Видео

Thank you!

well explained!

@brianschendt9824 Will or could there ever be a case where the CSTR volume is represented by something other than a square or rectangle on a Levenspiel plot?

Thanks a lot, it's really helpful

Yall ever try to calculate the flux of illegal immigrants crossing the border from mexico to USA? Ill bet Donald Trumps whitehouse did those sample calcs so good!

Movement is only happening in the r direction sounds like constipation in cylindrical coordinates. You think Donald Trump gets constipated because hes obese?

Reynolds transport theorem was in peter dismiles viscous heat transfer class that i dropped.

So this is like communication between autistics.

Yo Aaish this is like your random walk presentation in class! I was the class clown chem e in undergrad. I liked chem e because its not mainstream like chemistry. Its for people who are good at chemistry but want to be part of a cult. Chem e is a cult major. I think police officers who worked with me should know that engineering is applied mathematics, or street mathematics.

Well, since you assumed continuity of the system, then you can said, mdot1 equals to mdot2 and solve the equation without looking for V in, unless it's demanded in the problem.

Thank you so much this helped a lot 👍

Excellent Brian’s!!

That Aou"T" on 12:44 made me crazy (seems a "+"). Fy = -rhoVout²AoutSin40 (the last vector was wrong with -VinSin40, but you corrected the result). Nonetheless, thanks for the video!

How are you doing guys

But he’s falling asleep while explaining so now I’m falling asleep lol

Thanks buddy, keep doing what you are doing.

Well explained 👍

-7405 N net

Thank you Brian Schendt for using the terms convective and advective correctly! More professors (and even some texts) should do this.

better than the uni course fr

such a good resource, this was seriously aweomse

I usually find most you tube videos on most of organic chemistry topics more confusing than the books I use. This truly is applicable and guiding. I've no words!!!

super helpful, thank you!

I am so glad that i opened this video. This literally saved my life!!!!

Thank you so much

This is literally the best RUclips educational video I've ever watched. Brian, u probably saved my entire acid/base part of the organic chemistry exam ill have in few weeks, and for that I really want to thank you. I was struggling on simple exercises before watching your video, and with the examples u used and your explanation I can now solve them within seconds. This is such a good explanation im really happy I came across this video. Hats off for you. Regards from Switzerland !

I feel like I'm out of 5th period and sitting in the hs auditorium for the mandatory assembly for Ranking Acidity in O-Chem and all for it!

The answers don’t match the order you’re suggesting?

For the last problem, if p1 and p2 were given as gauge pressures, would they just be 0 in the equation?

Really good practice questions and great explanation too. Thank you so much.

how you get the dot product values ? the n

Means, 1. Whenever there is transport of mass, there can be or will be two ways - i) Molecular diffusion flux & ii) Convective flux. 2. For liquids with negligible relatively diffusion flux, only convective flux dominates & for gases, transport can be done without convective flux. 3. Divergence of total flux through surfaces matters for a control volume mass accumulation term whether it is source or sink. 4. Rate is nothing but source of consumption or production which affects the net divergence of fluxes & concentration content in control volume of a system at any instant. Rate term can be constant or transient in time or (space ?). 5. These fluxes transport matters for open systems which interacts with at least mass or energy & if not energy then should be with mass. 6. For full conservation condition, this equation should satisfy with mass balance of control volume in all three directions of flux interactions. Thank you sir ❤️.

In 14:04 to 16:06 you say that O > N in terms of electronegativity, and then S > O in terms of size, and so put them as S > O > N (you said that S will be the best). But if you look up the electronegativity table, then O=3.44 > N=3.04 (as you said), but S=2.58, so sulfur is actually the _worst_ of these two in terms of electronegativity :q So in that case it should really be O > N > S. Is that correct? So which factor should we consider as more important when it comes to accommodating negative charges? Electronegativity, or size? Is it possible, for example, for resonance or induction to outweigh one of the other factors? I.e. are they ordered top to bottom in such a way that we can check them in top-to-bottom order safely? Or could it be that some combination of lower factors can outweigh one of the higher factors on your list? What if one molecule wins with another by resonance, but loses instead by induction, for example?

Thanks for the video! I had to watch another video on molecular orbital theory to fully understand the first part, but now it all makes total sense. :) I appreciate the logical and concise explanations.

Thank you for the video, it made me get much better this topic about diffusion in rectilinear and spherical systems.

Omg thank you for making this I was so confused before!

very elegant！But what will happen when we take the first-order reaction into account？

Thank you very much for the lecture. My question is what of if reaction is Michael menten order? please help

Thanks for your explanation. I can finally understand the concept now

it was superb!

I was hoping to make it through the rest of the problem, and actually solve for the answer! I pray that you can answer my question I have for the very last step: How would I enter the velocity vector in the Fbolt equation? would I just treat it as a magnitude and square the velocities in the final step?

I was hoping to make it through the rest of the problem, and actually solve for the answer! I pray that you can answer my question I have for the very last step: How would I enter the velocity vector in the Fbolt equation? would I just treat it as a magnitude and square the velocities in the final step?

I dont know why the channels with such topics not being operated now, all were 5 years ago uploaded

the way you present answers at the end of a problem is confusing,

Thank you.

Would a better leaving group be more likely to leave than Br, such as tosylates?

This channel is so underrated. Thank you for making these vids and presenting them for free. Why would a more hindered carbon have a greater partial positive charge? Aren’t the alkyl groups EDG, and would therefore decrease it’s electrophilicty?

Thank u very to much 👍keep update more chemical englineer related videos

I'm new to this topic and this video confuses me :(((

thanks .. u made my day <3