Видео

Best sound with 🎧🎧🎧!!!

Multiple track output imported into DaVinci Resolve allows for better instrument separation in the final render from DaVinci.

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🤭🌹🥂🍾

Uauuuuuu 🌹👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🎶✨️🫂🥂🍾

LINDÍSSIMO INSTRUMENTAL... Quem está ouvindo com fones de ouvido, ficará encantado 🎉🎉🎉😊...

Added synthesiser track to melody line, boosted reverb for most instruments, reworked bass track with new lower notes, improved clarity of drum track, boosted level of drum track in final output, taper at end is made smoother.

👍👍👍

Nice one 💯

David R Lentz, Columbus, Ohio, USA I had two of this kit, one to build with the landing gear down, the canopy raised, with all the access panels, ordnance bays, etc., all open to view, the crew chief and service crew making visual inspection; and the other would have a USAF pilot seated in the cockpit, gear up, in flight approaching 20,000 metres, well exceeding Mach two, as the winged predator much as its namesake closes upon a cavalier intruder suddenly unwitting prey . . . . Unfortunately, with both kits, I could not make the upper and lower halves fit together correctly to close properly; no matter how I adjusted, retried, shifted, fiddled, struggled, even pleaded, the two halves obstinately remained three or four millimetres (3-4 mm; round 1/8th of an inch; 0.125”) awry, never for the twain to meet. I in my exasperation chuckled them back into the boxes, stowing them upon a shelf. Hasegawa, I want back my $90.00 each. Aside from you poor design, I have a personal reason.

The others cost as much or more and aren’t any better.

This song is nice.

Beautiful composition and sound! Fascinating neoclassical style with a little jazz mixed in! Very cool visuals as well! :-) I compose for piano and keyboards, too! Best wishes, Michelle

I'm also a 100% positive I built the Hasegawa 1/48 Phantom before 1986. Was the colorful VF-51 CAG bird you show on the Tamiya box. I built it while still single and living in barracks so it would have been 83 or earlier.

Thank you for this review.

Ignore the trolls especially the Auzzie t**t! Nice review - I’m building the Airfix 1:72 and it’s amazing how well you get to know the individual parts, so seeing this, you can immediately see the differences in the bigger scale I’m curcurious, what are the paint marks on some of the sprues for? I can’t figure that out!

One of my all time favourite aircraft. Nice looking kit. I have it in 1/72 and have been saving it. Good video.

"promosm"

It's so awesome, dear friend.

Are paid by Tamiya by any chance. Every "BEST" kit from you is Tamiya!

Please commentate I dont do subtitles

Sadly there are a number of issues with the Hobby Boss 1/48 Black Widow kits. (I have their P-61C kit, which I may cross-kit with either a Monogram P-61B or a GWH P-61B kit for a more accurate C model.) Firstly the cross section on the upper main fuselage behind the cockpit to the rear cockpit is far too angular. There should be a small clear curve on the shoulders. (Their P-61 C kit has the same fuselage parts) The nose radome is too short, being the same radome as their P-61A. The B and C models had a longer nose radome for a more advanced, Heavier, Radar fit. Lastly the main landing gear bay (and doors) are simply wrong. The Main Gear Bay had no rear Bulkhead. In the P-61A this was an issue because debris from rough airfields would be kicked up into the rear boom by the huge wheels and tires, and, after a time to accumulate, would unbalance the plane. This was due to the two single doors being open on landing and stayed open until after takeoff. To Fix this Northrop divided the gear door where the leg was into a very small door for the leg (Which remained open on the ground) and the rest would open to extend and retract the gear, then close again before landing and after takeoff. All would close over the gear bay when the Landing gear was fuilly retracted, thus essentially sealing off the bay itself In flight, but NOT for takeoff/landing. This was introduced with the B model and ALL subsequent models, including the F-15A Reporter Photo recon version. The Great Wall Hobby kit does correctly include parts correct for each variant. BTW the wing spoilerons are also incorrectly depicted, they lay flat on the upper wing in flight, not retracted vertically into the wing. (Compare with either the Monorgram/Revell or GWH kits.) The GWH kits also include full intake ducting on the Wing leading edges, something the Hobby Boss 1.32 kit also does! So why is there only Frontal grill pieces provided here?) Last is an issue in the Decals. The Stars and Bars for the wings are too large - they were the same size as the samll Stars and Bars on the fuselage. Similarly the red walkway strips are far too thick, about twice as braod as the original walkways. I think the red serial numbers for the tails are alo too big, but check references for that, some were larger. They are also missing a number of "No Step" stencils. I am also unsure if option 2 "Sleepy Time Gal" had pinup nose art on both sides - that would have been unusual, but not unknown.

I built that last year its a great kit

Thanks for the review. It looks like a decent kit.

Did you build this model?

Great music for getting up in the morning!

Ignorant me sees a Bf-110 with Japanese radial engines

Good job. Someone built something other than a zero or a ki 61 tony

Great review, very nice kit I built the Revell 1/48 version such a cool aircraft.

Cool review.

Is that nato black base color?

Wow! You can now not only hear the bass but also FEEL it!!! And the drums really take on a new dimension: the kicks are really meaty and the cymbals and percussion feel so airy! Thank you RUclips for reproducing such quality audio track.

As clear as water, as fresh as its smell, this adds a sparkle to your ear and eye as you make it through the day…

Nice.

One should also factor-in cost and availability, both of which favor the old Hasegawa kit. As a personal side note, I'm not a fan of the simulated avionics bays found in the Meng kit. Not having built one I can't say with certainty but to my eyes they look like two more areas that will need filler, sanding, and rescribing of panel lines surrounding the bays when not built in the item position.

A loud statement about the turbulent times we live in. When will things get better?

*Promosm*

Excellent video, thanks for posting and telling us modelers of recommendations, problems, and things to watch out for. You mentioned about fit, but would you also recommend any additions, like photo-etch or accessories?? Look forward to your reply.

Dear mate this is marvelous so so pretty congratulations

Thanks for the preview…. Whats the name of the song?

...It's only a Tamiya commercial!!!😬😬😬😬😬

I just received this kit and it's details are in a league of their own compared to other brands

rivets were filled to start with but it took 600 man hours after which they didnt bother as it made no diference to performance

sagenhaft guter Kit

This is a really good kit. Great fit, excellent armament options, two canopies. However, it is only good for a small portion of the F-16's flying out there. It is only giving one engine option (no big/small mouth intake option) and does not provide the drag chute at the tail. So, no Taiwanese, Greek, Turkish, Belgian, Norwegian and so on without an aftermarket set. By the way, the resin aftermarkets for this area come at a cost of roughly 50% the kit value. Another area for improvement (like with most Tamiya kits) are the decals.

I recently built y Revell version of the FA-18 Which was Hell to get together.

Building one right now. My first One-Oh-Wonder in 72 scale. Surprisingly large. It goes together well. The nose needed some filler. Otherwise the nose will have a slight concave shape. I love that sharp edges of the wings and intakes. Nice kit, albeit sparse in detail.

Love the fighting falcon design.

Nice clear detailed shots. I loved to see the HobbyBoss and Meng comparision!

I like your music..👍

Great music 👍i like it