Видео

Any JDK is normally OK, but if you have problems, you can install one with JavaFX included. You can find them here www.azul.com/downloads/?package=jdk-fx#zulu

There are strong pros and cons for tools like Lombok. Yes, it removes a lot of "boilerplate code", but it removes some of the control you have over the code. Personally I try to avoid such tools and make maximum use of the many improvements in Java to write better code. For instance, records allow to have data classes with much less code to write and maintain.

Glad you enjoyed it!

Indeed, I'm happy I could show one of the many JavaFX banking use-cases with this interview.

And thank you for watching :-)

You can find it here: ruclips.net/video/xbaLjoTU49I/видео.html

My pleasure!

Hi @alexba4798 did you "Install Java JDK with JavaFX" as described in the tutorial? See www.jfx-central.com/learn-javafx/fat-jar

Glad you liked it :-)

@@FrankDelporte It's rather me who thanks you.

Thanks, will do! :-)

Keep watching 😉

Thanks for sharing your project!

Thanks, hope it will be helpful for many!

Thanks

Thanks

You're welcome!

Thanks for subbing!

My pleasure

Thank you so much! I’m glad you enjoy what I do!

Thanks!!!

You can start with the tutorials on JFX Central: www.jfx-central.com/learn-javafx

That's the great thing, we have the choice what we use as there are many options :-)

Let's agree to disagree on this topic ;-) Just like any other framework, JavaFX can be styled to whatever you want your application to look. Or you can use one of the many libraries and themes to achieve a different look-and-feel. Check out www.jfx-central.com/libraries for AtlantaFX, JMetro, Transit Theme, etc.

Actually, looks official

Exactly the goal of this video series :-) Thanks for your kind words!

true

DSLs are the next step in my Kotlin journey 😉

Thanks James, very good idea! Will put it on my TODO-list, but for now can you maybe already take a look at this project: github.com/FDelporte/DrumBoothController/tree/master/JavaFXUserInterface. This is a PET project with a pom.xml that contains probably all the info you need. It uses maven-assembly-plugin to create a JAR with all the dependencies.

James, I quickly created this template project with a dependency that builds as executable jar with all dependencies: github.com/FDelporte/javafx-jar-template. Can you try out if this answers your questions? Then I can use it as the sources for a new tutorial video...

@JamesBosman-w1h , your wish is my command ;-) Such a tutorial is now available here: www.jfx-central.com/learn-javafx/fat-jar

@@FrankDelporte Amazing! This will help me a lot building my applications.

@@JamesBosman-w1h I hope so :-) And anyhow, if you find potential improvements for the template project, please let me know, or make a merge request!

By making clever use of the components 😉 for example as described here: www.vikasietum.com/post/designing-responsive-ui-with-javafx-layout-containers

Thanks for your feedback! I'm not a "deep technical expert", just an enthusiastic user ;-). They are the same regarding the components, but indeed the wiring towards the compute connectors for the base board, can indeed be different, exposing more features....

Indeed a great tool!

You're welcome!

sorry. i think i see now the example of the message receive through websocket.

Indeed in the code is two way communication implemented

@@FrankDelporte Thank you again for putting this out there. I had been spinning my wheels for a while before this.

@@naturalHex with pleasure 😀 exactly why I created this as I had the same struggle...

@@FrankDelporte one more question. I'm trying to connect your java code to a javascript client. The client wants a Websocket url. I'm failing to understand exactly what it would be in your example. ws://127.0.0.1/websocket/ws ? any thoughts? I've also tried localhost instead of 127.0.0.1 thanks!

Thanks a lot!

My pleasure!

Thanks for your question! JavaFX uses hardware acceleration by default, so the whole application “runs” on the gpu (rendering the scenegraph), but that probably depends on the system it's running on and if the Java runtime can access the GPU. But this is probably a good question for another video ;-) How LogoRRR is doing it: Pixelbuffer is “as direct” as you can get without relying on native code via Panama where you maybe could squeeze out even more performance. Anyway, there is probably no faster way to write to the screen with JavaFX, but let us know if you find one, and it will be used to improve LogoRRR even more :-) Almas Baim (creator of the FXGL game library) uses the same approach for some demos where he showcases some million pixels moving around: github.com/AlmasB/FXGL-FastRender. Check that project if you are interested in performance experiments.

@@FrankDelporte I think they were wondering how Robert avoided using "JavaFX" to draw as it seemed like that's what Robert was saying. But I think what Robert means is, he is drawing (i.e., populating) his arrays himself into PixelBuffer (which is a JavaFX class), and not relying on JavaFX's Canvas or Shapes to do the work for him. And later (not shown in the video) he is handing that PixelBuffer to JavaFX's WritableImage (which extends JavaFX's Image), which allows you to supply pixels -- see his BlockImage class. So JavaFX is still doing the lower-level work here, he is just avoiding using less-specialised nodes like Shapes or Canvas.

Thanks for yet another JavaFX video. I like to see at least one section of the video diving into code for particularly interesting problem. E.g., I didn't even know about PixelBuffer until seeing this video.

Hi, you can find the specs of the ATEM Mini Pro here: www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/atemmini/techspecs/W-APS-14. It's only up to 1080...

@@FrankDelporte thank you

This is discussed around 11:45. It depends a bit on what you want to achieve...

@@FrankDelporte in my case, I have always wanted to create a DAW using JavaFX and java plus allow 3rd party vsti integrations, so becuase how much java had it bad for music and memory at the time.

That calls for an experiment ;-) I'm working on something vice-versa, use JavaFX to receive music (MIDI) instead of generating it: melodymatrix.rocks/