Видео

I have a Fulaim X5 which I love. I also have a cheaper wired lav which sounds better plugged directly into my iPhone 12pm BUT worse when plugged into the Fulaim!!!

Huge facts in this one.

lensgo test al the machines before shipping. Thats the reason there are some drops in the machine

subscribed. fire shorts brah.

alright... about to grab one..

thats cool

I got a sweet LED flashlight lantern at Dollar Tree . literally the best lamp ever. For a dollar. Its a 3" square by 1" thick

All very well said. I have plenty of mics and recorders, but it is my Rode Wireless Pro kit that I grab when I have limited space in my bag or whenever I do not know in advance what I will need. So much versatile and I have zero problem with the sound quality either. Sometimes I even use it with shotgun mics so that I can avoid a cable jumble. It can work as mono or stereo mics, can even record three people in interviews, it is a pair of 32bit floating point recorders, wireless/radio kit, clipon mics, USB audio interface... it can be connected to virtually anyting, or can be used stand alone, even without the receiver turned on... Yes, I would probably not use them in a Hollywood movie, but come on, I never shoot Hollywood movies.

I bought one as soon as it came out and still use it to this day. Used it for street interviews, for short films, for live performances and jam sessions, field recordings, ambient recordings, and table-reads. Unbelievable microphone for $200 (at least when I bought it).

Doesn't the blue yeti have a similar feature?

Is this different from an omnidirectional microphone?

dude sounds more like "ThatOneVirgin" lol. he should try and find a mic that adds some bass to his voice.

Had one for 2 years. Bought another. Make sure the direction you want is correct. But DAMN! ITS GREAT!

yeah, I've experienced this with my H4n-Pro as well. Zoom makes some really solid field recorders.

yup, i'm looking for one now

i hope it’s not the one ur using to record this

I used this microphone for all of the voice-over in this video. Have you heard of this device before? 🤔

I noticed (Psst.u earned a sub🤫)

I would remove only film in iso 3200 and film only with kit lens.

Thx for the advice

Me going to Fortnite to find good people Spoiler alert, it has a bad ending

Always buy 82mm filters you can use it in any lens and step up rings are cheap

Ahh the good old days

How broke your camera in some few seconds 😅

I hope I can buy the lenses in the future

Production quality is crazy for how few subs you have. Keep up the good work.

Really good video, kinda struggled to hear you over the kinda distracting music sometimes though

Very good vids! Hope one day you becone famous!

Honestly I like 4:3 and 1:1 because I generally watch RUclips with my phone in vertical mode while I scroll through comments or while looking for the next video, and on vertical mode it makes the whole video larger on my screen

All setup but Your subscribers is low

8bit and slog3 dont get along

Worth the watch. Good job, bro! What is cine2? How do you convert it on CST?

What's old is new again. I remember the 4:3 days before HDTV came out and everyone was happy to go 16:9. I can understand filming in 4:3 but in open gate so you can crop to a 16:9 and if you want to move the footage up or down in post you can. 4:3 is good for printing as its closer to most print ratios. Micro Four Thirds and Fuji Medium Format and Hasselblad are 4:3 for photography. Panasonic GH5, GH6, and GH7 film in open gate 4:3 and you can crop to 16:9.

Very cool real world use case comparisons! Enjoyed the video! Thanks.

Glad this was in my recommended.

Here are my thoughts on the subject. 4:3 isn't nostalgia, its just trendy. Some platforms are set up to provide a better experience for a square type ratio. If you post a wide aspect ratio video, it displays poorly on these platforms. Also, notice how most people shoot video with their phones, vertically. This often gives poor results, aka bad framing, and is done because the phone is easier to hold vertically. As far as MFT is concerned, only as few newer cameras support this. Most dslr footage you see was cropped to this aspect ratio in post. It was also introduced to content makers that post in a square type ratio. The aspect ratio that is chosen MUST serve the story, just like camera angles and focal lengths. The 4:3 ratio is restrictive. One example is that if you look at older tv shows, people had to stand unnaturally and awkwardly close to get a two-shot (Star Trek TNG). It also constricted wide angle shots. We see it rarely used in modern movies, and only done very strategically. Open gate ratios are popular now to serve the social media creators and the restrictions of their platforms. 4:3 does work well for talking head videos. Instead of ratios I would recommend looking closer at the why and how to choose focal lengths for you projects. That will tell you what ratio the project should be before you film. I recommend the book "Cinematography Theory and Practice" by Blain Brown.

I'm finna put out a video in 4:3... for the nostalgia

You're seeing a lot of 4:3 because RUclipsrs are shooting their MFT cameras in Open Gate and loving it! You're also seeing a lot of 3:2 videos, because now even the S5IIX can shoot in Open Gate

Just don't point at any direct sources of light. The chromatic aberration on those Lenses Is the worst ive ever seen. But that's the trade-off You get for basically being able to film in the dark.

PD MOVIE SMART google it this will change your life no more tennis balls

bro i bit the bullet to, but i have all the Aanmorphic by sirui even the 24mm but i said let me get it just to see how well it would work with the PD Movie smart. I must say it works better than the other lens. AF with this lens and PDMOVIE SMART is what you need for talking heads objects its. good

That first little hit was waaaay too slow. Painfully slow

I bought the first three on kickstarter 24, 35, 55 last year and got them for a really good price. They are well built, but a little loose in their focus adjustment. I have also bought the two most recent 16 and 75 and to my taste they are almost an update from the first ones. It tells me that there is a strong development going on at Sirui and I will definitely follow them. They are largely identical in shape, so easy to change if you use them on a gimbal in relation to the balancing. I intend to use them together with DJI's new focus system. If you are into something more cinematic, I can also recommend their Full-Frame Anamorphic lens, I have their 50mm and 75mm, I want 35mm and their 150mm. But they are some big lenses - If you are new to this area, there are also their carbon fiber versions.

if for some reason your cam screen doesnt have contrast focus indicators, you can buy a cheap laser ranger. I bought a 16mm film camera (like actual film) and you cant really see focus in the eyepiece, plus the laser is also in meters (Ukraine made camera) and the laser can read meters or feet. Also I heard this sense has a slight hue to it? just bought a Russian Jupiter 11 lens for my BMPCC 6k and it looks amazing. very old.

The biggest downside for me is the non-swappable mirrorless mount, meaning I can only use it in one mirrorless system. DZOFilm Vespids, albeit more expensive, is full-frame EF mount and more versatile.

My eyes hurt... but its good i just looked into the lamp

Not to say I’m *not* a fan of the Nitewalker lenses, but I decided to go for their APSC 1.33x anamorphic lenses and I’ve never been more pleased with a lens. The lens certainly has “a look” to them. I only own their 50mm for my FX30, but I’m gonna certainly buy the entire line up of lenses for all the anamorphic projects I want to do

Have you used it to do client work or filming ?

The only dissapointment for me is the chromatic aberration, I got the 35mm t1.2. Besides that, it's a really good lens for the price. Looking forward to buy the anamorphic one as this doesn't have that exagerated chromatic aberration and, yeah its anamorphic lol.

👍🏾