Видео

Let me add the fact, that according to Krabbé the notation of that castling is 0-0-0-0.

beş dənə sözdən ibarət şərh

Patt

who won

b5 instead of b6 wins?

😂😂😂

pawn on d5 attacks e4, hence no castling allowed under condition you have mentioned.

This is what happens when you play with jeans

He dose well for a streamer tbf

Nice bro.

Great recap

Boring.

Can you make a video about how to play in lichess

The d5 pawn is attacking the e4 square.

Se que Ted Clubber Lang dijo que la súper neblina de limón es fabulosa, pero tampoco creo que abusar de ella sea buena idea...

silly

hilarious. gamers know this well ... find a silly omission in the rules structure, and milk it.

No no no no no.

As the the other comment said, the King and Rook have to be both on their original squares etc., So this is a complete prank and was never possible. Also it doesn't matter if the Rook is attacked or a square that the Rook passes through is attacked to Castle.

bruh you just wasted my time

That's funny. But you have the conditions of castling a little bit wrong. You say that the opponent can't be attacking a square between the king and rook. That's not quite true. The opponent cannot be attacking the square the king crosses over. So, when O-O-O, a piece may be attacking b1, and castling is still legal.

Just push the pawn

There’s an obvious cut, this video is fake 😂 you cannot castle across the entire board

Lol, Dutch are inventive;)

Wow sooooo true

Half of the video is pitch black

This is not true, and is a hoax by Tim Krabbe. The FIDE rules since their creation (1930s), included the condition that rook need to be on the same rank. Not to mention that the problems including vertical castling were published before fide existed. (and likely the reason FIDE included the same rank condition). TLDR: Krabbe had nothing to do with it.

This is insane!

Omg that’s crazy now that I’ve watched the video

I see mates in 3 but not 2. e8=Q, if d4 then Qe2# but if Kg2 then Qe2 Kxh1 and long castles mate I can’t find anything after O-O+

If b1 is covered by the opponent then you can still castle long

Problem chess is another discipline alltogether, now one could argue that the piece did move, it just got promoted thats all, its not another piece tecnically so that should of settled the debate without a need to change the rules

It doesn't matter if the rook is attacked anyway. Only the king isn't allowed out of, through or into a check.

Isn't the pawn on d5 attacking the e4, so there is an attack on the path of the castling?

what was the notation?

that's amazing

Die Altbekannte Krabbenrochade :-)

Draw😂😂😂,but you lose on time

Proud of 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

Black missed m1 for so many moves with 7 minites on clock, kinda deserve the draw

I hereby publicly apologise

😂😂

Bro we can do collab

❤😂

would be nice to see the ratings of the players. Also as I understand you (Ingilab Guliyev) played with black pieces. So writing your name first in the video title is a little confusing. Good luck with your channel!

I feared for my life after 12.Be2?? because you could advance your pawns with tempo, like 12...b4 13. Nb1 and you've got a real nice pawn storm going. I thought I could get away with it because your pieces couldn't easily join the attack, but in hindsight this might have been too lax from my side. Instead of 24.Rh7+?, which I played quite fast due to the time difference, 24. Ne7+! would have been a real nice move, opening up the diagonal for the queen to jump in via the h-file. Anyways, good game mate! I wish you best of luck in your future games.

He missed mate in 1

Very cool to see you got everything recorded. Definitely adds to the mood compared to just an analysis board.

Aayyyy letsgoooo