Видео

Great Video!

can anymone please send link me of this MINITAB. i cant find it

Thank you very much!

My kappa came back horrible, in the negative. I don't understand, my CVIs were all great.

WHAT do you do with the communication responses?

thanks for this guide, it helps me a lot especially when I'm a non-statistic background

GLEN MAXIMUS-the Gladiator

🤣 Promo-SM

sir kindly make online videos about spss. thanks

aslam o alikum sir. am waqar from Pakistan, sir I founded beat videos on your RUclips channel about spss. sir, am beginner and need some extra knowledge for better understanding, sir, am expect to you for online webinar or video for beginners to advance level. sir if you will, kindly mention me. thanks, i will wait for your reply

thanks sir

thanks sir

thanks sir

It would be really good in making videos of this nature based on our future publications.

Looking great Michael.

Good one, i like the compact short form :)

"Six Sigma Champions are con men" “All you have is smoke and mirrors” "Six Sigma is a snow job" - Creator of Six Sigma, Mikel Harry 91 % of Six Sigma companies have trailed the S&P 500 (Qualpro survey). A long term study of hundreds of Six Sigma projects at Ford showed an average of 1 in 5 parts defective AFTER improvement for “successful” Six Sigma projects. Six Sigma is a destructive scam based on pure farce. It started with Mr Bill Smith and his out-of-control molding process that happened to drift “as much as 1.5 sigma”. Smith’s buddy, con man Harry, “proved” Smith disaster happened for every process ... based on the height of a stack of discs! Most folk never bothered to check. “Neutron” Jack Welch at GE described Harry as a “madman” and said no one had any clue what he was talking about. Jack handed over $1B anyway. A scam was born! GE has now thrown the Six Sigma trash out. EVERY aspect of Six Sigma is worthless, from its normalization nonsense, to its irrelevant enumerative methods, to its paralytic DMAIC. Dr Wheeler, the world’s leading process statistician, calls Six Sigma “GOOFY” and the stuff of “the tooth fairy”.. CBS calls it the most stupid fad of all time. There is never justification to stray from the giants of Quality Dr Shewhart, Professor Ishikawa, Professor Lewis, Professor Deming, Dr Taguchi and Dr Wheeler, for the lunacy of Six Sigma’s self-confessed con man. How the Six Sigma fraud was started: ruclips.net/video/0kZbJLHK_4M/видео.html Lean was tacked on to prolong the Six Sigma Scam. 98% of LSS implementations FAIL (IW survey)

This video is good but you did not explain how to calculate the convergent validity in excel sheet

Over 8 years later, thanks man!😂

sorry Professor if am not mistaken your example it looks as if you explaining mediator not moderator. moderator is caused by the ID, but mediator changes or influence the r/ship between IV and DV.

I want an urgent help. Can anyone you share a reference where author has used excel to calculated fleiss kappa

If possible, please share the excel for this video, Fleiss Kappa. Thank you!

Thank you for the presentation, i have a questionnaire with 5 likert scales variables, 7 nominal variables. Can i only use the 5 likert scales variables to do the exploratory factor analysis? or choose 2 or 3 between them. Also, is exploratory factor analysis the same as convergent and discriminant validity? I am a little bit confused. Thanks in advance for your reply. Should we do both convergent and discriminant validity, construct validity using EFA in one study?

Hi Professor, I have read your paper on Frontline Employee Adaptability with Prof. Mekoth. I loved your work and this video too. My doctoral research is on workplace adaptability itself. I have cited your work in my dissertation. Thanks and best regards.

Very helpful! Thanks for this video.

Very good video. Does this apply to just that single domain? What if you have multiple domains in a questionnaire and you've calculated CVI for each of the domains? In that case how do you calculate content validity for the entire questionnaire?

Really informative. I went through multiple studies and finally got this video. It is really helpful. Developed a clear concept about how to calculate ICVI. Great Thanks

I had a questionnaire scale of 30 items and 8 constructs. I conduct EFA and had to remove some items. I end up with 6 factors and 24 items. My question is how do I continue from this point to validity analysis? For convergent and discriminant validity shall I consider the original scale or the one after EFA?

This video helped me alottttt. Thankyou. Can you please post the theory related to this video.

Very good video, but it would have been better if the sound would a little higher...

Thanks for the video, i have both nominal and ordinal variables in my Likert-scale questionnaire. Should i use criterion-related validity or construct validity (convergent and discriminant) to check the validity of the instrument? Or should i do both of them in the same study? i saw that for nominal variable, there are some restrictions so i am a little bit confused. Your reply will really help me.

Thanks for the video, i have both nominal and ordinal variables in my likert-scale questionnaire. Should i use criterion-related validity or construct validity (convergent and discriminant) to check the validity of the instrument? Or should i do both of them in the same study? i saw that for nominal variable, there are some restrictions so i am a little bit confused. Your reply will really help me.

sir can you share the spreadsheet template

This video really helped me alot and it's easy to understand too

It was very great! For someone like me who isn't an Excel Pro to understand using those formulas in such a short time. Amazaing!

found very useful.

Thank you very much this helped a lot!!

Sir , if you please can you share excel sheet with me in nsr8060333@gmail.com, thanx.

Found this video after I read multiple of CVI research papers. I must say that this is great especially on the calculation demonstration! Thank you

Thanks mate, saved my day

SANA LANG TALAGA NAINTIDIHAN KO HAKHAK

Can you please share the reference for the method you used in the video? That would be really useful.

I can use a scale of 1,2,3,4,5 ?

thanks

Awesome. Thank you!!!!

Thanks

Bro, you need to speak lauder... Anyway thanks

why do you take the constant value in the Standarized Error?

may i know how to delete multicollinearity problem in eviews

Great resource. Thanks