Видео

This video is very informative on the topic science and religion ✅ Much appreciated🙏

Αυτός ο ζεστός και τρυφερός άνθρωπος είναι ένα αληθινό διαμάντι σήμερα Πέρα από της γνώσεις του φωτίζει τον αληθινό Χριστο Τολμώ να πω τον αγαπώ

ΑΝΤΙΓΝώΣΗ .. σας προτείνω να το διαβάσετε το συγκεκριμένο βιβλίο

22.39 Absolutely agree with this lady. Indeed she is Blessed. Although science most certainly has a place of importance in our world, I feel it can, and often runs away from the importance of the fact that in itself, science is not to be distanced from our Creator but to look on God Himself as the true Architect, Surgeon, Creator, Father of mankind, and to place science where it belongs, in His Hands, like a scalpel so to speak brings science into a safe place and glorifies Him which is how it should be. When science runs ahead of God and goes its own way, this is where Danger takes hold and destruction, error, self gain and suffering takes place.

No death before the fall

49:42 The Telos of the scientific community is to achieve paradise IN THE WORLD, on earth, 'apotheosis', which is diametrically opposed to the telos of the human soul which is the suprarational 'theosis', acquiring the grace of God, and reaching the Kingdom of God which cannot be observed with a scientific instrument. How can something WITHIN the world encapsulate and help us understand the nature of the world? This is like trying to look at the back of your own head from the sky using your own eyes, this is like trying to see the inside of your head by looking into a mirror. This is a common problematic in the history of the scientific method, which arguable spans back to the ancient greek philosophers. Christ said 'My Kingdom is not of this world'... 1 John 4:6 We are of God. He who knows God hears us; he who is not of God does not hear us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error. John 15:18-25 [18] “If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. [19] If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. [20] Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My word, they will keep yours also. [21] But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know Him who sent Me. [22] If I had not come and spoken to them, they would have no sin, but now they have no excuse for their sin. [23] He who hates Me hates My Father also. [24] If I had not done among them the works which no one else did, they would have no sin; but now they have seen and also hated both Me and My Father. [25] But this happened that the word might be fulfilled which is written in their law, ‘They hated Me without a cause.’

47:18 Prescient statement. We are moving towards transhumanism, post-human society, the human is apparently just 'a hackable animal' according to dr Harari.

30:00 Read Torstein Tollefsen, his works 'The Christocentric Cosmology of St Maximus the Confessor' as well as 'Activity and Participation in Late Antique and Early Christian Thought', if you haven't already. You will be blown away.

1 Corinthians 1:18-25 [18] For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. [19] For it is written: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.” [20] Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? [21] For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. [22] For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; [23] but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, [24] but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. [25] Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

15:30 I think the word he was looking for was 'metanoia', as in change of the phronema, the changing of the spiritual mind, the turning of the nous toward the God. Metanoia is achieved through the grace of God, it is not a philosophical or scientific matter. 'Metania' is a type of bow/prostration we do during prayers/liturgy.

10:25 Neo-patristic works are not necessary for this, simply go to the Church Fathers themselves and their patristic works. Neo-patristic theologians often create more problems than they solve. Of course the Church Fathers did not have the information we have today regarding the sciences, there are many things which they simply have not said anything about. But are those things really necessary for society to comprehend? Do they benefit mankind? Or should the focus be spiritual (I think so...) Colossians 2:8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ. Colossians 2:18 Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind

1 Corinthians 2:4-16 [4] And my speech and my preaching were not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, [5] that your faith should not be in the wisdom of men but in the power of God. [6] However, we speak wisdom among those who are mature, yet not the wisdom of this age, nor of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing. [7] But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the ages for our glory, [8] which none of the rulers of this age knew; for had they known, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. [9] But as it is written: “Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor have entered into the heart of man the things which God has prepared for those who love Him.” [10] But God has revealed them to us through His Spirit. For the Spirit searches all things, yes, the deep things of God. [11] For what man knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? Even so no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God. [12] Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we might know the things that have been freely given to us by God. [13] These things we also speak, not in words which man’s wisdom teaches but which the Holy Spirit teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual. [14] But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. [15] But he who is spiritual judges all things, yet he himself is rightly judged by no one. [16] For “who has known the mind of the Lord that he may instruct Him?” But we have the mind of Christ.

Note regarding "edification" and "Knowledge of the Son of God" (verse 13): "Knowledge of God" is not an external 'knowing about God' but a direct experience of God. According to Saint Gregory Palamas (14th Century A.D.), via the grace of God we see/experience God Himself, but only His energy, not His divine essence which is unknowable to man. And it is not merely our purpose to learn the Holy Theology, in order to know about God, but our true purpose is to know God directly, through the grace/life of the Holy Spirit: "It is our purpose to communicate the teaching on the light of grace of those long-revered saints whose wisdom comes from experience, proclaiming that "such is the teaching of Scripture". Thus we set forth as a summary the words of Isaac, the faithful interpreter of these things: "Our soul", he affirms, "possesses two eyes, as all the Fathers tell us. Yet the sight which is proper to each 'eye' is not for the same use: with one eye, we behold the secrets of nature, that is to say, the power of God. His wisdom and providence towards us, things comprehensible by virtue of the greatness of His governance. With the other eye, we contemplate the glory of His holy nature, since it pleases God to introduce us to the spiritual mysteries." Since then these are eyes, what they see is a light; but since each possesses a power of vision designed for a particular use, a certain duality appears in the contemplation of this light, since each eye sees a different light, invisible to the other eye. As Saint Isaac has explained, the one is the apprehension of the power, wisdom and providence of God, and in general, knowledge of the Creator through the creatures; the other is contemplation, not of the divine name but of the glory of His nature, which the Saviour has bestowed on His disciples, and through them, on all who believe in Him and have manifested their faith through their works. This glory He dearly desired them to see, for He says to the Father, "I will that they contemplate the glory You have given Me, for You have loved Me since the foundation of the world." And again, "Glorify Me, Father, with that glory I have had from You since before the world began." Thus to our human nature He has given the glory of the Godhead, but not the divine nature; for the nature of God is one thing, His glory another, even though they be inseparable one from another. However, even though this glory is different from the divine nature, it cannot be classified amongst the things subject to time, for in its transcendence "it is not", because it belongs to the divine nature in an ineffable manner. Saint Gregory Palamas also teaches our way of life determines whether we properly come to "know" (experience) God, or if we contrariwise remain in spiritual darkness: "Such a divine and heavenly life belongs to those who live in a manner agreeable to God, participating in the inseparable life of the Spirit, such as Paul himself lived, "the divine and eternal life of Him Who indwelt him", as St. Maximus puts it. Such a life always exists, subsisting in the very nature of the Spirit, Who by nature deifies from all eternity. It is properly called "Spirit" and "divinity" by the saints, in-so-much as the deifying gift is never separate from the Spirit Who gives it. It is a light bestowed in a mysterious illumination, and recognised only by those worthy to receive it." (Source: 'The Triads', chapter 'On Deification'). And, in the last section of this biblical analysis, we shall learn that if we are saved on the Day of Judgment, we shall go into heaven and be able to see and know God the Father as well as the Son and the Holy Spirit.

An amazing individual

Bog nam posalje ljude koji potrose i posvete svoj zivot trazeci spoznaju i sustinu naseg egzistncionalnog funkcionisanja.Jedan od njih je i profesor Miloje.Svetlos spoznaje gubi se u tami njihovog odlaska i nespremnosti onih koji dobro zive i snalaze se bas u tami.Istina nikoga nebi ugrozila da se odreknemo egoizma i svega negativnog sto je evoluiralo evolcijom drustva.Srecom postoje pisani tragovi i onih koji su liseni egoizma kao sto je profesor .Veliko mu hvala.

Σχετικά με τον καρκίνο με βάση μία στατιστική της βικιπαίδεια υπολογίζω ότι έχουμε κοντά στα 20 εκατομμύρια θανάτους ετησίως από αυτή τη μάστιγα (σημειώστε ότι οι θάνατοι σε όλη τη διάρκεια του β' παγκοσμίου πολέμου, στρατιώτες και άμαχοι ήταν 80 εκατομμύρια). Συγκεκριμένα το 2012 είχαμε 8,2 εκατομμύρια θανάτους από καρκίνο και στη συνέχεια έχουμε μεγάλη αύξηση με νέα κρούσματα. Μάλιστα αν λογαριάσουμε ότι πολλοί άνθρωποι για την ίδια αιτία δεν πεθαίνουν από καρκίνο αλλά από άλλη χρόνια ασθένεια όπως καρδιακά και εγκεφαλικά νοσήματα τότε το παραπάνω νούμερο των 20 εκ. φαντάζει μικρό (πρέπει να το υπολογίσουμε έτσι και να προσθέσουμε ένα ποσοστό από αυτές τις αρρώστιες εδώ διότι στην πραγματικότητα δεν μας ενδιαφέρει ο καρκίνος αλλά η αιτία που τον προκαλεί). Σε ότι αφορά στο πνευματικό μέρος θα πρέπει να κρατάμε την πίστη στο όνομα του Ιησού Χριστού ψηλά διότι η πνευματική ένωση μαζί του συνεπάγεται και την θεραπεία στο σώμα μας. Σύμφωνα με τον Ιπποκράτη και τους νεότερους φυσιοθεραπευτές (Σάββα Σαββίδη, Τηλέμαχο Ευθυμιάδη) η λύση είναι στην τήρηση των κανόνων της φυσικής διατροφής πχ δεν πρέπει να τρώμε κύριο γεύμα χωρίς πείνα, να έχουμε φρούτα και λαχανικά στο διαιτολόγιο (τα φρούτα σε ξεχωριστό γεύμα) πάντα με πείνα επαναλαμβάνω τρώγοντας και με εγκράτεια. Κάπνισμα και αλκοόλ ούτε για αστείο. Επίσης πρέπει να δώσουμε τον ορισμό του τι είναι οξεία και τι χρόνια ασθένεια διότι ο καρκίνος είναι βαριά χρόνια ασθένεια, αν λοιπόν θεραπεύουμε με φυσικό τρόπο δηλαδή με φρουτοθεραπείες την οξεία ασθένεια δεν θα εισέλθουμε ποτέ στις χρόνιες ασθένειες και συνεπώς δεν θα πάθουμε ποτέ καρκίνο, αλλά όπως ανέφερα τηρώντας τους κανόνες της υγιεινής διατροφής είναι δυνατόν να μη αρρωστήσουμε ποτέ ούτε δηλαδή με κάποια οξεία ασθένεια. Ηλιοθεραπεία με μέτρο, κίνηση, υδροθεραπείες, μασάζ βοηθούν πάρα πολύ σε κάθε περίπτωση. Προτείνω να κατεβάσουμε τα βιβλία του κυρίου Σαββα Σαββίδη από το ίντερνετ 'Η ΦΥΣΙΟΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΠΡΑΞΗ' και 'ΤΡΟΦΗ ΚΑΙ ΥΓΕΙΑ' (στα οποία ο συγγραφέας εξηγεί το θέμα με απλά λόγια και με πολλή αγάπη για τον άνθρωπο). Ομως χωρίς ενθουσιασμούς θα πρέπει να μένουμε σταθεροί και με πίστη στις πνευματικές αξίες και να μην ξεχνάμε ότι το σώμα αυτό είναι προσωρινό και ότι καθώς εφορέσαμεν την εικόνα του χοικού έτσι θα φορέσομεν και την εικόνα του επουρανίου (Απ. Παύλος Α Κορ. 15,49), συνεπώς τίποτα δεν πρέπει να κάνουμε χωρίς Χριστό ο οποίος θα μας απαλλάξει οριστικά από τη φθορά οδηγώντας μας στην αιώνια ζωή.

Templeton Foundation is against the Orthodox ethos, yet they are funding this 🤔

Ο π. Βασίλειος είναι αξιολογότατος επιστήμων , ψυχίατρος , κορυφαίος συγγραφέας αλλά και συνάμα θεολόγος και ποιμένας… διασαφηνίζει και φωτίζει πολλά ακανθώδη , κρίσιμα και επίκαιρα ζητήματα .. οκ ξέρουμε τους κύκλους και τους λόγους για τους οποίους πολεμείται ..δεν ειναι Πάπας … αλλά συμβάλει στην μεγάλη ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ πως η Εκκλησία και η Πίστη δεν έχουν τίποτε να φοβηθεί απο τις επιστήμες …

When will we be able to see this full documentary? Thank you!

.. когда слушаешь отца, раскрыв рот 😮

His eyes are closed

TURN ON THE SUBTITLES AT THE TOP RIGHT OF THE SCREEN AND IT WILL DISPLAY ENGLISH SUBTITLES FOR THE WHOLE DOCUMENTARY

I'm glad to hear Prof. Taylor's opinion on religion and science in such an elaborated way. Thanks for uploading.

Could you please add Greek subtitles? Thank you very much 🙏

Με όλο το σεβασμό στον συγχωρεμένο τον Κριμπά: α) ο δαρβινισμός προφανώς και είναι θεωρία. Δεν έχει καμία απολύτως απάντηση σχετικά με το ζήτημα της εμφάνισης πιο πολύπλοκων μορφών ζωής, δε μπορεί να εξηγήσει πως προκύπτουν πολύπλοκες δομές όπως πχ το μάτι, πολύ περισσότερο δε το νευρικό σύστημα. β) δεν ισχύει σε καμία περίπτωση ότι η επιστήμη βασίζεται μόνο σε αποδείξεις και ακλόνητα δεδομένα. Η θεωρία του Μπιγκ Μπανγκ έχει ελάχιστες αποδείξεις υπέρ της, ενώ αντίθετα υπάρχουν πλήθος στοιχείων εναντίον της. Παρ' όλα αυτά, πλασάρεται ως "γνώση" και "τεκμηριωμένη" επιστήμη επειδή καλύπτει τις πεποιθήσεις κάποιων επιστημόνων. γ) αν η Πίστη, κι όχι η "Θρησκεία" όπως λέει ο Κριμπάς, ήταν "εξελικτικό πλεονέκτημα", θα έπρεπε όλοι οι άνθρωποι να πιστεύουν. Σύμφωνα με τις δοξασίες της θεωρίας της Εξέλιξης, τα άτομα που δεν διαθέτουν το εξελικτικό πλεονέκτημα εξαφανιζονται. δ) υπάρχουν δεκάδες ψευδο-επιστημονικά πεδία γύρω μας που η "επίσημη" συναίνεση consensus τα πλασάρει για καθιερωμένη γνώση. Ένα από τα πιο κραυγαλέα είναι η Ψυχιατρική. Υποκειμενικές γνώμες, αντι-επιστημονικές θεωρίες περί "νορμάλ συμπεριφοράς" που καθορίζεται από τον "μέσο όρο" και πολλά πολλά άλλα. Κι όμως η ψυχιατρική θεωρείται "επιστήμη" ενώ η Πίστη δεισιδαιμονία.

WE, the Orthodox Christians do have our patriarch of Constantinople and each Orthodox Christian church has its own patriarch. I am from Serbia, and we have our patriarch, the Russians have their own etc

i am amazed at how often even supposedly great scholars adhere to the false claim that a Seventh Day Adventist religious cult is responsible for forwarding the YEC movement throughout the later 1800's through to the 1960's. This theory has been credited so many times I don't understand why Ronald Numbers is stupid enough to even go down this pathway. The truth of the matter is that it is simply untrue to say that the majority of Christians prior to the emergence of Ellen White believed in an Old Earth. That is absolutely false! It wasn't until the proposal by Charles Darwin that Old Earth even came into its own in religious circles. Prior to this the general consensus had no reason to think anything other than a literal reading of the Genesis account as Darwin was one of the pioneers who gained world wide attention for his studies suggesting an old earth. Ronald Numbers is quoted on the topic of how great a following the SDA Price had with his YEC views... "Ronald Numbers notes Price’s ideas were mostly rejected by fundamentalists of his day. By the 1920s Price has found few followers." peacefulscience.org/prints/origns-yec/ the fact is, Price (the Adventist who proposed Young Earht Creaionism) was immediately discounted and discredited such that his writings gained almost no attention despite claims here by Ronald Nuimbers to the contrary! Price was called a crackpot and that's about where his publicity ended! The reason for the resurgence in the early 60's was because this coincided with a need from those in the Christian community who believed in a young earth, to counter increasing scientific claims to an old earth. Creatioin Scientists started to do their own research and began to discover some serious issues with Darwinian models. Over the last 60 years this evidence against the main stream view has only grown in volume and significance! See the following quote "This is not to say this was the dominate view in the middle ages. Historian Michael Roberts says, “In 1550 few questioned the ‘biblical’ age of the earth.” Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler were two who agreed with the famous Bishop Ussher that the date of creation was only around 4000 BC." peacefulscience.org/prints/origns-yec/ Ronald is just plain dishonest in many aspects of this video.

Ενδιαφέρουσες σκέψεις, το δίχως άλλο. Αν και δεν γνωρίζω για την επιστημονική θέση της ψυχανάλυσης σήμερα. Πρόσεξε κανείς άλλος ότι σε ένα σημείο έκανε διάκριση ανάμεσα σε "ψυχολόγους" και "ψυχαναλυτές";

Ενδιαφέρουσα ομιλία! Αν κρίνω από το επίπεδο, δυστυχώς οι μισοί σχολιαστές εδώ από κάτω είναι μάλλον μονοκύτταρα όντα. 58:00 Αυτό που λέει για την "Εύα" και τον "Αδάμ" δεν κατανοώ πώς μπορεί να ισχύει, αφού οι δύο υποθετικοί μας πρόγονοι έζησαν, όπως υπολογίζουν οι ειδικοί, όχι στην ίδια εποχή αλλά με διαφορά δεκάδες χιλιάδες χρόνων.

Очень интересно и познавательно и вроде бы понятным языком, но некоторые гипотезы надо осмыслить, не каждому дана такая философия мысли, как у Кирилла В., хотя есть среди комментариев и те, кто считает, что может дать оценку и корректировать деятельность Кирилла В.в подходе к православной религии и науки. Можно сказать одно, если говорить простым языком, все проповеди и беседы Кирилла В. Копейкина всегда интересны, понятны, обоснованны как с православной точки зрения, так с научной, имеется в виду и на уровне психики. Этот вывод сделан от давнего прослушивания его проповедей ещё, когда Кирилл В. служил в приходе на Двинской, затем каждый год при трансляции праздничных служб в Казанском Соборе, желаем здоровья Кириллу В.и рады будем новым встречам. .

Η απάντηση : ἀποκριθεὶς δὲ εἶπεν αὐτῇ ὁ Ἰησοῦς· Μάρθα Μάρθα, μεριμνᾷς καὶ τυρβάζῃ περὶ πολλά· 42 ἑνὸς δέ ἐστι χρεία· Μαρία δὲ τὴν ἀγαθὴν μερίδα ἐξελέξατο, ἥτις οὐκ ἀφαιρεθήσεται ἀπ' αὐτῆς. Μάρθα = ανθρώπινη επιστήμη. Μαρία = ανθρώπινη λαχτάρα για ΘΕΟ

Что касается науки, то она копается в поделках Творца, а самого Творца в упор не видят. А религия стоит на Вере, где отсутсвуют Законы Вселенной. К 10 заповедям Иисуса Христа добавьте Знания и Закон (12 диадим будут полноценными) , тогда религиозное недомыслие примет Восток - Восходящий ток и тогда смерти не будет второй, а будет Вечная музыка.

Секулярная культура Кирилл - патриарх, подчиняющий Синоду, очень много говорил о Секуляриза́ции (от лат. saecularis - светский) - в социологии процесс снижения роли религии в жизни общества; переход от общества, регулируемого преимущественно религиозной традицией, к светской модели общественного устройства на основе рациональных (внерелигиозных) норм. До конца XX века в русском языке термин «секуляризация» был традиционно историческим и описывал процесс экспроприации церковных земельных владений в пользу государства, который в России практически закончился в XVIII веке... Транскоммунизм - создаёт сурогаточеловека??? А то ничего, что коммунисты дали обществу Моральный Кодекс коммунистов, который не противоречил духовным ценностям??? Духовность ведь не только принадлежит религиозной пастве, а всему человечеству. Только религиозные деятели не понимают, что духовность бывает разная от низкой до высокой. Ведь есть закон Вселенский - Да и Нет об одном и том же. Протестное движение против религиозных насаждений, особенно против религиозного насилия, всегда присутствовал. Ведь косность религиозных верований не давала развитие челу. Религия должна очиститься от смертного греха, а потом утверждать свои нормы на Новых Представлениях о мире. Вся речь Кигилла была посвящена именно отсутствию религиозной духовности и потере величия Синода. Кириллу надо было сделать анализ падения религиозной духовности в радикальном русле Синода (Кириллу надо отректись от Синода и тогда Кирилл откроет путь Новому Христу и себе). Дело в том, что религиозные деятели в основу своих верований поставили Символ Веры на Вселенском Соборе (325 г. Нашей эры). Этим эпохальным событием все течения христианской Веры поставили крест на релиозном представлении Вселенной, что мы и наблюдаем через 2000 лет. Религиозная паства не смогла понять за 2000 лет, что Вселенная не работает на религиозном догмате, а исключительно на Законах Вселенной. Иисус об этом фарисеям говорил постоянно, что они заблудились в своём недомыслии. Иисус сказал фарисеям, книжникам и первосвященникам: «Горе вам, законникам, что вы взяли ключи разумения: сами не вошли и входящим воспрепятствовали» (Евангелие от Луки, гл. 11, ст. 52). Кириллу надо понять и переосмыслить послание Иисуса в Евангелии, Евангелие от Фомы, и покаятся в грехах Синода, тогда народ поймёт роль религии в своей жизни, а религия переосмыслит своё недомыслие и выстроит переход от Веры к Знаниям Законов Вселенной. Не поймут - Христос уничтожит все церквя. 7 церквей останутся Христовых во Вселенной.

Heresy...

Στον 19ο αιώνα δεν θα μπορούσε κάποιος φυσικός να πιστέψει στην δημιουργία. Παρόλαυτά σήμερα τα πράγματα άλλαξαν με την πρόοδο της φυσικής . Δεν κινδυνεύει λοιπόν η πίστη, και δεν χρειάζεται η απολογία ή το ταίριασμα με την σημερινή επιστήμη.

Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. Science may be as old as the human species, and some of the earliest archeological evidence for scientific reasoning is tens of thousands of years old. The earliest written records in the history of science come from Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia in around 3000 to 1200 BCE. Their contributions to mathematics, astronomy, and medicine entered and shaped Greek natural philosophy of classical antiquity, whereby formal attempts were made to provide explanations of events in the physical world based on natural causes. After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, knowledge of Greek conceptions of the world deteriorated in Western Europe during the early centuries (400 to 1000 CE) of the Middle Ages, but was preserved in the Muslim world during the Islamic Golden Age. The recovery and assimilation of Greek works and Islamic inquiries into Western Europe from the 10th to 13th century revived "natural philosophy", which was later transformed by the Scientific Revolution that began in the 16th century, as new ideas and discoveries departed from previous Greek conceptions and traditions. The scientific method soon played a greater role in knowledge creation and it was not until the 19th century that many of the institutional and professional features of science began to take shape; along with the changing of "natural philosophy" to "natural science". Modern science is typically divided into three major branches: natural sciences (e.g., biology, chemistry, and physics), which study the physical world; the social sciences (e.g., economics, psychology, and sociology), which study individuals and societies; and the formal sciences (e.g., logic, mathematics, and theoretical computer science), which study formal systems, governed by axioms and rules. There is disagreement concerning whether the formal sciences are science disciplines, because they do not rely on empirical evidence. Applied sciences are disciplines that use scientific knowledge for practical purposes, such as in engineering and medicine. New knowledge in science is advanced by research from scientists who are motivated by curiosity about the world and a desire to solve problems. Contemporary scientific research is highly collaborative and is usually done by teams in academic and research institutions, government agencies, and companies. The practical impact of their work has led to the emergence of science policies that seek to influence the scientific enterprise by prioritizing the ethical and moral development of commercial products, armaments, health care, public infrastructure, and environmental protection.

Sad. People aren't willing to be drawn to the truth rather go for the videos with millions of views and chances are those videos offer o hope when it comes to the value of humanity. . I urge you, of the Universites, with a voice, to let it be known; Richard Dawkins speaks on behalf of Miletus, who accused Socrates. . Dawkins speaks on behalf of Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx as well. . . It is an ancient paradigm that ultimately centers itself upon making your own mind, god. .

ΥΠΟΥΡΓΕΙΟ ΠΑΙΔΕΙΑ ΝΑ ΠΟΙΟΣ ΕΓΑΨΕ ΙΣΤΟΡΕΙΑ ΙΠΠ.ΔΑΚΟΓΛΟΥ ΓΙΑ ΠΥΘΑΓΟΡΑ ΑΦΟΥ ΛΟΙΠΟΝ ΒΕΒΑΙΟΥΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΡΧΑΙΟΥΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ΣΟΦΟΥΣ ΠΛΑΤΩΝΑ ΚΑΙ ΠΥΘΑΓΟΡΑ ΕΠΑΒΕΒΑΙΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟΤΗΝ ΔΙΑΙΣΘΗΣΙ ΤΟΥ ΜΙΚΟWSKI KAI ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟΔΕΚΤΟ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΟΥ EINSTEIN ΟΤΙ Ο ΧΡΟΝΟΣ ΕΚΦΡΖΕΤΑΙ ΣΑΝ ΜΙΑ ΣΠΕΙΡΑ ΚΑΙ ΑΦΟΥ Ο ΚΥΨΕΛΟΕΙΔΗ ΚΑΝΝΑ ΒΟΣ ΕΧΕΙ ΚΑΤΑΣΚΕΥΑΣΘΝΕΙ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΑΚΟΛΟΥΘΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΜΟΡΦΗΣ 1 Φ Φ² .........Φ12 Φ13 ΑΝΩ ΔΥΝΑΜΗ Η ΟΠΟΙΑ ΠΑΡΙΣΤΑΝΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΤΕΛΕΙΑ ΠΥΘΑ-ΓΟΡΕΙΑ ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΣΠΕΙΡΟΕΙΔΗ ΕΛΙΚΑ ΟΠΩΣ ΕΧΕΙ ΗΔΗ ΑΠΟΔΕΙΧΘΕΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΑ ΤΟΜΟ ΕΠΕΤΑΙ ΟΤΙ Ο ΚΥΨΕΛΟΕΙΔΗΣ ΚΑΝΝΑΒΟΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΜΙΑ ΑΛΛΗ ΜΟΡΦΗ ΤΗΣ ΤΕΛΕΙΑΣ ΣΠΕΙΡΟΕΙΔΟΥΣ ΕΛΙΚΟΣ ΕΝΑ ΤΡΟΠΟΝ ΤΙΝΑ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΓΜΑ ΑΥΤΗΣ ΣΥΣΧΕΤΙΣΜΕΣΝΟ Η ΑΛΛΩΣ ΑΝΑΦΕΡΟΜΕΝΟ Σ ΕΝΑ ΣΤΑΘΕΡΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΑΝΑΦΟΡΑΣ ΜΕ ΤΡΙΣΔΙΑΣΤΑΤΤΟΥ ΚΑΡΤΕΣΙΑΝΕΣ ΣΥΝΤΕΤΑΓΜΕΝΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΓΚΛΕΙΕΙ ΜΕΣΑ ΤΟΥ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΑΓΟΝΤΑ ΧΡΟΝΟ ΠΟΥ ΤΟΝ ΕΓΚΛΕΙΕΙ Η ΙΔΙΑ Η ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΙ-ΚΗ ΣΠΕΙΡΑ-ΕΛΙΞ. ΜΕ ΑΛΛΑ ΛΟΓΙΑ Η ΤΕΤΑΡΤΗ ΔΙΣΤΑΣΙΣ ΠΟΥ ΑΦΟΡΑ ΤΟΝ ΧΡΟΝΟ Τ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΕΝΣΩΜΑΤΩΜΕΝΗ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΜΟΡΦΟΛΟΓΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΠΥΘΑΓΟΡΕΙΟΥ ΚΥΨΕΛΩΤΟΥ ΟΥΡΑΝΙΟΥ ΚΑΝΝΑΒΟΥ ΟΠΟΤΕ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΗΝ ΒΟΗΘΕΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΑΛΛΩΝ ΣΥΝΤΕΤΑΓ-ΜΕΝΩΝ ΤΟΥ ΑΠΛΟΥ ΧΩΡΟΥ Χ .Ψ. Ζ. ΔΥΝΑΜΕΘΑ ΕΥΚΟΛΩΣ ΝΑ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑΣΟΥΜΕ ΧΩΡΟ-ΧΡΟΝΙΚΑ ΠΛΕΟΝ ΚΑΘΕ ΣΥΜΒΑΝ ΚΑΙ ΝΑ ΤΟ ΕΝΤΟΠΙΣΟΥΜΕ ΚΑΤΑ ΘΕΣΙ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΙΔΙΚΟ ΟΥΡΑΝΙΟ ΧΩΡΟΧΡΟΝΙΚΟ ΠΥΘΑΓΟΡΕΙΟ ΚΑΝΝΑΒΟ ΤΟ ΕΤΟΣ 535 Π .Χ .ΜΑΖΗ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΔΕΝΔΡΟ ΤΗΣ ΖΩΗΣ. ΓΕΩΡΓΙΟΣ ΔΑΚΟΓΛΟΥ

Κάνετε λάθος σχετικά με τη θεωρία της εξέλιξης. Σας το λέω με αγάπη γιατί είμαι εξελικτικός βιολόγος.

Place add English subtitles and captions

A beautiful recollection of the formative years well spent under Communism.

0:00:00 - Parcours du Père Boboc 0:06:15 - Religion VERSUS sciences: "la connaissance scientifique qui doit être eucharistique" 0:13:24 - Anthropologie TERNAIRE "corps-âme-esprit" et bioéthique "le droit à naître" 0:27:25 - Transhumanisme décrypté: "spiritualité" sans dogme, religion minimaliste, déisme et transdéisme, eugénisme, destruction de la famille

Έχω πάθει την πλάκα μου ! Τι υπέροχος ποιμένας ;! Α living reference guide to the rest of us !!!

Ο Θεός να σε αξιώσει παππούλη μου ❤️

Thank you for the upload this is an excellent discussion

too bad some part of this video is in french. I don't understand.

The Latins separated from the Grace of God due to pride.

Αρκετά συντομη συνέντευξη. Διέκρινα και κάποια μικρή απροθυμία εκ μέρους του συνεντευξιαζόμενου.

This needs more views. Fantastic content.

Развивать наш мозг, нашу психику, мы не умеем ими пользоваться