Видео

I doubt it. 19th players would play a much "romanticized" interpretation probably exaggerated at times. Mr Rudess interpretation is FAR from that. Lacks nuance and proper dynamics...understandable if one thinks he has accustomed himself to electronic keyboards.

@@MrBeen992 yes sure, i agree - but i meant in terms of attitude and timing :-) of course Jordan doesn't care about performance practice, but he has something so unique in his approach to the piece that looooots of "hip-specialists" lack imho

@@SayBootsey probably it is all in your mind. For me it was a very formulaic and forgettable interpretation.

@@MrBeen992 how can it ever not be all in our minds? 😀 and i'm strictly not talking about his interpretation but approach and attitude - those i find very authentic, not his stylistic choices. however, it grooves pretty hard, also something the hip-movement is lacking these days since they care way too much about hand-displacement, how to arpeggiate chords, and whatever they think rubato is... 🙃

Exactly. The sound is so piercing to my ears. Being there should have been an excruciating experience

At first I thought it was a digital piano. But seeing it's an acoustic.... it's just gonna sound that way because it's very echoey in that auditorium hall. You're not gonna get an intimate quiet sound. It's ok, he's great regardless. And everything he does 99% of the time is in fact amplified.

If you put this performance at the level of Horowitz you should consider mental health.... 😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I listened Mr Rudess from start to finish. Never heard Chopin 😢

yeah ppl go on raging because Rubinstein or Kissin play it better than Rudess like no fucking shit sherlock lol what a shocker when two of the GOATs of classical piano would play a standard of the genre better than a pianist from another style of music.

i encourage you to listen to different versions of this piece and then you'll see what they mean by it there is no way in which it is absolutely "supposed" to be played, there is way more nuance than you think there is listen with open ears and an open heart

Your comment is cringe: "It is good because I liked it." 😂😂😂😂

LOL this was horrible

Pndj0 no sabes ni lo que hablas. La interpretación es un desastre de principio a fin excepto en algunos pasajes que parece al fin entender lo que exige la pieza. Mejor que se quede tocando su rock "progresista".

By classical standards you mean, then, no he isnt.

He is the best Progressive Rock style

😂

Music is an art. It can be used to do whatever people want with it, it’s also free to anyone to enjoy, he can do what he wants and doing what he does makes him happy, and I enjoyed his performance :)

​@@AnthonysMajestyyeah, there is space in Chopin's music for personal interpretation BUT he cannot murder this piece !

Yeah I would need cannabis to enjoy this horrible interpretation of Chopin 😂😂😂😂😂

@@MrBeen992He actually play some parts of the music very well, netter than anyone I’ve ever listened, although he does speeds up at most parts.

@@tetevo better than what you've listened on RUclips ? Ok, but I am talking about professional playing.

@@MrBeen992 There is professional playing on RUclips. Listen to 6:54 till 7:30 minor errors, but perfect tempo and intensity. And his profession is progressive metal keyboard player, he’s not and never was a professional pianist. But, as I said, play some parts of this music better than I’ve ever listened. Chopin is absolute genius in the classical piano music field.

​​@@tetevo Actually, I am not interested in those kind of "errors". He lacks interpretative skills...badly

I dont know your musical environment but Ive never heard in the classical world someone saying this or that is the only right interpretation. And when someone say something like that it is in a much broader sense.

@@MrBeen992 or just ask a classical instructor if it's ok if you change something in a piece to your liking and watch them berate your confidence into the dirt

@@syzygy2464 What I do know is that Jordan Rudess interpretation is horrible

No, it wasn’t.

This is classical music, not Progressive Metal. The sound of the video is not so good, but the playing is very good.

@@Velbert2 They both are more alike than what you would have guessed. In the rock world, Dream Theater comes the closest to the apex of music, which would be classical music in the Baroque, Classical and Romantic periods, in my opinion.

@@tetevo Yes, it was. Maybe before speaking learn something about profesional pianists. It's beyond messy. But good enough.

@@ignacioclerici5341 no it was not. He plays better than most classical pianists. And most certainly better than you and me.

You obviously dont know anything about piano playing and piano players.

He´s great, but this was full of mistakes, I agree with #Charlie Angel

He is good technics

Редкое видео, Джордан рудесс, классика