Видео

Mathematicians laugh in superiority at the physicists.

My grandmother sailed a lot and she saw it but most people didn’t believe her.

3:32 Equal transit time

We really don't know if all the fundamental forces combine together at high enough temperatures, to make the grand unified theory. What i want to know is if gravity was a thing, then why didn't the entire universe collapse back into a singularity? That's a big problem.

At 1m distance I'm not sure which force is stronger, but at long distances seems to me that the gravity is the only force that matters!

Good stuff, as always. Liked & Subscribed

Woah

had no idea what you was on about when it came to the math, but others have said the Planck length is like having a human hair being the size of the observable universe then the Planck length would be a tree on earth

No. It doesn't prove anything. It's not even a paradox. The assumptions are wrong. What if light only travels so far before dissipating all its energy into the quantum foam? What if there are dark clouds that scatter brigh light into darker infrared light?

Thank u 😀 for this video

That was another five minutes and twenty-three seconds of my life I won't get back, trying (and failing) to find out what a tensor is. I should have read the bit about "viewer discretion is advised". Still, it was entertaining - smiles.

Aha... so proton's make up everything. I knew we couldnt trust those bastards.

What if we find a way in the future to turn off the Higgs field? Go even faster than light?

Proton-to-electron mass ratio: 2(2·3·5)²+[2(u+u+d)-mᵉ]/mᵉ = 1 836,15267 electron = mᵉ = 0,51099895 MeV proton = mᵉ·2(2·3·5)²+2(u+u+d)-mᵉ = 938,27208943 MeV neutron = mᵉ·2(2·3·5)²+2(u+d+d+mᵉ)-d-(1/2)mᵉ = 939,56542052 MeV quark d = 4,75416145 MeV quark u = 2,36916387 MeV electron(mᵉ) = 0,510998950 MeV muon (mᵐ) = 105,658373568 MeV = mᵉ · ᵉ√ ̅̅ ̅̅(2⁴+5⁴)·(5⁵-2·3³)̅̅ ̅̅ e = 2,7182818284... (Napier's constant, Euler's number); mᵐ = muon mass ; mᵉ = electron mass mᵐ = mᵉ * [(2⁴+5⁴)*(5⁵-2·3³)]^(1/e) tau (mᵗ) = 1 776,938 MeV = mᵉ · [(2⁴+5⁴)ᵠ꞉(2·5)-e] φ = 1,6180339887... golden ratio ; e = 2,7182818284... (Napier's constant, Euler's number) mᵗ = mᵉ * [(2⁴+5⁴)ᵠ/(2*5)-e] mᵗ = mᵐ · ⁴√ ̅̅ ̅̅ 2⁷·5⁴-3 ̅̅ ̅̅ α = 1꞉ ᴾᴵ√ ̅̅ ̅̅ ̅̅(2⁴+5⁴)ᵠ · e⁵ ̅̅ ̅̅ ̅̅ (fine structure constant) α = 1/[(2^4+5^4)^φ*e^5]^(1/π) = 0,0072973525677660... φ = 1,6180339887... golden ratio, e = 2,7182818284... (Napier's constant, Euler's number)

I invented ugawumba , 1 ugawumba is equivalent to 0.00001 planck length.

Good video. Though conjectures are treated as science nowadays even by scientists

Could the Planck length be the membrane between us and the infinite Universes around us?

string theory is so useless ..... I wish it would just go away

Disclaimer… I never took higher level physics, I just watch a bunch of YT videos…I know that you can use tensors to transform a 2D map onto a 3D surface say a globe while maintaining proportions. So from that fact I knew that tensors contain relational data. If I transform x how much does y change in order to maintain the same angles. I believe this would be controlled by some scaling factor, some rule, or generalization in the matrix.

The Google search history… lol 😂

Would love to see a video on the electric universe theory

Nice Vid..keep going 🌌👍

So you end the video and you still don’t give your viewer an explication of what a tensor truly is? Danggg

So from a photon’s perspective, it would see the entire universe and all time past and future. Just like the inhabitants of Flatland don’t realize that we can see inside their homes, their safes and even inside their bodies, but the 2D inhabitants can only see lines of different lengths and determine shapes by going around them and feeling them.

Can anyone tell me why the energy given off in a scattering experiment at Planck scale by definition is a black hole, please? It was almost the last thing he said in the video.....Thanks!

It’s a party in there

Should we expect the mass to fluctuate within a certain margin if the internal dynamics are so messy?

Are baryons and fermions synonymous ?

So basically, a "proton" identifies a location in space where the uncertainty principle is particularly active in producing fundamental "particles" that are constantly interacting with each other.

Ur mom is a proton

Smith Ruth Davis Melissa Taylor Shirley

Beautiful video! Is it only inside protons and other particles that quarks show up or is does it happen everywhere in space?

Remember when one i think japanese researcher faked a pentaquark paper. Mission failed succesfully

thank you, economy will rise by using jet plasma machine and compressed gas(Air) in isolated structure in water pool with more than 80 % efficiency , it transfers compressed gas(hot air) temperature from engine to water for steam generator in first level, New energy from sea will change world soon, there are other source of energy that with international cooperation in coastline we can reduce effect of global warming, sea is huge source of energy, further more we can prevent these phenomena like cyclone and flood and wildfire by using this hot seasonal atmospheric condition, recent years in summer, geothermal energy happens in surface of coastline, there are many countries in coastline with seasonal hot weather and water condition in comparison with middle Ocean, its more than 12 degrees , in sum-up, by using this energy not only is economical but also reduce global warming in countries like Japan, China, India, Mediterranean countries, Iran, Brazil, Mexico, Us, Canada, (Africa and Arabian countries....) . I invented new method base on air pressure rules and quantum physics ionization sea water minerals in strong dynamic magnet bases on paramagnetic and diamagnetic particles and electrical microwave wave field and electric chemical reactions (K+, Mg++, Na+, H+, H++, li+, H2, ...) +( O2, N2, ...) into up level by vacuum pump from storage into combustion chambers as major part of fuel (more than 50%) for producing electricity and fresh water and fertilizer. this machine produces 150Megwatt-hour/hour and 20000M3/DAY fresh water and fertilizer. 7 methods zero pollution for reducing global warming I mentioned in my profile. (G20 countries can solve these phenomena).

unfortunately for all you "CMB disproves steady state" people, you base it all on an assumption that the power of the universe is relegated to the limitation of the photon. So desperate to disprove God and so eager to use evolution to do so; it's laughable at the hubris and arrogance! where is there any proof that the universe took billions of light years to expand? You would think that quantum physics would totally destroy this ignorance. But it doesn't because of the underlying agenda of "Destroying God"! the power of the universe > the photon.

I don't believe we know what's inside a Proton as we add energy that turns into matter in particle accelerators creating new particles.

It’s close enough

Gravity is not a force

I wonder if this has anything to do with motion.

There are NO subatomic particles. The atom is a helix like your DNA. There is a positively charged side and a negatively charged side, spiraling around a hollow tube created by the push toward and away from each other. Just like every beam of light. Just like the magnetic flow. It’s all the same action. The charge difference/ratio between the positive and negative in htz (like nano or pickhtz) is what creates the bonds, shape and total weight and charge. Think of it like more a battery.

Very good. Next time reduce the speed of delivery of narration... could it be made more illustratitive?

QM classicalized in 2010: Forgotten Physics website uncovers the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie, Planck, Bohr etc. Further: “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon ended ALL Standard Theory/Model by the Expansion Theory. A proton is a collection of 1836 expanding electrons and add a bouncing expanding electron makes a hydrogen atom. “G” calculated from first principles- the hydrogen atom- in 2002. Try to keep up.

Hello , when the universe first formed, did subatomic particles interact with the Higgs field and change Z bosons, gaining excess charge and mass? Does this change occur in the form of absorption and release? and how does it turn out? If it results in absorption, since the mass of the Z boson is high, shouldn't the masses of the quarks and electrons that absorb the Z boson also be high?

Uncertainty applies to our ability to make precise measurements. Theres no reason or evidence that it's a physical property that cause 'particles' to be unable to decide if they exist making 'turn there existence off and on'

If we are all truly living in a Boltzman Brain, there wouldn't be an individual thought that I would have that you wouldn't know. 😉

Every model we use is a human model. We use a model of gravity that is incredibly precise, and may yet improve upon it, but at the end of the day it is still a human created model and therefore not a perfect representation of reality. Same goes with any observable phenomenon. This is why AI will never have an accurate perception of reality as it can only rely on human models to understand the world.

This is so absolutely true to the core. We are introduced to tensors, but tensors are related to a myriad of other functions and, although we are working with tensors, we STILL DO NOT KNOW WHAT A TENSOR SPECIFICALLY IS. The following is a simple Google Search for the question, "What is a tensor in simple terms?" “In mathematics, tensors are geometrical objects that describe the linear relationships between geometric, nu- merical, and other tensile vectors.” “The simplest way to imagine a tensor is that it's a vector in a product space. And, of course, we have spinors and twistors. I suspect that the tensors, spinors and twistors are basically just mathematical objects that can be used to describe physical properties, just like scalars and vectors. In fact, tensors are merely a generalisation of scalars and vectors; a scalar is a zero-rank tensor, and a vector is a first rank tensor. The best way to grasp it intellectually, I suspect, is to just work on some algebraic maths problem and a tensor would be mentally written as an algebraic object that describes a multilinear relationship between sets of algebraic objects related to a vector space. Tensors may map between different objects such as vectors, scalars, and even other tensors. And, for some reason, I still cannot envision how the tensor concept is able to enable one to focus on what part of the maths equation we are trying to solve for, but it somehow works. For some reason, the tensors, spinors and twistors are the alternate maths version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

@3:00 this is a critical point, the Compton wavelength is certainly *_not_* "purely quantum mechanical". The mass is gravitational charge (or inertia, but then there's the Equivalence Principle), so it is a relationship that involves gravity. GR is already a quantum theory imho, just not classically, since classical GR presumes trivial spacetime topology (locally Minkowski) which is fundamentally wrong-headed. Any spacetime containing matter cannot be locally Minkowski. There has to be non-trivial topology. Provided that topology can contain ER bridges it will contain closed timelike curves, and that yields a quantum theory. The indeterminism due to CTCs is precisely the same as QM indeterminacy (gives a nondistributive orthomodular lattice of measurement propositions), only this indetermism is superior in a sense since it is explained with spacetime topology, whereas in QM it is just unexplained axiom.