Видео

Yes 🙂 I hope I referenced it! Book 4, 22, 4. Against Heresies yes. 👍🙏

Is this passage from irineus in against heresies? About the age of jesus

It's all Astro-Theology, "Celestial Code of Scripture" by John McHugh shows how both Greek and Hebrew mythology came from the word Puns of the Sumerian and Akkadian tablets. It makes sense because we are the Universe observing itself.

This is a great video, I've wanted to go to visit but don't fancy being stabbed. You've taken the risk for me - Thanks :)

It's worth checking out Charles N. Pope's, Jesus and the Julio-Claudian's. On Josephus: one can find comparative lists of about 30 instances where the lives of Paul and Josephus are near identical. I think Carrier is too quick to dismiss this when he says Paul is not a myth but the Jesus character was. In my view, there is some kind of hidden bias taking place in Carrier's assessments.

Knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. 2 Peter 1:20 Speaking of these things in all his letters. Some things in these letters are hard to understand, things the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they also do to the rest of the scriptures. 2 Peter 3:16 This applies to you.

There's a shortage of many things these days but there doesn't seem to be any shortage of self-appointed bible teachers.

Inane, vacuous drivel!

Schizo final boss

The Vatican has a list of popes going back to St Peter in its Annuario Pontificio under the heading "I Sommi Pontefici Romani" (The Roman Supreme Pontiffs). There were already 5 before the turn of the 1st century AD. And 32 before Constantine's Council of Nicaea. So how can it be that the Romans endorsed Christianity only in the 4th century under Constantine. Something smells very fishy.....

Its pretty obvious Jeesus was a Roman creation. Rome suffered heavily in the Jewish Revolt 67-73ce and likely gospels were written after that. They retroject the Jeesus charater back to the 30s CE so he could "prophecise" the destruction of the temple - which had already taken place during the revolt. I think Joe Atwill also suggests this It was an attempt to convince the violent Jewish factions - the Zealots and the Sicarii, that contrary to their pre-existing beliefs, their Jewish messiah was actually a pacifist who wanted them to "turn the other cheek" This was hidden code for submitting to the Romans. The NT mentions both the cause and the outcome of the Revolt, and also makes the generation of 70s CE culpable for Jeesus' crucifixion The Romans were master propagandists, so much so, they even invented witnesses and historians. Anyone who investigates the life story of Josephus will conclude he is also a made-up man

Well yes, they would definitely be party to and likely supporters of this new imperial project. It looks that way anyway.

If Mark was a play ordered by Domitilla and Clemens was executed because of "falling into jewish ways". Wouldn't that indicate them as if not creators, at least supporters of the Titus/Christ cult. A cult designed for jewish slaves and soldiers. Could this imperial cult have gone rouge after the execution of Clemens?

Buddha and Jesus,. " Yashua", are the same spirit.

Definitely no man called Jesus Christ ever existed. Yeshua of Nazareth did.

Gnostics listen to smells like teen spirirt eith zero irony

Jesus who? What was his last name? A lot of Jesuses in the world. You hace to be more specific.

Ein Stutz durch Raum und Zeit

The nominative case use of adelphos in Koine Greek leads credence to the interpretation of James having a relational bond with Jesus that may or may not have been blood, but most definitely was familial, or at least Paul appears to sell it that way to his target audience: no doubt to bolster some of his own spurious claims to apostolic authority. Paul reserves this inflection of "delphys" in the instances in which James is the indirect active object in each topic whereas when his mode of persuasion pulls its pathos punches to clearly curry favour with the congregation his epistle is aimed at, then he opts for the more inclusive form of delphys ie adelphoi in an undisputably ecclesiastical context. My God I'm a sad nerd. If you got through this comment without falling asleep, I salute you. Good video. Cheers

This will sound weird: I have raised the birth and death charts for Jesus, and when I compared them to Titus' birth chart, there is evidence of him being Jesus' reincarnation. Honestly.

Even Genesis 6 talks about the brothers of Jesus.

Yes very, and it goes so nich deeper than this. Stay tuned 😉

Revealed gnosis? Gnosis is knowing thyself.. it's about directly experiencing who you truly are.. no faith, no belief but direct knowledge of your true self.. I've just revealed to you what gnosis is

Revealed gnosis? Gnosis is knowing thyself.. it's about directly experiencing who you truly are.. no faith, no belief but direct knowledge of your true self.. I've just revealed to you what gnosis is

Rev 22/16..I am The Morning Star.

i don't know whether you know Dr. David Ammon Hillman or not but he knows his ancient greek like no other. His podcast, Lady Babylon is broadcast live maybe twice a week. He is a character but well worth your youtube viewing. if you haven't heard of him, now is the time to find out. he has many lectures, classes and presents a very thorough understanding of the ancient greek pharmacon and tells the story of Jesus in a way you have never heard. I subscribed and will drop by to see what you think.

Stanley baker,played him in the film,where's jack made in 1969,also staring tommy steele,dudley foster, its on youtube.good film.

Many tiles and cobbles were stomped on in the making of this video..!

They don’t know where he ends and they begin, my brother

Christianity was a critique on Judaism like Protestantism is a critique on Catholicism and Islam is a critique on all of them, the Christians were saying the Jews had not got it right. To say it is the wrong god and there is a higher god is to totally befuddle the word god. That's not quite how those very first Christians would have thought about it

For at least fifty years after he died there would be people convinced he never did and that he would physically walk round the next corner at any minute

Cool angle

Ralph Ellis says that Paul and Josephus were the same person: same life story; when one stopped writing, the other one started.

Thanks for analyzing this stuff and sharing your excellent insights.

That may be true but only wanted a coffee.

The only Son that matters is Jesus Christ who is the only Way to salvation, the only Truth you can believe and the only Word worth listening to. Repent and be born again; the gift of salvation is free and no one is beyond its reach.

Hail Sol Invictus 🌞

Great video. I've been vectoring in on similar ideas, since realizing that the literal story of Christianity makes no sense at all given the facts we have. I'm interested in the pagan worldview as well as gnostiscm. Instant sub and and I look forward to going over your videos 😀

He was a genocidal, murderous monster.

Yahweh was the storm god of the Kenites (note link with Zipporah). He replaced the Hyksos' storm god Baal who was demoted to Al (or El).

Ralph Ellis has said that Josephus and Paul were the same person - worth a read.

Yes, the book sets it out very clearly and it seems spot on.

Interesting ☦️🧿👀

Just started reading the gnostic book eye opening

So many manuscripts, yet no originals and nothing verifiably written by an eyewitness. Yeah, miss me with that.

We need a UK gnostic meet-up. Enjoying your videos!

Even if there was only one manuscript of the New Testament, that wouldn't make it any less of a true revelation to mankind of the good news of Jesus Christ, and His work on that cross that reconciled mankind to God.

Thanks

So many manuscriptions therefore no manuscript corruption