Видео

The trigger for lowering the gear is called doing the landing checklist.. Checklists must done.. no excuses..

Have you checked the authenticity of the video?

My thoughts, as to why the aircraft seemed to be maintaining a high speed along the runway, agree with some of those in the comments. The estimate speed was high enough for the aircraft to fly if the flaps and slats had been fully deployed. The wings have a slight curve which indicates they are producing significant lift but not enough to completely support the aircraft. Also the aircraft is sitting in a slight nose high attitude which puts the wing at a slightly higher angle of attack which in turn produces more lift. The spoilers, that would have dumped lift on the wings, were not deployed because they need the landing gear to be down and aircraft 10ft or less above the ground. The result is that an appreciable amount of the aircraft's weight was not bearing down on the runway. Whether or not it was intended to make the approach and landing without flaps, slats, and gear the pilot flying , in my opinion, had no glider pilot experience. Yes many pilots have successfully made emergency no power landings without glider experience but in this case a glider pilot, in particular, would have recognized that they were too high and close to the runway to turn final. I'm sorry to say but I believe the pilots own this one. R.I.P. to the crew and passengers. To see how valuable glider pilot experience can be, look up Gimli Glider.

Fatigue likely played a role with the crew’s behavior, it took off at 2:48am

Nose up indicates go around fail !

Maby the captain and co Pilot was drinking in Singapore the night before and when they arived to the airport got away with the security in Singapore and took the plane straitdoun to hell

The idea a jet sliding on it belly slows down quickly is an OWT. Check the data: 1. Friction Coefficient • The friction coefficient between the aircraft’s fuselage and the concrete is much lower than the coefficient between rubber tires and the runway. • Typical values: • Tires on dry concrete: 0.7-1.0 • Metal fuselage on concrete: 0.2-0.3

I cannot get out of my mind the idea of pilots soooicidal pact

Even if it did slow down a bit the concrete slab in its way would have still done damage no???

Additionally the theory of engines producing forward thrust is flawed... because we see from the landing and approach video no heat signature from number 1. Thus no thrust... and number 2s thrust reverser sleeve was deployed... if the sleeve translates aft the blocker doors are attached to the sleve no way it could produce forward thrust... however the thrust being vectored can excacerbate the ground effect and cushion of air under the wing.

Your math may be flawed. Because 1 the camera also moved. And also you are using average numbers for example if the touch down was actually the high side of the margin of error at around say 190 kts and the overrun was actually in the low end of your margin of error at around 130 kts that means a deceleration of approximately 60 kts, now several have done the math of the nose passes end of pavement until it impacts the berm and use the distance divided by time to come to approximately 130 kts at overrun still screaming fast. One also possibility for the late touch down as well as they turned to line up.. as iff a power off 180 did they come in over the approach end of 19? Or did they cut it in closer judging a degraded glide time (which would also account for delay of extending gear, and again the whole sequence was around 3 minutes...and again with number 1 out you would have to manually drop the gear, thats at minimum a 30 second process perhaps they felt its better to land on the belly than risk either A not making the runway, or B touching down on landing gear that is only halfway through its gradual extension.

You also say unless it were a fual engine failure. It would have been better for the delayed vectors. But when you watch we know that #2 suffered some compressor stalls which means degredated performance but from the TR deployment and video of the approach we can see it was still operating possibly at a highly reduced thrust.. but no TR deployment or heat trail from number 1. Therefore the urgency is likely due to loss of adequate thrust in both engines... additionally if Number one was out that will take out the A hydraulic system which controls the gear extension... in a low thrust or no thruat you would go for best glide to reach the runway which is predicated on flaps and gear up and around 200kts only loweing the gear once landing is assured... if you are sure you are going to make the runway at a low altitude you simply dont have time to move the gear handle to off, awkwardly turn and pry up the dust covered hatch, pully fully 3 separate handles then wait 15 more seconds for them to hopefully drop into place. As far as flaps, if the hydraulic options were comprimised you could run them out electrically however it requires you to reach to the far left aft overhead panel (captains side) open thebguard and arm it and hold another 3 position switch into the down mode after having selected a flap setting. Now if capt is flying and FO isnt tall or doesnt have long arms.. it may be difficult to reach. And also flaps on hydraulics take a while, flaps electrically actuated take longer. And again you dont want that extra drag until you know you can make the runway.

The first 3 minutes this dude is begging like a dog, for a few lousy bucks. Such a pathetic excuse for a podcaster, more like a homeless ragman picking a smoked cigarette from a garbage can. Every channel it’s the same begging rant

At 10:15 you make the false assumption that they went around without gear. However from the speed on the adsb data and other available statements and photographs gear and flaps had been deployed for the first approach. The question remains was the go around triggered before or after the bird strike and what was the actual reason for the go around which we will have to wait for cvr data

No Wall No Dead .

I hope the pilot was not radicalized. I am just saying

The experience pilot can’t stop the speeding planes bcuz the Boeing landing gear & brakes system is not working at all.😢😢😢

….it did not slow down bcuz the landing gear & brakes system not working at all….

Bird Strike Right side but thrust reverses applied Right side and NOT on Left side which should have been running but was not. NO FLAP SLATS SPEED BRAKES and wrong side engine shut down.

I wonder why the plane stayed so straight with the reverser deployed. This could indicate compromised thrust on the right engine.

CG

It’s pronounced “Jeh Ju” content creators covering this story need to learn to say the name correctly

Because of high speed the plane skidding off the runway. Also doesn't look like landing seems like the plane is taking off the runway why? The speeding

The guy who took the video... Although very tragic and sad, would he get paid for its use?

TOGA to 5000. Bird strike checklist, stabilize and land on 01 the Active runway. They panicked pretty obvious.

Why are your videos posted twice?

Looks like pilots error. They panicked! Suicide? All things to be done for landing were not done! RIP for all people who suffered🙏

On which electrical bus does the Ground Proximity Warning reside?

This was a panicked human relying on survival instincts almost exclusively.

maybe one engine had a quick failure, the other one had a slow failure which they only realized too late at which point their landing gear would not drop but they were already lined up.

No sheet!

We are not stupid we know the plane didn't slow down my eyes told me !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No mystery. Aluminum and titanium has less friction than rubber tires...

There's a slightly longer video out there taken from the fence line, about 9 seconds after the aircraft hits the berm if you listen carefully you can briefly hear two different engines winding down. I believe one of them is main a engine and the other one is the APU. Which indicates flight crew was following or trying to follow emergency checklist

In this tragedy, several people at the airport, along with people in the cockpit, made fatal and fatal mistakes

The internet’s reactions to tragedies is fairly predictable at this point. Emotions are high and unanswered questions terrify people, so scapegoats are created. In this case the scapegoat has become the brick wall. That’s not to say the wall wasn’t part of the problem, but the wall wasn’t flying the plane. The pilots were. Everybody needs to just chill the hell out and wait for the data to come out.

There is a confusion and lack of coordination among the flight crew to carry out specific and definite responsibilities

Because engine titanium and tail strike area titanium no melting for friction on runway

Why they didnt land on ther dirt?

Maybe they intended to approach clean and lower the landing gear at the last seconds (this is what I would have done), but at the heat of the moment they forgot that and might have believed the gears were down and they would touchdown at the landing marker. That might be the reason why the plane landed long in the middle of the runway and with no speed deceleration.

The analysis of the aircraft speed on the ground does not take into account the aspect angles and is not meaningful. At touchdown the aircraft was travelling at about 150 kts. When it had descended below 10 ft the thrust reverser (TR) on the No 2 right engine was deployed and the engine was producing some thrust. The No 1 left engine was not running an the TR was not deployed. Without the No 1 engine running and the TR deployed on the No 2 engine, there is no way that the pilot was attempting to take-off. The flaps and slats were not deployed even at 150 kts the aircraft was far below the speed required for rotation. Simply your math is wrong. The approach was at 200 kts, which is the correct speed for a flapless landing. To have stopped on the landing would have required a runway of at least 6,000m. The world's longest airport runway is 5,500m. An attempt at a flapless landing was always going to end badly.

No amount of searching for physical clues at this horrific crash site of the Korean Boeing aircraft in Decembe r2024 will reveal the ultimate real cause! The real investigation should be done at Boeing's factory floor! I heard from independent aviation industry insiders and experts that this horrific tragedy came as no surprise as the Boeing manufacturer's quality has been hugely compromised over the last decade by the employment and influx of huge numbers of poor quality Indian technical workers who took every opportunity to cut corners resulting in many defective parts for the aircraft and so Boeing and it customers are now starting to pay a heavy price for such a huge personnel recruitment mistake! Therefore the real cause of the crash is to be found on Boeing's factory floor where every aircraft manufactured there over the past decade is a defective aircraft and hence a flying tmebomb waiting to explode in the air! at any time!

A frame freeze shows No.1 engine off the pavement, aupporting the theory of an attempt to get airborne again.

I agree 100% with your analysis, I did my speed calculations from one runway light, to the next and came up with a speed of 190 knots, so we were not that far apart, I also looked at this aircraft's last 30 flights that I could get data on, and all of them showed landing between 3000 and 4000 feet down the runway, so this landing apart from the damage, wouldn't have been different for them. Google Earth imagery is old, I use software here that is more up to date, and the start of RW 19 runway extension works was complete, so they had ample room for a shorter landing attempt, I also wondered if they didn't hit that ILS mound, would the aircraft have survived? We shall never know, as the boundary fence was also made of concrete blocks, and then you have all the approach lights beyond that, I fear the end result would still have been the same once the engines dug in. I can supply the updated image of the runway if you require it.

No reason forgot lower landing gears, flaps/ slat deploy usually prior gears down, I thinks pilots had try his best,,,,,,,,,,,😢😢

Maybe only one system in working departure, no redundancy available, birds strike, engine failed, all hydraulics collapse, flaps not being down before gears, above dicision height, togo around, one engine work, no flaps deployed, lift force limited to specific height, deep turnaround, made a glidering option, no gear down flew further longer, limited height for glidering, landed on mid runway...............unlucky. 😢😢😢😢

Why don’t planes have a cockpit warning sound when gear is not down below a certain altitude?

This is terrible. First of all, Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Secondly, this video is often a mirror image, so we don't know exactly which engine was damaged by the birds. Third, the aircraft was configured to land before the bird strike. Proximity to the ground, a series of bad decisions under stress, underestimating ground effect on landing, and ultimately touching down Halfway through the airport was the main cause. Technical failure combined with pilot error.

I think the crew has committed a suicide, as a mechanic for more than 20 years I can't believe that all systems could fail at once , such as engine failure , gears fail to down with main , back up and manual pump , flaps fails , more than that the plane had enough speed to hang in the sky to making the best decision before landing

Landed long and hot on concrete with no brakes and engine(s) making lower.. Flippin' moron.