Видео

There are other side effects at play here, no battle of attrition in Stalingrad happens, many Soviet troops have been encircled instead of successfully retreating to the Caucasus during Case Blue, insufficient time to build up decent defensive lines against the advancing Germans, no US bombing of Germany which further affects their logistics, etc. Overall, the Germans are very lucky and manage to reach Baku and capture it later as outlined in the video.

Yeah, i agree.

it is Barbarossa backwards

​@@wimblewomble4751i realised alr lmao

Small mistake but thanks.

@@General-HD The same mistake repeats in all these videos (not just by you, but other authors as well) that use the same video as template (the one about the actual course of WW2 in Europe), because that video also had the mistake. Anyway, nice job and hope you remember this detail in the future!

Yes but this is an alternate, I addressed about the Soviet loss in another similair comment.

Why?

British and French empires lasts longer and they go back to improve their economy, USSR tries to recover as Stalin wants to hold on to power, Sino-Japanese still ongoing though it's possible that war might break out with other countries, USA is still growing as a potential super power, other Europeans countries continues normally, Germany might be united in the future for years or decades later, and so on.

@@General-HD k

@@General-HDno Berlin Wall, no Cold War, well not between US and Soviet Union?

​@@ssesssusman9417 US and Soviet relations are not as severe as in real history, but both would like to see the British and French empires decay, which will most likely happen as they slowly lose their grip on other lands.

@@General-HDBritain only decayed after WW2 same with France. and before WW2 the British did notice the Empire was wavering and they had already planning to go on a path of further Dominionization within the Empire giving far more autonomy to their other major colonies by granting them dominion status Egypt and Nigeria being the most likely first ones. however India likely still is given independence tho as it’s simply too big and has too many people but it’s possible that I may not divided in order to have a strong presence against China both Pakistan and Bangladesh are still part of India and Britain maintains Burma possibly giving them similar autonomy too. If Britains successful France could possibly follow in Britains footsteps in giving more autonomy to their colonies in order to maintain control for far longer with both of them potentially even maintaining them or atleast directly controlling some of them with significantly more influence over the rest to the present day.

@@norlex416 I thought it was clear in the info box, but basically the Soviets were not 100% beaten yet but that they knew they will still lose years later because they are outmatched by the Allies's industrial might, population and resources. So they would seek for peace and not risk their country to collapse.

@@polishstick0609 Nice, they do get Gdańsk but like you said the rest would be radical, I don't think the French and British will push for mass expulsion like that and besides they are interested in the balance of power so that Poland doesn't get too strong like how Germany was.

​@@General-HDMaybe this could've been possible if the western powers demanded that Poland gives ip some eastern territories to newly established Belarussian and Ukrainian states?

​@@polishstick0609 Perhaps in a territorial sense, but Poland would probably want to keep some eastern lands because thats where more ethnic Poles live.

@@General-HD I don't really mean that Poland woudl've been west of so called "Curzon's line". No way they woudl give up Lwów, Grodno, Wilno and maybe Brześć nad Bugiem. Whole of former Austro Hungarian controlled Galicia lands woudl stay Polish! Btw in the north, The border woudl probably run along ethnic division between Poles and Belarussians (Lithuanians would be forced to remain in Poland), basically making cities of Grodno and Wilno stay in Polish hands. If this happened, then they should get Lower Silesia for this. Btw I think Poland should have actually given up some territories in the east if this timeline was canon to decrease tensions between Poles and various eastern slavs.

It tells you in the info box, December 1939. The Allies promise to give Hungary land if they helped and they did

@@delano4526 oh yeah you are right

No

Да и Германию в этом видео очень даже не до оценивают

Без ленд лиза хуй бы чё савок на самом деле бы сделал лол

The Iraq coup and the Greek entry into the war were the only two unnecessary additions to the video

True I still gave them a seperate colour, but that coup would have happened anyway whether it was fascist like Italy or communist and they would call for the Soviet in Iran to get rid of British imperialism, but the coup was too early and the Soviets were to late to help.

someone's fiesty

No way bias in alternate history we gotta cancel him

Imagine getting mad at a alternate history video 💀

Sees alternative history video where allies win. "Biased" Bro, they won in real life as well

Netuno???

@@SenhorSavoi savoia

because the treaty between Britain and Poland implied that if Germany declared war on Poland, the Allies were obliged to go to war.there was not a word about the USSR.And secondly, the Soviet troops did not fight with Poland because the Polish government itself said not to resist the Red army