- Видео 9
- Просмотров 201 127
Rufferafu
Добавлен 18 сен 2022
Rolex Submariner: Vintage vs. Modern (1680 & 126610LN)
Comparison between vintage and modern Rolex Submariner #rolex #submariner
Просмотров: 2 302
Видео
Review: Rolex Explorer 114270
Просмотров 5 тыс.9 месяцев назад
#rolex #rolexexplorer #watch Rolex Explorer (ref 114270) review.
Review: Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36mm Green Dial (126000)
Просмотров 23 тыс.Год назад
#rolex #rolexoysterperpetual #oysterperpetual #watch Rolex Oyster Perpetual Green 36mm (ref. 126000)
Should You Buy a Tudor Pelagos 39?
Просмотров 16 тыс.Год назад
My take on whether you should buy a Tudor Pelagos 25407N #tudor #tudorwatch #watch
Green Special Edition: Tudor Black Bay Heritage Harrods (79230G)
Просмотров 14 тыс.Год назад
Here is a closer look at Tudor Harrods edition (ref. 79230G) #tudor #tudorwatch #tudorwatches #blackbay #harrods #watch
Rolex Submariner vs Omega Seamaster 300M - Which one is better?
Просмотров 62 тыс.Год назад
Comparison between Rolex Submariner (ref. 126610LN) and Omega Seamaster 300M (ref. 210.30.42.20.03.001).
Which one to choose: Rolex Submariner 40mm or 41mm?
Просмотров 28 тыс.2 года назад
#rolex #rolexsubmariner #rolexwatches #rolexero #watches #watch Comparison between the newest 41mm Submariner and a previous generation 40mm Submariner.
Review: Swatch X Omega MoonSwatch - Mission To The Sun
Просмотров 13 тыс.2 года назад
#moonswatch #swatch #watches Here is my review of the much hyped Swatch X Omega Moonswatch.
Cheap Vintage Rolex Watches - Rolex Oyster Perpetual Date 1500 & Rolex Oysterdate Precision 6694
Просмотров 37 тыс.2 года назад
#rolex #rolexoyster #rolexoysterperpetual #vintagerolex #watches
Tenho um deese azul ai pra vender alquem tem interesse aceito proposta
Ola
most 34mm vintage or semi vintage rolexes looks bigger because their lug to lug is around 42mm..... hence looks quite big on the wrist.... i think most rolex 36mm case width's lug to lug is 43.5mm.... really not much difference / larger ....
The vintage watch on the left makes the newer watch on the Right look like a Deep Sea diver.
What is your wrist size?
16,5 cm
I can’t wear my Rolex without catching guff from my friends. No problem with my Omeeega though. I don’t mind. I like the Omega more anyway. Looks nicer and I can afford to beat the shit out of it.
Iheard that rolex never puts under reflective coatingon teir watches. Anyone know if tats true?
Very good comparison ❤ very useful thanks 🙏
Thank you!
41mm is nicer
Rolex 1 n only!
I have a 114270 from 2001 and I wear it every day with a smile on my face 😎 lovely watch you have there sir.
Thank you! Enjoy your watch!
I own the 14060M as well as the 114060. While the newer version is obviously superior in quality, I still prefer the more elegant lines and wearability of the 14060M. If Rolex also offered the Submariner in the 5 digit case size but with all the modern materials and bracelet of the 6 digit version it would be a massive hit for them. They offer the Yacht Master in various sizes so I don't see why they can't do the same thing with the Submariner.
I think 5-digit Submariners are the best Submariners ever made. They have the aesthetics of a vintage watch but still retain a touch of a modern watch.
Trying on a sub and gmt master ii at a local made me love my seamaster more. I like its quirkiness and solid construction.
Agreed. Vintage looks nicer.
Vintage looks way better
For the price omega is better value imo. But sub is still king.
It is an absolutely beautiful watch for the money. One of my concerns was the green bezel wouldn't go well with many clothes, however that's not true. It does
It's a great all-rounder, and the color is quite subtle.
do not call them cheap!
Why is that
@ Because it’s very valuable
Para los estándares de Rolex, si son "baratos"
I love the Omega dial, but the size of the watch and the bracelet are not for me. When Omega updates the watch, then I will consider buying it. That's why the Sub is perfect for me.
Sale
I can second what you said about the Omega bracelet. I had mine start failing and nearly dropped my watch because of that. The lack of double locking mechanism is very disappointing
Anyway to put a rubber strap with steel end link on this watch? Lug width is 22mm.
Thank you for this!!! Very helpful!
Omega of course. Better watch and better price. No brainer.
The older I have gotten the more I realize the emotional and aesthetic feeling that one must have to appreciate a watch. If you get that “feeling” when you put the watch on you know it! Forget about the movement and the bracelet etc., it’s the dial and how the watch feels on your wrist that matters. If the sub gives you that feeling it’s the one for you, if it’s the seamaster then that’s the one. Don’t talk yourself out of a watch based on specs or trends or what other people say. Go by how you feel when you look at it on YOUR wrist.
Sub all day
“The Submariner is an Evolution, not a revolution.” I think we all know what the better watch is 😉
I love both of these watches, but I feel the Seamaster would be sooo much better if they changed out the 90's bracelet
That is part of the style of the Seamaster, just like the older iconic bracelet on the sub. I love both, they both have their own take on a dive watch, both recognisable in their own right.
@@a0r0a7 I have since grown to love the seamaster and it's bracelet
@@paulcu130 good to hear that. My criticism of the Omega 300m, mine in particular is the action of the bezel, it really does not feel like thousands of £ of watch, no play or anything but just the feel and sound. My Seiko and other divers I have just feel and sound of better quality. Otherwise I love the Seamaster, my grail piece.
@@a0r0a7 I will find out soon. it is the next watch on my radar. However, I don't like what they are doing with the latest Seamaster models. They remove a complication (date), remove the ceramic dial and bezel, remove the Seamaster bracelet and increase the price. Now you may be someone that doesn't like a date on a dive watch, or you may not like a ceramic bezel (I like both, but on the Seamaster I love ceramic), but if those things are considered a down grade on other watches why do they increase price. Not a fan of what they are currently doing with the Seamaster. However, I love what they are doing to the Speedmaster. Got a sapphire sandwich back in May and now I have my eye on the FOIS. Still want a Snoopy at retail, but that is just a dream.
@@paulcu130 I have the ceramic 300m Seamaster, prefer this to the latest models like you said.
Omega all the way. Rolex is eye-catching, since every celeb has it, but comes nowhere near to the beauty of Omega Seamaster. Specially the iconic 2531.80. Also, Omega is more accurate, as you mentioned -0, but that doesn't matter that much, both are very accurate. To me, bracelet is way better on Omega, fits better on my hand, like silk.
I actually prefer the Omega clasp. I have both and the reason I prefer the Omega is you don’t have to take the watch off. So easy to adjust while driving. Overall comfort they are pretty even. I would give the edge slightly to the Rolex though. Mainly because of the taper. But the Omega is still super comfortable. It’s my do anything watch. Plus I love the white dial black bezel.
Omega for me 👍🏻
Would get the Submariner (as opposed to the Submariner Date) so it did not have the Cyclops.
Just about the best comparison I have seen. The only plus point to the Omega that I can see is that it comes in blue. Oh, and it has a display case back if that's a preference.
Nice video sauna broder
41mm is definitely nicer. Much more refined case and look
Both great, but the Omega bracelet is not great.
Omega owners are forever cursed to spamming youtube comments to make themselves feel better
Have both but initially purchased the 300m. Rule of thumb, don't settle. You will always be wanting a Sub no matter what.
I love my Tudor Pelagos 39, and I love the entire Pelagos line. My only contentions with this piece: I wish the dial and insert, like the 42 OG, were matte black; and I wish the hands were as bright as the markers and insert. Hopefully, Tudor's fixes the lume issue, because you will be able to get new 'service' hands during service. Nonetheless, the hands are still potent; I am able to read the hands throughout the night.
Love this video. Great camera quality and it does justice to this watch.... I'm really considering this over the new one. Prefer the 20mm lugs, the green lume and more vintage look and bracelet... only down size is the lack of anti reflective crystal, but... no watch is perfect
Thank You! No watch is perfect, but this one is pretty good.
Can't wait to get this watch
ROLEX!!!!
I have a 15200 and I can’t stop looking at it. It gets the most compliments too
15200 is a nice watch, enjoy it!
my is half gold 15053 in a rarer black dial with golden bezel....most 34mm vintage or semi vintage rolexes looks bigger because their lug to lug is around 42mm..... hence looks quite big on the wrist.... i think most rolex 36mm case width's lug to lug is 43.5mm.... really not much difference / larger ....
Selling 1500 and 6694
The Omega’s bracelet is ugly AF, absolutely big & clunky with no tapered sleek look, gross. I will take the most desired Rolex any day & anyone who says anything different is a damn Rolex hater or can’t afford a Rolex. There I said it
I love the Rolex op 36 green stunning 🤩
40 mil for life!
there is a point I don't understand. The accuracy of Omega is 0-5, which means you can expect just your watch might go faster in a long run. I own a seamaster, and sometimes, it even doesn't have any deviation. on the other hand, the accuracy of Rolex is -2 to+2. it means that your watch is less predictable and might go slow or fast!!!!! so, from this aspect, it is clear that Omega is more reliable and accurate. I wonder why no one pays attention to this important fact and just says Rolex is more accurate!!!!!!
With the helium escape valve, rolex. Without? Omega
34mm Rolex is Best Rolex