aotake, or at least used to be able to. Lifecolor UA 136.

in building IJN (and IJA) WWII planes, you should be aware that the above comment and the companion comment (re "nonsense") are utterly incorrect.And simplistic.Japanese planes( including of course the A6 variations) show that a plane could bear 3 or even 4 aotake variants.Even if 1 color off the production line, partial or greater repainting painting could occur in the "field." Secondly, and surprisingly under appreciated), during the last 2 yrs of the Pacific war, the Japanese were running out of EVERYTHING, including paint and its component chemicals.So again, variation occurred.Complicating matters is surviving archetypes have not necessarily been painted exactly as original.Whenever people make pronouncements that are intended by their writers to be authoritative & cast with an air of certainty,as with the case with the three commentators on colors here, regard all such statements with great skepticism.Ask them politely for their sources, if any.Always best to do your own research, and with the vast availability of resources, that can be a very enjoyable endeavor too.Dont merely rely on those eager to lecture you on the "right way".These people are often wrong.Very wrong.And in the end, you may find that YOU were right all along.

"Okay"?! The dude did an excellent job

Thank you it's always a learning process and room for improvement

Thank you for sharing!

Hello in this build I used only X-13. But I didn't do any researches so I'm not sure if this is correct actually

@@yippeescalemodel1151 thenxs

Thank you!

@@yippeescalemodel1151 thx

starting at 3:51