Видео

Half throttle exists only in your imagination. Your claims are arbitrary. I used the same clips that you did, in fact. The only difference is in the editing. Unlike you, I did not play tricky games with the editing, in order to make the car seem faster than reality...

@@Seventh7Art 🤣🤣 fake video smh they were aiming for top speed run it's Bugatti 400 drive he was half throttle and on low power No speed key top speed was restricted to 251 mph And he was on half throttle Original video 0-300 kmph 13.8 seconds LOL slower than a Chiron 🤣 This guy used useless clips to show the acceleration You could use car and driver video proper 0-183 mph and Chiron SS 300+ top speed clip In your video Chiron SS did 200-300 kmph in 6.8 seconds I have GPS video of Chiron SS doing 200-300 kmph in 5.8 seconds 0-100 kmph 2.1 seconds Bugatti already stated on thier website 0-100 2.3 seconds 0-200 km/h 5.5 seconds So 100-300 km/h 3.1 seconds 0-100 2.1 sec 100-200 kmph 3.1 sec 200-300 kmph 5.8 sec GPS 300-400 km/h 8.9 sec Add those all 0-100 km/h 2.1 sec 0-200 km/h 5.2 sec 0-300 km/h 11.0 seconds flat 0-400 km/h under 19.9 to 19.7 seconds

That 12.1 Fake news 😂 Bugatti never tested Chiron SS in real world with VBOX they never did live testing there Pdf says 0-100 km/h 2.3 seconds 0-200 km/h 5.5 seconds So 100-200 km/h is 3.1 seconds I have real GPS video of Chiron SS doing 200-300 km/h in 5.8 seconds 0-200 5.5 seconds + 200-300 km/h 5.8 seconds 0-300 km/h 11.3 seconds 0-200 km/h 5.5 seconds 0-100 km/h 2.3 seconds 100-200 km/h 3.1 seconds Real GPS verified videos Or if 0-100 km/h is 2.1 seconds Then 0-200 km/h 5.2 seconds 0-300 km/h 11.0 seconds flat And also in Car And driver magazine even with so much speed Delay on speedometer It did 0-178 mph in 10.2 seconds So 0-186 mph 11.1 seconds is possible with a accurate GPS device Speedometer had massive delay from 163-193 mph Sorry and Chiron SS is accelerating much faster than VBOX was showing 300-400 kmph 8.7 seconds on VBOX on Bugatti official video Total 0-400 km/h 19.7 seconds Or even if you add 11.3 + 8.7 seconds The 0-400 km/h is 20.0 seconds flat This can only he proved if Chiron SS 300+ was tested in perfect conditions

You are wrong again. Before I uploaded the video, I tried to make a video with only two clips, the 1st and the 3rd clip. Unfortunately for you, I do not cook up videos to make Bugatti look faster than what it really is.... 0-300 still takes 12 seconds and 0-400 still takes 22 seconds, not 20 as you claim. Your videos are wrongly edited to make Bugatti look faster.

@@Seventh7Art top gear video is trash inaccurate how mph showing 196 mph While Vbox showing 320 km/h that's 200 mph While top gear video showing 196 mph 😂💀 Go use Bugatti official video It did 300-400 km/h in 8.7 seconds TopGear video 300-400 kmph 9.6 seconds There's a 1 second difference huge gap

VBOX 300-400 km/h 8.7 seconds on Chiron SS 300+ top speed run??? Only if you speed up the video. In reality, that Vbox video shows 300-400 in about 10 seconds, as my video shows without malicious editing. Also it is YOU, who used the second clip in your videos and now you tell me that I shouldn't have used it.

@@Seventh7Art you video shows 9.6 sec 300-400 kmph take a look at Bugatti official video The video on upper right hand corner It did 300-400 kmph in 8.7 seconds Or the video might be in 60 FPS It's Bugatti video nothing is forwarded And Chiron SS is Accelerating much faster than VBOX is showing The GPS speedometer does have delay it cannot show live speeds accurately VBOX speedo is literally blinking speeds This is only reason because Chiron SS is Accelerating at much faster rate even VBOX isn't able to record live speeds To measure accurate acceleration Bugatti should used VBOX camera Just like Rimac Nevera and Regera used with throttle power distance Acceleration data everything live and accurately

@@Smzxe Vbox speedometer delay is important only when numbers change very quickly, not when you are doing 400 km/h and accelerate slowly, which means that Vbox catches up with real speed, since acceleration is getting low. Also, the video on the top right corner shows exactly the same speed. I don't see any difference.

​​@@Seventh7Art 😂 have you watched Bugatti official video? It did 300-400 km/h in 8.7 seconds Your video is inaccurate You used 62-186 mph run which is most trash clip ever In 62-186 mph Chiron SS is going half throttle They were aiming for top speed run not Acceleration Just keep the first Car and driver video Do 0-183 mph on car and driver video And 183-250 mph video of Chiron SS top speed run You will get 0-400 km/h in 21.3 seconds Don't use useless clips bud And Vbox meter does have delay The speed numbers are moving way too fast Vbox speeds were literally blinking The Chiron Supersport is at Accelerating much faster rate Even VBOX is not able to read live speeds Only if it used VBOX inbuilt camera like Regera or Rimac Nevera We will see true acceleration or Chiron Supersport live With exact speed distance throttle and power Data on live Vbox camera Sad there's no run of Chiron Supersport 4 years passed

My Peel P50 and Moped are faster than your civic

@@Smzxe lmao, neither of those even have vtec.

​@@aidsface any bicycle will do the job your civic breaks down bro gonna get passed by a bicycle

Beats the Tesla to the 1/4 mile

@@Zeil_tha_dragon Tesla 9.08 in the quarter. Interior removed it will do 8.7

​@@grabir01 lmao 😂 Tesla never did 1.9 never Chiron SS smoked it 😂

Bugatti chiron ss 1600hp awd Koenigsegg agera 1300hp rwd 🤷

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 Bugatti weighs much more too, so keep that in mind

@@SonarRaptorYT with such a huge level of power, the weight is no longer so important, what is more important is the 4-wheel drive. there is no way for the koenigsegg to use all the power from 0-150kph the koenigsegg will spin the wheels all the time

@@jozefjozefczyk3936 Koenigsegg are light but slightly less powerful, Bugattis are heavy with more horsepower. It’s an amazing car rivalry that will engrave itself in history

Yes, when it comes to 0-400 km/h or 0-250 mph. However, Koenigsegg Regera and Rimac Nevera will beat it.

Rimac Nevera matches 0-200 time... It is a tie at 4.4 seconds.

​@@Seventh7Art FAKE Rimac used 5 foot rollout Official 0-100 km/h was 2.09 seconds 0-200 km/h 4.7 seconds without rollout check again The first F1 car you showed did 0-100 km/h in 2.0 flat and 0-200 km/h in 3.9 seconds Show the first F1 car 0-250 km/h clip it was Mercedes W09 with low fuel 0-100 km/h 2.0 seconds 0-200 km/h 3.9 seconds 0-250 km/h 6.4 seconds wayyyy faster than Rimac Nevera

A moto gp can to do a 0 to 100 in 2.2s 0 to 200 in 4.2s and a 0 to 300 in 8.9s

Literally every car that goes over 350 don't have as much downforce as these cars so it makes sense to reduce the drag for topspeed lmao. Goofy stupid comment you did here

nowdays it can pass 340 even at mexico

😂 DRS KERS And DOUBLE SLIPSTREAM this thing will be extremely slow in real life from standstill it will not even touch 340 kph none of them

That video which he showed was made before Monza i'm pretty sure

@@ForzaPolska06 maybe

It said so far, that video was made after the Belgian GP. That’s before Monza.

what is this xD

Bro 😂 from Standstill these F1 cars wont even touch 340 kmph and these will be way slower from standstill because all of these F1 cars used Slipstream In real world these F1 cars would hit 0-300 km/h in 10 seconds flat and top out at 340 kph Because they used Slipstream and KERS

Ι analyzed your 100-300 km/h in 5 seconds video. That video did not use real data telemetry with normal lag. The speedometer looked very different from official MotoGP videos where the bikes display a different GPS interface. You know what I discovered? In ALL 3 different acceleration videos, motogp bikes did not come even close to this scandalous video.... It took them 5 seconds to run 150-300 km/h, while the 2022KTM video showed 100-300 in 5 seconds!!! This is way off, the gap is huge. Then I analyzed the KTM and it did 150-300 in 3.8 seconds while all other bikes took 1,2 to 1,4 seconds more for the same speeds. So, I cannot accept the KTM video as correct. It makes no sense at all. It's like a 500 horsepower Hayabusa doing roll races.

​@@Seventh7Artfront wheel on MotoGP bike lifts at 200 km/h they have so much lag bike tilts left and right so these speedometers aren't 100% accurate Bikes are accelerating faster than speedo shows 2023 KTM GP bike did 0-100 km/h in 2.1 seconds 0-200 km/h 4.4 seconds 0-300 km/h 8.2 seconds 2023 MotoGP bikes speedometer was much smoother Wait I'm sending link

Jeez your everywhere bro!​@@Smzxe

2022 Moto GP bikes 0-350 km/h 12.4 seconds ??? I will believe it when I see your video demonstrating that claim. On my video, 0-350 takes 12.7 seconds... Pretty close to your claim for the bikes... It does not matter though. Electric cars will beat everything, including F1 cars and motoGP bikes. An Italian company is now producing a super light electric car which weighs only 1.5 tonnes and outputs 2040 horsepower. Much quicker than Nevera with much better power to weight ratio. Nothing can beat electric torque and power. Mark my words boy.

@@Seventh7Art Electric motors have instant torque with 20,000+ rpm. Engines don't have such high bandwidth. Transmission is a problem with engines. That's why locomotives use motors.

@@Seventh7Art If nothing can beat electric torque and power, explain the Hoonicorn Mustang outrunning Tesla Plaid S??

The regera get around 400, F1 in regulations fastest speed trap was 374, by i think bottas at azebaijan 2016

@@GabrielFujiwara43 haha V10 F1 cars will hit 400 km/h before regera since BAR Honda reached 413 km/h No road car got any chance V10 F1 cars regularly hit 0-300 km/h in 8.6 seconds and casually hitting 360+ km/h on many tracks Montoya 372 kph on Monza fastest speed ever there What was 950 HP and 600 Kg about

This 2015 Ducati was faster than any F1 car in existence 0-100 km/h 2.44 seconds 0-200 km/h 4.8 seconds 100-200 km/h 2.4 sec 200-300 km/h 3.7 seconds 0-300 km/h 8.5 seconds There's speedo lag Count 200-300 km/h time again with stopwatch 😂 0-350 km/h 12.9 seconds faster than any F1 car in existence

@@Smzxe You are doing it wrong. Unless you are clinically retarded, I made a video just to prove you wrong. F1 cars can go much faster than you think.... 0-100 in 2.3" 0-200 in 4.4 seconds, 0-300 in 8.5 seconds and finally 0-370 in 16.9 seconds.

​@@Seventh7Arthahaha dream away g#@boy

​​@@maticcro5992 12 year old kid this MotoGp bike is much faster than any F1 car in existence 😂 I have Acceleration video of most powerful F1 car 2019 Ferrari SF90 F1 2019 Ferrari did 0-300 km/h in 9.5 seconds 100-360 km/h 16.8 seconds 2015 Moto GP 100-361 km/h 10.6 seconds 0-300 km/h 8.7 seconds corrected This clown showed 9.2 seconds speedometer is laggy stil faster than 2019 Ferrari Most powerful known F1 car ever This MotoGP bike acceleration was also faster than V10 F1 cars such as F2004 and Renault R-25 Kiddo this MotoGP destroyed them Just imagine 2022 MotoGP bike 2019 Honda GP bike 0-100 km/h 2.1 seconds 0-200 km/h 4.4 seconds 0-250 km/h 6.4 seconds 0-300 km/h 8.5 seconds 0-350 km/h 12.4 seconds Faster than any known F1 car

​@@maticcro5992 here's real video you kid See how much faster Moto GP bike is compared to a F1 car ruclips.net/user/shortsEy45hTQUTmQ?si=gPzFYRIFrJ38IdvY same track F1 car got headstart But MotoGP bike was so much faster in acceleration or top speed Kid literally believed those fake acceleration numbers 😂 Grow up kid

No. One:1 barely hits 275 mph while the Alpha 12+ on race fuel makes enough power to hit 280, with the right gearing.

check the speed of a GTR switzer

The One:1 has much faster acceleration than the Venom GT. The One:1 does 0-300 km/h in 12.9 seconds and has,a top speed over 285 mph.

Slower acceleration ?

Dumbass the one 1 had faster acceleration

do a roll and the venom will maul it given that its driver knows how to shift

​@@salamander5318 It can do 11.9 not 12.9