buddy, please, could you explain why you are not considering the buoyant force as another force opposing the weight? my understanding is that terminal velocity is reached only when the combination of buoyant force + drag force become equal to the weight.
You said that at critical density the universe would stop expanding and that is a flat universe. But don't we live in an accelerated universe that seems to be flat? Or atleast we cannot say what the shape of the universe is even though we know its expanding. According to what you said, if the universe expands then we live in an open universe, isn't it?
Do U mind telling me the order on which I watch this playlist, previous playlist had explanations before questions but this playlist starts off with 4 questions
It's stated that one half value thickness would decrease the radiation by 50% and that (2) of these thicknesses would block 75%. Wouldn't the first thickness block the weaker photons resulting in the second thickness having to be somewhat thicker to reduce another 50%?
If it's so dense and it turns regular matter into itself, wouldn't it shrink anything it touches by a large margin? Cuz it would have to condensed it to a similar density as itself for it to exist right?
Well done guide of defenition! I need all content for knowledge of luminous efficacy of a radiation for exp. beam as the ratio of luminous to radiant flux contamined to a beam because direct - beam solar radiation near the horizonfor clear sky radiation. So to obtain an approximate expression for the ~angular distribution~of radiance by replacing the zenith sky radiance and express it as a civil engineer I look briefly to Yours topic so I can mathematicaly define solar radiant flux. 😊
🤭 my clan on codmobile is called anti quark but couldn't make it fit so I had to write " ≠quark" but Luke didn't look cute so I added a nice smily so it ended up as: \●_●≠quark Which means cute anti quark 🥰... u can join if u want 🤗
Very simple, very understandable, overall great.
Helped a lot. 😊
buddy, please, could you explain why you are not considering the buoyant force as another force opposing the weight? my understanding is that terminal velocity is reached only when the combination of buoyant force + drag force become equal to the weight.
If you see this, I want to thank you for this video. I now understand this concept which I couldn't get my head around at school.
if the back emf signal is so small , how does thar compare to a common magnet, like the one you stick on your refrigerator?
You said that at critical density the universe would stop expanding and that is a flat universe. But don't we live in an accelerated universe that seems to be flat? Or atleast we cannot say what the shape of the universe is even though we know its expanding. According to what you said, if the universe expands then we live in an open universe, isn't it?
Very helpful, simple and clear!! I finally understand this, thanks so much!
Your explanation is really clear thank you i just need this to make a metal detectors Srry if my english bad
THANK YOU 🙏, this helped alot. do you have any more for the entire paper?
Are the electron shells around the nucleus of atoms based on the Inverse Square Law?
how can you determine the direction of the eddy current in the pan when it is stationary?
Do U mind telling me the order on which I watch this playlist, previous playlist had explanations before questions but this playlist starts off with 4 questions
Hi
Because he is my ancestor and my last name is stokes and I found out is one of my close ancestor!
Wait are we talking about sir George Gabriel Stoke?
this question came on my exam for 8 marks thank u so much
"meeeEWWW"
Legend 🙏🏾🙏🏾
It's stated that one half value thickness would decrease the radiation by 50% and that (2) of these thicknesses would block 75%. Wouldn't the first thickness block the weaker photons resulting in the second thickness having to be somewhat thicker to reduce another 50%?
amazing
❤❤
❤❤
Straightforward and clear, thanks :)
Thanks!
💐💐
If it's so dense and it turns regular matter into itself, wouldn't it shrink anything it touches by a large margin? Cuz it would have to condensed it to a similar density as itself for it to exist right?
Great! Short and very meaningful! Thank you
ok 🙏✌️
This video is awesome, you explained it really good! thank you for sharing your knowledge! :D
thank you :)
thank you!! this vid was really helpful
thank youuuuu
I do not care about detectors but ı detect an "innit" in 1.06 🫡
Well done guide of defenition! I need all content for knowledge of luminous efficacy of a radiation for exp. beam as the ratio of luminous to radiant flux contamined to a beam because direct - beam solar radiation near the horizonfor clear sky radiation. So to obtain an approximate expression for the ~angular distribution~of radiance by replacing the zenith sky radiance and express it as a civil engineer I look briefly to Yours topic so I can mathematicaly define solar radiant flux. 😊
Very simply explained Effective ❤
🙏🌹🌹🌹
🌹🌹🌹
💐💐💐
🙏💐💐💐💐
🙏💐💐
😇
💪💪
what if the kinetic energy before is greater than the kinetic energy after
Such a beautiful explanation, thank you 🙏🏻
BEST EXPLANATION Finally i understood this topic in simple method great teacher ❤
amazing informative video thank you so much
I'm a cute anti quark 🥰
🤭 my clan on codmobile is called anti quark but couldn't make it fit so I had to write " ≠quark" but Luke didn't look cute so I added a nice smily so it ended up as: \●_●≠quark Which means cute anti quark 🥰... u can join if u want 🤗
mas madali daw to gr.12 st.John sabi ni gab
THANK YOU SLAY