Видео

Really? Wigs padded with leather? Anything but an Afro 😂😂😂😂

Great! Waiting for the next decades!!

Hi! What's the name of the outerwear on the man in @16:46 ? I'm attempting to recreate it but can't find any other examples of one with a square neckline like that

I'm really fascinated with Egyptian jewelry.

I'm really struggling with this. Anne Boleyn, not Mary Boleyn, married Henry. The constant references to Mary are grating, especially when it clearly says Anne on screen! The Tudors took power in 1485 not 1483, after Richard 3 was defeated at Bosworth. There were still Plantagenet rebellions after Tudor took power, and there was plenty of turmoil and upheaval after. Burgundy wasn't part of France or England. At best, Burgundy was an ally of England. Most of the time, they weren't even so much as an ally of France - a sister of Edward 4, Margaret, married a Burgundian and became the ArchDuchess. But it was governed separately and *never* part of England. In 1500, Henry wasn't even Prince of Wales, let alone King. He was still the second son, the spare, destined for the church. Richard 3's brother was King Edward 4. The portrait of Henry wasn't him in his prime - Holbein painted him when he was ageing and obese, Henry in his prime was as a young man, in his early 20s. He was well into his 40s when this portrait was painted in 1536. The portrait of the lady at 29:44 is Lady Helena Snakenborg. She was Swedish and came to England as part of the embassy when the Swedish King was seeking Elizabeth's hand in marriage, and she stayed and married an English man, serving as a lady in waiting to Elizabeth up to her death in 1603. Hampton Court is a Palace, not a castle. We don't think E1 had smallpox - we know she did. The portrait at 22:47 is John Howe, painted by someone in the artistic circle of Marcus Gheeraert the Younger. At 12:45 "distract" not detract. Interesting video, shame the wild inaccuracies which kind of ruin it and make this a more frustrating than enjoyable watch.

Cat miauing at min 2.16? :D

The hours spent curling their hair up into afros while banning black women from showing their hair 🤡🤡🤡

"... anatomical recreation of what it's supposed to be covering and hiding." Nice one! That's some first rate palavering.🙃 I really enjoy your videos. Thanks for posting.

Yes. Early Middle Ages. Basically fall of Rome (post 400) and later.

Thankyou!

great video, but what i think you could add is timestamps. since the video is quite long, they could be quite useful for orientation

A “False” beard sounds as dumb as the Land of the “Black” soil!!

This lady has some serious lack of common sense issues! Did she say they melted She butter in the hot Sun on they’re wigs to condition them???? 😂😂😂😂😂 ummm they’re black aren’t they? As an African American i just got finished “conditioning” my actual braids with Shea butter!😂😂😂😂

This is very inaccurate historically. Burgundy was never part of France in the renaissance or before. Burgundy was never part of England’s territories in France either. It was an independent country and part of the Holy Roman Austrian Empire Definitely not part of France or an English territory. It’s now Belgium more or less.

Battle of Bosworth was 1485, not 1483

Tut had a pyramid tomb? I'll alert the press.

I enjoyed this video

I love the braids on the women and the afro’s❤ Not to mention the Sun kissed skin tones! All Black people’s hair grows straight up towards the Sun. Just so many fun facts!❤😊

Thanks so much for sharing these lectures!

Ok, so I like this content however I have to say …. The “Wig” stuff is all fabricated!! Those wigs are exactly what I said… recreations of sick minded peoples imaginations… all of those statues are representations of indigenous black African hairstyles… I guarantee you either some modern Arabs or Europeans with bias views and agendas made the so called hair / wigs under those jewels… these people were black Africans and ain’t no way they made wigs and jewels that look like braids to go over straight hair… ain’t no damn way!!! Now carry on..

Great lecture!

Great video! Very helpful and informative and I loved the collection of images you have carefully selected.

18:25 getting heavy Quirrell vibes

At 25:20 the females were shown lighter skin tone as a symbol they did not need to work out in the sun all day. That was for the men and boys.

A high forehead was a componant of beauty? During the 15th century? Before?

"His pyramid tomb"?

Interesting you didn't say anything about the brown skinned noble woman 😂

Fascinating

Majorly underrated channel ❤🎉 thank you

So insightful, thanks

Is this the Middle Ages?

Amazing research! Thanks for sharing!

This channel is a hidden gold mine! Amazing work! Thanks so much!

There it is again in the gabled hood. Had it recently become available? Was it an early band name?

Why do so many of the French hoods have a fabric headband of what looks like gold silk with black stripes? Beautiful! Why are so many of that particular fabric design?

*Palestine

The large, wide beaded collar necklaces were a symbol of divinity of the wearer.

ruclips.net/video/oURLKZjDnVg/видео.html ruclips.net/video/nq1jGHk1YcM/видео.html ruclips.net/video/JUl5z_QUm8A/видео.html Have a close look at those hair locks worn by the women and tell me where have you seen them before also have a close look at the loin cloth worn by the man with the mic and tell me where you have seen such loin cloth.

THANK YOU. SO WELL DONE! Please keep sharing

Love the video, very well done and very useful to me. I have been trying to identify the painting shown at 11:45 without success, I would very much like to learn more about it.

thanks for this there is not much info on historocal fashion other then one off videos

you keep saying Mary Boleyn it wasn;t Mary It was Anne who became queen , Mary was king Henry;s mistress and never queen

17:45 tudor women in the early times did not wear stays. it was the kirtle that was kind of stiff and helped them achieve the shape they look they wanted. it was more in the elizabethan era when the pair of bodies got adopted. The first mention of pair of bodies is in 1571, for Elizabeth I's wardrobe. www.elizabethancostume.net/corsets/history.html this explains it well.

Thank you so much for this! I really needed it for the art i make :)