Видео

Tesla sent mobile service and they replaced it.

How much did u pay ?

@@maeaurelio9773 It was still under warranty, so it was free. There are some DIY videos on RUclips.

Im coming up on 2 years of ownership ill probably never use these features

Why do you think that? I don't believe that's true

You shouldn't have to work that hard to convince yourself that it's good. I think it sucks 😕

I don’t see how they’re going to improve it, personally. Nor do I think the over complicated and frankly ludicrous occupancy network which Tesla fans seem to attach blind faith to, will end up working particularly well. These are essentially just work arounds, computationally and power expensive and only necessary because of a really short-sighted ideological decision to remove short range 3D sensors

@@derdudederamblockchillt9994 the camera is attached analog to the pcb, the others have a digital interface. I have read that somewhere, some time ago.

Good point! Mine does beep, but not for things on the side, apparently.

It will improve over time, dont worry

Tesla keeps getting a pass from loyal owners as always. When are we ever going to hold Tesla accountable?

Over time? Why would you justify a bad quality product and not hold Tesla accountable for a lower standard product. Expect better and you will get better!

Based on recent history it got worse over time, not better, people need to be genuine about the situation. Nothing builds confidence than the corporate tagline :“It’s better than nothing”…

i believe his adress

Try dealing with supply chain logistics in a pandemic. They had cars to deliver and found a software solution to missing sensors. Just a bunch of whiny brats; I see why tesla owners get a bad name.

6 months ago, was not the height of the pandemic disruption, and other manufacturers deliver many more cars than Tesla with sensors, so why do you think there was a supply issue rather than a cost issue?

No supply chain logistics, just premature cost cutting. No whiny brats, just customers who have cars that do not perform as promised and in fact may be dangerous under certain circumstances. There is only one thing worse than a missing safety feature and that is one that is there but does not work properly. FFS Tesla, just make it an option, people would have paid the $114 you saved by removing them.

Duped with a $7500 tax deduction

A $7500 uss deduction. Ha

I’m surprised it took you this long to work that out, Tesla habitually over promise and under deliver. What I am surprised about is that the class action lawsuits are not flying already in America over this. If I had purchased a vehicle made demonstrably worse by silently removing important features in an OTA update from the manufacturer after I bought it, I would be taking action.

Ah, true! That's the perfect explanation for what I'm seeing. Hopefully, they can add those sounds soon.

I have tones like crazy for the side (with USS). I would love to be able to go through certain drive-thrus without all of the beeping. I wish the beeping was basically only if you were at risk of hitting the object if you kept doing what you are doing.

how so?

@@davidholst11 The warning is so inconsistent is not enough information for you?

@@davidholst11 multiple reasons, the cameras can’t tell shadows, that’s why the lines are so crooked and jagged. You get no warnings of items directly in front of the car up to a 12” distance. So parking close to a wall is out of the question, same for rear of car. No consistent audible sounds warning u of objects. Doesn’t work in the dark, USS does, etc. Just too many shortcomings.

@@idonotcarenow any software like this relies on good real time sensor data, and the sensors are crap in this case. Low res single cameras cannot properly perceive depth in real time without some ai tricks to glean depth information using parallax. Shadows, blind spots, night time, grubby lens will stop it working. I’m amazed it works as well as it does, all things considered. Time to be brave and admit they need to put USS back in and then undertake to retrofit all vehicles produced without it.

@@robinisathakur it’s a terrible look to walk it back and they’ll never do it, we’ll just suffer without and take it like good boys.

you are writing nonsense, removing parts is always the best engineering solution. less parts is better in infinite ways. every ai feature is terrible at the beginning but capable to become godlike. so, this is the very worst version and it will only improve from here.

@@JohnSmith-pn2vl okay sure... I have ultrasonic and it works great down to 1 inch... So say what you like. You're way wrong.

@@JohnSmith-pn2vlyou can’t say removing parts is the best engineering solution.. not at all. removing parts after a deep analysis that the part is not needed is indeed a good move in terms of production. In this case they should’ve done this after years of testing. They clearly removed it due to supply chain issues..

@@JohnSmith-pn2vl so you are clearly not an engineer