Видео

no deberia de ocurrir mas bien es todo lo contrario en lumen los tiempos son excesivamente rápidos , el programa suele tener un bug con la barra de tiempo al momento de calcular el tiempo total de renderizado esto ocurre cuando envías muchos renders o videos al mismo tiempo ,intenta enviar renders o videos en juegos de 2 o 3 y prueba como te va

thank you so much

Hello, thank you very much it took me 4 to 5 minutes for each scene, my GPU is already somewhat old, RTX 2070 with 8 GB of RAM, I am sure that something newer will reduce the times considerably. The red part is done in post production, just like the glow effect in it. glass

@@robertoflores.archviz Ty for the info; your video was very pivotal in me deciding to install Twinmotion last night. 5 minutes per scene is not bad that kind of quality; using a 3090 in Arnold, it takes about 2.5 minutes per frame and each one of you scenes look like about 400 frames or so. Real time rendering looks like it is the future. Would I be able to get that file to test my GPU render speed? Ty again for the video!

@@lightning4201 Thank you very much, if this is the way, for now I am not sharing the scene but there are several files with different settings and everything is organized in post production.

Yw @@robertoflores.archviz and I understand. What I really want to find out is if Twinmotion scales proportionally based on your card(s) that you add to your machine. Do you know? Or is there a standardized benchmark file similar to the Blender Classroom scene that GPU scores can be compared with?

@@lightning4201 You can use the test scenes found in Twinmotion after the video card you install, you will experience improved graphic performance reflected in your fps on your PC, it is like simulating a video game. I recommend Nvidia graphics cards with more than 8 GB of vram already 8 gb is for small projects 12, 16 or 24 would be ideal, AMD cards have problems with twinmotion

thank you so much🖐

si de verdad costo beneficio lumen es la mejor opcion ,cuando hablamos de la máxima calidad PT es lo mejor ,va a depender mucho del tipo de trabajo que se solicite y el presupuesto un ejemplo una parte de este video me demoro en lumen 2 minutos en pt fueron 5 horas , a mi personalmente por estética me gusta mas lumen vs calidad PT, pero coincido contigo PT para imagenes es lo mejor

thank you bro

muchas gracias amigo reynaldo

thank you

if all the videos are tests made with the early trial version, to export in 4k you must purchase the paid version

@@robertoflores.archviz the 2023.2 paid version isn´t ready yet though... is it?

hello yes I accept without problem

@@robertoflores.archviz sorry for my bad English... I meant .. we can export twinmotion file to .exe file . So that clients can roam around and see the model like a game... In that export .. is lumen supported .. or just the standard lighting only.... Thanku for the reply

@@muhammedlamyp.j9860 don't worry, it is indeed possible to do this under the parameters of twinmotion presenter. exe

thank you very much this was rendered in 4k approximately 35 hours

hello thank you very much if it is possible as long as you have the 3d modeling

@@robertoflores.archviz Thanks🌹

@@user-gy8lx2wh9e 👍👍

hola gracias es un elemento animado que se importo directo desde 3dmax

@@robertoflores.archviz serías tan amable de indicarme como se llama el archivo para poder buscarlo??? o talves el link de descarga???

thank you very much friend

Thank you very much for your comment😃

thank you i have rtx 2070 8gb laptop

thank you

thank you so much

😀😀👋

😀👍

thank you

los descargue de internet y otros son de quixel bridge al igual los materiales .

Te recomiendo el curso de dviz 3d búscalo en sus redes con ese nombre es el mejor precio calidad

Thank You very much ❤️❤️

Thank you amigo

@@robertoflores.archviz ❤️

Thanks a lot

Thank you bro👏👏

thank you bro

gracias amigo

hello friend thank you very much the trees are from quixel you can download them directly from twinmotion