Видео

Tyrone, Thank you for kind words and support. God bless.

Dear Crusader of Mary, Thanks for your kind words. I really appreciate your dissemination of these videos. God bless.

Jack, thank you for your kind words. God bless.

@ You’re welcome. I forwarded the video and your other video on the subject of Hell.

Mary, thank you for your kind words. God bless.

Thank you for your kind words. God bless.

Thank you for your kind and generous words. God bless.

God bless you.

Dear Lazarus, yes St Peter denied Our Lord three times but Jesus knew this in advance and yet still gave him primacy and care over the other disciples. Note Luke 22:31-32: "Simon, Simon, Satan has sought to sift you as wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith fails not, and WHEN YOU HAVE RETURNERD TO ME, strengthen your brethren." Jesus here gives Simon (later Peter) the responsibility to care for his brethren, with Jesus' prayer to support him. God bless.

Maybe 16-17 years from now. God bless.

Thanks for your support and kind words but i don't have the technical know-how to do Podcasts. God bless.

I agree. The saints are alive in Christ, not "dead."

Thank you for your kind words and support. God bless.

U have to look at the revelation peter spoke which is the foundation of christ Church, the revelation that jesus is God, is on which christ built his church. I believe the correct translation is also little rock. People are saved by turning to jesus not a christian leader. Honour them but not saved by them. To much focus on church theology and not our God. Their is no one like jesus.

Dear sir, I have to respectfully disagree. It is not the confession of Simon that receives the new name of "Cephas", but the person of Simon making that confession. We shouldn't be separating the confession from the person making the confession. The foundation of the Church is Christ himself, but in Matt 16:18-20 we see Christ delegating power and authority to Simon to bind and loose in his name. It is Scripture, not any so-called tradition, that records that Christ gives the "keys to the Kingdom of Heaven" to Simon after changing his name to Petros, which is masculine for Rock. It is not a confession that can possess and exercise the use of these keys, but a person, namely, Simon now Peter. Again, the "divine right" is not based on any tradition, but is firmly based on what Christ did at Caesarea Philippi. The fact that Peter is the Rock is confirmed also in John 1:42, where upon seeing Simon for the first time and before he makes any confession of Christ, Christ changes his name to "Cephas", which is the Greek transliteration of the Aramaic Kepha, which means Rock. I won't repeat the rest of the video, which outlines the 8 other occasions St Paul calls Simon Cephas, or Rock. Again, all Scripture, no tradition. God bless.

Bethany, thank you for your kind words and support. God bless.

Marty, thanks for your post and nature of your comments. I invite you to please consider the following as regards Mary's perpetual virginity: Firstly, Matt. 13:54-57 speaks of four "brothers" of Jesus, being James, Joseph, Jude and Simon. Yet, we know that Jesus also had first cousins by the names of James, Joseph, Jude and Simon. How? Firstly, we know from St Paul in Gal. 1:19 that "James, the Lord's brother" was an Apostle. Yet, how is he "the Lord's brother" when we know from the lists of the Apostles in Matt 10, Mark 3, Luke 6 and Acts 1 that neither James the Greater nor James the Less had St Joseph as their father, rather their respective fathers being Zebedee and Alphaeus (or Clopas). We know from the first Christian historian - Hegesippus - that the father of James the Less being Alphaeus was a brother of St Joseph. That makes James the Less the first cousin of Jesus. We then know that James the Less had a brother by the name of Joseph (Mark 15:40), so Jesus also had a first cousin named Joseph. We further know that James the Less had a brother named Jude (Jude 1:1) and he was the Apostle Jude Thaddeus. Finally, Hegesippus tells us that James the Less was the first bishop of Jerusalem and he was succeeded by his brother Simon in AD 62. So, Jesus also had a first cousin named Simon. It is not possible that Jesus had brothers named James, Joseph, Jude and Simon and also first cousins with precisely the same names. What is provable is that the James, Joseph, Jude and Simon in Matt 13:54-57 are actually Jesus' first cousins, the children of Alphaeus married to the "other Mary" mentioned in John 19:25. Furthermore, Mary's perpetual virginity is the fulfilment of the prophecy in Ezekiel 44:2: "This gate shall remain shut; it shall not be opened, and no one shall enter by it; for the Lord, the God of Israel, has entered by it." The God of Israel entered into Mary's womb. She became the new Temple, the new Holy of Holies, wherein God dwells. Mary is God's dwelling place on earth that is reserved for him alone. St Joseph is Mary's protector and legal husband to prevent any harm being done to Mary and the Christ child. God bless.

Starlight, Thanks for watching my video. I have a large number of long videos on my channel about the Eucharist. You are welcome to watch any one of these at your convenience. God bless.

@roberthaddad7850 Thank you, teacher, for showing us the way to our salvation. God bless.

Besides insults, do you have any plausible arguments?

I meant the first Christian historians outside of the New Testament.

Mary's perpetual virginity is the fulfilment of the prophecy in Ezekiel 44:2: "This gate shall remain shut; it shall not be opened, and no one shall enter by it; for the Lord, the God of Israel, has entered by it." The God of Israel entered into Mary's womb. She became the new Temple, the new Holy of Holies, wherein God dwells. Mary is God's dwelling place on earth that is reserved for him alone. St Joseph is Mary's protector and legal husband to prevent any harm being done to Mary and the Christ child. Allegations of idolatry have no standing here. Virginity is not an exclusive divine attribute, for John the Baptist, St Paul and some of the Apostles were also virgins all their lives for the sake of the Kingdom. See also Matt Matt 12 and 1 Cor. 7 regarding the value of consecrated virginity for the sake of the kingdom. God bless.

@roberthaddad7850 With all due respect Ezekiel 44:2 is about the Temple Mount eastern gate which is believed by Christians to be the gate where Jesus entered Jerusalem. This gate was shut closed in 1541 by the Ottoman empire. Both Christians and Jews believe the Messiah will enter through it during his coming and we know this is the return of our Lord Jesus Christ. In 1 Corinthians chapter 6 it says that all believers are temples of the Holy Spirit. Please read Revelations 1:13-18. Jesus is Alpha and Omega and Almighty. He doesn't need any protection. Every knee shall bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus is Lord and he's coming back to judge all sins worst of all blatant idolatry.

​@@poncehouston5023 I will respond with due respect. Your interpretation cannot stand as Jesus entered through this eastern gate in AD 33 and yet this gate was not shut until 1541. In the 1500+ plus years between these two events millions of others would have entered through this gate, yet Ezekiel's' prophecy states that NO ONE else would enter through this gate after the Lord passes through it. It can only refer to the Lord's entering into Mary as his Temple while within her womb. Where does it say that Jesus will enter through this gate when he returns again? Rather, he will return in glory, unlike his first coming. I agree with the Scripture verses you quote so there is no point in debating these. Jesus as an infant in the womb and as he was growing up certainly needed protection, for if St Joseph wasn't beside Jesus and Mary, Mary would have been stoned to death for being pregnant out of wedlock and Christ would not have been born. When Jesus does return, he will certainly punish idolatry, but not the veneration of his Mother and his saints. He will also punish heresy and those who established their illegitimate denominations in opposition to his Catholic Church.

@roberthaddad7850 Jesus our Lord and Saviour will return soon in all his Glory. Let's make sure in 2025 we worship him the way he truly deserves. Love him with our hearts, minds, and souls, and put nothing or Noone before Him.

Sorry, I am not wrong about the brothers and sisters of Jesus. Please listen to my video again. Firstly, Matt. 13:54-57 speaks of four "brothers" of Jesus, being James, Joseph, Jude and Simon. Yet, we know that Jesus also had first cousins by the names of James, Joseph, Jude and Simon. How? Firstly, we know from St Paul in Gal. 1:19 that "James, the Lord's brother" was an Apostle. Yet, how is he "the Lord's brother" when we know from the lists of the Apostles in Matt 10, Mark 3, Luke 6 and Acts 1 that neither James the Greater nor James the Less had St Joseph as their father, rather their respective fathers being Zebedee and Alphaeus (or Clopas). We know from the first Christian historian - Hegesippus - that the father of James the Less being Alphaeus was a brother of St Joseph. That makes James the Less the first cousin of Jesus. We then know that James the Less had a brother by the name of Joseph (Mark 15:40), so Jesus also had a first cousin named Joseph. We then know that James the Less had a brother named Jude (Jude 1:1) and he was the Apostle Jude Thaddeus. Finally, Hegesippus tells us that James the Less was the first bishop of Jerusalem and he was succeeded by his brother Simon in AD 62. So, Jesus also had a first cousin named Simon. It is not possible that Jesus had brothers named James, Joseph, Jude and Simon and also first cousins of precisely the same name. What is provable is that the James, Joseph, Jude and Simon in Matt 13:54-57 are actually Jesus' first cousins, the children of Alphaeus married to the "other Mary" mentioned in John 19:25. God bless.

Jesus, Mary and Joseph Cousins and blood relatives were considers Brothers and sisters in the time of Christ, it still is that way in some parts of the world. When Jesus travelled to Jerusalem with his family yearly, his whole family and relatives who were part of his tribe would go together for the pilgrimage feasts (cf. Lk 2:41) and living with his parents in Nazareth (cf. Lk 2:51-52) many of the family lived together as one family but may not be blood brothers and sisters. 🙏

Ah Christians! Cant even get your own book right but will swear blind you've got it right and everyone should listen to you as if you're not gullible enough to fall for the lie of religion in the first place. Next time you can save your own time. I'll tell you know. No one, and I mean no one, gives a shit what you think about your imaginary friend and supporting the bible only makes you a terrible person.

This video is surprisingly correct. About time I see truth for a change.

@@roberthaddad7850 Dude this is lies and you are a false teacher the Bible warned us about

The astrologers of ancient times were not practicing Astrology , which is what the Bible forbids. They were simply tracking the stars, noticing consistencies and remarkable phenomena. God showed a special star to guide the way of the “Three Kings”to the newborn king, and it moved as they moved. That is not Astrology; that is Grace.

No sir. The Wise Men came in fulfilment of Old Testament prophecy as the first gentiles to acknowledge the Messiah. They had nothing to do with Herod's later evil desire to murder the infant Jesus. What you suggest has no basis in reality. Sorry. Furthermore, the term "astrology" in the ancient world had a broader meaning than the word does today. It included what was forbidden in the OT but it also included what we would call astronomy today.

Atheism - the last and greatest superstition. Imagine, believing that he universe can cause itself to exist out of nothing. Giving nothingness infinite power to create. This is the ultimate superstition.

@roberthaddad7850 you clearly don't know the meaning of superstition, I recommend dropping that bible in the bin and picking up a dictionary, you're delusional and it's sad