Видео

When you profit from other's security risks and tell the world to stop quantum computing .... :(

I think somewhat like Penrose on this topic. I DO NOT BUY THE BBT except the great TV show. I believe the single biggest problem with GRT and SRT as well as Newtonian Theory is the belief that ufG is an attraction force. If you accept two different concepts: 1. The ufG is the 3 dimensional superfluid like ether that forms the basic foundation for the universe, thus more like a cloud and... 2. The ufG is a pressure force that like an atmosphere of interactive density variations "condenses out matter" from the within pressure knots and eddies of ufG, much like rain squeezed from a cloud. Newton's 🍏 did not fall because the earth pulled it. His 🍏 was pushed to earth by the far greater pressure force of Earth's ufG knot acting in the vicinity of the knot surrounding the apple with both pushing on the gradually awakening of the covalent bond holding it to the stem. Since pressures reduce at the inverse square the mathematics of orbital mechanics as defined by Newton work just fine. But viewing ufG as a pressure force means that dual-wave/particles (photons) interacting with any reference frame must be measured at a fixed rate of C in a quantum mechanic state regardless of the origin frame that might be moving at C+v or C-v. This is a layman explanation but essentially it does reconcile the duality physics of QM and large or cosmic scale ufG. It also precludes Einstein's ridiculous notion that space is defined by the presence of matter and curved. Space is a 3 dimensional volume whether filled or empty. Density of matter is a property of space, not it's defining size or means of existence. Time is a sentient fixation with measuring movement within space, there being no body at rest anywhere in the universe. Time is not a 4th dimension. It is an artificial construct of sentient observation of movement. Einstein's theories were filled with poor mathematics.

Wow, and the JWST had found something from BEFORE the Big Bang? AND and AI voice generated BS channel is going to tell me the TRUTH about it? AND something about Roger Penrose?!?! Get the feeling all these dumb AI slop space channels are created by the one guy, but why the obsession with this fake news subject?

The only thing that’s been to somewhere that doesn’t exist is your imagination

PROFFESSOR ROGER PENROSE IS CORRECT. IT WOULD TAKE A PARTICLE ACCELERATOR THE SIZE OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM TO PROVE OR DISPROVE STRING THEORY.❤

lmao his very work that establishes the finite start to the universe is quite literally mankinds most proven science the spacetime theorems. Which points to a big bang universe lol... what in the world is this title.

ai trash

clearly you know nothing about physics, LOL. What he said say none of the things you state in the title. you are one of those quacks who post st upid videos that waste people's time.

This Ai voice is not doing it for me man

Yes

It's just a PR. Why don't you guys sit down and think, discuss, an maybe agree to something without 'race'. We already have a Large Collider that delivered a mouse. Not a single energy producing Tokamak - whatever is the name is in production. Maybe that money was wasted too? Anything useful other then WMD?

What's the "TERRIFYING " part? Click bait confirmed!

Fake and lies. Nothing but click bait. There is nothing going on with that star. there has never been anything going on with that star. Betelgeuse will outlive us and probably outlive the entire human race.

Trolls give me my phone back or pay my bills

No one is worried. Betelgeuse according to measurements isn’t creating enough Iron yet to kill its nuclear fusion and there for instigating the Core Collapse and the Star Exploding in a Supernova explosion.

Betelgeuse Betelgeuse Betelgeuse !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Beetlejuice 3 gonna be lit

The pronunciation of 'Battlejerz' is terrifying - unusual activity on Betelgeuse is NOT... by any measure. AI and its products are garbage on steroids.

But, several stars have been seen going 'Supernova' & surprisingly, still existed after going 'Supernova'. One would think that the term 'Supernova' would be retired. But, Big Science doesn't allow observed contradictions get in the way of their theories.

These discoveries are really really fascinating. I was already skeptical that the Big Bang was the beginning of the Universe, as it doesn't answer how and why the Universe spawned out of nowhere. I think it is more logical that the Universe is eternal. And the fact that we don't understand dark matter and dark energy really underlines how much more we have to learn. Maybe there is another explanation for redshift that will be discovered soon, thanks to JWST

NASA isn’t worried. Nor is anyone else who realises how far away this star is. Scaremongering rubbish

ALWAYS REACT WITH THUMB DOWN ON CLICK BAIT VIDEOS!

Teach your AI robot to pronounce Betelgeuse....

REPENT confess your sins to a priest follow your Lord Jesus Christ

I ain't worried about any collision 💥. The human race will be LONG GONE before it happens. We're doing a good enough job destroying ourselves. Lol

click-bate bollocks

I heard this years ago: When WHEN Yellowstone blows, agriculture will suffer greatly all over the planet as the ash will block light from the sun to an insurmountable degree. No more crops. That is what I heard. Time to fire up the old LED - lit greenhouses.

Williams George Davis Kenneth Hall Ronald

That's fucking stupid....................................................................

Scientists came up with big bang trying to explain everything moving .. Sometimes smart people are the stupidist.. Let me help yall out .. Universe's are circular .. No way an exsplosion would end up circular .. NO WAY ANYONE CAN MAKE THAT MAKE SENSE.. 😂😂 IDIOTS

cookingpot le Gigant?

Just one More proof giants lived all over the world. As the fortress in Rockwall Texas that is being covered up but not everyone bye that Bologna

You should see the sugar bowl

how are they not buried by now...if i leave a small patio stone on the ground its gone in a couple years with a layer of dirt on top and grass growing on it

Could the jars have been used to collect rainwater?

How heavy are the lids? How many people would it possibly take to lift the lids on an off?

Drinking cups is the purpose , that simple . With lids

✌️💚

bs

We live in a hologram, projecting God’s nightmare. Infinity is finite, up/down, good/bad =binary systems. The nightmare has an end. What you are spying about is not for you to manipulate. Great mistake.

Galileo disproved gravity/gravitational long before Isaac Newton came along and conned everyone with his gravitational attraction nonsense. Einstein further muddled things with his relativity nonetheless. Nicholas Tesla called him out for his mathematical nonsense but the flat earth proponents refused to accept Galileo's heliocentric model of the solar where it's the Earth's motion in space that creates the tides. Not some mystical force emanating from the moon that somehow can't be quantified. Giordano Bruno theorized the existence of exo-planets and am infinite universe with no cosmological center and was burned at the stake. Galileo was was imprisoned for his radical heliocentric model and tidal theory. Lame brain physicists cannot and will not admit the truth. Gravity is not a force. It's an effect. The universe is infinite with no cosmological center. Physicists are stuck either explaining an infinite universe with no beginning and no end. Or a creator god. As Carl Sagan would say : Both possibilities are equally frightening to a physisist.

What I find mind blowing, is that there are historians and people who still insist sites such as this, are "natural". Another example is the under water structure in Japan, nicknamed the Japan Atlantis. Government figures and some archeologist keep saying its a natural formation formed naturally over time. 🤦🏻‍♀️

I didn't hear Cox say he believed it or say there's any proof of it. He explained the theory (and it's not even a new theory) it's just mathmatically possible as we understand now. But is it likely? Probably not.

"What if I told you that the universe existed before the big bang? " (you say in that so aptly artificial voice) well Id assert you were an Ai and ask you to shut your mouth and let a human explain eh like Brian

Then again maybe God, who's been here forever, decided to build a material universe forever ago.

AI TRASH

I know, I've already seen this info in more detail.

in a nutshell: Everything that was 100% fact last year is absolutely wrong this year. HOWEVER! It is always a scientific fact until it ISNT. And the most intelligent of the uneducated can simply parrot whatever today's facts are, and they can be certain to be righter than anyone else is.

In the paperback book published 3 months before the JWST was launched and a year before the first CEERS survey was released, called SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY by RON KEMP, On page 48 I wrote quote, "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." I know exactly why the early universe contains so many old, fully mature galaxies, some even larger than our own Milky Way. I wrote all about it in the series of 6 books titled SECRET UNIVERSE. I accurately predicted the impossible early galaxy problem and even explained how I came to such a wild conclusion. There was no multiple, parallel or cyclical universes before the big bang. A big bang never happened. In my book GRAVITY I determined Einstein's equations on gravity was missing something very important. It was missing the action responsible or causing gravity to happen in all large spherically shaped bodies, you know, asteroids, comets, moons, planets, stars and even black holes. Once the action causing gravity was included in Einstein's equations on gravity, then all the predictions they made prior now appear to be all wrong. Starting with the age of the universe, how it came to be, the theorized singularity that inflated FTL then came to a stop, a hot dense point from where everything came from, supermassive black holes and more. After this action is added to his equations all the observation became perfectly clear. By revising Einstein's gravity equations I not only accurately predicted the impossible early galaxy problem, but also predicted the Hubble Tension and S8 Tension currently baffling scientists. The action causing gravity also causes the motion of stars and galaxies pinned on dark matter and dark energy. It predicts that stars are born close to supermassive black holes and then slowly migrate away as more and more energy and matter is added to space near the black hole. All the secrets of the universe unfolded after I determined what was causing gravity in large bodies and why. Everything began to make perfect sense. The theories and predictions made by Brian Cox, Kaku, Penrose, Susskind, and many more are basing their ideas on flawed cosmology from the start, the flawed equations of general relativity and 1st law of thermodynamics. We know energy and matter can indeed be created because if they can't be created then there would not be energy and matter in the universe. Scientists just don't know how energy and matter is created or when it all began. It wasn't a big bang. Cosmic inflation never happened. Scientists are not really looking for answers. They are looking to make things complicated so to continue doing their research, receiving grants. If the secrets of the universe were simple, explained by one action, an action that can be confirmed in experiments, and it explained everything, then there would be no need to look any further for a solution. I discovered this solution in 2004 after studying quantum field theory, particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology. I tried to explain what I discovered in NASA's space forum where astrophysicists were answering questions and they wouldn't listen to me. I told them telescopes cannot look back in time and they began claiming that according to the speed of light, and Einstein's look-back time I was wrong. I told them the JWST would find old, not young but old galaxies, some larger than our own Milky Way but further than an actual light distance of 13.8 billion light years away. I explained to them that the action causing gravity in all large bodies occurs because of over-unity of energy and they got extremely angry, called me name, insulted my intelligence and more. I told them the 1st law of thermodynamics was wrong. Because if energy is constantly created inside of large mass then when that energy comes to a rest relative to the large mass it would convert into pairs of oppositely charged elementary particles. Causing the slow increase in the total volume and density of energy and matter in the vacuum of space. This action is why matter is both attracted and why other large bodies are repelled away. It explains everything. Then in 2015 a Harvard professor and his students conducted a simple experiment, which can be repeated. They wanted to see if they could use weak EM fields to suspend hydrogen atoms in a vacuum chamber. They discovered at certain frequencies the hydrogen atoms were suspended because they contained a small electrical charge. Then they wanted to see what would happen if they sent different wavelengths of light to see if they could disrupt the positions of the suspended particles. The particle then began to glow with energy, more than the low energy light they were using to try and nudge the particles. The suspended particles they determined was radiating gamma rays, X-rays, and lots of heat, infrared light, more energy was being produced than what went into the experiment. They published their work to a peer review journal. When I read the experiments I knew instantly what was happening. So I commented to the researchers congratulating them on proving over-unity of energy. Then I returned to the journal to copy the URL for reference to a paper I was writing and the article and my comment was nowhere to be found. Peer review realized I was right, the experiments proved over-unity of energy was indeed possible yet didn't want the world to know how easy it was to create energy out of thin air "a vacuum". The experiment proved my hypothesis correct about how energy and matter is constantly being produced because large spherically shaped bodies are being suspended in the vacuum of space by countless weak EM fields. It's actually the spherical shape of the large bodies while suspended in a soup of weak EM fields that results in gravity, dark matter and dark energy reactions. This has profound implications from the beginning of the universe to now. A big bang never happened. The universe could be hundreds of trillions of years old and we would not know it. We look out into space and can only estimate the age of bodies in our own galaxy. We get an estimated age of around 13.7 billion years for the oldest stars in our galaxy. I proposed that because energy and matter is constantly being created new near large mass, then the largest galaxy, possibly containing a SMBH in it's core weighing a trillion solar masses would be the center, where everything in the universe originated. All other bodies would be moving away from it. Thus the oldest and largest galaxies would be located on one side of the universe while the youngest and smallest galaxies would be located on the opposite side of the universe and our galaxy because it's around 13.7 billion years old would be somewhere in the middle. That's why I made the prediction that the JWST would discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as it's able to see, even further than 14 billion light years away. I also wrote that in the opposite direction the JWST would find galaxies to become smaller and smaller with distance till they end with nothing beyond them but a massive empty void where new matter was slowly being created new. All this because of over-unity of energy occurring to all large bodies suspended in the vacuum of space by countless weak EM fields "light". There was no big bang. There was no multiple universe. Energy and matter is slowly being created new everywhere. This explains everything, including the Hubble Tension and S* Tension. I came up with this theory in 2004 and wasn't able to publish my work until 2021 before the JWST was launched which confirmed everything. One side of the universe, towards the LEO constellation they discovered old, fully mature galaxies as far as the telescope is able to see, even further than 13.8 billion light years away. They are called "universe breakers". Then on the opposite side, towards the Aquarius constellation they discovered a drop off in the number of galaxies and stars. Beyond them is nothing but a massive void. I published the entire series of 6 books before the JWST was launched 12-25-2021 explaining all this and more. I even explained how there's no such thing as a black hole information paradox, origin of comets, why the sun's corona is millions of degrees hotter than it's surface and more. All because of over-unity of energy and pair production theory and or virtual particles.

If a title says 'changes everything,' you know you're in for some bullsh***t.