Видео

Hello. It sure is, great color accuracy out of the box, factory calibrated - something you don't find on many displays. Very good text clarity. High regular (SDR) brightness at 430 nits when most displays are around 250-300, so it does very well in a bright room + decent HDR brightness at 650 nits. Very good console compatibility, both PS4 and XBOX at 120hz 4K. Sharp and fast image if you can keep it at 90+ FPS in games, so it very much depends on your hardware and the games you play if you want to use it for gaming you should first check if you can keep the monitor close to its highest frame rate for the best experience and minimal input lag. A bit big at 32 inches if you stay too close to it, curved edges would help, but on the other hand a flat panel is better for content creation. If you can get it with a discount it's a great buy.

Hello. No, natively it does not. You can play with black bars on the side at 4K60 downscaled, or at a lower resolution either in forced 16:9 or with the image stretched to fill the 21:9 aspect of the monitor.

Hey there! The G85SB has HDMI 2.1 port bandwidth but it just can't run a 120hz 4k signal on the panel, as many reviewers also pointed out. I doubt that changed on the SD model. There's been a debate among gamers about the need for 21:9 resolution aspect official support on consoles, the sad conclusion is that it doesn't seem to be a priority for either Sony or Microsoft. Consoles are meant to be mainly plug & play, as simple as possible, they are not meant, up to this point, to have the same versatility as a PC, and considering most console gamers plug consoles into a TV and most TVs are 16:9 aspect, there would first have to be a major shift in adoption of 21:9 aspect TV panels by the general consumer before it would become a priority for any console manufacturer to shift their attention and make adjustments. You can run the console in a sort of "compatibility" mode where it will run at 2560x1440 upscaled to 3440x1440, emulating a wide screen, but I wouldn't advise it - though you can try it if you'd like. For console gamers 16:9 OLED screens and TVs are a better choice IMO, but if you console game on the side, and use the monitor for PC gaming / tasks / movies , the G85SB/SD could be a decent allrounder. As for the newer version's matte panel, it's a personal choice - I like a matte coating on my screens, but even as I'm writing this reply the sun is shining brightly on my display.. : -)

@madmaxed2063 Hey, how is the text clarity on yours ?? so the SD version has full 2.1 Hdmi, but it still can't run 4k 120hz console game because of aspect ratio panel ? I am looking for a monitor that I need to use for reading 70% of the time and media and console consumption for the remainder 30% it is so hard to find one without a flaw.. oled ones are amazing but not so good for text clarity and burning .. while great clarity displays don't game well .. I don't pc game but I do want to start gaming with console to start that's why I was asking

@@dr.sharkmonk374 Yes, unfortunately, being the same panel you can't run a 4k 120hz signal on it. It already had HDMI 2.1 bandwidth on the miniHDMI port, the limitations were elsewhere. The text clarity is ok, but for the best results considering the usage you've mentioned I'd recommend going for a 4K display, 32 inch preferably, at 1meter away - normal desk distance - and 150% windows scaling you will get the best results. Either a 4K OLED, or a premium 4K LED display, IPS or VA. 16:9 is a better aspect for consoles and text reading. Personally I'd go for a 4K VA panel with mini-LEDs for the best overall results in gaming and media / production. Check out the Samsung Neo G8 mini-LED 4K 240hz S32BG85, it's a personal favorite of mine, goes up to ~2000nits and makes the whites pop in-game in a more realistic manner than on an OLED panel which will always be limited by the burn-in factor. Why not an OLED for office/reading/productivity? The static images/logos will lead to burn-in over time, maybe not a year or two, but depending on the daily number of hours you're using it for reading and other similar tasks it will alter it's properties over time. There are longevity reviews on Rtings for some OLED panels which lose top brightness on the less then 100% window area (50% 20% etc) with nits going down from 300-280 to as low as 200 after a 1 year usage period. Those issues won't manifest on a regular LED or mini-LED panel. Hope this helps you make the best choice.

@madmaxed2063 you are such a pro.. I have been researching this momitor stuff for a week now and I absolutely found neo g8 to be an allrounder for me as well minus the curve factor that monitor and dell's 32 4k IPS g3223q were in my top 2 as per my requirements too(but some eye strain concerns in it probably mwn) So I thought let's not game and go for text clarity and colors only. I absolutely adore Mac studio display glossy plus 5k, but closest to it is dell 4k ultrasharp and 3x cheaper .. let's see if I go for it. lol Thanks a lot for a great advice.. cheers ..

But if I at all I go for oled instead, I would definitely go with the samsung newer versions odyssey g8 or g6 given they are putting safeguard + tech plus static logo detection and auto light reduction and same thing if there's no movement on the monitor they auto adjust everything..

Hey there. Don't have a PS5 Pro, but you should be able to connect one to it and play at 1440p with VRR and HDR active. The monitor doesn't support 4K at 120hz, just 4k 60 (need to turn off game mode for that), downscaled. A minus is you won't be able to play in 21:9, just 16:9 with black bars left and right, though still a good experience, still OLED quality. You can use the built-in speakers, and will need an HDMI to microHDMI cable for the PS5.

@@madmaxed2063so I won’t be able to play games at 120hz on the monitor if I’m using ps5 pro?

@@ROBust_romo The short answer is: no , unfortunately just 4K 60fps downscaled, that's why I suggested a 4K 120hz+ monitor for the best results now and over time.

@@ROBust_romo “The PS5 isn’t powerful enough to run 4K at 120Hz anyway.”

It does, at a 20 degree angle +/-

Does it allow you to turn it from landscape to portrate?​@@madmaxed2063

You mean the menu to change the Local Dimming function? If that's what you mean, press the pen-tip-like button under the Samsung logo, then navigate the arrows around that pen-tip to select "Menu" - the top part of the initial on-screen guide, then select "System" and you'll see the "Local Dimming" option.

Greetings! I haven't tried them wired, only wireless but the quality is around a 9 to me, it has a very clear sound with just enough bass and highs and a very, very detailed mid section that you will very much appreciate if you like your music's instruments well separated and clear. There is no muffled effect that you may get with other headsets that over emphasize the lows or highs, these ones are just spot on balanced. Considering the price range I see them as a best-buy, 50hours of playtime, detachable cable if the battery ever fails, very comfortable padding and wear - they are just 200g! I'm quite sensitive to heavy headgear and these have won me over with that as well. At 65 USD / EUR you can't get a better overall headset. I think they're only bested by the ATH M50XBT2, but only by a small margin in the sound department and the latter's build quality, but at more than twice the price : -)

@@madmaxed2063 That's amazing review! yes It's balanced since its for mixing. thanks for your time and transparent review! will definitely get one!

@@jezzowps My pleasure, glad to be of help!

@@85RChester Sweet. It's a good monitor! A piece of advice, if I may, always use FSR quality or balanced in modern games, with FSR quality you gain about 50% more frames and the perceivable quality difference is negligible. That's the beauty of 4K, you can boost your frames and keep the eye candy when using recent upscaling tech : -) so native 4K is just a baseline, you'll be able to cap the monitor's refresh rate in most situations.

@@xephosbot Hello there. It's relevant if it meets your needs. Being OLED I would not recommend it for desktop/office use with a lot of static images, it's mostly intended for gaming, watching movies. If you want to have a good all-rounder see the regular LED, or mini-LED offers, there are a lot of good options. As I've discovered a mini-LED boosted image is far better in bright scenes than OLED, as it can reach higher nits and will give you a more life-like sensation, even though it may not be as pure contrasty. That being said, if you're set on getting an OLED display the 4k needs better hardware, whereas the wqhd one is at less than half the pixels, so you'll get about twice as many frames, or require half as powerful/expensive hardware for the best output. You won't have any issues on MacOS from what I've read. Another consideration is if the content you'll be running on the monitor is optimised for 21:9 aspect ratio, which could come in handy if you "split" screen applications, like keeping Xcel on one side of the monitor and, maybe running a browser or chat on the other half.. Price wise the 4K monitor is also more expensive. Consider your use cases and I'm sure you'll reach the right decision : -)

I've got new g8 2024 oled 240hz and I'm returning it matte display sucks, and 2023 g8 was glossy remember it was beautiful and this new one is just meh

@@24kCookieVert It's a matter of preference, some people work / play in well lit rooms and a matte display coating helps, but it depends on the implementation I guess, harder coatings may give off a foggy/dirty look. On the other side a glossy one will show off all sorts of reflections if you are in a bright environment.

Around 800euro, but you could get it for less if on sale, I managed to get this one for a little less than 700euro. Some stores have offers for resealed units, which are perfectly fine, but have been opened and in some cases used for a couple of days before being returned.

Hey. No, just wqhd at 175hz. But it's blazing fast even at 175hz as it's OLED it has near instant pixel response.

Greetings. Yeah, most Alienware monitors of the past years have a built in crosshair, it's under the Alienvision part of the menu. It's generic crosshairs, but you can customize it if you download their software for Windows. This article here explains it well, give it a look: www.dell.com/community/en/conversations/alienware-desktops/aw2723df-customize-the-crosshair/64c105fef4ccf8a8decf8a6a Hope it helps .-)

Hey! thanks for the suggestion, looking forward to experiencing that aspect of the game as well :D So far the GPU is the bottleneck, but getting decent frames and the visuals are wonderful!

Hello, yes it is!

Android devices with OTG function are supported so it should work with the Samsung S23 Ultra .-)

Hello, yes, always. V-sync will make your game laggy unless you have a framerate that never goes below the max refresh rate the display is set at. I got used to always keep it disabled and prefer to use an in-game framerate limiter (Diablo IV has such a thing) or just go with unlimited FPS if I don't need the extra GPU headroom (or limiting for broadcasting, heat buildup purposes etc)

@@madmaxed2063 Thank you for reply! I always set v-sync ON for the tearing. Diablo 4 for me is unplayable with vsync off (as other many games). Text on screen and other things get "tearing" alot! I have a 4080 super, 7950X3D and display 24" AOC IPS 75 hz adaptive sync (no gsync compatible, no freesync). How do manage the tearing effect? Thanks!

@@proj3ctmayh3m Congrats on the great rig ! Do you know what model the monitor is, or at least the resolution it runs at? You should consider upgrading to a better monitor, for smoother gameplay, image and FPS headroom you should consider getting at least a 240hz QHD monitor, the specs you mentioned are enough to drive a 4K 240hz monitor too. With an RTX 4080 super and 7950x3D you will be bottlenecked by the monitor at 75hz. Why even 4K 240hz? well, you'll be future proof, and the image is sooooo crisp! Don't go for the 144hz or 165hz monitors with that rig, punch higher, you'll love it : -) As for the tearing, try limiting your framerate to 75, go into Settings - Performance - Max Foreground FPS set to 75, it should help for the time being.

If you've paid 670 Euro for the PC + monitor you got a huge discount :)) It has it's drawbacks, as do all Samsung Smart OS monitors, some of them do tend to want to turn off while you are using them or don't sync with the PC when powering on. Personally I can live with the minor drawbacks, but it's your choice if you choose to go with something else. I'd recommend you try something from their 4K lineup, maybe the G8, which is purpose built as just a monitor. 4K on a good monitor can change your perspective, though you need good PC horsepower to drive it over 60 FPS in demanding titles.

@@madmaxed2063 Of course ONLY the monitor cost 670. I've now got used to its peculiarities and found out that you have to turn off VRR. I had a strange stuttering in the picture the whole time. But now that I've deactivated VRR, everything is smooth as butter. Either way, it's just a bridge monitor. I used to have 4k and this OLED bottlenecks my system.

@@0newithmisery Yup, turning VRR / Freesync ON sometimes makes things worse on some Samsung smart monitors, like flickers, jitters, scanlines etc - it's a trial and error thing, setting up a Samsung monitor, unfortunate cause they make such great panels.. : -)

@@madmaxed2063 With my Samsung TV I have absolutely zero Problems when VRR is enabled. Only Adaptive Sync is active on the monitor now. But that is forced to be active as soon as the game mode is active. And that is always active. After all, it is supposed to be a monitor. So why the heck does this thing even have a game mode? Either way, if I had paid €1500 for it, I would have complained about the monitor after less than two days. But for under €700, it is a very good deal despite the annoying "features". I will replace the monitor again as soon as a 32-inch 4K 16:9 OLED comes out that meets my requirements. Right now I am playing Dead Space on the G8 and it is really completely outstandingly cool.

@@0newithmisery Samsung has been pushing the "smart / tizen " OS thing on its clients for many years, they don't want to understand not everything is meant to be "smart" in that way and that their current OS implementation in its current state doesn't bring +value to every user, at times it just complicates the most basic function the product should achieve.. most big corporations tend to lose sight of the simple things when following their "greater" agenda. But enough with the corpo-politics, which Deadspace are ya playing? :D

Sorry to hear that. So far I've had 4 Samsung monitors that have performed admirably and haven't had any RMA issues. Sure, they have plenty of "faults", mainly software issues - some smart ones want to turn off by themselves, even though you're using them, asking for remote input not to do so, most have scanlines or light jitters while using Freesync at lower refresh rates, that's why I turn it off altogether.. - but mechanically they've been impeccable, even though the boxes they've arrived in seemed flimsy and had been roughed up by the couriers (bad, low-paid couriers : -) Otherwise a very good monitor for the money, it's even on offer these days. Hope the new one will be a keeper ! :D

Hello. Yes, for most content. I keep it on Low Local Dimming as it makes the highlights and bright areas pop and it's pleasant to the eyes even when browsing or watching content online, whereas on High Local Dimming the blacks get crushed and the white areas get this halo effect in most normal scenarios. High can be used for certain games or movies. The monitor is great but the calibration will take a while and not everyone will enjoy it on the same settings. When you do get the settings right, subjectively, you won't wanna go back to a regular monitor without mini LEDs : -)

​@@madmaxed2063 Thanks for helping🎉 can you share me youre color settings please?

You're welcome, glad to help. When I first setup the monitor the settings were all wrong and the image looked really bad, so I know it takes some tweaking : -) I keep it on "Faster" Response Time, Low Input Lag "On", Black Equalizer 13, FreeSync Off, Custom Picture Mode with 80 Brightness, 83 Contrast, 64 Sharpness, Color is on Normal - baseline 50 50 50, Gamma Mode3, Saturation 50 as well. Contrast Enhancer Off. Try these settings and see how they suit you.

@@madmaxed2063 wow We use almost the same settings, mine are 80 brightness, 80 contrast, 72 sharpness. The gamma mode is the same, 3, but I use the contrast enhancer on, I like it because the colors and images are brighter, but it gets worse when I watch dark movies with these settings (for example, The Batman 2022). Do you use it on PS5? If you do, can you tell me what settings you use for HDR? Thanks. (I use the same settings :))

I wouldn't use Contrast Enhancer while Black Equalizer is at 10 or above, with Local Dimming on Low or High, because you lose too much detail in the shadows while certain areas become pitch black. In my opinion Contrast Enhancer works well with edge lit monitors to create a more contrasty look in certain scenarios, but at a cost. Mini LED monitors already dim the black areas by default when Local Dimming is enabled. Haven't used it with a console yet :"-)

Hey! It's great if you play fast paced games, FPS, MOBA competitive types, games that can actually hit the 360FPS or above and benefit from them. DELL / Alienware are reliable brands. The HDR isn't great though, don't count on it to make a big difference, the nits are OK, the panel is bright. The pixels are a bit spread out on the 27inch display but if you keep it at more than an arms length from you the image is quite clear and crisp. Otherwise, if you don't play the types of games that can benefit from the 360hz display, if you want a more cinematic experience, I'd like to recommend you look at the Samsung G6 240hz QHD 1000R VA smart monitor, it's fast, quite low priced lately, and has deeper blacks and colors.

@@madmaxed2063 ok thanks, but I have a 3060 and I was wondering if you think it is worth it if I am going to upgrade my gpu soon. but I'm just wondering if you think that it is worth it?

If you want something to enjoy for a good part of the foreseeable future get a QHD monitor, 27 inch is the sweet spot, but 32 is good as well, get a VA panel curved monitor for immersion. Check out the Samsung G6 240hz smart monitor. Otherwise, if you play competitive games like Rainbow 6 Siege, Fortnite, CS, Valorant, LoL.. get the 360hz IPS monitor : -)

@@madmaxed2063 ok thanks i will get it then :)

@@marty5254 Hello. I'm inclined to say go with the Samsung, even though you didn't specify exactly which LG monitor you are referring to. The monitors I've used the past few years, and have had no major issues with were either Dell or Samsung. I currently have 2 Samsung monitors on my main PC and a Samsung OLED TV, and I like them a lot. Regarding this monitor in particular, for me the 1000R curve make a big difference, the fact that it's ultrawide is very nice, though you must ask yourself if you prefer that to a normal 16:9 aspect one, maybe you multitask a lot, like I do, or watch movies, in which case 21:9 helps. Also it has a smart OS and remote, big plus for some, it's growing on me too, the remote I use a lot. It gets OTA updates frequently. Good ergonomics and aesthetics! The drawback is you need a dim lit room to enjoy it. Using it in a sunny room or a room with a lot of lights behind the user will make for a less pleasant experience as it's very reflective. Hope this helps you make the best choice :-)

@@madmaxed2063 dude thanks so much! Btw I was talking about the 34GS95QE if that changes anything

Yw. The 34GS95QE has the advantage of a faster refresh rate, but you won't benefit from the 240hz refresh rate unless you have very good hardware and the game engine can handle that many FPS. Sure, you could say it's more "future proof", but that depends on how long you see yourself using this monitor before upgrading. Unfortunately, since these OLED panels are fairly new tech, no one can say how many years they will last before exhibiting problems. Anyway, 240hz vs 175, matte coating on the LG, glossy with a light purple tint on the Samsung, better overall looks on the Samsung + smart OS, deeper curve on the LG. Both are really good deals, the folks at RTINGS reviewed both of them if you'd like to search them up and see which one is for you.

ultragear sucks because it's matte display

QD-OLED

Those are kantos, they’re like $200+ on various sites.

They're Edifier 1280 active speakers. They are about half the price of the Kantos speakrs, around 100$ and very good for the money, have them playing off the Creative SB Z SE & the Sound Blaster AE-7. Quick review here: www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/edifier-r1280t-powered-speaker-review.16112/

Hey. No it cannot do 4k at 120hz, only 4k 60hz downscaled if/when using a console. It runs at 3440x1440 175hz natively.

Hey, the version you have is g85sb it has got usb C and micro hdmi. The updated version g85sd has regular Hdmi 2.1, and DP and no usb c .. I am a noob but should it mean it will support 4k 120hz console gaming? Also, it has antiglare..

@@madmaxed2063hey, would u suggest corsair xeneon 27qhd over this for a ps5 pro?

@ROBust_romo Hey! The Corsair can do 4K at 120hz downscaled with VRR and HDR, which is a plus over the Samsung, but it has low SDR brightness and quite poor color accuracy as the review at Rtings pointed out. Has some input lag when using 60hz signals which you may or may not notice. It's a good monitor compatibility wise, but I'd suggest native 4K monitors for PS5 Pro, in the long run you are best served.

Hello, no black screens or any other issues, though I've heard some Samsung smart monitors tend to turn off by themselves. Only a few times has it happened that I got prompted to press the remote "OK" key, on my Odyssey G65B smart QHD VA 27inch monitor, in order for it not to turn off (although active) over the course of 5-6 months. On such a rare occasion it's something I can personally live with, but if it's worse you should probably return it.

Hello. Sharp enough, if you want the best of both image quality and decent FPS QHD or WQHD resolution is the sweet spot; 2560x1440 or 3440x1440 is where you wanna be. For anything above that you'll need the best of today's hardware to even break 100FPS in most new titles without frame generation or upscaling tech.

@@madmaxed2063 its same as 2560x1440?

@@umutnengin4951 Hello, no, it's a wider, cinema-like aspect, 21:9 at 3440x1400 versus 16:9 at 2560x1440 - roughly 5 million total pixels versus 3.7 million pixels

@@madmaxed2063hello i purchased this monitor arrives in 2 days do u have any issues since u buy this monitor ? Are you recommend this monitor ? And you using hdmi or dp ?

Hey! Sorry about the late reply, been out for a while. Although I'm sure you've already plugged them properly, the square-ish blue (USB-B) cable plug connects to the monitor, and the USB-A (regular USB) connects to the PC - that allows the monitor to act as an USB hub - you can then connect other peripherals directly to the monitor's USB plugs. Pretty decent feature, which I love, more so since my case is under the desk and not as accessible. Can never have enough USB plugs! :D The DP (display port) video signal cable is reversible and you can connect either end to the monitor and to the PC. Enjoy the monitor!

Hey. It does not, no remote or smart hub, it's just a plain monitor : -) Good for esports / high frame rate gaming, decent for everything else.

@@4merico Hello. DP 1.4 & HDMI 2.1

Hello. The issue you're referring to may not be related directly to AMD GPUs, it may be a poor implementation on the part of Samsung. They have some suggestions on how to deal with it in this reddit post: www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/158cb8b/samsung_odyssey_g8_oled_capped_at_400_nits_hdr/ - although I would suggest to use Samsung monitors with Freesync OFF. I have a 4k Odyssey Neo G8, a 2k smart Odyssey G65B and they both have flickering issues (light pulses, lines on screen) when used with Freesync on. I personally don't mind having Freesync off, the VA panels, deep blacks and good colors + the 1000R curve is what I want, though initially I was disappointed by the fact that most Samsung monitors can't be used with Freesync enabled I decided the other aspects are more important. Besides, for me tearing almost never occurs on a 7900XT + 14700K, 12400F or 7950X3D .

Alright thank you, so the monitor wil also not be capped at 400 nits when you have freesync off ?

Hello. No, it doesn't have speakers or tizen OS.

It's "love or hate" with OLED monitors at this point in time. Some time will pass until they become the norm, the prices go down and the technology advancements allows them to be full-time all-purpose monitors, but they are the future for sure :-)

@@madmaxed2063 oled its the Best. But Not From samsung with the oily mate coating

Comments like this are so idiotic. The gloss panel is definitely better when it comes to image quality, but it's all about user preference. Some prefers matte cause they want immersion, not reflection.

It is not as apparent as other matte panels. Semi glossy would be a better term.

Hey there, yes, it's the same panel

Mid mpg 271 qrx

Lo negro muestra morado solo cuando la luz se refleja en el monitor. (the blacks have a slight violet tint only in direct sunlight) Este monitor es mucho mejor que lo Odyssey G85SB ultrawide con la superficie brillante de la pantalla. (this monitor is much better at reflection handling than other OLEDs with glossy screen finish)

@@madmaxed2063 gracias, que molesto que valga y den estos resultados, creo que añado es que este año 2024 hasta en sus televisores miniled han tenido mala calibración y muestran colores morados

eso pasa hasta con tv oleds si tienes muy iluminada la habitación ajaja

Hello, no bother. Walking, sure, they are very lightweight, the clamp force is just right not too tight. For biking as well, and you can wear them for hours without a problem. But I wouldn't use them for running or CrossFit type of workout though. Too much sweat will wear the earpads faster I asume. But the sound is awesome!

Sure feels like that compared to an MX Master 3s :D

Thank you! This ended up in a friend's new build, he's loving it 😁 Got a second one for myself, the price is just too good at just 200$ /€

Hey there. Haven't tried them yet, been busy the last couple of days, but 2 of my friends have the Soundcore Life Q35 and they are sold, great sound, comfort and battery life (only minus is that the earpads got worn out about 12-14 months in, for both of them, and needed replacing). Also, I was fortunate enough to try on the Soundcore Liberty 3 Pro earbuds a while back, and they are absolutely brilliant, MJs Smooth Criminal never sounded so clean and deep! :D

Hello! From what I've seen after test streaming to Twitch & RUclips, the x264 CPU encoder delivers better quality per frame than the H264 GPU encoder. The CPU power consumption and load does go up quite a bit though, but if you have good cooling, a good PSU and headroom for the encoding, for the best possible quality I'd go with the CPU encoding. On the GPU encoding side I've seen temporary quality drops during fast action scenes and sometimes even randomly. Can't say if it's an AMD only issue, or if it's the same on the nvidia side, only streamed AMD GPUs - 7700 XT and 7900 XT. Personally I like to play with fast frame rates, currently have a samsung G6 240hz display, and I'd like to cap it at least at 120FPS while playing, so, for me, CPU encoding is better because I can cap the GPU at 100% and leave the encoding load on the CPU (since with 100% GPU load I've seen the H264 GPU encoding struggle at times and drop frames). There's an advantage, quality wise, to stream in UHD, if your system is good enough and you have a great internet connection (since the bitrate needed will be very high), UHD is the future, and RUclips will save all your videos, unlike twitch. The downscaled UHD video will look very good in QHD and FHD as well, considering your system and internet connection are flawless :D You can also use 2 PCs for streaming, and that will make it easier to use CPU encoding. Check out my other test streams if you'd like to see some differences. Hope this helps. Have a good day!

It depends on the FSR quality level, you could get anywhere from 15 to 100% extra FPS from what I've seen, but the quality will suffer as you go up in FPS. Don't have any FSR on recordings for this build, but on an 7800X3D / 7900XTX you can go from 60FPS all the way to 110FPS from ultra quality to ultra performance, in the scene I've tested, and will stay at 90FPS(50% extra frames over native resolution) if you choose balanced mode.