- Видео 42
- Просмотров 36 010
LossPreventionMaverick_ Rahul Patteri
Катар
Добавлен 25 сен 2011
#LossPreventionMaverick #RahulPatteri
FAT - BS EN 1789 Ambulance. #RahulPatteri #LossPreventionMaverick
FAT - BS EN 1789 Ambulance. #RahulPatteri #LossPreventionMaverick
Просмотров: 105
Видео
#PSMS #LossPreventionMaverick. CCPS_RBPS, 20 Elements - A layman’s prespective
Просмотров 469Год назад
#PSMS #LossPreventionMaverick. CCPS_RBPS, 20 Elements - A layman’s prespective
Trouble shooting - U/G HDPE FireWater line leaks. #RahulPatteri #LossPreventionMaverick
Просмотров 368Год назад
Trouble shooting - U/G HDPE FireWater line leaks. #RahulPatteri #LossPreventionMaverick
NFPA 11 - Fire Fighting Foam Testing Prototype. #RahulPatteri #LossPreventionMaverick
Просмотров 300Год назад
NFPA 11 - Fire Fighting Foam Testing Prototype. #RahulPatteri #LossPreventionMaverick
FIRE VEHICLE - FLOW COMPENSATED FOAM INJECTION #Fire_Truck #LossPreventionMaverick #RahulPatteri
Просмотров 35Год назад
Snippet on the Plumbing on a Fire Truck. Touch base, to know more. Thanks Rahul Patteri
Fire Fighting Foam circulation from Fire Engine to Foam Trailer #RahulPatteri
Просмотров 57Год назад
A demonstration of transferring foam concentrate from Fire Engines to Foam Trailer Need more info, drop in. Thanks Rahul Patteri
MAH Project Lifecycle - From Challenges to Opportunities
Просмотров 5513 года назад
MAH Project Lifecycle - From Challenges to Opportunities
Life Saving Rules + Process Safety Fundamentals
Просмотров 6 тыс.3 года назад
Life Saving Rules Process Safety Fundamentals
Process Risk Terminologies (INHERENT RISK / MITIGATED RISK / RESIDUAL RISK)
Просмотров 6073 года назад
Process Risk Terminologies (INHERENT RISK / MITIGATED RISK / RESIDUAL RISK)
TOXIC DOSES, TLV, TWA, STEL, AEGL and ERPG
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.3 года назад
TOXIC DOSES, TLV, TWA, STEL, AEGL and ERPG
Temporary Refuge Impairment Assessment
Просмотров 4634 года назад
Temporary Refuge Impairment Assessment
Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) - Layman’s point of view
Просмотров 8 тыс.4 года назад
Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) - Layman’s point of view
TOAST MASTER CC7 - RAHUL PATTERI - Man & Medicine
Просмотров 7998 лет назад
TOAST MASTER CC7 - RAHUL PATTERI - Man & Medicine
RAHUL PATTERI - TOASTMASTER CC4 - CHOTTU!
Просмотров 9769 лет назад
RAHUL PATTERI - TOASTMASTER CC4 - CHOTTU!
RAHUL PATTERI - CC3 - kinesthetic Intelligence
Просмотров 6729 лет назад
RAHUL PATTERI - CC3 - kinesthetic Intelligence
TOASTMASTER - #RAHUL PATTERI GLASS IS HALF EMPTY
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.9 лет назад
TOASTMASTER - #RAHUL PATTERI GLASS IS HALF EMPTY
Brown Michael Davis Laura Rodriguez Amy
Hall Jeffrey Lopez Richard Thompson Maria
Thank you, Rahul, it was such an informative video. Although, as process safety engineers we come across all these rules in our industry, it was difficult for me to find a way to make something interesting to pass this information to the operations or maintenance team to remember them and apply them during their daily routine activities. After watching your video now I'm sure how to do it. Thanks for the efforts once again!
@@nareshnutakki1235 , i am elated at your feedback. I hear you. We come across so many good practices to be rule sets to assimilated to front line. Let’s together aspire to make it interesting. Thanks a bunch.
@@losspreventionmaverick_rah2873 forgot to mention..Good to know about your motivation force behind your service at the flag end of the video. Looking forward to more such interesting videos.
Nice explanation sir😊
Very Good sir , wonderfully explained
Thanks and welcome. All the best Rahul
Dear sir , could you please make more such example vedios for QRA specificly
Thanks a lot master! I am really looking forward for part 3. Pleaseeeee
terbaik
Thank you for the excellent explanation. Could you please tell me how to contact you?
Pleasure is mine. Sure, please text me on LinkedIN. Cheers
Please which name can I use to search for you on LinkedIn ?
I have sent a request on LinkedIn
@@Wrash-v9v, www.linkedin.com/in/rahul-patteri-a0083a12? Try again, please
👍
Rahul great work. Hp ct coo same aimm ccps w. I typed it again to check my memory 😊
You nailed it 👍🏻👍🏻 Thanks a bunch
Nice work! Never thought of breaking this so logically!
Brother, please keep the picture straight! Almost broke my neck- very unsafe😁
Very informative and insightful..... I watched in 1.5x & was perfect 😊
Thank you Bijay. Happy it helped
thanks you so much please make such vedios for PHAST SAFETI software also
Hey there. I wish I could. I donot have working license to the software. Thank u. There ought to be ample videos on SAFETI / PHAST. If u have doubts on using, do ask me
what does it mean
I am looking for the answer on that question but tell me if it is right 70% N2, 60% fuel + N2, 20% fuel + O2, please correct me here if it is wrong
Very simple and easy to understand. Appreciated efforts 😊
Thank you. I am happy it helped
This is gold man 🎉 just pure gold 🥇
Much obliged, you have made my decade 👍🏻🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽… thank you
correction for AEGL should for 10 minutes, 30 minutes and 60 minutes then 4 hours and 8 hours .. thank you
Much obliged
Appreciate if you could post a video on fire safety assessment study in petrochemical & how active fire protection implement on its recommendation
Thank you Nithin for querying. Will bring forward a few videos on FEHM (Fire Explosion Hazard Management). Thanks
👍
🙏🏽🙏🏽👍
A small correction while calculating TLV TWA it is (C1T1 + C2T2)/(T1 +T2)
Well noticed 👏🏽👏🏽👍🏻
It is a good engineering practice to do surge analysis on firewater network piping system, especially when piping system is using non metallic pipes Well in this case, there is a highly likely chance that the valve is not support at the bottom, settlement of valve may have induced stress on the pipe which may have cause it to crack..
Excellent brother 😍
Thank you Satish……… Luv uuu 😃😃👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Excellent explanation.. easy to understand. Thanks so much!
Thank you 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽…. Happy it helped 🙏🏽 All the best in your learning
nice one my dear
Well done sir
Excellent explanation sir.... Thank you👍👍
Much obliged 🙏🏽🙏🏽
Have you hit some targets 🎯?
Hi there….. haaa haaaa…… fired a lot of rounds, so, a few might have hit 😇🙂 Thanks
Ithil pinne Puli aanallooooo
Valiyaaaa Vediiii, Cheriyaaa Vediii 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Hi Maverick! Very informative video. Thanks for posting this. May I ask you how can we avoid this leak as is normal to have HDPE underground to prevent corrosion. also, what can we do if this leak is not in the manhole but in the buried section?
Hey there. So let’s break it down. 1. Why do we use HDPE - Like u said, it reduces the problem of corrosion. - it’s quite light in weight, which helps in offshore structure load bearing. - The procrement rates r relatively cheaper. 2. What r the problms: - the strength is pretty much like a tea buscuit. Pretty hard, but very brittle. - fusion welding of HDFE is a specialist task, and the needs more functional QA/QC - Though procurement is cheaper, the construction costs are higher. ASME B31 compliant HDPE spools come in shorter lengths. Therefore the construction schedule increases due to increased heat treatment needs. So, ur Q: - If the project design need is to have HDPE sections of piping underground, then idemtify those sections where manhole culverts are required. Instruct the civil and piping designers to have metallic spools are those junctures. Commissions all those sections which mixed joints (HDPE + Metallic) Thanks
You avoid it by properly specifying the “pipe embedment zone” which calls for certain grades of sand/aggregate with particular graded sizes to ensure the HDPE does not get scratched or punctured by large, sharp materials. You can’t just dump gravel in the hole and expect not to have issues. Quality control is key as many of these jobs move quickly.
I attended this class😎
Oh yes I recall, you snoring... Such was my these lectures. Alle :-).....
Sir , I have a doubt regarding the interchangeable nature of use of frequency and probability to callculate RISK . Like probability is dimensionless and can be in between 0 to 1 but frequency of an accident can be more than 1 ?
Hi there Mr. Prasad. Risk is multi-dimensional. In the context of risk from a potential major accident hazard, involves.. Severity of the hazard (the consequence) x how frequently it could happen (how often / how probable / how frequent)…. Now to address your Q, objectively… Probability- for example, how often a bulb fails to light in 100 attempts.. if it happens 1, then probability is 1/100, if it happens 10 times, probability is 10/100. Same is the case for ifrequency too… Both probability and frequency in a major accident hazards occurence is statistically, extrapolated to 1000 years, 10,000 years, 100,000 years etc. Usually the term “PROBABILITY” comes along with probability of failure in demand. “FREQUENCY” comes along with frequency of occurrence. I hope, i have confused u more 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Best to u
Just came back for a refresher. Would appreciate if you can share the 70-30% rule.
Hey there Majid. Happy to hear, the video is worthy of ur time. I believe you are seeking about the ETA (Event Tree Analysis)? Am i right? Thanks
@@losspreventionmaverick_rah2873 Yes Sir!
@@majidmeraj86, The 70/30 principle is something, during the initial analysis (the QRA designer / risk engineer) uses while producing the event frequencies using ETA (Event Tree Analysis) Ref to: - IOGP process release frequencies - HSE UK database - MARSH database - OREDA etc. What we need to understand, all this is taken from statistical analysis from incidents world over. The 70/30, could be reduced to 90/10 as well, i.e. 90% of the events would be detected and 10% otherwise, in installations where F&G mapping has been performed and which has a robust Asset Integrity framework, where at any point of time every detector is available. Similarly, 70/30 can be 50/50 too, at places where detection is not by any engineering measure but by personnel during rounds. ETA is a statistical approximation of operational readiness. Hope it helps. Thanks
@@losspreventionmaverick_rah2873 thank you so much. Very clear to me know.
Very nice explanation
Thank you Vishal
My stint in RUclips shorts
Good info
Sir please share part-2
Sir Can I join the group you are talking about?
Hi Majid. Sure
I think there are mistakes from this lecture. The sum of the percentages should add up to 100 but here because you didn't the diagram well, it has led to plenty mistakes. From the diagram 10% oxygen line should point to 90% nitrogen but was pointed at 80%. Please check and make the necessary corrections. Thank you
Good day, Thank you for your input and more importantly for taking time to view the video. I believe the accuracy of the video is spot on, within the range so derived. Nevertheless, If there is an error in judgement, we will fix it. Cheers
@@losspreventionmaverick_rah2873I doubt whether you understood the comment by @stephenakuoko6238 The video is a good lecture,but this mistake in the graph (9:26 ) will create serious doubts in young learners. Your graph isn't symmetrical and hence has lead to the mistake of not adding upto 100% of any concentrations. Have a look at the mistake before making confident statements about the accuracy of your video.
@@eappenjacob1894, the lecture is bring out the rationale of flammability matirx, and how stochiometry corresponds to combustion practices . Stated towards 02.27 mins. Thank you for taking time to point out the anomaly. Good day to u.
Where is your part 2
thanks
Thank you for the detailed presentation, keen to watch part 3. God bless you abundantly.
Very grateful for your benevolence. Much obliged. Indeed, I shall be making Part 3 soon. Thank you
Thank you sir for another great video, In ADNOC we call ABC of LSR..... A work A-uthorization. B B-ypassing safety controls. C C-onfined space. D D-riving. E E-nergy isolation. F line of F-ire. G toxic G-as. (LSR no.10) H1 H-ot work. H2 working at H-eight. L safe mechanical L-ifting.
Much obliged for your kind words. I love the ABC of LSR. We need to keep thinking of ways and means to make learning, and retention of these terms easy and interesting. Thank you for your time.
Nice explanation sir.
Thank you Macwin Dsouza
That is awesome, keep going 💯
Thank you M S 🙏🏽🙏🏽👍🏻
Great informations
Good to understand outline of pettochem industry. Great work. Proud to be associated.
Amit yaara:.:::: it’s words of yours and lessons of ours, that keeps me ticking, i luv u yaaraaa…. Keep well
I disagree with the RPM you mentioned for GT
Every disagreement is supportive. Plz express why.
Alrite.
@@losspreventionmaverick_rah2873 if its used for producing electricity RPM will be 3000 or 3600. But for otger uses yeah it will be different.
You made this easy to understand. 👏👏
Thank you Prasanth