Видео

If price,weight and size of the body and lenses don't play a role than fullframe is the better choice, because the quality can better better, although in most cases only at pixel peeping. Enough professional landscape photographers with APS-c show this. In my world as a hobby photographer money, weight and size play a role, so there is no need for me to go fullframe.

Lovely stuff

keep it up big fella!

Amazing video

I was hoping you would reveal something that was NOT for macro photography :) Good tip, but I don't do macro photography. I was hoping for something related to the colours, some filter or something. Thanks anyway. Good video.

The Laowa 65mm f2.8 manual lens is so light - Tend to keep it in my backpack for this type of photography.

Photos are AMAZING 💚 Some of the best images I've seen of mushrooms and without a macro lens - WOW!! And a very cool hack.

Superb photos!! Great info and logic!!

If your on Mirrorless already, lenses should be better in quality. Full frame is the no regret option & can be bought _'used'_

I don't think I'll ever get rid of my 7Riii. It really isn't as bad in low light as people say...i returned the Riv because that was actually bad in low light. I think the 42mp sensor was one of the best made in terms of being a good middle ground between iq and noise. I wish they built on that sensor more instead of going to the 61mp.

Personally for landscapes I think M43 is more than good enough. They have about 20 megapixels these days and you get more DOF more easily, far smaller kit, excellent IBIS and stabilization, also, in my opinion with a long telephoto the subject in the distance seems to allow more DOF, relative to waterfalls and the like. In apsc, to me Fuji lenses are best and can get great resolution. No other manufacturer really treats aps with any respect, lens wise, in my opinion. Plus the more mpix the more you need a lens that can deliver it, and the more you need good stabilization. I can probably get more effective resolution on an apsc Fuji 24 mpix than my 5Dsr if I hand hold a shot and depending on the lens, although mirrorless models these days have good IBIS. I think it is more a matter of low light and higher ISO's where the real differences are. But I can tell you using the up res in lightroom on an M43 shot can be quite amazing. I see no reason for 95 percent of people shooting landscapes, to need super high megapixels, at least for work they do for themselves and even for a lot of client work. For real estate m43 is way more than enough and it provides superb images. Panasonic 7-14 lens is super sharp with excellent colors and contrast, it does flare fairly easily but when it does, the setting is easy to identify ahead of time. Best wishes, nice video, God bless!

Everything else being equal full frame is

I have been involved in digital photography for 16 years and when I started there were not many full frame cameras and cameras in general did not have the ISO range and resolution of the cameras of the last several years. You can use most any modern day cameras to photograph landscapes regardless of sensor size, what you do with your photos is another story. I have a 22 × 14 inch framed print taken on the coastline of Maine with a Pentax kr 12 mp DSLR and the old 12-24mm f4 Pentax lens, photo was taken on a tripod at sunrise an online service called frames by mail printed and framed in a matted ,black gallery style frame and the result is beautiful. Their are so many factors that go into taking a landscape photography that is worth framing, subjects, lighting, composition and photographic technique are more important than sensor size. Many people very seldom print their work and I would say that printing your photos is an important step to being a better photogrpher, it will make you appreciate your work that much more and you can see how good or bad your work is and give you a better idea of how to get better. Another way to get better is to learn basic editing of your photography files. Now matter if you shoot jpeg or raw files post processing will make your final photo that much better and give you the ability to critique your work, it makes you look more closely and by looking at photos that didn't work what went wrong. Shutter speed could be too slow or focus points could be off.

I was considering the a6700 for photography because it's a crop sensor and has great iso handling, for someone who only knows how to shoot from 105mm and beyond (say wildlife, macro, aviation and extremely compressed framing overall) and I was so close, SO CLOSE to getting it when I realized that it has only a maximum mechanical shutter of 1/4000, and the viewfinder was only HD720P reducing to VGA when autofocus and burst shooting, thing that my old trusty A77II never did. Then I thought the A7CII was my go to, thinking it had 1/8000th and the same feel, until i realized that the camera not only is also limited to 1/4000 but it only has a single curtain, which means you're going to get half hemisphere bokeh when you want to shoot fast moving subjects with a background full of tiny lights. So I am eventually going for the A7IV, it might not be as good for video but, I don't care, the camera is complete for photography and has a better autofocus than SOny A6700's sugar coated "ai ID engine" that only places a box around the subject of matter without determining whether the shot is going to come sharp or OOF.

a6700 doesn't have a stacked sensor - it has a back side illuminated sensor.

I upgraded my old and trusty Sony A77 one month ago. After a lot of back and forth with really considering going full frame I went for the A6700 with Sony 16-55 G 2.8 and Sony 70-350 G lenses. And I am so happy with that setup. It is light weight (both lenses and the camera is under 2kg), good lenses are cheaper and the amount of functionality makes it versitile for all kinds of photography from wildlife, to street to landscape. I love it!

adobe premiere has 10bit

one day the flipout screen is going to break an internal ribbon, you just cant stop fiddling with that screen, i have that camera too i cant stand you fiddling with that LCD

Why stop it there, Ban walking in the wood or just leave this.

wow a 12 shot focus stack! man that's dedication to get the entire scene pin sharp haha. nice work!

Hey Josh! Nice video would love to have a clean wood such as this one close by! Agreeing with you on staying on paths and making sure wildflowers don't get damaged. It's not just other photographers, as often dog owners would also unleash their dogs into the beautiful landscape, possibly creating a fair amount of destruction. I guess there has to be something for everyone!

Wonderful video and gorgeous pictures. I really like your calm style, not rushing everything. I think it’s tempting to go off the path (at least for me), but sometimes we should hold ourselves back.

Beautiful video man, enjoy your wedding!

Hi Josh, can you link the mount frame you're using on this camera?

Can you tell a bit more about the lenses you were using earlier with FF and the lenses you are using now? I just want to have an idea about the weight and cost differences in lenses if I choose a7c over the a6700 (both the bodies have similar weight and size).

Hi there, thanks for this review. What do you think about the Sony 70-350 compared to this one?

Can also speak highly about this lens. I've chose this as the only zoom lens in my Fuji kit. Having used other zooms, I realized for the most part, they are all compromising image quality, so instead of having to lug a couple zooms around, why not just get the 18-300 and have everything covered. It is so convenient being able to take this lens and maybe one smaller prime. For users of bridge cameras (ie. Lumix FZ1000, Sony RX10 III/IV, etc), they are used to this experience of being able to have a swiss army knife to approach any subject or situation. Having the 18-300 on an APS-C gives you several advantages, primarily the sensor quality over 1" bridge sensors as well as the manual zoom action. That said, the actually image quality in good light will be comparable to a bridge camera and in some cases the bridge camera may even be sharper (in the case of Sony RX10III/IV). There are so many ways to be creative with this lens, and once you get used to the ability to frame any shot the way you like, it becomes quite addictive. You just need to embrace the higher apertures and softer image look and be aware of the somewhat busy bokeh in some situations.

Nice review indeed. What do you think about the low light performance when compared to Nikon d5600.

Falcam F22 / Ulanzi cage, et al, for the win.

Why do you need a rig unless you are mounting additional equipments to the camera? You want to keep it small and light and then you go ahead and attach a rig! The cover on sensor is actually the shutter. And shutter could get damaged too. Also please try 10 bit slog3 once then you wouldn't want to go back to 8 bit :) Good detailed review. Thanks for sharing.

I come for a canon 800D (APSC)... i think it's time to buy a new comera but can't decide between a6700 and a7cii. I want a portable camera for landscape and street photography!

Thank you for this great video! Planning to get the same lens, now without doubts.

There's a L Bracket for the 6700 from Leophoto which does not block the screen as it's only a small addition to the left side, which is arca swiss compatible though Also you can shoot 10 bit in 4:2:0 which works in davinci. only 4:2:2 requires the paid version.

The a6700 is simply the best digital camera I have ever used and owned. I also have the A7R3, and what a fantastic camera it is. Still is. The but is that the a6700 has the focusing technology straight from the A7R5 and that made it even more special than my A7R3. Still use the R3 a lot but when it comes to birding or catching honeybees doing their job, it's the a6700. The focusing is on and it is quick. The handling is superior with a great grip very similar to the a6600. It's just comfortable to use, like a well worn glove.

Leukotape is awesome. For improvised bandais, moleskin replacement/blister care, gear repair etc. It's useful to wrap it around the lighter also. I'm surprised this video has do few fews. It's a good quality video. Thanks for sharing it.

Que bonito hermano… gracias por la lección… 🤘🇬🇹

If you want nature photography sites in Malaga (Costa del Sol) contact with me!!

How can you talk about the best camera of 2024 in mid-January 2024 ? 🤣

Fuji has better lens selection And a higher flashlight at 1/250th of a second

Thanks for a thorough review. It is a lot of camera for the price point.

Great review. My only suggestion is to be a little kinder to Blackmagic Design when referencing the cost of DaVinci Resolve Studio. There is a whole company working hard on DaVinci Resolve software and I assume you are using the free version, which as you right point out has almost all the features of the "Studio" version. The "Studio" version costs $395 at B&H and INCLUDES the Speed Editor, a piece of hardware is worth $395 all on its own. On top of that, I have had the software for about 5 years and have yet to be asked to pay for an upgrade to the latest version. For pro-level software, DaVinci Resolve Studio is the best software deal ever. You are getting an even better deal, because you can use almost all the features of the pro version for free. So, to complain about the price of the software for what currently is considered a "pro feature" (10-bit video files) seems unfair to me. All the best.

You getting though that experience was worth a subscription. All the best.

I am using Fujifilm XT5 and XS20. I love them so much. They are driving me insane.

Why this camera would be a better choice than a Fuji XS-20, or XT5 for example ? I never understand those self proclaim expert who claim that one thing, whatever you're talking about, is the best choice for everybody, without knowing their selection criteria : here "the best APS-C" or "The best lens". We are borderline in a scam.

A thorough review Cameras are like cars, there isn't a bad one any more

A6700 is sweet camera

I have had many shoots like this lol but there is always the next one to look forward too and days like this are just part and parcel of being a wildlife photographer.

I have the A6700, Sony 16-55 f2.8, Sony 70-350mm f4.5-6.3 and the Sony 11mm f1.8. It is a great setup for hiking and kayaking. The 16-55mm resolution is superb. The bulb mode which allows you to go past 30 seconds is really important if you want to use a star tracker or long exposure. With the bluetooth remote you don't have to touch the camera once everything is set up which really helps with a star tracker as you don't want to touch the camera and ruin your alignment.

Hey Josh! that's my neck of the woods! really enjoyed watching you explore the reserve its a good one albeit a little easier to navigate when its a little drier.