This story highlights the contrast between genuine compassion and superficial sympathy. The man’s dog is dying from hunger, yet the man chooses to cry rather than use the resources he has-bread and food-to help save his loyal companion. The beggar points out the futility of this gesture, emphasizing that tears alone are insufficient if they are not accompanied by practical help. He contrasts the material value of bread with the deeper, more meaningful sacrifice of tears, suggesting that true compassion involves taking action rather than merely expressing sorrow. The beggar’s words imply that the worth of tangible assistance far exceeds the sentimental value of tears, which, though deeply ...