Видео

no he badly repeated something vedic but poorly like all of the western knoledge before christianity and islam destroyed civilization replacing it with a hell and a marketplace hell.

badrock formula? wtf is badrock

the only problem is how Helios puts all those cows on Sicily and how he feeds them

0:01 you lost me there.

Need more such videos

But how many unwell fed bulls ?! See yah in 2000 years

Wild to think McDonald’s goes through that much cattle each day?

17:45 this cracked me up

Well looking at the current time, 0… 0 cows since they all died with-in 2200 years, probably,

bro this world we live in, oh how i lust for the library of alexandria, how thy people there sang of the gods in the stars and of the green fields and distant seas beyond which other worlds

I like how the ant is a she for inclusivity's sake in the example between minute 20 and 21, but the only female ants are the queens and not workers out foraging for food 😅

ancient equivalent of a zip bomb

say no to veganism lol

The answer is wrong. No way that many cows could fit on Sicily.

That was a great video, I'll check out your other ones. Thanks.

please dont use ai for historic representations

The guy who killed archimedes should listed as legendary war criminal who is worse than Hitler.

I would really have enjoyed your video if it weren't for the volume of the music, i had to leave halfway I couldn't put up with it any longer. If you do an update without the crappy music I'll subscribe. Cheers

I'm not only confused but also tired of useless math and I don't see the poem as a good one

17:50 what's going on with the text on the board there?

I think we should teach history of such amazing people instead of wars.

9:01 bro forget that Bhaskar give us quadratic equations formula (shri dhar acharya)

How plagiarizing Poincare led to Einstein's theory of Relativity, you mean.

This was lovely to watch; I am shocked to find out that Einstein wasn’t a mathematician. It’s so much more accurate to call him a logician with a focus in theoretical physics.

Something went awry ... a perfect square cannot end in 8 ...

thanks man, for crediting Indian mathematicians, except for a few they don't get much credit.

Speaking of math coming before physics, David Hilbert is the same Hilbert who created "Hilbert spaces", essentially the general abstraction of dimensional space, with possibly infinite dimensions, that lies at the heart of the math of Quantum physics.

Einstein never thought that math is beneficial for his theory. Awesome!

wonderful❤.

I love you 💕😚

I wouldn’t call tensor calculus “simple math”. Anything else that tries to explain GR without tensor calculus is an offensive oversimplification, and sadly RUclips is full of this kind of quacks.

Bet 78.86% of ppl stopped watching it before 8 minutes

I wish there was a channel highlighting the great math and science races of history like Hillbert and Einstein... great video

This is the most informative piece I have ever seen about AE. I was amazed to learn of his initial disdain of higher level math and of his intuitive use of the axiomatic method. Congratulations to Ben and the team for creating this gem!

Very good production. Melvyn Bragg in his BBC Radio 4 'In Our Time' repeatedly marvels at how abstract maths or things done just because someone thought about doing it often turn out to be part of or essential too later developments in science and / or technology.

Now the next step is figuring out how general relativity and quantum mechanics fits together and once again time is the key. General relativity and quantum mechanics will never be combined until we realize that each individual observer is observing them both at different moments in time. Because causality has a speed limit (c) every point in space where one observes it from will be the closest to the present moment. When one looks out into the universe they see the past which is made of particles (GR). When one tries to measure the position of a particle they are observing smaller distances and getting closer to the present moment (QM). The wave property of particles appears when we start trying to predict the future of that particle. A particle that has not had an interaction exists in a future state. It is a probability wave because the future is probabilistic. Wave function collapse is what we perceive as the present moment and is what divides the past from the future. GR is making measurements in the observed past and therefore, predictable. It can predict the future but only from information collected from the past. QM is attempting to make measurements of the unobserved future and therefore, unpredictable. Only once a particle interacts with the present moment does it become predictable. This is an observational interpretation of the mathematics we currently use based on the limited perspective we have with the experiments we choose to observe the universe with.

What if you put all those cows on the same spot i mean exact one spot combining there masses

Not allay other time the math is baked on the fly by the physicist like in the case of Dirac

le maths now : Find the value of X

Archimedes Write a Problem That Took 2,200 Years to Solve... ... and we are in year 2024 GIGACHAD IMPRESIVE

He would have received a letter back saying wrong number....

yes, the reason 17 or any number of dimensions works is because it also works in one dimension. any number of dimensions boils down to a vactor of distance in one dimension

How about solving the problem of putting food on the table then figuring out this useless bullshit!!!

Damn this is well explained

I need a five minute version that a five year old could understand.

Good science is never "overthrown." It is merely refined. Newtonian physics is not wrong. It is just not 100% precise.

Amazing video, thanks so much. Really interesting and nicely put together. I subbed.

Suggestion - not criticism: PLEASE remove or at least tone down the music in the background from all your future videos - it does nothing but distract the viewer from what would be a good presentation. Sorry, but this is a pet peeve of mine. Unfortunately, some RUclips content providers are under the impression that background music somehow makes an instructional video more dramatic and/or professional. This is not true! It's bad enough that we have to crank up the volume on some videos because of a bad audio recording or a regional accent, only to have the music overpowering the vocals. RUclips documentaries should not be created/treated or edited like a music video - Sorry for the rant.

“…..Lost to history” Or Archimedes was full of bull.