Видео

Very good question. Think about how opposition press your backline or you. Are they pressing with 1 FW? 2 FWs? By creating depth/width, FW who’s pressing you needs to run extra yards. It opens up space and possibly a free man. If they don’t want to run extra they wouldn’t press you. Some situations, you might have a numerical advantage, then you don’t need to create depth/width. Basically, you need to assess the situation and read the game. Hopefully it makes sense to you

Thank you 👍🏼

Its called chaos within discipline

ノムトレ来ないつでも。

Thanks 👍

Appreciate it!

Thank you

ありがとうございます。日本とは少し異なる環境かもしれませんが、日本で教わった事、学んだ事を取り入れて練習メニューを作るよう心がけています。

@@GKyuts 勉強になってます。これからも宜しくお願いします！

Thanks !!

Np

Depending on how you want your distribution to be. If you lean back, the ball floats up, which is perfect for a big long range distribution. However, it gives more time for your opposition to adjust and attack the ball. It can be 50/50 ball. On the other hand, the one I explained in the video is for driving/distribution. The ball gets to the specific space/player in short amount of time because the ball doesn’t go as high as when you lean back. And it increases the rate of successful distribution + easier for the receiver to receive the ball.

@@GKyuts thanks for the detailed explanation! Honestly this driven ping is a bit harder than the ‘tradiitional’ long ball which takes a bit longer to reach target. A little fault and maybe u don’t get enough height to reach the distance intended.

I mean he's better in goal than Sanchez

you are right, go sack RDZ for that

Imo, what he did in that moment is to attract the opposition and sucked them inside by him stepping forward with the ball. It allowed option 1 which LCB had more time with the ball when he received. Yes, he could’ve played the option 3 but how risky was it to play in the air when you already stepped forward and having a pressure from his right side? Also we, as GK, need to think as if we are the receiver. What types of ball do you want from your teammate? This is at least my option and how I see the game. If you think option 2 is effective and efficient, why wouldn’t you? Thanks for the comment

@@GKyuts Great analysis man! Love your videos and will keep commenting with more doubts if I have them!

Glad you like them!

Cheers, Cameron

Thanks!

Good analysis. Keep up the good work

Thank you.

Thanks for the kind word!