CPU Duke
CPU Duke
  • Видео 109
  • Просмотров 38 521
45 Years Intel 8088
Hey folks,
45 years ago, exactly on June 1st, 1979, the i8088 was born. This date marks a unique milestone in the x86 CPU history.
Let´s explore this milestone a bit more in detail together. In this video I talk about the CPU evolution of the 70s and early 80s starting with Intel´s first microprocessor. The 8088 is an 8-bit version of the 8086. IBM chose this CPU due to several reasons that I will touch in the video. As a result, the 8088 can be regarded as THE grandfather of all PC processors having been used in the original IBM PC and IBM XT. From then on, x86 CPUs were set as standard and still is!
I will also decap an i8088 and look at the microstructures using my metallurgical microscop...
Просмотров: 4 481

Видео

XBOX Classic Teardown
Просмотров 976День назад
Hey folks, Following up on my promise to tear down my XBOX (see the Pentium 3 - 25 years anniversary video), I finally managed to get it done! The XBOX contains a special Pentium III Coppermine version which I wanted to add to my collection, and I had purchased a cheap XBOX from the flea market just for this purpose. When I came around to test the console (thanks Thomas for the video cable!), t...
512 followers!
Просмотров 329Месяц назад
512 followers! In the computer world the number 512 is famous, that is why I am celebrating this small milestone with you by decapping one of the first CPUs having 512 kB second level cache - the Intel Pentium Pro! Thanks for subscribing and stay tuned for more videos coming soon... CPU Duke Music: Sky by Hotham soundcloud.com/hothammusic Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0 ...
35 years Intel 80486
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.Месяц назад
35 years Intel 80486
EASTER EGG hunt
Просмотров 2692 месяца назад
EASTER EGG hunt
25 years Pentium III
Просмотров 4,3 тыс.3 месяца назад
25 years Pentium III
The Year of The Dragon
Просмотров 2263 месяца назад
The Year of The Dragon
Silicondoodle Medley 2023 - Short version
Просмотров 3204 месяца назад
Silicondoodle Medley 2023 - Short version
Silicondoodle Medley 2023 - Extended version
Просмотров 2,6 тыс.4 месяца назад
Silicondoodle Medley 2023 - Extended version
CPU Duke Channel Trailer
Просмотров 2265 месяцев назад
CPU Duke Channel Trailer
Microscope upgrade!
Просмотров 3085 месяцев назад
Microscope upgrade!
30 years Doom
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.5 месяцев назад
30 years Doom
25 years NEC VR12K
Просмотров 1296 месяцев назад
25 years NEC VR12K
180 followers!
Просмотров 1357 месяцев назад
180 followers!
Metallurgical Microscope review: Radical (India)
Просмотров 864Год назад
Metallurgical Microscope review: Radical (India)
30 years Intel Pentium
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.Год назад
30 years Intel Pentium
Nintendo GAMECUBE teardown
Просмотров 187Год назад
Nintendo GAMECUBE teardown
CPU Collection in wooden cases
Просмотров 266Год назад
CPU Collection in wooden cases
66 followers celebration
Просмотров 62Год назад
66 followers celebration
2022 Chip Decapping Medley - Extended Version
Просмотров 203Год назад
2022 Chip Decapping Medley - Extended Version
2022 Chip Decapping Medley - short version
Просмотров 240Год назад
2022 Chip Decapping Medley - short version
40 years Intel 80186
Просмотров 403Год назад
40 years Intel 80186
#Silicondoodle Medley 2022 - Extended Version
Просмотров 114Год назад
#Silicondoodle Medley 2022 - Extended Version
#Silicondoodle Medley 2022 - short version
Просмотров 6 тыс.Год назад
#Silicondoodle Medley 2022 - short version
EBAY CPU Loot #2
Просмотров 392Год назад
EBAY CPU Loot #2
EBAY CPU loot #1
Просмотров 465Год назад
EBAY CPU loot #1
BNISE microscope - all issues fixed
Просмотров 291Год назад
BNISE microscope - all issues fixed
BNISE microscope for CPU silicon die analysis
Просмотров 551Год назад
BNISE microscope for CPU silicon die analysis
30 years DX2 CPUs
Просмотров 1302 года назад
30 years DX2 CPUs
40 years Intel 80286
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.2 года назад
40 years Intel 80286

Комментарии

  • @MK-of7qw
    @MK-of7qw 21 минуту назад

    That IBM machine in the background looks beautiful. Good save from the bin man

  • @MK-of7qw
    @MK-of7qw 47 минут назад

    I had a 550mhz slot P3. I also had 2x 800mhz cumine p3 chips on a mobo. It was a sweet computer for the time.

  • @daschefer
    @daschefer 10 часов назад

    Very good, I have subscribed. In the Evolution table I couldn't find one that I have here, the Intel RapidCad.

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke 8 часов назад

      Thanks, yes I focussed on common CPUs, the RAPIDCAD is more a 386 upgrade FPU solution. I actually don’t have it!

  • @mlann2333
    @mlann2333 17 часов назад

    The 4004 wasn't the world's first CPU. It was the first commercially available CPU. The first CPU was part of a chipset for the f14 tomcat in 1969.

  • @Keullo-eFIN
    @Keullo-eFIN 19 часов назад

    Never even realized that the original Pentium has a HUGE die.

  • @AK-vx4dy
    @AK-vx4dy 23 часа назад

    I rember those 600MHz EB marked, i don't know what they done, but speed of applications and network transfer went through the roof

  • @Keullo-eFIN
    @Keullo-eFIN День назад

    Such an underrated channel, I need to check your other anniversary videos as well.

  • @uewepuep
    @uewepuep День назад

    What do you mean more than 100mhz FSB can only be used with PGA370 systems? I certainly have a Slot 1 600EB.

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke 8 часов назад

      Got it, yes that 600EB in deed is a Coppermine 133 MHz FSB slot 1 CPU!

  • @gnerakles
    @gnerakles День назад

    Quality content mate

  • @djdano2k
    @djdano2k День назад

    Yes, the Siemens Nixdorf computers. One model out of the Scenic line was my first PC back in the 90's. With this designed blue colored case and crt. Everything integrated, with a gameport on the front(!) of the case. Fondly memories of it, playing lots of dos and early win95 stuff. Today this model is rare seen on the flea market. Great video man, thanks for the memories!

  • @bradl7439
    @bradl7439 2 дня назад

    And to this day, Intel CPU's still startup in real mode.

  • @algorithminc.8850
    @algorithminc.8850 2 дня назад

    Enjoyed this ... I look foward to checking out your channel. Thanks. Subscribed. Cheers

  • @definitelynotadam
    @definitelynotadam 3 дня назад

    My first PC was a 386 SX with 4 MB of RAM. Another World :)

  • @edgeeffect
    @edgeeffect 3 дня назад

    In the UK , that vice you use is branded as "Stanley" which is a classic old English tool company... what brand does yours have? Came for the classic chips and got distracted by 21st century marketing... sorry.

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke День назад

      Yes it is a Stanley! Never failed me sofar!

  • @rouelejour4080
    @rouelejour4080 3 дня назад

    People who didn't come to computers until micros don't apreciate how remarkable the 8088 was. Prior to that cpu width and memory width was always the same. 32 bit bit mainframes had 32 bit wide memory, 16 bit mini compuers had 16 bit wide memory. The 8088 was the first processor to separate cpu width and memory width.

  • @mrflamewars
    @mrflamewars 3 дня назад

    The only 286 based machine I've ever used is a Tandy 1000 TX - spent most of it's life running DeskMate and various DOS games.

  • @KennethScharf
    @KennethScharf 3 дня назад

    The 8 bit bus actually doesn't reduce the chips performance by 1/2. Due to the chips internal fetch queue and the fact that it takes several clock cycles to perform each instruction (super scalar processors didn't arrive until the Pentium), means that the 8 bit cpu can almost catch up with the operations of the 16 bit. It DOES depend on the actual instruction mix, but the actual performance of the 8088 is a bit better than 50% of the 8086. It's close enough to justify the lower cost of the 8088 vs the performance of the 8086, especially if one can run at a higher clock speed. IBM was initially specing a PC design using the 8085 processor, but Bill Gates at Microsoft suggested that they use the 8088 instead, pointing out the greater memory addressing, and that software development for the newer processor would not cost any more than for the 8085. Big Blue took his suggestion to heart, and the rest is history.

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke 3 дня назад

      I will not hairsplit over this as there is enough margin (the instruction mix). Thanks for listening so carefully!

    • @KennethScharf
      @KennethScharf 3 дня назад

      @@cpu_duke I never tried to decap a ceramic lid package. I didn't realize that was so easy to do, I' have decaped the metal lid types on eproms and rams (did you know you can use decaped drams as simple image sensors?)

    • @Piero71
      @Piero71 14 часов назад

      The 486 can reach, in optimal conditions, one clock cycle per instruction.

  • @leilanielectronics
    @leilanielectronics 4 дня назад

    I still have many of these old chips

  • @mRibbons
    @mRibbons 4 дня назад

    Ive absently wondered why the og xbox was so big... But seeing the disk drive and 3.5" hdd side by side like that... it all makes sense.

  • @annieworroll4373
    @annieworroll4373 4 дня назад

    oh neat I thought I was a little younger than this chip. but I'm a little older! Hugely important chip. Arguably more critical to the platform as a whole than the 8086 itself.

  • @alphadog6970
    @alphadog6970 4 дня назад

    This guy cares about intel more than intel itself 😅

  • @cedric0850
    @cedric0850 5 дней назад

    Great Video, man! This stitch looks cool, how do you do this?

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke 8 часов назад

      It’s quite tedious. You take many pictures very accurately next to each other, „scanning“ the die in a zig zag fashion. I use ICE software to stitch it to a large canvas.

  • @phillycheesetake
    @phillycheesetake 6 дней назад

    If the delidded one still works, try cleaning it up and putting a glass cap on. That would make a great centerpiece for a display build.

    • @lidarman2
      @lidarman2 5 дней назад

      Interesting idea. But Incident light might create a noise issues since semiconductors emit light but also absorb it.

  • @aus.deutschland
    @aus.deutschland 6 дней назад

    😱 barbarian, broke good CPU

  • @MotownBatman
    @MotownBatman 6 дней назад

    New Sub; Detroit, Michigan, US Well Done Sir! this was a great video! now do the 80186 LOL WAsnt Happy to See that 8088 to Loose its Lid. I Would have given it a New Home LOL

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke 5 дней назад

      The CerDip is not particularly rare. Got 3 for 16 British Pounds including shipping. Kept 2 in my collection…

  • @waldmensch2010
    @waldmensch2010 7 дней назад

    nice video

  • @mrflamewars
    @mrflamewars 7 дней назад

    The 8088 powered the first PC and was absolutely important because of that - People say x86 is "old and busted" - I say it's durable and capable of evolving with the times - bet it will be with us for a hundred years !

    • @edgeeffect
      @edgeeffect 3 дня назад

      Back in the day, I considered the Z80, 6502 or 6800 to be "vastly superior" to the 8080.... but where are the 64 bit versions of all those "better" chips today?

    • @johnrehwinkel7241
      @johnrehwinkel7241 День назад

      @@edgeeffect The superior CDP1802 led the way, with its register-rich, flexible architecture, which led to RISC, ARM, and some of the most powerful 64 bit CPUs today. Of course, if you want more, the PowerPC line is still going strong and offering 128-bit architectures. It too has RISC heritage going back to RCA's humble 1802.

    • @sharoyveduchi
      @sharoyveduchi День назад

      @@johnrehwinkel7241 ARM is not RISC. This is a deception. ARM has dedicated instructions for converting Java Script floats to integers, it has SIMD instructions which are distinctly a CISC thing that were introduced in the Intel Pentium with the MMX instructions, and ARM v8 has more instructions in its ISA than probably any CISC chip from the 1980s and definitely more than the original Intel Pentium. I had counted by hand the instructions from the Intel Programmer's manual for the Pentium versus modern ARM. I would also like to state that modern CPUs do not spend most of their chip area on the logic. Even a fully fledged Ryzen CPU's chip area is mostly cache and not the logic. There is no advantage for someone to choose ARM over x86 in the desktop, laptop, or server arena. Power efficiency? If you see ARM do better than x86 in energy efficiency it's because they either have better manufacturing at their disposal such as when Apple reserves newest technology from TSMC so AMD can't get their hands on it or the comparison makes no sense. For example, comparing a mobile chip with a desktop chip is silly because both Intel and AMD have established power consumption of 65 watts or higher on their desktop chips. Their laptop chips easily go as low as 6 watts such as the Intel N100 and if you undervolt they can go even lower. The Steam Deck is one of those devices where you can lower the power consumption to just 5 watts and games still perform ok. If anyone wants to learn more they can check out my video on CISC vs RISC on my channel.

    • @user-ts4mz3jy9i
      @user-ts4mz3jy9i 23 часа назад

      My first machine was a 5150 and I learned assembler on it. I remember thinking what a useless instruction XLAT was back then. I just looked it up and it still exists in modern x86 chips. That alone tells me we need to move on from x86. God knows how much other junk there is sitting in that instruction set now.

    • @mrflamewars
      @mrflamewars 20 часов назад

      @@user-ts4mz3jy9i From what I've read a lot of those old, seldom used instructions are handled by microcode instead of having dedicated hardware - the transistor budget for keeping the backwards compatibility cooties around is a very small percentage - just like legacy x86 decode is generally - Most things get decoded into micro-ops that handle everything now - the first generation Pentium was the last hard wired x86 machine - the P6 core in the Pentium Pro changed everything.

  • @jackwt7340
    @jackwt7340 7 дней назад

    Zeus was stunned.

  • @celioazevedoofficial
    @celioazevedoofficial 7 дней назад

    It changed the world.

  • @BettyBo-zg1ok
    @BettyBo-zg1ok 7 дней назад

    "Hey fools, welcome back to my channel." Instantly subbed.

  • @fradd182
    @fradd182 10 дней назад

    A bit underwhelming cooling for 733Mhz PIII. GPU also, given that air is not directly flowing over it to the exhaust fan.

  • @user-nj2zj6yo1b
    @user-nj2zj6yo1b 12 дней назад

    Finally!!! Was waiting for this! :)

  • @BGTech1
    @BGTech1 12 дней назад

    Oleg K did die shots of the chip in one of these several years ago

  • @pentosa
    @pentosa 13 дней назад

    We meet again, nowadays it is very difficult to find a used pentium iii, but now I am testing the compilation with heavy and modern linux distros. the compilation time with this cpus took ever most than 5 hours, in the best of cases with minimal installation with xorg. In the future will test more older architectures than athlon xp

  • @achachno9899
    @achachno9899 17 дней назад

    Typical eBay Scrap lood with the gold fingers haha

  • @FS-rm1yg
    @FS-rm1yg 24 дня назад

    Why dont we have 128bit architecture?

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke 14 дней назад

      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/128-bit_computing#:~:text=Thus%2C%20there%20are%20currently%20no,are%20given%20in%20§%20History.

  • @mateiberatco500
    @mateiberatco500 27 дней назад

    I stopped at the graph for waay too long, cause it's too messed-up in history: 1. Why is 8-bit overlapping with 4 and 16-bit, but 32 and 64 are not overlapping? Overlapping is good if you account for product life, but that is extremely difficult to assess. If you account for the last product released, maybe, but it's still wrong for the next reasons. 2. How come you graph the 386SX, but not the original 386 (later renamed to DX after SX launch)? 386 was in 1986, 386SX was 1988. 3. 386SX is a 32-bit CPU, just line 8088 and 80188 are 16-bit, not 8-bit (assumption of reason for ovelapping 8/16). 8085 is the last 8-bit in you graph.

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke 9 дней назад

      Hi, thanks for your feedback. First of all the data is entirely my own database based on all CPUs that I have. I had to delete many data points to keep clarity. The data points are introduction dates on the monthly basis, btw. the 386SX is clearly wrong and I had corrected this in my PIII and 486 anniversary videos. Now to the challengin topic of overlapping architectures (4-,8-,16-,32-bit): so as said it is not about the life time (some CPUs were still produced 20 years after their launch date), so it is about the internal and the bus structure. Is the 8088 and 80188 a true 16-bit chip? I disagree to your view. :) as we learned crippling down 16 bit CPUs to a 8 bit data bus looses 50% of performance, but it does not mean it is a bad or not succesful chip. Another reason for me to keep the 8-bit era spanning to the mid 80s is that many will simply remember that this was still the 8-bit time. Thanks again for forcing me think this through again!

    • @mateiberatco500
      @mateiberatco500 8 дней назад

      @@cpu_duke Another POV of bitness: the actual instruction set. 8088 can run any 8086 SW. If you consider the data bus, then all Pentiums would be in 64-bit (or more with dual/tripple/quad-channel RAM). I did see in another video the 386SX/DX correction.

    • @fffUUUUUU
      @fffUUUUUU День назад

      ​@@mateiberatco500good point ☝️

  • @sebastian19745
    @sebastian19745 29 дней назад

    I just find your channel and I must say that is quite interesting. However, I have a curiosity. Everyone knows that the original IBM PC and IBM XT had discrete TTL logic ICs and few dedicated ICs that later were bundled in the chipsets (2-3 larger ICs depending the manufacturer). I would like to see if one can identify the original 8086 support ICs in one of those early chipsets (DMA controller, clock generator, etc or even the floppy / HDD controller, UART, PIO, etc). There are many that look at the CPUs die but I did not find anyone interested on the chipset dies. It would be interesting I guess.

  • @kurthectic2902
    @kurthectic2902 Месяц назад

    Great video. I still have memories of the Pentium era. My first PC had a Pentium 133, good times.

  • @knoxduder
    @knoxduder Месяц назад

    BuuZinga!

  • @user-nj2zj6yo1b
    @user-nj2zj6yo1b Месяц назад

    Every clip you post, I'm always curious what the accompanying song will be 😂. haha love these

  • @JohnDoe-ip3oq
    @JohnDoe-ip3oq Месяц назад

    I have a 1.3 tualatin in a powerleap adapter, in or840 board using dual channel rambus, with obsidian x-24, radeon 8500 aiw, vortex 2 sq2500, Logitech rumble mouse, scsi, Windows ME with kernel EX. The thing isn't 100% stable, think irq conflict, ghz too high, and cpu requires a second slot Terminator which also may be unstable. I have plans to use a PiKVM stream to Internet. Maybe charge to play on, but no website skills. Who knows, just sitting in basement for now.

  • @valentinoesposito3614
    @valentinoesposito3614 Месяц назад

    The best Pentium

  • @dampytofficial
    @dampytofficial Месяц назад

    Okay

  • @jonbondMPG
    @jonbondMPG Месяц назад

    "yes there's a harddrive"... can't you hear it whirring away there? There's nothing like the sound of a 90's HDD .

  • @vgx-sam8164
    @vgx-sam8164 Месяц назад

    cool bruhh

  • @jonbondMPG
    @jonbondMPG Месяц назад

    I prefer to say 1000.... Huzzah for Octal!

  • @d942yd42
    @d942yd42 Месяц назад

    may your 2powers increase!

  • @mrflamewars
    @mrflamewars Месяц назад

    Here's to 65535 followers and beyond!

  • @user-nj2zj6yo1b
    @user-nj2zj6yo1b Месяц назад

    Congrats on 512!