- Видео 2
- Просмотров 221 708
Adam Smith
Добавлен 16 мар 2011
Landing a Navy E-2C Hawkeye on an aircraft carrier
Cockpit view of landing a Navy E-2C Hawkeye on the Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71.
Просмотров: 215 524
Видео
Navy Centrifuge Training (CFET) ENS Smith 16OCT15
Просмотров 6 тыс.9 лет назад
My experience at the Navy's centrifuge in San Antonio, Texas. Best advice I received prior to the ride was to "Embrace the suck!"
Know when to fly through the 1202 alarm I guess ask a astronaut
Good shit
🫡
wow thats a lot of control movement
Hes constantly moving the controls. Thats some serious focus. Awesome.
And I thought parallel parking was difficult.
Navy pilots are the best. Great job!
Correct mustache adds 20 skill points and makes the landing easier.
And now you know why a big moustache is mandatory!
so amazing...
👍to the pilot. Awesome. Great display of skills. I had an adrenaline rush; felt like i was with them in the cockpit. Thanks for posting!
Fly Navy
plane with giant disk on back makes for a difficult landing. nice work sir.
Such professionalism with these Navy aviators. This is a plane I would have loved to learn how to fly. Fly NAVY!
They say nothings harder to land than the Hawkeye. I think it’s the size, wingspan and the distance from the pilot to the hook behind you- it’s much farther back than a jet. Bravo Zulu!
Ich glaube an Alienstechnik
Dear oh dear I couldn't do this I would be sick
Holy shit, talk about earning your pay.
OMG, Unglaublich !
EXCELLENT !!!...!!!EXCELLENT!!!...
Good mustache
YOY CAN WATCT IT A THOUSAND TIMES... !!! A MASTERPIECE !!! ...
Myyself and a freind went through flight school together. She flew E2's Awacs then on to P3s Etc. I flew F18s. I didnt want to fly Fighters. I want to to fly Helicopters. Now we are both retired from the Navy. She is flying for Fedex. I applied for Fedex and they wont even look at me since I dont have any heavy time.. i guess a full load 66000lb f18 isnt classed as a heavy.
SY Sublime "i guess a full load 66000lb f18 isnt classed as a heavy." Yours is not an uncommon story, military or civilian. I think you've heard the stories too, of folks who wanted jets and were slotted to rotary or other fixed wing. My grandson had that type of experience, out of MCRD, SD. He wanted to be a Rifleman, but they were so overloaded with candidates, he was "volunteered" to be an Assaultman. He later found out he liked it, because he got to blow things up. No matter how well we prepare, I guess it sometimes comes down to the luck of the draw and timing. I doubt if I'm telling you anything new as your f-18 is considered "large"(41k lbs to 300k lbs), while the "heavies" are over 300k lbs. Of course when you were delivering the "goods", with your f-18, it was to a targeted point and you might come back a little lighter:). With civie commercial, I think it would be a skoach different at taking on passengers and goods, to then drop off the same elsewhere:). With great respect to you, I am in no way busting your chops. I think I understand how you are feeling. It would seem to me if, that if you've got the aptitude to learn to fly in the first place, it should be a matter of being able, including with sim time, to transfer those skills and transition to another type of aircraft. What do I know. I used to work in the (Regular) USAF WX shack, then transferred with USAR Commo(Reserves). Be well sir. You may not have been doing what you wanted, but I, for one, can say, if you scored the 3 wire frequently enough, walked away from every landing, didn't get into hack and wore the uniform well, then I'll buy you a beer anytime. E-7 USAR, Ret.
It is always very impressive for me to land on this small island, a maximum of flying skills. Thanks for this video
Top marks for sporting a moustache like pilots of yesterday year 👍
Man..I know how big carriers are, but when you're coming in to land it just looks so TINY!
Top tier mustache btw!
Wouldn't be possible without the mustache!! haha
Bro I swear every single Hawkeye pilot has the most lush and thick mustache ever
He is in CONSTANT contact with yoke and throttle - f'ing nerve-wracking!
And what we can't see is the pilot at the same time is constantly working the rudder pedals with his feet - every change to the power levers (those are in his right hand) requires rudder correction.
The amount of control input is astounding.
Interesting how the C2/E2s dont go full power on touchdown like the jetbois. I guess with wings like that and upward tilted turboprops, you've got plenty of time to come back up on the props. Epic view!
Yes, with a turboprop power is instant unlike a turbine engine that requires a spool up.
Yeup, you have instantaneous power from those T-56's because all you are doing is changing blade angle. The engines are already spun up. And its pretty impressive when all 9200 HP kicks in (Old school T-56-425 with the 4 bladed HS props. Great vid! Now an old former hummer guy 89-96'.
Steel balls. Great Job.
I was nervous just watching the video.
What’s the deal?...I use to do this all the time on my Nintendo.
Great job. Gust of wind right at the end did not phase him.
Great pilot. He was watching the artificial horizon the entire time. They were in clouds right up till about 1/2 mile out. I really enjoyed this video. As others have commented,perfect viewpoint.
That was a good workout for my mirror neurons.
thanks 4 this i was the radar man on an eE2a callsign seabat in my earphones : "seabat put the tail hok down"
@Tucker Gary - Were you a pilot or an RO ("radar man"), and Seabats - they were VAW-111 Seabats at Miramar, right?
That is shit-your-pants scary, almost had an "adverse trouser incident" just watching it from this onboard view. It's a whole different game from all the vids showing recovery from the deck viewpoint - and it is called "recovery" to a carrier not "landing" isn't it?
Yes. And they don’t take off, they launch. They are catapulted.
I understand dynamic elevator movement for airspeed control. I don't understand constant dynamic aileron movement for directing the nose laterally to bracket the target. Is adverse yaw eliminated on the E-2C? If coordinated then lots of mini Dutch rolls. Why not just use the anti-turn control, the rudder alone, dynamically and proactively to bracket (hold perfectly) the target between his legs. Using that short nose for alignment would be a 45 degree crab. Even if the ball business is like ILS, the rudder is still the less problematic yaw control. Aileron is bank control and we don't want bank and turn. Probably a computer thing.
This is just a guess but the engines on the E-2 are identical which means they both spin in the same direction causing a yaw movement whenever the throttle is adjusted requiring rudder input to be used to counteract this yaw. Therefore trying to coordinate rudder inputs to correct for the engines and for an inperfect alignment might be difficult for pilots or might not be as effective as using roll due to adverse yaw because of the AoA
Also, E-2 engines are very powerful for the aircraft (a Navy requirement). The turbine section, at something in excess of a constant 13,000 rpm, powers huge 13-foot props through a reduction gearbox at, if I remember correctly, a constant 1138 RPM. Cockpit power levers control thrust not with throttle or turbine speed, but by changing the prop blade pitch angle and all power changes are felt instantaneously. You'll see the pilots moving those power levers quite a lot, especially as they get in close, and the E-2 has not yet had, though I believe it is planned for the near future, any sort of automatic or computer-controlled landing capabilities. Pilots have to continuously correct aileron, elevator, trim, power, and rudders.
0:00 to 2:10 steady....steady.... 2:12 start shaking the controls all over the place in hopes of not becoming a fireball.
It's because they had just entered the burble effect of the carrier where the carrier leaves a turbulence effect that the pilot has to correct for before touching down
@@sonniedae6398 No shit, really? Thanks Captain Obvious.
@@haywoodyoudome I mean to most people who don't understand even basic aerodynamics all turbulence means to them is unstable air on their airline flight and they don't know that lots of different things can cause it so not captain obvious, more like Lieutenant JG Know-It-All :)
@@sonniedae6398LMFAO LT JG Know-it-all.... awesome!
@@haywoodyoudome Always happy to provide a chuckle across the internet. Now if you'll excuse me a fully grown man just called DCS a video game and I need to complain for 40 minutes about why it's a flight sim and not a video game even though DCS can be used either way and usually is referred to as a game because it's simpler to say and has a more appropriate connotative meaning to what DCS is as a whole
Reminds me of my last flight on a Norwegian 737.
All in a day's work.
Those pilots trim button thumb must be massive
Amazing skills. Why does the stick moves like crazy?
He constantly puts in corrections, to keep the aircraft aligned (left/right) to the landing deck, on speed, and on the glide path to intercept the arresting cables. And then there are also constant gusts of wind for which he has to correct.
Talk about fucking intense!!!
Master of the Universe
An amazing and precise piloting
I'll never be able to do that. That's for sure!