Видео

I loved this one as I spend a lot of time on Dartmoor and are fimiliar with the mounds, this will certainly make me look at them in a new light, we could do with some core samples from them. As to the style of the video with the use of AI, I did find it a little bit weird, I had to listen to it and not watch it, like the other commeter stated it was distracting, I would rather a low tech video with you sat in your kitchen reading the script. then it would not take long to produce. Love what you do, thanks.

The importance of water is the ancients knew water was the antenna for life. This is explained well by a YT video titled "Unlocking a car with your brain - sixty seconds". In everyone's case, the E.M.F interacting with the water molecule dipole is the "Soul" or "Mind", a living signal that when joined with the WiFi enabled meat suit is consciousness for the broadcast of life. Its the reason why people used to emerse their bodys in pools of water to make the aerial bigger for a better signal strength. Ken Wheeler explains ancient metaphysics well.

The medium used for this topic is very odd. Is this AI? Real people but scripted? It’s all very cringy. Why not just produce a straight forward video?

Brilliant

Get a human to read the script.

On this video you keep calling it the Valium (the name of a drug) instead of the Vallum. The word Vallum possibly pronounced Wallum or Vallum means wall. Obviously it is not a wall but a ditch/canal. T C Bell, a marine engineer, was the first person to recognise it was a canal to move the stone for Hadrian's Wall. Once the Wall was built there was no need for it. As Martin Eckholt, who investigated European rivers, stated, "it is generally accepted that the only way the Romans could have transported cut stone from the quarries was by water".

You lost me the minute you called it the Valium that’s a drug it’s the Vallum. It is also well documented that it was built long before the wall .

Brilliant but can't watch the AI and animation.

Thank you.

I will always be grateful to Ross Broadstock for introducing me to our living national treasure Robert Langdon 😂

Only 562 view😮

Amazing ❤❤❤❤

Amazing!!!!!!!! 🙉🤯🤯🤯🥰🥰🥰🥰😍😍😍🥰🥰😍😍😏🥰🥰😍🥰🥰🥰😍🥰🥰🥰😍🤯🤯😛😇😇😛 I LOVE THIS VIDEO 😊😊 👌🏻 AMAZING 👏 I Will go tell Howard if he has seen it 🤯🤯🙉 did you watch his new video Hey Robert I forgot about your channel 😅 must not have been getting notifications 😢😢 My memory is not very good currently sorry 😢😢 Really love this video and thanks 😊 ❤ 🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉

😂a

😊

great video

The French resigned in 1940 so Paris doesn't get destroyed. They should have joined instead.

Between the animation and Robo voices, I had to stop watching this.

I agree with you that the dating of the sites is somewhat spurious at best the same as the automatic assumption that they are all made for some religious use or as a giant open air calendar, but actual geological evidence as well as Physics debunks your hypothesis, for example. 1) Rivers may be able to flow downhill but a boat without a powerful engine can not fight currents that would be that strong - and so far no outboard motors have been found from the Mesolithic or earlier, until the last 200 years. 2) Doggerland and Doggerbank are between 15 to 36 meters below current sea levels yet much of the land is dry - but according to your hypothesis Doggerland and Doggerbank must have been above sea level even though the water level was many meters higher. I would ask where the evidence of salt from sea water has gone as the water level on land can not be higher than the sea - unless it is held back by a barrier of some description. 3) If the water levels were as high as you propose - why would they need to dig a series of moats, surely the land being a isolated island is more than enough defence or surely a wall would have been easier and more effective. 4) Again if the water levels were as high as you hypothesise why would they build canals when the water was high enough to travel everywhere without the need to build a complex monument. 5) Finally if the land was that inundated with water there would have been much less land to grow food and thus even less room to bury the dead, which we know they did as we find their tombs, and even more importantly where would they live - or was the population extremely small, which makes me then ask, how did they get the Manpower to build these monuments?. I am honestly curious about the points I have mentioned and would love to hear your thoughts about it, I am not here to cause any drama I am just an enthusiast with a logical mind and a few years of research under my belt. Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Another excellent study which, in my opinion, furthers the evidence in support of your archaeological theories.

Please help us understand how water flows uphill. Wansdyke? Wanstrench?

Grimes Graves dug entirely with antler picks.........And here's a stone axe we found down here?????

Brilliant presentation, thank you. I love your approach to the past.

Thank you for this always intriguing upload. May I postulate that the ability to move such large stone monuments may seem odd to us today is because like many things it is a technology that has been lost due to the need to no longer use stone in the same way for construction methods, for example when the Roman empire collapsed one of the lost technologies was Concrete - which took 1300 years to re-invent although the Roman system evolved into what we now see as the Catholic Church. For me a question I have found myself pondering is if we as Humans have a built in template for the evolution of certain key technologies, so if people are separated by thousands of miles and thousands of years of technical evolution yet still come up with comparable ideas - is this like language a built in concept of Humanity which would supersede seeding of knowledge from an advanced civilization which so far zero evidence has been found for?.

Hi Robert. I can't remember if you ever mentioned the many species of marine lichen on Stonehenge. Experts are saying it's presence is unexplainable. 😂

Where is the evidence of Locks? Water doesn't travel uphill and the Wansdyke is very hilly.

I look forward to your discovery of tons of Mesolithic burnt wood and charcoal deposits on the top of Silbury hill from your ‘lighthouse’.What? There aren’t any? Oooops.

I've travelled a number of miles on different canals in the UK. Have never seen one which had cross-section like Wansdyke. It would be more canal-like if the large bank had been used to create embankments to level out the dips between adjacent high spots in the ground. A straight line is not the most efficient route for a canal to take through undulating countryside. That would be a contour canal which follows a horizontal route along a contour line. There's a great example of a straight-line canal at Caen Hill, near Devizes. Unless gravity was very different in Neolithic times, a Wansdyke Canal would literally not hold water.

You show Silbury as an island.So you are suggesting they started building it underwater….. Ooops.If they wanted a lighthouse beacon they would have built it on the shoreline not at the bottom of the valley ( river floor in your diagram) Back to the drawing board my friend.

You think it ridiculous that people might fight up a hill as opposed to going round the side..But you don’t think it’s ridiculous to try and build a canal up ( and down) a hill - rather than going round the side.Mmmm

Perhaps a better title would be Refining rather than Debunking. As you and most recent documentaries acknowledge the age of the site goes back to meso or neolithic period and has had several periods of development. Coinciding are constant refinement of archaeological theories as more excavations there and across the landscape with enhancement of tools (geomagnetric, LIDAR, radiocarbon, strontium, etc) to clarify which aspects are more likely based upon the evidence. Obviously the naming of of the site dates back into the saxon period and how that evolved into the English of today. Compound that with the development of archaology terminology standards and henge is today inaccurate. However renaming a world famous site to reflect current terminology is not beneficial. Also given the age and development of the site the topography probably had both human and natursl changes that impacted the ditch/moat. I do think the benefit of documenaries serve two purposes. First it shows that cotinued examination evolves archaeology theories and what once was considered likely may be less so today. That's important for average people to understand that science is not absolute and that is okay. Second the style and depth gets average citizens excited and intrigued about the populace of the past. If done well, a doco should dispel the 'primitive' connotation that does injustice to the creativity and determination to develop methodologies with the tools and knowledge at hand. The mere fact there are multiple development periods at Stonehenge with increasing complexity should be appreciated as are modern monuments. It is lazy and facile to assume some outside advanced civilization (Aliens, Atlantis, Giants etc) aide past cultures. Quite possible that 3000 years from now, we could be considered primitive as well. 😮

what website or program are you viewing the lidar on? would love to explore around my area with it

I'm sure the lack of water access was part of why the cathedral was moved along with the clergy down to what hecame Salisbury. But another reason that has much credibility is the confluct between the clergy and ruling class at the castle. This apparently reached at crisis point during the tumultuous reign of King Stephen 1135--1154. There were in fact three individuals who were buried in the cathedral in about 1140 in full leg irons. King Stephen was not above using force to get his way. This information comes from a British Archeology magazine.

Makes a lot of sense in many ways - a lot of sites have been badly mis interpreted over the years, Stonehenge is the prime example, they look at a Dolmen and know it was once part of a burial chamber but look at the bare bones of what is left at Stonehenge as if the monument was complete. Many ancient sites have had their stone taken for other construction projects, Avebury and many others are proof of this as well as the Roman road near to Stonehenge which is where some of the original monument may have ended up. Great content as always, looking forward to seeing more of your theories and research.

You can always find a so-called ,'expert', to pontificate on the subject you are interested in and as you are paying coin to the ,'expert', he / she will probably tell the narrative the way you wish it told. This is why I am hightly suspicious of climate change and the so-called, 'experts', who all spout the mantra approved by Governments who wish to hit us with more Taxes based on the climate change narrative they bought and paid for.

Atlantis has a potential to be validated in our present time. In this documentary: 1. Dan discusses "an inspiration" for "Atlantis", and "Atlantis is presumed to be a Fictional Story" a "Myth" 2. The Animated Character is repetitively repeating the "Plato's Points of Atlantis" The content is a worthy watch of Greek Island's Archaeology. My response points: 1. The subject of "Atlantis is a presumed Myth" by "Mainstream Academia" because it doesn't fit into or support their: "19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline" 🔹 I must point out here that they are making 2 actions that are prohibited by the "Standards of Science and Research" which prohibits using a Theory as Fact and to use Belief in the Theory, as if it were supported by Fact (as if being supported by Peer Reviewed Science), and it isn't. 🔺The "Standards of Science and Research" in summary, include instructions such as: "With Mind fully Open and free of any predetermined Beliefs, Theories, Opinions, ...and allowing the Research Methodologies to extract the greater facts." I would propose that the subject treat Atlantis with a Higher Minded Open Mind, as a "potential Historical reality, pending research and studies, using the Plato references, Archaeology, Anthropology, History, Geology, Geophysics, and Sociology. Weighing each potential location from the Plato Points and making efforts to do the actual due diligence towards determining any qualified location and commencing with an Archaeological Dig and/or underwater exploration as necessary. There are viable potentials such as that mentioned, Doggerland, and the widely supported "Eye of the Sahara" location. Keeping in mind, what was originally submersed, may not be fully submerged today. The "Eye of the Sahara" location has the most prevailing number of "Plato's Points" and has above ground access for studies. The behaviors of the Academics should be noted in terms of their Ethics, Wisdom, and adherence to the "Standards of Science and Research". "Authentic Academics" adhere to the Standards, and that is what I suggest is the most important value towards this and all History, including Archaeological Studies. Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian

So in 50 years it's all buried ? So 3000 years , really Dan?

I'm curious to know what mechanism was causing river levels to fall: was it in fact land 'rebound' - relieved of the weight of 1000s of metres of ice the ground would naturally rise (eustacy)..?

Good info here but the animations and AI voice over do not add to the professionalism.

📚 On another Topic, I would encourage this group to look into: (a subject I can only assume would be of interest to those of British heritage and lineage): DNA is a Historian's "Go to and Comfort Zone", as the lab based findings can be repeated, thus 9ffering a ReliablevResource with Confidence. 🔺 The English or British? Whichever best identifies those in Britain (between 1 AD and the various Germanic invasions) The English Male DNA today reflects that: < 2% (that's less than 2%) of the (Original English/British Males DNA is found in the Current British Males). Replaced by the various Germanic: origins: (Roman, Viking, Anglo, Saxon, Jutes, and Normans = all It is not made clear Publically, by the DNA data, which group applied an Ethnic Cleansing upon the male population of Britain. I suspect the Angles/Anglos, but that is merely my perspective. The subject requires clarity, however, I've yet to find an Academic or Resource that defines the details of this <2% Original English Males. It has been noted that the early areas of Ireland, England, and Wales saw an influx of Basque to the earliest "Hunter Gathers" (those HG's are never DNA Identified either). "Who, When, and What", happened to all these English Males? The Adults, Teens, Adolescents, Children, Toddlers, and Infants? Why is this ignored? and ... I suspect the whole of the History of Britain, Wales, Ireland, and Scottland, has been highly modified to fit the needs and desires of those whom are the Decision Makers of the British "Political", "Socio-Economic", their "Banking and Financial Corporatists", whom are served by the Writers of History and Mainstream News + the "Opinion News Groups" aka "Commentary and Tabloid News". To ignore the obvious would be an insult to the Higher Minded aka Mature Minded, well studied and professionals in the fields of History, Sociology, Journalism, and Political Science. I would be ever so appreciative of content and resources that can provide clarity on this subject. Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian Tennessee, USA 🔹(I also have a degree and practical application in the field of Journalism) ⭐ Sub'd and Shared

Megalithic Stones around the Globe "were not moved by brute power" ... I am confident that these structures were pre-flood, like Gobekli Tepe. Pleased, this Documentary actually takes facts into consideration that are ignored by "Mainstream Academics", (remember "Authentic Academics" follow the "Standards of Science and Research", and don't ignore the facts that don't support the "MS Theory Paradigm"). The "Mainstream Academic 19th Century Theory based Paradigm and Linear Timeline" is not reasonable in its Theory based, limiting contrast to the observable Geology and Artifacts. ... and it doesn't meet the "Standards of Science and Research", which prohibits using a Theory as Fact. It has become a sort of "Mainstream Academia Dogma Orthodoxy". The value of other Resources: Geophysics, Lidar, Geology, DNA Studies, Anthro-Sociology, Quantum Physics, Linguistics, ... are oddly overwhelmingly avoided in Archaeology's interpretations, and they ignore "Peer Reviewed + Journal Published Science Findings" when they don't support their "Paradigm and Linear Timeline" I can provide examples. My comments are Discernment rather than Judgemental. Beth Bartlett Sociologist/Behavioralist and Historian

How do you watch this without those stupid cartoon interruptions

How do u watch this without those stupid cartoon interruptions ?

eeeeeeew, what on earth is that intro??

im 1000000% sure thy woud never use humans to pull that rock thy had very big OXEN those days

Points to doggerland is as stupid as your characters are creepy. You ruined a decent show... hope you're happy.

perhaps the wood henge/s were the local school/s, with stone henge so to speak the university/s

Stolen content and moronic ideas .

So cleared ground and pathways ? And mass of humanity , fed , housed , protected, , oh my myy , Not to mention how were these stones cut ,

I think you are right about the importance of water, but should be more to it than just delivering goods. .. It's been raining for 6 months, flooding all around, water everywhere on the fields, but the Avebury ditches are dry. Why? Avebury is on a chalkland aquifer. A market doesn't need 30 - 65 tons stones to form 3 circles. I see the same formula at ancient sites: running water under quartz megaliths (sarsen or granite). I think we are missing something here to see the full picture, to connect the dots.