Видео

So from a photon’s perspective, it would see the entire universe and all time past and future. Just like the inhabitants of Flatland don’t realize that we can see inside their homes, their safes and even inside their bodies, but the 2D inhabitants can only see lines of different lengths and determine shapes by going around them and feeling them.

Can anyone tell me why the energy given off in a scattering experiment at Planck scale by definition is a black hole, please? It was almost the last thing he said in the video.....Thanks!

It’s a party in there

Should we expect the mass to fluctuate within a certain margin if the internal dynamics are so messy?

Are baryons and fermions synonymous ?

So basically, a "proton" identifies a location in space where the uncertainty principle is particularly active in producing fundamental "particles" that are constantly interacting with each other.

Ur mom is a proton

Smith Ruth Davis Melissa Taylor Shirley

Beautiful video! Is it only inside protons and other particles that quarks show up or is does it happen everywhere in space?

Never let mathmagicians form science theories. Let this AWFUL psuedo science be the example. Math people should collect data for science, not make terrible tales to explain the data. Measure stuff and then stfu. You are ruining cosmology and quantum physics when you try to explain it.

Remember when one i think japanese researcher faked a pentaquark paper. Mission failed succesfully

thank you, economy will rise by using jet plasma machine and compressed gas(Air) in isolated structure in water pool with more than 80 % efficiency , it transfers compressed gas(hot air) temperature from engine to water for steam generator in first level, New energy from sea will change world soon, there are other source of energy that with international cooperation in coastline we can reduce effect of global warming, sea is huge source of energy, further more we can prevent these phenomena like cyclone and flood and wildfire by using this hot seasonal atmospheric condition, recent years in summer, geothermal energy happens in surface of coastline, there are many countries in coastline with seasonal hot weather and water condition in comparison with middle Ocean, its more than 12 degrees , in sum-up, by using this energy not only is economical but also reduce global warming in countries like Japan, China, India, Mediterranean countries, Iran, Brazil, Mexico, Us, Canada, (Africa and Arabian countries....) . I invented new method base on air pressure rules and quantum physics ionization sea water minerals in strong dynamic magnet bases on paramagnetic and diamagnetic particles and electrical microwave wave field and electric chemical reactions (K+, Mg++, Na+, H+, H++, li+, H2, ...) +( O2, N2, ...) into up level by vacuum pump from storage into combustion chambers as major part of fuel (more than 50%) for producing electricity and fresh water and fertilizer. this machine produces 150Megwatt-hour/hour and 20000M3/DAY fresh water and fertilizer. 7 methods zero pollution for reducing global warming I mentioned in my profile. (G20 countries can solve these phenomena).

unfortunately for all you "CMB disproves steady state" people, you base it all on an assumption that the power of the universe is relegated to the limitation of the photon. So desperate to disprove God and so eager to use evolution to do so; it's laughable at the hubris and arrogance! where is there any proof that the universe took billions of light years to expand? You would think that quantum physics would totally destroy this ignorance. But it doesn't because of the underlying agenda of "Destroying God"! the power of the universe > the photon.

I don't believe we know what's inside a Proton as we add energy that turns into matter in particle accelerators creating new particles.

It’s close enough

Gravity is not a force

I wonder if this has anything to do with motion.

There are NO subatomic particles. The atom is a helix like your DNA. There is a positively charged side and a negatively charged side, spiraling around a hollow tube created by the push toward and away from each other. Just like every beam of light. Just like the magnetic flow. It’s all the same action. The charge difference/ratio between the positive and negative in htz (like nano or pickhtz) is what creates the bonds, shape and total weight and charge. Think of it like more a battery.

Very good. Next time reduce the speed of delivery of narration... could it be made more illustratitive?

QM classicalized in 2010: Forgotten Physics website uncovers the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie, Planck, Bohr etc. Further: “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon ended ALL Standard Theory/Model by the Expansion Theory. A proton is a collection of 1836 expanding electrons and add a bouncing expanding electron makes a hydrogen atom. “G” calculated from first principles- the hydrogen atom- in 2002. Try to keep up.

Hello , when the universe first formed, did subatomic particles interact with the Higgs field and change Z bosons, gaining excess charge and mass? Does this change occur in the form of absorption and release? and how does it turn out? If it results in absorption, since the mass of the Z boson is high, shouldn't the masses of the quarks and electrons that absorb the Z boson also be high?

Uncertainty applies to our ability to make precise measurements. Theres no reason or evidence that it's a physical property that cause 'particles' to be unable to decide if they exist making 'turn there existence off and on'

If we are all truly living in a Boltzman Brain, there wouldn't be an individual thought that I would have that you wouldn't know. 😉

Every model we use is a human model. We use a model of gravity that is incredibly precise, and may yet improve upon it, but at the end of the day it is still a human created model and therefore not a perfect representation of reality. Same goes with any observable phenomenon. This is why AI will never have an accurate perception of reality as it can only rely on human models to understand the world.

This is so absolutely true to the core. We are introduced to tensors, but tensors are related to a myriad of other functions and, although we are working with tensors, we STILL DO NOT KNOW WHAT A TENSOR SPECIFICALLY IS. The following is a simple Google Search for the question, "What is a tensor in simple terms?" “In mathematics, tensors are geometrical objects that describe the linear relationships between geometric, nu- merical, and other tensile vectors.” “The simplest way to imagine a tensor is that it's a vector in a product space. And, of course, we have spinors and twistors. I suspect that the tensors, spinors and twistors are basically just mathematical objects that can be used to describe physical properties, just like scalars and vectors. In fact, tensors are merely a generalisation of scalars and vectors; a scalar is a zero-rank tensor, and a vector is a first rank tensor. The best way to grasp it intellectually, I suspect, is to just work on some algebraic maths problem and a tensor would be mentally written as an algebraic object that describes a multilinear relationship between sets of algebraic objects related to a vector space. Tensors may map between different objects such as vectors, scalars, and even other tensors. And, for some reason, I still cannot envision how the tensor concept is able to enable one to focus on what part of the maths equation we are trying to solve for, but it somehow works. For some reason, the tensors, spinors and twistors are the alternate maths version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

@3:00 this is a critical point, the Compton wavelength is certainly *_not_* "purely quantum mechanical". The mass is gravitational charge (or inertia, but then there's the Equivalence Principle), so it is a relationship that involves gravity. GR is already a quantum theory imho, just not classically, since classical GR presumes trivial spacetime topology (locally Minkowski) which is fundamentally wrong-headed. Any spacetime containing matter cannot be locally Minkowski. There has to be non-trivial topology. Provided that topology can contain ER bridges it will contain closed timelike curves, and that yields a quantum theory. The indeterminism due to CTCs is precisely the same as QM indeterminacy (gives a nondistributive orthomodular lattice of measurement propositions), only this indetermism is superior in a sense since it is explained with spacetime topology, whereas in QM it is just unexplained axiom.

Read the Ummo papers and you will see what is the smallest unit we can measure.

I think 𝛬 = 1.900432(43) E-52 m^-2 Search the following number on the web for the published research article: S2666032624000334

nothing all because it does not exist

Gravity is not a force but a phenomenon that stems from space distortion as result of presence of energy/mass. Hence the perceived “paradoxes”.

A very clear and very lovely explanation

There’s no operational meaning beyond Planck scale. Absolutely no spacetime can exist beyond it. Idealism > Physicalism

Way above this old retired biologist's pay scale - But - I do have enough layman experience, and knowledge, to understand what he is saying. Well, at least the basic concepts he describes.

Hot Take : "data science" people have no business using the word "tensor" at all, since their data sets almost never represent mathematical objects obeying certain transformation rules when you change the basis.

All this is predicated by high temperature imagination. Simple Bollux and false dreams.

I like it! I had a little trouble following the cadence of the narrator... maybe you can slow it down a little?

Or you could logically define the Planck Length as the wavelength of light where it’s energy = Planck constant, which equals exactly c. Of course that would make Planck Time equal exactly 1 second. But that would make too much sense, so where’s the fun in that?

Newton said it was a force, and he gave that force a name: "gravity." When Einstein said with his theory that there is no such force named gravity, then gravity does not exist. that's why you can lift a book and think you are stronger that the earth because there is nothing that pull down How are you going to find something that does not exist?

No wonder people are doubting the stability of a proton.

these videos are a gift, seriously, thank you for taking the time to make them and share with us all!

What is half a Plank length called? 🤣

this is my personal journey down to a tee! Well done

Time is a compactified dimension onesinglePlanck second in size. . This is why there are limits. Limit theorem. This is why there is conservation. We are closed universe in present moment. And limit theorem says that the closure< is between maxima and minima. Neutron decay cosmology Gravity gathers mass to event horizons Neutrons fall into event horizon Fall out in deep voids Where they decay into amorphous monatomic hydrogen, proton electron soup, Dark matter. And then this coalesces and falls towards an event horizon.

this is one of the best explanations Ive ever seen, thank you!

This is absolutely brilliant !

I enjoyed seeing your well produce video tutorial. My interest in the subject far exceeds my abilities. For those that may prefer a mechanical analog, you can look at harmonics of a guitar string and such. If I may, I would like to present another mechanical method quantize a system where you can actually build very stable elementary structures. ruclips.net/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/видео.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 Area under a curve is often equivalent to energy. Buckling of an otherwise flat field shows a very rapid growth of this area. It may show how the universe’s energy naturally developed from the inherent buckling of fields under stresses. Under the right conditions, the quantization of a field is easily produced. The ground state energy is induced from a newly discover variation Euler’s contain column theory. Containing the material from the vertical axis must happen before over buckling, or the effect will not work. Speculatively, the sheet of elastic material represents a field that is responding to stresses in a quantized manor when stress is applied in the vertical A stable structure can be produced when the undulations are bonded to a flat sheet that is placed above and below the core material. Using sheet material in this case, we are all familiar with corrugated box board sometimes called truss core panels. In chemistry it would be molecular structure down to atomic and sub-atomic structure.

I enjoyed seeing your well produce video tutorial. My interest in the subject far exceeds my abilities. For those that may prefer a mechanical analog, you can look at harmonics of a guitar string and such. If I may, I would like to present another mechanical method quantize a system where you can actually build very stable elementary structures. ruclips.net/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/видео.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 Area under a curve is often equivalent to energy. Buckling of an otherwise flat field shows a very rapid growth of this area. It may show how the universe’s energy naturally developed from the inherent buckling of fields under stresses. Under the right conditions, the quantization of a field is easily produced. The ground state energy is induced from a newly discover variation Euler’s contain column theory. Containing the material from the vertical axis must happen before over buckling, or the effect will not work. Speculatively, the sheet of elastic material represents a field that is responding to stresses in a quantized manor when stress is applied in the vertical A stable structure can be produced when the undulations are bonded to a flat sheet that is placed above and below the core material. Using sheet material in this case, we are all familiar with corrugated box board sometimes called truss core panels. In chemistry it would be molecular structure down to atomic and sub-atomic structure.

This is non-scientific question right out the gate. We can't observe anything below the Planck length - even "in theory" (i.e., it's not just a matter of not having the technology "yet"). In order to look at something that small, we'd have to create conditions which would lead to a microscopic black hole, and the hole's event horizon would prevent any information from getting out. So, eve if we make a proposal for "what happens" down there, we're unable to collect data to validate it. We can't apply the scientific method, so there's no point in asking the question in the first place. You may invent an idea, or read about one, that really sits nice with you, and then you can believe that's what, in fact, happens, but it will always be only a philosophical speculation - never settled science.

Sounds tens!:p I'm glad I'm just a regular human :p