Видео

God bless and thank you for watching

@@UkemeHenshawTV God bless you

@@marymanzear2900 Amen and thanks for watching

God bless you dear. Hope you remembered to subscribe?

@@LoginConnections thanks and God bless you

God bless you. You can raise your prayer points here

It's always good to engage the word of God everytime. God bless you sir

This is very insightful ❤

@@velkyn1 Thanks so much for your observations. I urge you to search for the previous messages from part 1. God bless you

@@RoyalCCG why would I search for messages when you fail in this one? And curious how your god doesn't even bless christians so why would I believe your false claims that it would bless me?

@velkyn1 Did you watch the video completely or you are just in a haste to vent your anger?

The fool says in his heart that there's no Thor, Shiva and Quetzalcoatl.

My message is clear, that you don't worship the creature over the creator. God is merciful and slow to anger. He doesn't act because you want Him to act, He loves the world and doesn't want them to perish but be saved. How do you feel that your own child chooses to kill himself, will you clap for him?

@@RoyalCCG So, your message here leans on the idea that some distant “Creator” deserves attention over what’s right in front of us, the “creature.” Funny thing is, this “merciful” God you’re pushing sounds more like a manipulative parent - supposedly loving, but only if His children constantly praise Him or else face the threat of hellfire. Let's talk about this example of a child who’s struggling. In real life, if a parent really cares, they’d do more than just sit back and watch, “slow to anger.” They’d be actively involved, doing everything to help, right? But you’re saying that this God chooses silence, even when people are in pain, choosing not to “act” because, what, it doesn’t fit His timing? Imagine telling that to someone who’s lost a loved one or is going through unimaginable suffering. A truly caring, all-powerful being would do something, wouldn’t He?

@AnotherViewer Take it or leave it, if I come into arguments with you, it makes no sense. You are pushing for it but, my message is clear, salvation. You have lived in assumption that the things you made with your hands are better off or might it be you are oblivious of the existence of the creator of the universe. So, I bring to your notice that there's the creator of the universe who is a better option for you than the things He created. Now, my heavenly father has not threatened you with hellfire but, it's a fact that if you don't know him, you are doomed for hell. The world is actually doomed for hell when Adam fell into sin, Christ came and redeemed us all but, you must acknowledge what He did before it becomes yours and that's the reason for John 3:16, Romans 10:10. So, friend, listen to message with an open heart and you will be blessed.

@AnotherViewer I don't mind listening to help you out because from your letters, there are missing links. I can lead you to the everlasting joy

@@RoyalCCG Alright, so you say your "heavenly father" has set up this whole system where we're all somehow doomed unless we believe exactly what you believe. Isn’t it convenient that you’re certain of this creator’s intentions, as if they align with your personal convictions and warnings? You’re framing this as if rejecting your version of salvation is ignorance, yet you’re assuming that your interpretation of the universe-and everything in it-is the only possible truth. You claim we’re damned by default and saved only if we follow a specific doctrine. But let's break this down: why would an all-knowing creator set up a world with so many beliefs and cultures only to condemn people for failing to adopt yours? And on top of that, you’re calling this salvation and “blessing.” Sorry, but a god who threatens eternal punishment for simply using the mind it supposedly gave us isn’t offering salvation-it's coercion. So let’s get real about what's actually being offered here. If you’re confident in your beliefs, then own them, but recognize that expecting others to blindly accept them without evidence or questioning makes it sound like you’re less interested in honest dialogue than in echoing what you’ve been told. Oh, I bet you think you've got all the "missing links" figured out, huh? Everlasting joy wrapped up in a neat little belief package? Let’s be real-your so-called "joy" comes with some serious strings attached. If this joy is conditional on agreeing with you, then it’s not exactly free, is it? Maybe instead of assuming everyone who thinks differently is missing something, you could ask yourself why your version of joy depends on telling others they're incomplete without it.