Видео

This does not apply to quantum-physics as a particle can be in two different states at the same time. Not two combined states, but two fundamentally different states. Which means a statement about the particle can actually be both true and false at the same time.

This is a fine example of varlous types of sophistries and logical fallacies. Right off the top you have the straw man argument, with Plantinga saying questions about religions are claiming that a belief in a single religion is either immoral, egotistical, self-serving, or arrogant. That is shifting the onus to the questioner to defend the question, when we don't have the questioner on hand to tell us what they think, and why they think that. This is a classic politician's move, by the way. When you get a question you don't want to answer, restate it in a way that either changes the question completely, or changes it into a question you do want to answer. Later, Plantinga says in reference to his own belief, "It's not like I can just say, okay, I'm going to stop that..." Then he goes on to tell how to convince people to stop their own beliefs. I mean, if you can't change your own mind, why do you expect others to change their minds? Then the whole thing about science being different hundreds of years ago, which proves...well, I'm not sure what. Has scientific knowledge grown over time. Yes. Have some theories been abandoned over time. Yes. The he chooses possible the worst argument comparing Newtonian mechanics to quantum mechanics. People still use Newtonian mechanics, and Newtonian gravity every day. For most purposes they work fine.Like I say, this video is a fine example of sophistries and fallacies.

To my Christian friends, the Bible has forewarned you about religious leaders such as Ravi Z in the video clip: “…. O my people, your leaders mislead you; they send you down the wrong road.” (Isaiah 3:12) “But there were also false prophets in Israel, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will cleverly teach destructive heresies and even deny the Master who bought them. In this way, they will bring sudden destruction on themselves. Many will follow their evil teaching and shameful immorality. And because of these teachers, the way of truth will be slandered. In their greed they will make up clever lies to get hold of your money.” (2 Peter 2:1-3 KJV) And don’t be one of those people who seeks for leaders who can tell you what your itching ears like to hear, and don’t be the rejector of truth and don’t chase myths, be clear in your head, and don’t be a coward or afraid of the suffering that automatically comes with following the Lord: “For a time is coming when people will no longer listen to sound and wholesome teaching. They will follow their own desires and will look for teachers who will tell them whatever their itching ears want to hear. They will reject the truth and chase after myths. But you should keep a clear mind in every situation. Don’t be afraid of suffering for the Lord.” (2 Timothy 4:3-5 NLT) The fact is, the eternal reality of Christ has appeared from age to age with a new name. You should not let the physical body of Jesus blind you to the the actual eternal reality of Christ which predates the body of Jesus 2000 years ago. It is this eternal reality which again has manifested himself in this age in the person of Bahá’u’lláh (the Glory of God). Didn’t Christ say that upon his return he would have a new name? “…. And I will also write on them my new name.” -Christ (Revelation 3:12) Is not God, the God of renewal? “They are brand new, not things from the past. So you cannot say, ‘We knew that all the time!’” (Isaiah 48:7) Didn’t Christ make all things new 2000 years ago? “Therefore if any man [be] in Christ, [he is] a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.” (2 Corinthians 5:17 KJV) Didn’t Christ also promise that upon his return he again would make all things new? “….. Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.” (Revelation 21:5 KJV) So, to expect the same status quo from 2000 years ago would be the antithesis of what the Bible had actually predicated. Read the Bible carefully from Genesis all the way to the Book of Revelation--all 66 books depict an ever-changing, ever-renewing revelation of God. If this fundamental principle has not been grasped, one cannot claim to know even the most basic facts about the Bible, because in the last analysis of the spiritual quest in the Bible all facts are weighed in and find their true meaning and coherence in the balance of an ever-evolving revelation of God which would be reflected in the transformation of human psyche and the human society. Dr. Hushidar Motlagh, an outstanding Baha’i scholar had stated the following: “Recently, a series of interviews entitled, Prophecy Today, Christian Leaders Look at the Signs of the Time, was conducted with several distinguished Christians. Leaders of various denominations, both Catholic and Protestant, were asked to link the events of our time to biblical prophecy. Among the leaders interviewed was Dr. James Kennedy, one of the most distinguished Christian scholars and founder of the Westminster Academy. He is known to many Christians through his writings as well as his weekly television and radio broadcasts that reach millions in 3,300 communities in the United States and 21 other countries. When asked “What do you believe are some of the major mistakes we tend to make in our study of prophecy?”, he said: The great Princeton theologian of the last century, Dr. Charles Hodge, said something which I have always thought is worth remembering. He said that though the Old Testament is filled with some 333 prophecies concerning the first coming of Christ; in spite of that, nobody got it right. And as you know, they crucified Christ because of a misunderstanding about what the Messiah was really coming to do. And we should because of that be somewhat humbled and modest in our attempts to interpret prophecies concerning the second coming of Christ. It is quite possible that all of us [Christian leaders] are wrong as well. [Emphasis added.].” Source: Motlagh, Hushidar, “I Shall Come Again”, pp.14-15. Also, Living By the Book, CBN Center, Virginia Beach, Virginia, p. 2.)

Seems the atheists are mad that Platinga the goat refuted their problem of evil.

6:08 starts

w

Jesus Is God , Our God Is so Real and perfect , we still want to know more details and historical facts but the faith and firm belief He put on our hearts Trough The Holy Spirit makes us believe and see it all as truth even without all this evidence that All The Prophecies were fulfilled in Our Own God That Died for Us On a cross so we don’t die and at all times He Was always Alive and Making Everything Perfect and So surgical In a way nobody can denied He’s God and I confess His Name Jesus Christ As My Lord Father God and Savior Amen

Right and wrong..slavery ? Bible approved of it

And Andy neither can christianity, you can not explain the meaning of life, or if a heaven exists. Please demonstrate its existence.

No christianity did not invent science, Christian science depends on Islamic science, and they depended of greco Roman science, the Greeks depends on the Babylonian svience, and they on Sumer and egypt. Other civilisation,China for instance also.had science, which was more advanced than that in the west. Also the resurrection of Jesus is a claim not a fact. We have no contemporary historical evidence or documents of this at all. We have the gospel accounts which were written anonymously, were not eyewitness, in high greek, from an oral tradition of story telling between 45 to 100 years after the claimed events. An honest speaker would exp!ain that, and why zombies did not match around Jerusalem as claimed in Mathew, no earthquakes, probably no tomb either

Jesus Christ, the creator of this video is an absolute moron

Ravi Zacharias died an unrepentant sexual predator cleric who vastly harmed too many women for decades. Out of compassion for his many victims, please delete this video.

The irony of someone claiming to be intelligent making intellectually dishonest strawman for their made up argument and treating it as a conclusion. The fact of the matter is, atheism is just a standpoint for a agnostic who does not want to call what they do not understand 'God'. And since neither part of this 'debate' have an even remote understanding of the Big Bang, it seems most presumptios to suggest that either side get to question 'why'. Your partner not being able to disprove you does not make you right. I would hope that by moving forward together, at least as a collective, we can get away from needing to put each other down for the sake of debate. Debate, which is the most useless form of communication. If your debate is not a rap battle, then I will not accept any winner.

Has IntelligentFaith315 closed?

Why do all these cut off abruptly?

This man's understanding of all religions and explanation of truths that must correlate. He helped me in my earlyier 20's

How did God design and create? Did all life, lant and animal, suddenly pop into exitence?

Who was the professor speaking? Where was this? When was it?

Weather existence of God is still up in the air. Religion is definitely a scam.

It wasn't from his interviews for The C For C. I can tell you that. The problem as I said repeatedly in my own playlist against Strobel is he is a highly acclaimed investigative reporter--or was. And he completely disregarded investigating anything. His lack of journalistic integrity was astounding. His interviewees were largely fundamentalist and his research was from largely fundamentalist books written by those very interviewees which is why I am accusing him of never having been an atheist when he did those interviews. I am researching the claims of those interviewees and it isn't evidence it is speculation and usually bad speculation or flat out untruths. If you research what general consensus of scholars are vs what Strobel's interviewees state you will find quite different opinions. Bascially Strobel's contention was "the fundamentalists said it made sense so it did." He never fact checked or looked for contrary opinions. He offered his own light "what ifs" then just agreed with the counter opinion of the fundamentalist without searching further. And that's the real truth behind his biased book that made him very rich. Cheers, DCF

That's nice, but it didn't mention what that evidence was... so I cannot show this to my class. It's just entertaining.

Why is Ravi still on RUclips? He is a sexual fraud

But if God can't actualize a world then it's not really a possible world, no?

1:03. All those things he mentions that God cannot do, they speak of a reality that God functions in. So where did this reality come from?

So fulfilling over 300 prophecy must be more than all the atoms in the universe so nothing compares to the word of Jesus other than the word of God

You mean that could be Random? Hell No!

May be there's a God. No! There is a God.

to answer the question 100%. it's real easy to write a story claiming a prophecy was fulfilled.

Muslims believe Jesus is the Messiah too just not the Son of God being a branch of God I don’t understand how these prophecies are reverent too the point Jesus is a branch of God am I wrong?

Is it possible for different truth claims to be true simultaneously? For example: Can 1+1=2, but also 2+3=5 simultaneously both be equally true in the same way?

Can different classes in school teach many different things that are true? Yes. Many different religions can also be true.

Excellent @min7:25

the free will defence only applies to moral evil and not natural evil. natural evil is in the hands of god.

Scam alert! Tots debunked by real scientists.

Scam. Now tell us about flat earth theory, another patch of garbage fully refuted by actual scientists.

Atheists be like "I dont understand it. Thus it is impossible!"...GREAT video! All athiests need is to read the bible and be more humble.

From Lehigh University Department position on evolution and "intelligent design" The faculty in the Department of Biological Sciences is committed to the highest standards of scientific integrity and academic function. This commitment carries with it unwavering support for academic freedom and the free exchange of ideas. It also demands the utmost respect for the scientific method, integrity in the conduct of research, and recognition that the validity of any scientific model comes only as a result of rational hypothesis testing, sound experimentation, and findings that can be replicated by others. The department faculty, then, are unequivocal in their support of evolutionary theory, which has its roots in the seminal work of Charles Darwin and has been supported by findings accumulated over 140 years. The sole dissenter from this position, Prof. Michael Behe, is a well-known proponent of "intelligent design." While we respect Prof. Behe's right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department. It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally, and should not be regarded as scientific.

If you want to wind up with a very sophisticated system.. Which would yield better results…. A centrally planned system? Or a system that flexibly evolves according to market demand?

Hindu is an ethnicity, not a religion.

The believer in atheist Dogma wants to be evil, so if God prevented them from fulfilling their desires, then they would complain about that too. God just can't win with those morons, and their objections are merely emotional, not logical or intellectual.

An apologist I admire once made an excellent point with a believer in atheist Dogma on another video that I recently watched: Those who put forth this so-called "problem of evil" as if it's a good argument against God's existence are like passengers on a plane who find out that there's a little rust on the wing, or maybe a little dust or dirt on the windows. Then their conclusion from that observation is that because the airplane isn't 100% perfect according to their own biased judgement, that therefore the people who designed and built the plane don't exist. It is a huge and ridiculous leap of logic in either case, and it's shitty "arguments" such as this that can help explain why most people on the planet don't take believers in atheist Dogma seriously.

My question is why does pain have to so overwhelmingly intense and seemingly out of proportion. The journalist in Saudi Arabia who was tortured for 7 minutes before killed comes to mind. Limbs sawn off while still alive. The terrible acts of Nazi Germany's Mengele. Why didn't god create pain to be very unpleasant vs excruciating beyond description?

Pure Eisegesis! I refuted the 300 prophecies list. No Jesus in there

Thank you so much! This is really helpful-

Thats false.cause what about heaven? Will People have free will in heaven? If not we will be like robots.if we get free will then there will be evil in heaven.check mate bro

He is one amongst those many philosophers who heavily relies on modal logic.

This is number one bullshit

Pure bollocks

Jesus never claimed that he would suffer or die for your sins.

If Jesus was human, then he was not God.