Видео

Maybe women ought to ask themselves : "What would my life be like if he were gone?" Not divorced, but dead. Look around you, he's not coming home today or any other day. Can I handle the kids, the house, the bills? That's a better question to ask. Every woman on the planet can envision a bigger house ( with housekeeping service, of course) It's like asking the husband can he envision sleeping with a hotter wife.

who would marry this piece of work get a vasectomy and never get married

Try to work it out. You might find with hard work & forgiveness both of you can find each others respect friendship even love again. Maybe its different but God heals broken hearts & homes, especially if you have children dont give up too easily. Just sayin

When the man stops putting up with the womans deflecting, condescending, argumentative nature.

marriage is a very bad contractt for men.

A spanking is legal, and there is a difference between spanking and beating.

It is like Dr. Jekell and Mr. Hyde. When he is at work or away from, he is nicer and more of the man that met. Now, when he is home, he consistently finds things that i do or do not do to be mad and lash out verbally or acts aggressively towards things in our home. He also is very dismissive and treats me like im irrelevant.

A thought experiment for you and your divorce minded GFs. Let say your son's gf want to get married and your son is on the fence. She doesn't want a religious marriage, justice of the peace is fine, but your son is still undecided. GF comes to you and asks that you reassure your son that marriage will be good for him bc of xyz. Tell me, what will you tell him? What is xyz?

What would Jesus do?

Hi!

❤

Hey there , I hope you're doing well! Your Video is very interesting, I like your content! But your channel is not well-optimised, Video "SEO" score is very low. That's why your channel rank is very low in Subscribers and video views. If you fix the "SEO" area in your Video, you get huge audiences.

Not after you pay for childcare for 2 or 3 children. Plus, the expenses of working. There is not enough left of $40,000 to make all the stress worth it. A woman does have to have more trust in her husband to be fair.

What an awful name for a channel! It goes both ways. The less the woman earns, and the harder the man worked to make money the more the man has to pay her in court settlements. Because he worked hard to support them she gets to keep the kids. How is any of this fair? It isn't, but at least the distribution of monetary assets is the way it is for good reason. Having the wife work to earn an income isn't functional, it means many things. It means she will be too tired for her children and husband, it means there is less money and positions for men to make an income to be able to sustain a family, to be able to make a wife have the privilege to stay at home. This also makes women more resentful towards their husbands for making her have to work, and less attracted to the majority of suitors, as women appear to rank men in relation to themselves in term of status and income rather than have an objective standard. There is more cheating with a mixed work environment, when men and women starter working together the term having an "affair" was coined. It means that children go neglected, and susceptible to dangers and especially outside influence. This is not natural. Children should be with their mothers, mothers should be with their children. Kids can also be with family or friends, trusted people who has their best interests at heart, but not spend their days with activists or government hires(teachers.) It comes down to biology. Women are vulnerable while pregnant and rearing children. And weaker to begin with. So they must rely on men for their resources and safety. It's a one way street with resources flowing her way, not the other way. These and many more reasons, I bet. And so things were arranged the way they were. And now they are not. It is at is today, because a certain rich family that shall not be named decided that it was a good idea to entice women to work for two reasons. First so that the government would be able to tax twice as many workers, secondly to be able to indoctrinate the children through schooling and academia. They used feminism for their own purposes, and popularized it. Their objective was to make more money, and to induce a political revolution, and they figured that because they were rich they were wise enough to decide what politics should rule the west for us! What it all comes down to is human preoccupation with money. Man invented money. Man understands money better than Man understands nature. Man suffers. The children of Man suffers. The children of Man turn away from marriage. Civilization crashes. Man dies. Thinking the way you do, that _"two incomes is better than one"_ is incredibly short-sighted. And thinking that you get a worse settlement in court by not working, when proportionally you actually get more is also a fallacy. Then you cannot say it's unfair. Women who wish to succeed in marriage had better 1)stay virgins until the wedding night, and 2)don't work more than you can handle while simultaneously raising children. Studying or working extra or having a small side business is probably fine. Because things are as they are today you may have to work some for an extra income or rely on your parents to afford having a family, but it should never be your goal to have double incomes or a "career." Unless there is something you're truly passionate about, of course.

That is rare! Most the time the woman takes everything she can get tot eh point that he has to move back with him parents because he can't afford rent after paying child support and alimony while she gets to go away on vacation. This happens all the time to good men that were abused and cheated on by women.

I know what she's referring to as I signed on the dotted line when I divorced and didn't use an attorney because I had no financial means...it affected our 3 children. However, thankfully, we survived and thrived. I understand that many men are often financially stripped, and that is not correct either, but wonen need to open their eyes and be informed.

Yes lets support the creation of broken homes....

When women initiate divorce they've already planned it for months in not years. The truth is that is is on outlier case, the vast majority of the time men are wrecked financially while the women are awarded almost automatically the house, child custody, alimony and child support; all while making as much or more than men. This is a prime example of the "damsel in distress" victim role that women play in court and biased family court and divorce judges swallow hook line and sinker. Welcome to the man's side of the divorce experience.

YOu hear that MEN. Educate yourself and protect all your assets. Women are not to be trusted once you head into this territory. Never belive a woman's story in a marriage. NEVER. ruclips.net/video/EybSSH7Jiec/видео.html

" No one is accepting less than they're entitled to and I think that probably true". That ought to be a full stop statement. Look, I understand that a wife may not be as agressive as her husband , but the courts understand this as well and are tilted accordingly. My friend is paying $43,000 per yr for 22yrs to his ex wife for spousal support alone. (at least it will be down to that after the youngest son is of age) We men think we're providing a privileged life of being able to stay at home and focus on raising two sons, but women and divorce courts seem to think its an oppressed, caged, existence deserving of 22 yrs of reparations.

Congrats. Now you know how men feel when we get taken to the cleaners. Works both ways...😉

It doesn’t matter here either. I was repeatedly raped by my ex and he came back and got half custody. Ladies if you are thinking of getting pregnant, go to a sperm bank. Better to raise kids alone.

Yes, it's insanity. However, it seems to be a global problem. This happens here in Germany unfortunately a lot as well and I even know some mothers in other European countries who make similar experiences in family courts.

I live in Canada & it's even worse here. The police don't care about domestic abuse & Children's Aid (Canadian version of CPS) will tell you it never happened EVEN WHEN the preschool age child is standing in front of them with a black eye. The Family Court judges say "the law is irrelevant" when you finally get to court. It's maddening!

"2 comments" One was deleted LMAO.

I didn't know this. That's crazy!

It's the same everywhere sadly. I cant even begin to tell you the hell i went through to only win a supervised visitation, and a restraining order that said he wasn't allowed to swear at me 😂😂 this is after he tried to kill me and my 2 year old while i was 8 months pregnant. Once after a particularly bad attack leading to the police picking him up and taking him in, they let him go 3 hours later and gave him the house keys without warning me, i was asleep on the couch with my daughter in my arms when i woke up with him standing over me.. They always say we can't do anything unless he does something... I never understood this... how much more did he need to do? The abuse was unreal and the threat to my children's lives was 100% real! Yet women and children will always be silenced. It finally stopped after my now hubby who raised my kiddos as his own stood up and told him he would beat the snot out of him if he blinks in my direction, my oldest just turned 22 and ive been fear free for 16 years. I admire people like you who fight for all the voices that gets silenced every single day .. Thank you!

ill NEVER pay child support with 50/50 custody even with a court ruling

...the wording implies the father owes the mother child support (since you stated "...it's the bare minimum he can do" 0:37 .... Is this bcuz 1) most cases show fathers who owe mothers, 2) in most cases the father has a better paying job than mothers, 3) you were told this by your own lawyer in your own personal case against your child's father? 🤔 just curious.

50/50 custody means exactly that, when the kid is with mother she pays and vice versa. Women are genuinely horrendous creatures 😂

You , as a licensed barrister, cannot seriously be suggesting courts convict men without evidence?

Ya I think that is pretty obvious. Nobody is going to just give that much money away during a divorce. There can be exceptions, say perhaps the husband has substantial 401k's, they may negotiate to keep the 401k's in exchange for the house equity. The important point is that all marital assets will be split 50/50 but that doesn't mean every single asset, just that the totals are equal. So if you are getting the house "free and clear" it would certainly be in exchange for other assets.

Only a box would get 4-5 years before they had to refinance, a man would never get that opportunity. Men should get all the equity, they probably worked their rear ends off to built that equity with little input from the box.

hormones, passion, culture, legal requirement in certain cases.

Many people get married because they don't want to be on their own so they take anyone that comes along. That's why the separation/divorce rates are so high. Basically "You'll Do!"

I would very much like to hear from the men who have been divorced and how much they had taken from them, and what they were left with. What is 'alarming' is the way men get treated in divorce in the USA.

Vocelinda

Gents, this is what crazy looks like... stay clear....

Tell the driver to go where the ticket said you would be. If he says "oh I'm sorry I got lost, I'll rerail right away,, can you please help me?", it's one thing. If what he says instead is "well I changed ny mind, this is where we're going now, screw you and your ticket", that's the time to get off.

Wow, so many triggered people in the comments.....people who probably didnt address their own wrongdoings in the downfall of a a marriage to boot....shes just giving advice to people who care about what hapoens in a divorce...ideally, this doesnt happen, but people arent very accountable or mature or have good family values....so thats why it comes to this....

I was a young boy once. My father came to me, talked to me, said he couldn't stay in the family home anymore. He said he had problems with my mother, and a functional marriage couldn't be possible anymore. From the getgo I hated him just for that, because I was a product of a loving union, so I believed they had the duty to work on it. But they didn't. As he was going, I told him point blank that he needed to support the home as if he hadn't left. He made me a promise that he would. That nothing would change, except that he wouldn't be there every day anymore. I told him that if he didn't, knowing my mother, she would assert her spousal rights by every legal avenue she could - which of course, she did. He brushed it off, saying none of that would happen, that he would continue on delivering as normal. That was a blatant lie. A lie that he reaped no benefit in saying, for my mother DID sue him to oblivion in divorce court, just like I had warned him it would happen. Honest to god, he would have had an easier life if he honored his word.

Stay single guys.

He's not going to say anything he's now got piece and quiet . MONEY is only drama he's got . How much the system is going to take .

There is no reason for men to get married, especially if he has something to loose.

What you’re addressing doesn’t have to do with divorce. What you’re actually advising women on is how to gain full custody of the children in order to receive the highest amount of child support. None of these issues will prevent a man from having to pay alimony, that is determined by weather or not she worked throughout the relationship or not.

Maybe just try to be a better spouse?

Marriage is dead! Women and lawyers killed it! Divorce lawyers better start looking for a new job!

Women 🤮🤮🤮

BS

70% of all divorces are initiated by women, with the primary reason being "I'm not happy." Marriage is a fools game.