Видео

The Arctic minimum summer sea ice trend is zero for the past 17 years. In the past few years it was almost as high as 1995. The probability that this could be due to chance has now dropped to 10% (after Swart et al calculations, 2015). If the hiatus continues until 2027, it will become statistically significant (p<0.05, or less than 5%) and no longer explainable by chance. Using National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) information for September minima (million km²): 2007 4.16 2008 4.59 2009 5.12 2010 4.62 2011 4.34 2012 3.39 2013 5.05 2014 5.03 2015 4.43 2016 4.17 2017 4.67 2018 4.66 2019 4.19 2020 3.82 2021 4.77 2022 4.67 2023 4.23. Plot the trend line for this data and it will be flat. ZERO net change in 17 years. The linear trend since 2007 is indistinguishable from zero ( around -0.17% per year ). In the early 1950s the sea ice concentration anomaly was lower than it is at present. The sea ice anomaly then rose during the 50s, 60s and 70s. This was followed by a decline. This is demonstrated in Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) data, which is based on historical sea ice charts from several sources (aircraft, ship, and satellite observations). The AARI data shows the sea ice concentration anomaly was lower in 1952 (-5%) than 2005 (-3%). The anomaly increased in the 50s, 60s and 70s. In the 80s, 90s and early 2000s it decreased. Since 2007 the trend has been flat. JAXA (Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency) satellite data from 2002 to 2024 Arctic Sea Ice Extent (365 day running average) shows no noticeable trend with values close to 10,000,000km² throughout. Their minimum extent for daily values was in 2012. No other year since has come close. MASIE (Multisensor Analyzed Sea Ice Extent - Northern Hemisphere) shows something similar to JAXA. From 2005 to 2024 Arctic Sea Ice Extent (365 day running average) shows no noticeable trend with values close to 10,000,000km² throughout. Their minimum extent for daily values was in 2012. Again no other year since has come close. It also shows a marked increase in Ice in the Greenland Sea since 2018. Polyakov et al (2003) show "ice extent (1900-2000) in the Kara, Laptev, East Siberian, and Chukchi Seas provide evidence that long-term ice thickness and extent trends are small and generally not statistically significant". Trend -0.5% per decade (±0.7%). Zhang (2021) shows there is no trend for Arctic sea ice volume since at least 2010, and observes that ice draft increased from 1995 onwards. Vinje (2001) shows a deceleration in the rate of ice loss from 1864 to 2000. Recent sea ice extent is very high when compared to the last 10,000 years. Also changes in sea ice extent and the speed of those changes were greater in the past (Stein et al, 2017). NOAA's Global Time Series Average Temperature Anomaly monthly data (1995-2004) for the Arctic region shows the peak anomaly occurred in January 2016 (+4.99°C), another El Niño year, and the trend is now downwards (-0.42°C per decade) as of June 2024. HadCRUT4 Arctic (70N - 90N) monthly surface air temperature anomalies record (1920-2021) shows the greatest number and magnitude of positive temperature anomalies occurred between 1930-49. All anomalies in excess of 5°C, including +7°C (referenced to 1961-1990) are from that period. No temperature anomalies from 2000-2019 exceeded 5°C. It shows no decade warmed faster than the 1930s and the current 'warming' finished in 2005. JRA55 SAT (2010-2020) shows most of the Canadian Arctic and Greenland cooling with parts of Canada cooling by 3°C and western Greenland cooling by 2.5°C in a decade. KNMI data (Twentieth Century Reanalysis V2c, 1851-2011, 68°N-80°N, 25°W-60°W, so Greenland) shows the most pronounced warming took place in the 1870s, and when comparing temperature anomalies, highest are in the 1930s and comparison of that period with recent temperature anomalies shows no net warming.

i hope they are found

A solar flare is different than a cme

Excellent good job, thank you !

Great video! Was this the recent CME?

What a load of bull**** , the suffered from a scheduled rapid disassembly while impacting the moon

Last 5 sec of the video has the story, rest is flub

Nature never disappoints. Marvelous find,and there will surely be more in future. Well done 👍

!!! TAKING TO MUCH. SAID NOTHING, !!!

I want my 3 min back 😢

F...k stopped music.

Why can't we see the original landing site on the moon with all of our telescope technology.

I suggest that you change the name of your channel from "Bright Mind" to "Dim Wit".

Im guessing the moon is not hollow ?

The guy on the bicycle during the speak of endurance 😂😂😂

The flood of Ai content has only just begun

Confirmed as a Mississippi resident.... with as hot and humid as it is... must've been a nightmare to get out of the ground.

No problem indicated. Just some people whose expectations are not met....

No, just fking no.

Plants still need water.

wtf is this AI shit

While it is interesting that this moss can bounce back from extreme conditions, I question whether it can do the whole life cycle in those conditions.

so verbose. Getting to the point seemed very hard. Frustrating video.

Perfect evolution. A wonder. No change over time. Perfect

This tells you nothing other than they found a wolf. I have never seen so much redundancy in one place. I will be ignoring this channel from here on. Bye!

that is an exercise in saying the samething 5 different ways....jeebus

these AI channels should be forced to indicate they are created with AI - that way we wont need to watch 10 seconds of the video to know it's not worth watching

Why show disproportionate sized debris? I wonder which nation(s) is/are preventing International cooperation in solving these issues?

Looks AI. Sounds like David Atteborough

It's no longer possible to salvage this situation. Sorry.

==:::::>{°^°}<:::::== 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 World Iz BURNING STOP- DROP & ROLL 🌺🍀⚜️🇨🇦⚜️🍀🌺

COUZINZ - WE clever Animalz think WE Smarter Than OUR NATURE🍀

It's already too late. There is more CO2 gas coming from one place where the ice is melting than we as humans could ever release. The plant will do it's thing and we are along for the ride. Some of us will survive. Humans will be around a long time no matter what happens on this planet.

Physics 101, cooling water reduces its volume and this glacier is literally on a drop in the total ocean so this is scaremongering with no evidence. If it did have an effect in cooling the ocean, under Henry's Law, it would cause more absorption of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere causing it to cool as well as cooling the global current leading to less heat transfer to the Arctic via ocean and air currents and probably less strong ENSO events.

Don't Thwaite For It ! 2024

Thought I'd pop in for my daily scare, and oh boy I wasn't disappointed.

More scaremongering.Can you back this up with scientific data please!

It's not a question of if but when....

The science says if we stopped all CO2 production today, the Earth would not START cooling for 1000 years. No way in hell are we going to stop all of it. It is what us 9 billion people breath out. Poor countries want air conditioning too, oil and coal or the only cheap energy dense resources we have. I guess we could kill all the poor countries. Perhaps two thirds of the population of earth. We are humans. We are resourceful. We have survived by migration for the time we first migrated out of the trees. Shifting weather patterns might make some poor countries wealth while wealthy ones will go into decline. Perhaps that is the problem.

Earth is going to do what Earth does. There are NO ways to mitigate nature.

ai commentating for humanity . no thanks

The thumbnail is Jupiter. At least get the thumbnail right.

Is this shit AI generated? Just random images and what looks like a bunch of stock images plus what seems imitation voices of several recognizable narrators...plagiarism alert!

This video raises no new questions, and did not interest me with stock photos that all had titles of the website the author relied on for visuals. I'm not impressed. The only fascination to me is this video was released recently (one would expect some updated info on the "mysteries").

Pictures of crocodiles and fish. Would have been better with animation of the 2 beasts

Why didn't you pay for the images you used? They still have the iStock watermark.

It's because they were English that's how they managed it😂

Australia shows the importance of freedom by defending off imperial Japan forces cutting off their supplies started the turning point. Remember Japan had more global control bigger than Nazism Germany had control over. There will always be an England and Commonwealth which has grown since the wars ending.

Cool 😎

3 likes!!??