Видео

Po

Sa keq po knon

❤❤❤❤

It's not autally real gooseberrys.indian gooseberrys are real.

Une te dua sa teuten ty ta dua sa lahuten vjen fundi shpejt o biroooo

Šiptari zajebali kosmet-->

That’s pigeon looks like cher ami

Yo the third word was extremely difficult, especially given the time limit. This experiment proves nothing

Ky eshte mbreti i kosoves ishalla jeton sa malet e kosoves se je me te gjitha😂😂❤❤🎉🎉

And my question to the teacher would have been for sure, why not put only the pencil down, why rise the fuc*ing hand?

i learned it back in middle school when like i said i was bullied no one was doing anything about it i was skipping lunch and crying at one of the lunch desks alone no one cared so i just gave up

They just re-branded nervousness

Waste of time

It’s weird the camera angles make it seem super fake even though it’s acted well

In life, you cannot change the test paper. Profit can only be gained if you answer 'given questions' correctly. So, you take your father's,mother's, siblings and cousins' test papers and you do them (alternative answer to their answeres). But you get no profit doing that. You do that to acquire some learned strength.

exactly what i needed

killer

inaccurate wording for an experiment which in itself, seemed fine. dont called it helplessness, when the people who were given the hard words, were probably thinking HARDER, than those without "helplessness"

0:05 ❤❤❤

What kund of door is this

0:08 ❤❤

❤❤❤

❤❤❤

❤❤❤

0:02

❤❤❤ 0:04

0:02 ❤❤

Shum e don Mashalla

The ad/thumbnail for another video covering the speaker at 2:36 when she's trying to teach the main point is a drag.

It's the accent from a Swiss-romands speaking english, which also a french person would sound like....

Plasma?

THIS IS WHAT THE US GOVT IS DOING TO THE WORLD. AND YOU

Those are holes or gills

“I have a question.”

Serotonin=learned helplessness. Studies

That must be what they teach in college only they don't let you in on the secret. It would explain a lot about young people today.

I can imagine a perfectionist having a panic attack if they were on the wrong side of the room.

As interesting as this is, it goes to show that humans experiment on each other all the time. Truly manipulative species and not a good one.

I'd actually be good at X if I wasn't a victim of a failed system which teaches learned helplessness. See victim culture.

I couldn't even think of melon

Intriguing and insightful experiment🤩✨️👌

I legit paused it when it first showed the list at the beginning. I couldn't get the 3rd one at the start even after solving the first 2

This isn't learned helplessness. Or at least, not all of it. From what I observed, learned helplessness typically occurs when you are not expected to try at all, and just told that someone else will do it for you, "your type of people" can't or don't do things like that. This can be because of your gender - ask your brother to fix this door, it's broken, because of your status - the maid will bring dinner shortly, or because of a toxic, overwhelming relationship (romantic or not) that makes you dependent and forget - or never learn - how to do anything on your own. Failure is NOT the only path to leant helplessness. (Though it's definitely why "girls can't do math.")

So is this what the true purpose of "New Math" is all about?

See also almost every computer programming tutorial ever

Life Is A Joke.

And now imagine having adhd and having struggle with tasks all the time and people telling you to just "do the thing, it's easy".

Or the first group got the 3rd answer faster than they would otherwise because of the earlier success. Or both.

I had two severe moments of helplessness and heavy doubts of my abilities and both situations, were the teacher’s fault. It’s gonna be long. 1. In my first day of HS math class: Algebra I, the teacher told us to open our brand new textbooks to like the middle of the book. I know now, some curriculums are different than others, but it seemed strange. So, I asked about it, just wanted a quick answer like “Oh, we’ll start over here, but you’re welcome to read other chapters at home” or something like that. Instead, she closed the book, stood me up and WALKED ME TO ANOTHER CLASSROOM, where I spent the rest of my math classes that year, “Problem Solving”. To this day, I’m still mad about it. Questions are curiosity, not punishable offenses in school. 2. I tried learning Spanish in HS and this incident was a doozy. All year long, she acted as if it were the easiest thing in the world to “pick up” a new language. I know why she thought that way, but I don’t think she realized why it was typically easier. See, I went to a SOUTH TEXAS SCHOOL with many Spanish-speaking students. I wasn’t raised to speak multiple languages, but I always liked Spanish and how it sounds. So, it was depressing when she had to explain herself and all her arguments boiled down to were: “I don’t understand why my non-Spanish speaking students are doing poorly, while the Spanish speaking students do so well!” I can’t even tell you how many times she blamed me because she can’t teach worth a single sentence.

Cinerama wasn't that obvious to me. I think the example illustrates the point because of the feelings induced in the other side of the room, but it doesn't prove it necessarily. She didn't have the easy side of the room answer they identified "American" as the anagram's answer. How do we know they even got it right? She never even asked them or gave them the opportunity to correct her to tell her they didn't get that, but some made up word by mistake. I think a further fair point to make is when doing any experiment, your attention to detail must be rigorous, and without checking each result, no assumption can ever be made that you got the expected results. I would also guess that there could be people who answer incorrectlly and think they got a valid answer. How would you know they didn't without selecting for the participants AND verifying their answer, or AT LEAST verifying their answer? YOU DON'T KNOW. I don't care for haphazard experiments like this. The lesson makes fair points, but it also definitely a fine example of poor attention to detail and drawing conclusions without scientific rigor. I suspect she was reproducing an experiment without actually completing all the steps done in that experiment to identify the same results. I don't care for this example of this experiment and instead feeling a sense of larned helplessness, I feel unsure that the experiment proves the claim with this example and definitely not in execution. Also, the video shows the video audience the "easy anagrams" and the third shared anagram that I identify as less obvious. If they were more transparent with the observers/audience and showed us both sides, the video and experiment would have made more sense.