Видео

This is from nearly 4 years ago, also it's an SLI benchmark, one of several I used to do back then. When using SLI in the form of a benchmark you want to put as much strain on the GPU's as possible. Basically the opposing method to how CPU's are benchmarked in games. I play most of my games on high and usually avoid ultra, depending on the game of course, I would rather have the frames. A great many people have different tastes, most people aim for a balance between visual clarity and performance, some people chase performance, a select few chase visual clarity and will even play games at 30 FPS for it. This is the great thing about pc, you make it your own :)

@@Esch88 ohhh well im glad to know you don't use max so you must dont notice a big difference in quality as I said from max and the setting below

@@cmoneytheman it depends purely on the game, if I have more than enough performance left on the table I'll happily just chuck it on ultra. Most games I will aim for at least 100-120 frames , as long as I'm getting the performance I want, I'll happily just chuck up the settings.

@@Esch88 but u must be turning down settings to get those frames I would think or was the 5k upscaled or your using 1440 cause I dont know how you could use high settings and frames that high

@@cmoneytheman well providing I get SLI working that will give me the performance but as I'm sure you are aware SLI is not an easy thing to get working lol. Of course yeah, I fine tune all my games to get the performance i need, I will play with settings first and then if manipulating those doesn't work then yes I will have to go down to 1440. I will use DLSS whenever I can, that technology is fantastic

i cant argue with a bit of healthy skepticism :)

trust me, i sweating hahaha

Np, didnt even notice

so basically its not using your second gpu eh, ive not touched this game in a long time but at the time i did this benchmark, they had just released SLI compatibility on DX12......im guessing you have made sure SLI is enabled in the control panel yeah?

please help when i go to control panel sli does not show on the configure setting it shows my 2 graphics card but does show maximize and all that stuff

@@Esch88 answer me how do i fix it btw this is my other acc

@@Esch88i have an asus and gigabyte 2080 ti sli but the option sli wont show

@@JustaGuyWhoLiftsForFun SLI is not detected at all? If this is the case then it's usually reinstall graphics drivers, if this doesn't work then it must be that you have the cards installed in your pc wrong. Or maybe one of them is dead, If they are not even detecting SLI on the control panel then that's really not a good sign

A none existent one

Depends on the need of the person, you need to define 'enough'. In SOTTR sli gives a 50%-60% approx increase in performance. It's up to the person what frame rate and fps they desire.

@Luan Nguyen yeah, i got my second 2080Ti for free, a mishap with an amazon delivery.....i wasnt complaining :D

It's because it's in 5K as to why it's around 80%, when it comes to general performance of the game though it has changed over time. When this was recorded it was before the game got given native SLI support. Ever since they made a dedicated SLI profile it just fucked the game up. I revisited this game a few months ago to find it was still running like ass. I thought it was more related to the 6700K showing it's age but hearing you are having issues on an 8700K is pretty odd. I think the devs have messed up royally at some point.

@@Esch88 Yes they must have messed it up because, they literally say you can play 4k 60 FPS with a 1080 SLI setup (something most companies don't dare saying). I imagine it must have worked at some point for them to be so bold. Far Cry 5 actually is playable in 4k on the same setup so it really makes no sense. Oh well I guess ill just play it @ 1440p. Thanks for the reply.

Yeah I agree, it's more for devs to experiment though eh. Will be nice to see the new 3000 series and new tomb raider in combination after what they've learned

im yet to give that a play through buddy

@@Esch88 only 5 bucks, I'm curious to see your fps at that res and settings, whenever you get a chance

@@xpodx sure, i can have a look when i next get time. been meaning to get a few benchmark vids up for a while now.

@@Esch88 thank you, i would love to see

thats the idea ;) ..... who said gun fire was a pleasant sound? haha

@@Esch88 hahah nice

It's a mixture of rasterised and traced, it's for sure a weak entry into Ray tracing I will agree.

Cheers, been meaning to put more content up but been busy just playing with the system haha

No, you can either force the second card off permanently or you can specify what you wish to do (use single card or both cards) on specific programmes via the Nvidia control panel. You can even force sli (alternate frame rendering) on none sli games, this has a 50% chance to work well (40%-60%) performance uplift usually. Just be aware with this method the game could be unstable. I would recommend utilising something called Nvidia profile inspector, this software allows you to even force alternative sli profiles on specific games. Let me know if you have any other questions!

@@Esch88 thanks brother i subbed and liked

@@themajedgaming8218 cheers buddy, i need to get some more content uploaded in all honesty, been enjoying playing the hell out of it though to do so :D

i show the video settings at the beginning of the video.......(4K)......the thumbnail also states the resolution

TheOfficialEsch88 odd. You should be getting 100+ fps easily, never should dip to 70 like that lol. I’ve seen three instances of this benchmark run on 2080ti sli rigs, two of those instances I saw in person. All three were recahing 120+ fps in the outdoor market/bar scene in never hit 70.

@@son-stevkan2815 not meaning to be rude here but i dont think you are taking in all the information thats been stated. this is with RTX (ray tracing) on ultra......also not just that, the outdoor area has a very high level of geometric complexity, if you look at the CPU usage during that scene its capping it out and thus bottlenecking the 2080Ti's. even though its being bottlenecked to a degree its not by much at all...for a cross comparison here ...... ruclips.net/video/APkDF7rAs_c/видео.html&t= ..... this is with two titan RTX's on a i7 6950X that also hits under 70fps in the same scene. im taking a guess that you didnt realise RTX was on, this is stated in the title of the video and in the description.

TheOfficialEsch88 Ray tracing was also active in those benchmarks as well. Lol. Albeit with 9900k’s which are far better for gaming.

@@son-stevkan2815 a 9900K isnt that much better than a 6950X (thats a laughable statement), they are the same archetecture for a start haha. forgive me on being dissmisive but going to a 9900K from a 6950X isnt going to go from 70fps to over 100fps on that scene. im willing to be proven wrong but that change is not going to happen.not unless theyve done some serious work on the game itself, its not going to happen buddy

Unfortunately in my position I can't, this was recorded through the NVenc encoder (nvidia software) at 4K. When the Nvidia software records, it compresses it, it then goes through further compression when it's uploaded to RUclips. Best method would be to use a secondary PC to record and for me to then share the file. Neither of which I can do, I don't have a secondary PC nor do I have the original video anymore :/ sorry. If you can take my word for it, the game looks fantastic. Great visuals, awesome animations and so on. One of the better looking titles to date.

I've not played the game for over a month now so I can't give you a concrete yes or no but I highly doubt that they would disable anything like that, especially when it actually gives you the option to enable it (AFR 1/AFR 2). Without doing any testing I would take a guess at that it's a CPU limitation but even then that doesn't really sound right as it's not a CPU demanding title. What are your system specs? What software do you use to monitor your performance? P.S the game is capped at 60 fps, I'm guessing you already know this though.

@@Esch88 Im running 2 1080's in sli and i have a intel 6700k cpu with 16gbs of ram, are you using nvidia inspector or just the nvidia control panel option.

@@jaypython1 nice system buddy, same as my current cpu....I only use inspector when the AFR options aren't working well. In the case of MK 11 I only tested AFR 2 on the normal Nvidia control panel. on 4K both cards was at around 30% usage as the game is capped at 60fps. 8K obviously strained the 2 cards haha, I couldn't even max the settings as the VRAM was all used up. I'm assuming you are also gaming at 4K? I would of thought a single gtx 1080 would be able to get a lock 60fps at 4K??? What performance (fps) are you actually getting? The only thing I had an issue in getting a lock 60fps was in the krypt, very poorly optimised area is the krypt.

Done ;)

it's maxed out on ray tracing. doesnt look at all that different eh haha

@@Esch88 You can see the difference but you have to be looking for it. Shadows of birds on the trees as the birds fly overhead, shine on the man's upper back. Canopy shadows actually match the shape of the canopy. Human shadows accurately passing over things on the ground etc. Not worth the $2000+ two 2080 TI will set you back to me. Especially always dipping under 60fps.

More like just being reckless with money haha

the thing is, it's kinda useless you can just play at lower resolution have the same experience for way way less money etc it's like extreme multicore cpu over 12-16 cores its useless for 99% of the population except system admins or content creation etc

@@cloudstrife7083 been playing at 4K for over 7 years now. Downgrading from that is not an option haha

@@Esch88 and here is me, I have never seen a 4k display in my whole life. Let alone being able to play games at that res. Its not that I dont have money, I just dont want to spend this much just to play a handful of games.

Cheers buddy, I was hoping it would be 120hz on MK11. unfortunately it wasn't -_-.......For sure, I highly doubt 8K is going to be viable for some time, I prefer higher refresh rate too. I don't personally play mk11 at 8K as it's only possible to do it with two 2080Ti's in SLI with these settings which due to that introduces flickering and other performance issues. This of course was just an analysis of what these two cards can actually do. 4K high refresh is the one atm!

@@Esch88 You do know that 8K and 120 hz capability will be new features of the next Xbox, right? Now, I think 8K at 120 hz would be a ridiculous expectation, except for maybe the most basic of Indie games, especially considering that most people don't have 8k TV's. However, I don't think it's unreasonable to think that we could see other fighting games at 4K 120 hz, besides MK12 on the new console. For example, maybe Street Fighter 6, Tekken 8, King of Fighters 15, etc. That, in addition to perhaps racing games and sports games at 4k/120hz.

@@bgates275 yeah I've seen the supposed specs, when I see things like "8K" "120Hz" "supports Ray tracing".....these are all just buzz words for the marketers for sure. Tbh it's more the frame rate that disappoints me on consoles. I went to pc over 7 years ago. I then picked up a ps4 to play the new God of war. I was a big fan of the series years ago, unfortunately I couldn't play for more than 2 hours as the frame rate is too jarring to the eyes, just looks a mess to me. It's a real shame. Hopefully they release a remastered version when the new consoles come back round. Then I will play it if it can at least hit a near 60 fps lock

@@Esch88 Just curious, what monitor or TV do you have hooked up to your PC? This has presented a bit of a difficulty for me. Right now, I am using a 37" Panasonic 1080P TV to game on PC and it's been pretty great over the last 8 years (and still runs perfectly). However, the problem I face when I want to upgrade to 4k or above is that Panasonic often stops making TV's for a while, or stops delivering to certain regions (Ie. The US). As for other brands of TV's, Samsung and LG seem to have some quality control issues. Sony is good, but I've been told by them that their TV's don't do 4k at 60 hz when connected to PC by HDMI. That leaves 4k monitors, and most arn't that large, or they end up being super expensive.

@@bgates275 I personally use the ACER Predator X27 (27 inch) as my main monitor, it's primary features are 4K at 144Hz, it is HDR 10 compliant and also makes use of adaptive sync (g-sync). I picked it up about 6 months ago now, fantastic monitor, it was pricey though I won't lie haha. In terms of Tv's I've not picked up a new tv for at least 8-9 years now (current one is a 40 inch samsung 3D TV (3D was bloody terrible haha). When it comes to the statement of sony not doing 60Hz 4K panels really does sound very odd to me, without looking into that I would like to say that the person who told you that is misinformed to be honest. 4K is a great thing but make sure you have the horse power to run it, have you experienced 4K gaming yet? Have you experienced high refresh rate gaming yet too? HDMI 1.3 and above can do 4K 60Hz for sure, that's the main thing you need to look at when looking at panel specs. (Providing you are wanting a TV). If its monitor just stick with the display port cable.

The ps4 pro doesn't even render the game at 4K, nevermind 8K, also RUclips copress's the video so you will lose a lot of visual fidelity. This was a performance analysis, not a visual quality analysis. sorry but You just showed your own ignorance with that comment there buddy.

TheOfficialEsch88 yes its not native 4k, just checkerboard upscaling. But i play it everyday on my Philips Premium 4K 3DTV with PS4Pro and it looks extremely pretty.

@@Busteee and this is a compressed RUclips video, was you expecting it to look amazing on a compressed video? If so then I have nothing else to say lol

TheOfficialEsch88 no I know, but we all know RUclips since 20 years and everythings compressed in here. Habe you seen it on a PS4Pro and a premium 4K TV model (2k and not 500€ styles) it looks really awesome and similar to your video, but shadows, dust and atmosphere are more on my PS4Pro than this video in the same stage.

@@Busteee did you not pay attention to the video settings at all? They was on high, not ultra settings, this had to be done to be able to run it at native 8K. I don't play it like this, this was a performance analysis, like I stated in the title. Yes I have seen it on the ps4 pro, it's lack luster at best. You have stated that you know the video is compressed and you then say that the dust isn't as good???? Are you being for real here? You do realise a compressed video will struggle to show the fine details of dust right? Sorry mate but you are being very ignorant. I run the game on the predator X27 monitor, feel free to look it up ;)

I never said it was, 11GB isn't enough VRAM that's why ;)

Русский

Unfortunately yeah it is, the krypt, main menu, fatalities and fatal blows are capped at 30fps though. Endri lauson has released a mod that fixes this and puts it up to 60fps, I use it all the time (I wasn't using it in this video though).

yeah it does buddy, the tech is a little rough at the moment though, pretty heavy on the hitching and frame drops when on ultra and high. medium settings is fine though, at least when i performed my testing. here is my video with ray tracing on with identical settings as this video ..... ruclips.net/video/rGa9Lwh7_zE/видео.html&t= Oh yeah forgot to mention, the hitching only happens on an unlocked frame rate, by locking it at 60Hz the game runs very smoothly. Admittedly though I don't play with Ray tracing, I cant justify going from average of around 100-120 fps to 60 for the sake of more accurate shadows. My opinion is that it isn't worth it for my tastes

cheers bud.....yeah will check it out. i didn't use any AA on this test but will check out the witcher profile. i'm suprised you need 2 1070's to run it at 4K, i would of thought it would of been powerful enough for a single 1070?

​@@Esch88 Unfortunately single 1070 is not enough, I get 40-50 fps on all settings ultra at 4K. My cpu is 4930k, maybe that's the problem. But it's perfectly fine now, solid 60 fps with SLI. :)

@@venomtrk I see, I doubt it's your cpu, your cpu is definitely still relevant haha, if you look at cpu usage in my video you'll see that it's pretty light on cpu usage anyway. Very nice man, I actually find it somewhat shocking as to how well sli works from day one on MK lol

$1140 in my case ;)

@@Esch88 $1140 for 2 RTX 2080 TI?! Who do you know, and can I get an introduction?

@@trevorwilliams3501 an incompetent delivery guy is all you need to know :D

Waiting to see someone do this game with a titan rtx at 8k ultra so i can tell you the vram needed

@@xpodx i hate AA personally, its like rubbing vasiline on your screen lol. bloom i hate too.....its just a way of faking how bright something is, thats the good thing about HDR. can't play this on absolute full settings as it max's out the VRAM. it can litterally do max settings apart from textures, it has to go from very high to high then the game is fine. i would take a guess at about 13GB too

@@xpodx overlay? you mean rivatuner statistics?

@@Esch88 i thought so. Muahah But epic my guy. Hey. Ww2 now? Im in. I hit you up on steam

@@Esch88 yea. Its part of msi download, and i go through settings in msi afterburner so i thought msi afterburner settings overlay

it doesn't support it natively, you need to force alternate frame rendering (number 2) on your 3D settings in the nvidia control panel

There was an initial fix on release day but it's out of date now unfortunately. I won't lie though, hitting over 100fps with these settings I'm generally happy with. With one card I'm floating between 30fps and 60fps at 8K. Would be nice to get the second card fully working to see if I can get an 8K 60fps lock just for the lolz :)

Cheers, need a bit experience on it. That's the first cod I've played in many years haha

@@Esch88 hell ya. Haha i know youll say diff, but 30ir was using 23.6gb of vram at 8k maxed, i think it needs 28 to 32gb idk.

@@Esch88 its my fav fps. So.. would be sick to vs you, i try to play at least a hour a day. If i can 2+ My steam username is, SceneRX

@@xpodx I highly doubt I would win if this is your go to fps haha....I would have to get some more hours under my belt. Yeah I'll chuck you an add, won't be tonight though, getting ready for mortal kombat 11's release :D

It looks soo good. And you get so many fps. Jelly. Ha

haha, i have the predator X27 in the centre and i have 2 more 4K, G-Sync, 60Hz monitors on both sides

tinypic.com/r/k3vfqx/9 pic is a tad old now but its very similar to the current setup

@@Esch88 dammmmn. Ha So. Nice bro. A video showing your setup would be so hella dope

@@Esch88 i will let you know when i can play ww2 and bo4 at 2x your res at 60+fps ultra high

hey man, thats due to ubisoft being lazy, when you set everything up via the control panel it states that its an SLI profile. the lazy thing that ubisoft did is all they did was enable/force AFR (alternate frame rendering). this can be confirmed in Nvidia inspector. (you can force AFR on any game) general scaling is only in the region of 30% - 50%. for sure one of the worst ''SLI'' titles. during actual gameplay i float around 90 - 110 fps. depending on the scene of course. yeah farcry doesnt use a tonne of vram. most modern titles only use approx 7GB - 8GB with a few exceptions from time to time most recent title that im playing that responds very well to sli is shadow of the tomb raider. well above 90% scaling, im averaging 120fps on gameplay on that. there are a couple vids on my channel related to that too

and in terms of changing gameplay, the higher fps contributes to a far snappier and fluid experiance IMO

@@Esch88 hell ya, super powerful setup bro. Very nice. You gonna do a vid about showing us your setup?

@@xpodx haha cheers bud, i wasn't planning it tbh but i will for sure concider it. tinypic.com/r/oscuno/9 this is a link to a recent picture of it, sorry about how blue, the camara really saturates the colour lol...it's a lot more subtle in real life :)

@@Esch88 wow bro. Looks amazing. That site was redirecting me and look likes ads and shit, damn. Ha deviantart? Ha

This is due to RTX when SLI is enabled. On the ultra and high setting of RTX it doesn't micro stutter, it just straight up stutters like a motherfucker haha. On the medium/off setting it's perfectly fine. I have a video up with the same settings with RTX off so feel free to cross compare them.

Strange, I'm managing 150 AVG framerate in this exact same test.