Видео

Thank u ! 2220

@@nicp662 thanks Nic.

Wow Moray James, i was lucky to obtain a lot of Cryo Speaker and Ic cables off now passed Roy Chan with your Logo On all , very nice sounding Gear.

@@VolkerWolske-rh2mb Did you say that Roy had passed away? I have not heard news from Roy in some time now. I would be grateful to know.

Thank you so much! 2390 are the most enjoyable to me !

Thank you! I really don’t know! This system got changes almost every day 😂

JBL 2220Η

Gauss 4582

Diy for 1500€ +,crossover 😅😅😅

Thank u!

Hello! It’s the 2440 using 2441 diaphragms!

@@nicp662 thank you. Ahh I see now why I was confused/ the lens and horn of the 2390 are integrated as a single piece. On the L200 and the L300 the lens is a separate plastic piece which is mounted over the mouth of a cast metal trumpet which is bolted to the compression driver. The L200 horn is a little shorter than the horn used on the L300. So those two tweeters are both three part assemblies and you can run them with or without the plastic lens both use the same driver. The 2390 and the 2395 both are integrated horn and lens. Getting the dispersion of the woofer and the tweeter to match at crossover is the big trick to making the sound of the two drivers integrate. If you are interested I will send you some photos of some experiments using Karlson couples on both woofers and horns. I recently helped my brother refurbish and upgrade a pair of JBL SR 4726a and the results were most rewarding. I was later able to listen to a local pair of JBL M2 for several hours and feel that the modified SR4726a give a very respectable account for themselves. I would like to hear the current version of the JBL 4367 synthesis but don't know of any owners close to me.

@@morayjames92 the horns and lenses both on 2390 and 2395 are not one piece but 2 different pieces screwed together. The horns on 2395 lenses are the one used at the paragon speakers ! 2309 and 2310 are the parts of 2390 combo lenses

@@nicp662 Thanks Nic for letting me know I will have to take a closer look at these horns. So when you swap from the 2390 to the 2395 do you only change the lens and keep the horn the same?

@@morayjames92 yeap horn driver is the samw

Thank u!

Yeap! I replace the 2390 lenses with the 2395. Tbh the 2390 sound a little more open and dynamic

@@nicp662 I agree probably because the 2390 has a little less lens affect on the horn output directly in front of the horn and impacts mostly the off axis output. In general I am not a fan of acoustic lenses like these as I find they mess with the stage and image and I prefer the horn with no lens at all. That said you seem to get very good results and in a small space too so kudos to you that is hard to do.

@@morayjames92 there is no mess with the stage and stereo image especially with the 2390 lenses. I have also the 2380 and 2355 horns, also a pair of tad th4001 horns for testing and in my opinion the lenses are easier to listen without big loss of detail or stereo image

Thank u!

Τίμια τα 2226 αλλά κυρίως για μπας ριφλεξ και ενισχυτές με πολλά βατ και ρεύματα λόγο σκληρής ανάρτησης και μεγάλο βάρος κώνου

800hz