Видео

@@hansheintz6392 as @TilmanThiele said, we are free to introduce new domains of abstract reality if we feel the need to transcend previous boundaries. But we are not free to transcend it in the ways in which previous structures and truths implicit in them deteriorate to any extent whatsoever.

Yeah. That's because one thing cannot be a dumpling and a bowl of rice at the same time. But if it could, then that would still be a legitimate choice to fall under the OR umbrella.

@UnderStanding_Matters but irl when people say or, its usually an ultimatum Otherwise they'd say A or B or both Human language and logical statements aren't always the same

@@godassasin8097 it is same. It is just in the experiential domain you don't usually have access to two choices that can be both separate and connected.

Also, I purposefully speak about the 'strict or' in the longer version of this video

@@AntoniosVaitsis-fg4ii not entirely unless the or is a strict or.

@@AntoniosVaitsis-fg4ii also, and corresponds to the intersection, while or - to the union

Working on the upgrade. Thanks for your attention!

@@SpaceM691 Appreciate it! Thank you.

Working on the sound quality! And love some old school Disney cartoon characters !!

@@milindshah4438 yes! I find it funny and more engaging tbh

But please, tell me what your observation is!