Видео

Audio's still rough past the 2 minute mark, IMO. Really appreciate this though, thanks for putting presentations like this up.

Looking good...my friend and mentor, Master Myfel Paluga...Hello to your wife Aya...

The Philippines claims Sabah on the basis that Sabah was said to be once under Sulu Sultanate. Descendants of former Sultan of Sulu claim that Sabah belonged to Sulu Sultanate because Sabah was given by Brunei the original owner to Sulu as a gift for purportedly helping Brunei to fight rebels. But Brunei refuted this claim and denied ever having given Sabah to Sulu. There was NO DOCUMENT regarding the transfer of ownership of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans. In fact on 29 December 1877, the Sultan of Brunei ceded the whole of Sabah to BNBC/British and concurrently appointed Baron Von Overback, the co-owner of BNBC as Maharajah of Sabah and Rajah of Sandakan and Gaya. This cession agreement was documented. When BNBC went to Sabah to begin their business, Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu. BNBC agreed to enter a "pajak" agreement with Sulu after they were advised by their fellow businessmen in Hong Kong who advised that Sulu would attack them if they didn't have a deal with Sulu. This "pajak'' agreement was signed on 22 January 1878. BNBC understood that this "pajak" was a "cession", so did early generation of Sulu Sultan accepted it as "cession". Only later generation of descendants of former Sultan of Sulu claimed that the "pajak" agreement was meant to be "rent" or "lease''. Still there was NO DOCUMENT regarding the transfer of ownership of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans. The two above events led to an overlapping issue on Sabah. What ever it was, the above agreement and overlapping issue were superceded by later event. On 22 July 1878, the then Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory. In 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. As new owner of Sabah Britain had full control and sovereignty over Sabah and they could do what ever they wanted. Sulu could not claim anything because they had already relinquished the sovereignty of Sabah to Spain and Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. What ever happened to Sabah after that was under British jurisdiction. Even though British had full control and sovereignty of Sabah, they still honoured the annual "cession money" payment stipulated in the "pajak'' agreement as consolation for the Sulu Sultan. So did Malaysia when formed in 1963, still honoured the annual "cession money" payment as consolation for the Sulu Sultan. The term "cession money" was used because to use the term "consolation" was felt to be too degrading. Thus the term "cession money" was continually used as used before by the British. Even the argument about the word "pajak" and it's meaning in the "pajak" agreement still favoured the British. The "pajak" agreement was written in classical Malay, in jawi script (Arabic alphabet). Malay is the national language of Malaysia and Brunei, and mother tongue of majority Malaysians and Brunei. In those days, Malay was also used by people of Sulu because Malay was the "lingua franca" of this region including the present Philippines. That was why the agreement was written in Malay. But over the years Sulu people had lost their Malay language (standard Malay) because of several reasons like colonisation by different European. This made Sulu relied on translation of the agreement. Things got worse when they translated it to Sulu's local language, be it Tagalog or Tausug, which was rather translation of another translation, that they translated it to their favour. The word "pajak" carried several meanings depending on the contact used in the sentence or passage. It could mean "tax, rent, pawn, lease, or cession". In the agreement between BNBC/ British and Sulu, the word "pajak" was used together with the phrase "selama-lamanya" which meant "forever". When "pajak" was used together with the phrase"selama-lamanya", in this contact the word "pajak" meant "cession". Cession means "the formal giving up of rights, property or territory by a state". When Sulu "pajak" Sabah to BNBC it meant Sulu ceded Sabah and it meant Sabah no longer belonged to Sulu. This was further clarified. There was a second agreement which was a supplementary to the first agreement known as "Confirmation of Cession of Certain Islands Agreement". It was regarding certain islands between Sabah and Sulu which they were not sure whether they were included in the first agreement or not. In this second agreement, the word "pajak" was no longer used because they thought it might lead to misunderstanding by later generation. Instead the word "menyerahkan" which meant "surrender" was used, and the annual payment was increased from 5,000 dollars to 5,300 dollars due to certain islands included. Another example where the Philippines generally or Sulu in particular misunderstood due to wrong translation or translation to their favour, was about the clause that the territory could not be transfered to another party. Yes, there was a clause that Sabah could not be transfered to another party "... without the consent of 'Duli Queen'...". The British translated "Duli Queen" as "Her Britannic Majesty", even though it was not correct literally but it was correct in the meaning. The "... Queen" was referring to Queen Victoria, the ruler of England / Britain at that time. But Sulu translated "Duli Queen" (or rather translated from a translation) as "Their Majesties' Government". This led to an understanding that "Duli Queen" was the ruler of Sulu. The question was since when Sulu as a Muslim state had a female as their ruler (Sultanah or Queen)? The above showed that North Borneo (Sabah) had indeed been ceded to Britain, that was why it could not be transfered to another party without the consent of 'Duli Queen' (Queen Victoria), the ruler of England/ Britain at that time. And further it was stated that any dispute about the agreement had to be referred to the "Consul General" being the Queen's representative in Borneo to be resolved. It meant that outside Arbitrator had no jurisdiction over the agreement. This fact became the main reason of judgement by Paris Court of Appeal in setting aside and annulling the Paris Court (lower court) ruling awarding the heirs of the defunct Sulu Sultanate. On 31 August 1963 Britain gave independence to Sabah and before that on 22 July 1963 Sarawak was given independence. The people of Sabah and Sarawak had exercised self determination to form Malaysia together with Malaya and Singapore. The sovereignty of Sabah and Sarawak as component states of Malaysia is intact and recognized internationally and recognized by the UN. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the United Nations Malaysia Mission Report "Final Conclusion of the Secretary-General", 14 September 1963. The last sentence of the report says: "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfillment as component states of Malaysia". Full text of the report can even be accessed from the Philippines Government Gazette website. About the arbitration award by Paris Court to Sulu of US$14.92B, it had since been set aside and annulled by Paris Court of Appeal. Here is the latest situation. Latest as in June 2023: 1. June 6th - Paris Court of Appeal had set aside and annulled the previous Paris Court (lower court) ruling awarding the heirs of the defunct Sulu Sultanate. 2. June 27th - Dutch Court of Appeal in The Haque had dismissed a bid by eight descendants of former Sultan of Sulu to enforce the arbitration award by Paris Court (lower court) ruling, and dismissed an attempt to seize Malaysian assets following the Paris Court of Appeal decision. 3. Paris Court of Appeal also imposed on Sulu €100,000.00 (Euro currency) to be paid to Malaysia as legal cost. 4. Mean while in Luxembourg, a second attempt to seize Malaysian Petronas assets had been filed in Luxembourg Court due for hearing in September 2023 after the first attempt was dismissed. This will likely be dismissed too following the Paris Court of Appeal decision. Now is already November 2023, no news about Sulu's claim proceeding in Luxembourg Court. It looked like they withdrew their case when they acknowledged the Paris Court of Appeal decision. Malaysia had spent around RM32m, equivalent to about US$6.6m to deal with these Sulu claim cases in various European courts, in Madrid, Paris, Luxembourg and Netherlands. Apart from the €100,000.00 Sulu has to pay to Malaysia as legal cost, Malaysia is planning to sue Sulu for compensation for the loss of RM32m spent.

Walang karapatan any pilipinas tumahimik kayu

1878 fake document

This is exactly what I was looking for but I wish it was even longer!! The secret to ranking = 🄿🅁🄾🄼🄾🅂🄼 !!

😆 [̲̅p][̲̅r][̲̅o][̲̅m][̲̅o][̲̅s][̲̅m]

I commend your impressive research. The western language actually has more similarities to ancient polynesian. The eastern peoples have a different language with infusion of more recent polynesian influence. But both still have commonalities with the other Austronesian languages. You should come to Fiji and hear the language differences and see the physical dispenses along with the cultural aspects. You will be surprised at how much commonalities we share with the rest of austronesia in terms of language and culture. Traditional legends state that Tongans were our brothers, descendants of Kubunavanua (Kupunafenua) who left Fiji and married with the Tahiti peoples (who were also distant relatives). But you are right the migration and trade was complex. People were moving back and forth between the various islands especially tonga Samoa and Fiji and even the Cook Islands and Tahiti. There is also alot of similarities with Tuvaluan and Gilbertese. Different dialects in Fiji had more or less similarities with specific pacific islands which shows that there were many interactions with our surrounding neighbours after the initial separation. At the end we are all the same peoples with different degrees of admixture of the two genetic pools (Austronesian and Aboriginal SE Asian peoples), just that some carried more or less different aspects of the culture, language and phenotypes.

Sultan of sulo don't have evidence land title sane as malaysia in 1963 they claim this island and sabahan people no choice to, but malaysian gov't recognized this portion of land owned by sultan of sulo a gift from brunie , British government paid a padjak recognized and continue by malaysian gov't this payment receipt is a strong evidence in ruling court in luxemburg.

Sabah 🇵🇭

Di yun claim babawiin rental lang yun sila di nag bayad di bawiin

Congratulations to Sultanate of Sulu Heirs won the case versus Malaysia now they will paid billions of dollars for not paying the lease to Sultanate of Sulu..

If you haven't done so, you ought to read _Narcotic Culture: A History of Drugs in China Book_ by Frank Dikotter, Lars Peter Laamann, and Xiun Zhou

TO MY FELLOW ORDINARY VOTERS FOR ANY DEMOCRATIC NATION: A Lawyer By Profession Should Be The Basic Qualification For Any Law-Maker Candidates, Especially For Senatorial Position. In Addition, He / She Should Have Track Records Of Being Righteous Public Official. For My 12-Chosen 2022 Philippine Senatorial Candidates, They Are The Following: 1.> Attorney Leo O. Olarte, MD Surgeon 2.> Attorney Herminio "Harry" Lopez Roque 3.> Attorney Lorenzo "Larry" Gacilo Gadon 4.> Attorney Rodante Dizon Marcoleta 5.> Attorney Salvador "Sal" San Buenaventura Panelo 6.> Attorney Alan Peter Schramm Cayetano 7.> Attorney Francis Joseph "Chiz" Guevarra Escodero 8.> Attorney Silvestre "Bebot" Hernando Bello III 9.> Attorney Jejomar "Jojo" Cabauatan Binay, Sr. Former Vice-President Of Philippines 10.> Attorney John Rualo Castriciones 11.> Attorney Gilberto "Gibo" Cojuanco Teodoro, Jr. 12.> Attorney Alex Ledesma Lacson

It should be the phil gov. Will take action onthis matter

❣️ Promo`SM!

1:02:31 don't mind me pin pointing Dr Paz words here.

The word “apo” was also used in Tagalog region. It’s only recent changes in the language post-colonial that the word vanished and replaced (clearly it is foreign since it is gendered; PH/Austronesian languages rarely have those) by the words “Lolo/Lola” only very recently in Manila version of Tagalog. If you read the primary sources including Tagalog dictionaries, they used “apo” just like the Kapampangan, Ilocanos, Bicolano etc.

Very interesting talk. I learned a lot from it, both from the talk itself and from the susequent Q&A.

Halo I live in laos PDR Would like Study about underwater Archeology

Wow. Nice information!

It’s funny she’s talking about changing Filipino habits but she herself picked up sociocultural terms from America like “oppression” when talking about poverty.