Видео

nice explanation helped me good job

Great video, very comprehensive. Have you read the paper of ujhelyi (2014) about the introduction of merit-based systems in us states? If so, what is your opinion of the identification strategy. The author applies a standard TWFE method which does not account for heterogeneous treatment effects or time variant effects so I think the estimated coefficients are not very accurate. Neither does the author consider spillover effects.

12:08

Great step by step lecture! I have a very clear understanding after only listening once.

the BEST video for staggered DID on RUclips

6:41

35:54

16:10

In class, while studying this, I thought this was some very difficult thing in my advanced econometric class. However, the way you teach, makes it very simple and it is not difficult at all. If only my professor taught it like this.

Great Video!

25:30

Thank you so much, totally understood :))))

This is truly an incredible series of videos!! Thank you so much !

If I understood correctly the final section of your video, we define the relations we believe there are in the world and then we use normal stathistical methods of calculating correlation. Then, considering our DAG definition and correctly stratifying the data, the "correlation" we calculated is the actual relationship of the data. If that's correct, could you point to a paper or section of those textbooks that says this?

44:01 Robust F-statistics

19:00

Very good presentation. It enriches by teaching of Public Sector and Welfare Economics for first years students of Bachelor of Science in Natural Resource Economics

Sir, is Progressive Tax System a product of 2nd Fundamental Welfare Theorem..

33:13

26:00

13:00

Wonderful. Learnt a lot.

Ben, you single-handedly helped me pass my econometrics MSc course. I watched all videos after being referred by Loise, and it made much more sense than the in-class lectures. You're the man!

Great explanation. Thank you!

Dear Professor, I am a student studying econometrics in South Korea. Specifically, I am interested in topics related to instrumental variables (IV). Your online lectures are wonderful sources for studying causal inference, and I truly appreciate them! I have a question about the exclusion restriction. In one of your slides, you mentioned that this assumption is untestable. I’ve come across many lecture materials stating the same. However, in Hansen’s econometrics textbook, I found an overidentification (Sargan-Hansen) test, which sets the null hypothesis as an exclusion restriction. I’m curious if it is possible to test the exclusion restriction using the overidentification test. I don’t quite understand the difference between the two tests. Thank you!

Thank u so much sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻♥️✨

Love you sir ❤❤❤❤

thank you for the insight!!! it help me to understand more about public economics in college

Thanks a lot for this. I am preparing for my final exam in 4 days time.

I'm an Econ PhD student, and my specialization is in macro. I didn't have much luck to learn this topic systematically in my department even though I need this tool for my research. Thank you so much for your effort in this amazing work and upload all the teaching materials for free! I learned a lot from your course.

helps a lot

Thank you sir, this was very helpful.

Thanks Sir

Thanks from India , Understood very well, nice explanation.

FAIR FEDERAL TAXES: - Armed forces should be funded by a tax on individual and business capital. This is the same principle we apply to funding police and fire protection at the local level. (i.e. TAX WEALTH to fund DoD, CIA, NSA, VA, FBI, SS, Coast Guard, customs, border patrol, DEA, ATF, federal marshals, ...). - USA should tax business revenue (not profit) to the extent necessary to fund Federal business services (DoA, DoC, DoD(R&D), DoE, HUD, DoI, DoJ, DoL, USPS, DoS, DoT, ...). Federal services with identifiable customers should be funded via fees. (e.g. parks, forests, Interstate highways, ATC, NRC, FERC, ...). - Personal income should only be taxed to fund the few federal services that directly benefit people. (e.g. Medicare, Dept. of Health and Human Services, CDC, ...). A personal income tax provides a way for citizens to hire other citizens to do work that benefits everyone. The personal income tax revenue should match that part of the Federal payroll (including contractors) to fund the few federal services that directly benefit people. Aside: It is a bad idea to fund operations with debt. Debt should only be used to "buy now, pay later (as used) " on durable infrastructure that cannot be funded by service fees. (e.g. school buildings, highways, storm drains, ecological improvements). If the Federal Debt exceeds the properly depreciated value of Federally-owned durable infrastructure, we should TAX WEALTH to restore the balance.

Thank you for uploading all the lectures. I am planning to go through your lectures this summer with your slides. Again, thank you!

Thanks a lot Sir.

thank you so much

you’re doing god’s work, thank you!

I can't explain how much your classes have been helping me, you make this subject a way more easier to understand and your explanations are excellent. Thank you so much for sharing it

This playlist is a gold mine for PhD students. Thanks again, Ben.

It is easy to follow. Thank you!

What paper is Lee et al. (2020) at 38:50? Please add journal name in such citations.

Thank you sir

This is the best verbal explanation of LATE anywhere after 6 years of study.

I like your videos. But the ads really disturb. I know it is your decision, but I think you can have an impact. Ben Lambert on RUclips brought me to economics. But he also has no ads. So if you have ads, I would advise to keep them low, because you want to have more students watch.

Thank you for the video lectures! its helping me greatly for revision!!

Thq sir ....🤗🤗

Thank you very much for this video! I wish my teacher was as clear as you are!

Great explanations!