Видео

only visual studio code! Why doesn't it do it specifically they for visual studio ?

Never ever buy their service . Too slow and lazy customer care. And no refund wasted my money

Thanks Its Works 👌👌

AGi is bullshit, we can not create it. We have no concept of what consciousness is, we dont even fully understand LLMs, we dont even understand HUMANS fully. It is impossible for us to create a generalized intelligence when you have yet to understand and conceptualize with a proof what intelligence is. We have no proofs or anything to even know what consciousness is. this is all marketing bullshit

Hi, great video.. but I have something wrong... im paying after 5 days networking about 3,70€? Is that normal?

What is at play on global stage is, in my opinion, Limits to Growth aka "he with the most resources wins". Automated west attacked resources rich manual east, so the Rich want what the Poor have.

Not sure if you mentioned it, but there will be a difference in the quality of the goods. Manually made goods, in most cases, would be better quality than mass produced cheap goods.

This was a great take! 10 year software eng now and toying with starting a side project/SaaS business and was having similar dissonance when working on it. I’ve been a part of enough venture backed startups to know that that model is not sustainable for most companies. So then how do we make something truly profitable and bootstrappable. Have you seen Pieter Levels content? He very much promotes the solopreneur ethos and it is inspiring

Sure you can. I work for one myself. If you have truly innovative tech that is actually useful that is. Copy pasting already existing products and business model isn’t how you should start a tech company anyway.

You have a very effective simple but perceptive take, and I like your voice. You will be able to do this professionally if you continue with youtube.

Hope you're not a neoliberal. The homeless in California and other places are homeless due to supply constriction introduced by the neoliberal wealthy class. Mixed zoning, civil government sponsored housing and lower regulative barriers to housing ladder would help mostly everyone but would hurt the wealthy dumping their money in real estate. Economic policy is always a matter of political will, leadership and vision. If you allow the superrich industrialist to monopolize politics you will get slavery in a few generations.

Free markets assume people are incorruptible and there lies the flaw. With govt. officials colluding with corporates, oligarchs, hedge fund managers, etc. the free market is an illusion.

We the people need to be compensated (universal income) for what has been taken from us (survival in the wild). Automated production is mass production, why would you need mass production for less than 1 percent (the rich) of the population?

make app for vision pro or ar/vr

20% of people will always own 80% of the wealth, our elite are just beta males. They have to rely on coercion, manipulation, lies. All of them have a bodyfat over 20% the only "elites" worth respecting are Arnold Schwarz, Alex Hormozi is another up and comer.

I wouldn't think automating your own farm or commune is the best opportunity if this were true - not in the short to medium term. People already dropping out of the labor force and going back to the land is a big enough TAM that you could make a killing selling tech for getting off the grid

Bro get real we don't live in a freemarket. We live in monopoly capitalism. 20% of people will always own 80% of the wealth, also called beta males.

yea but why would anybody grow there own food if pay is too low to buy it instead of revotling

What a sober thesis with insightful examples. I'm glad you popped into my recommended feed.

It might be important to mention you're limiting this to product companies. Plenty of agencies hit the ground running today.

Awesome, it's so easy...I had tried that a couple of years ago it didn't worked... I'll try these steps again 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

read Player Piano bro

There was never a goal of "maximizing profit" our elites are trillionaires, they are past the point of caring about money.

In-work poverty, no ability to buy something, less motivation for education, more people in crime

u have ed lol

I don't agree if you are automating tasks for example for a PhD person having to do some tedious weekly data entry to get information into some outdated system that say a pharmaceutical company does not want to spend money on getting an upgraded version because it does not add value to the company and as a result many highly educated people have left the company because they felt their skill setis being wasted with certain crap tasks. Many tasks being automated at corporations don't necessarily add value to you or the company and when yearly performance reviews come around no one would expect your data entry tasks to be noted as an accomplishment. Now if you took the initiative to automate it, then yes it would show a little about yourself as one wanting to work smarter not harder because as an educated out of the box thinker with the mindset of ain't nobody (with legit degree/education) got time for the BS work tasks. Now if someone is only there to get a paycheck, meaning no interests in adding value to their resume then yes they may have your mindset.

OpenAi will not die down it will take a chunk of web searching away from search engines. For many day to day searches what the Ai gives you is plenty enough

The question in the paradox made me think if agi would respond to those questions like you inferred it would most likely. I mention this because it may also be true that agi would respond in way that’s more likely unfamiliar to us, if its capabilities are that it can consider much more info and synthesize or derive new info from unimaginably large amount info that’s all being processed at the same amount of time. Then it would be most likely the decisions it arrives at should be unpredictable, because it’s leveraging our pattern of thinking without the limitation of storage and random access memory, Etc (even eventually) I think I am guessing agi won’t be a machine of action or decision making but more of machine for calculations that can mostly be arrived through quantitative certainty like physics. And for things it can’t always quantify it will use its own system or scale that may be incomprehensible by us and not simply ordinal

I don't think these are free services. You don't pay for the services because you are the product. The market to you you give your money to those who give them money. Without the indirect stage of you giving money to them there is no Google or social media. How would someone get paid to give you food. There are some examples in real life where the government funds someone's food. But if the power elites have no use for you why even keep you around certainly you could have a situation where they lived in relatively fortified positions such as in South Africa. But this is different. They won't have any utility function for the majority of the population. We already see the rise of a new religion in response to the decline of the value of the currency and the psychosocial effects that has. This new religion amongst other tenants teaches that people are fundamentally immoral. And that it would be undesirable to have more of them than it's unethical to make more of them. How often do you hear the phrase "humans are a virus" "They're destroying the world" there have been extensive psychological studies that show this is partially the results of a large number of narcissists who see themselves ask miserable and wanted to die but not having the nerve to kill themselves. And then projecting that everyone else must be in the same state or living is more burden than pleasure and does subscribing a positive moral value to the death of humans and humanity. Well you can see a certain proportion of these people as relatively Fringe. The Fringe is what's driving things forward. Thank you for your patience with my text wall😂 Edit about 2 to 3 months ago I may have my dates wrong the company known as meta and Google both laid off massive chunks of their workforce following exes laying off more than 2/3

The game is for us not to work anymore. We actually have a chnace to do this right bring general value and automate everything we don't wanna do. I believe it's currently ironic that most people have their job and hate it but also don't want something else to replace the job producing much more value for less resources and free up those humans to do something else.

We don't need 50% of men either

I expect the mass depopulation will be the result of the AI 99% will be 5% in 100 years

why are car prices going up, usually in line with average wages and amount of debt one can service......car production is automated.....

There is a major factor that you overlooked, which makes things more complicated. If we develop a new method to automate many of the jobs in a given industry, then the real cost of production in that industry is bound to decrease. If the goods are being manufactured in a competitive market, then the price of the produced items will go down too. That then pushes up the purchasing power of wages for the remaining workforce. This is why it's not as straightforward as you present, and it is difficult to predict what the final impact on wages will be. In the real world there are of course other mechanisms that also don't fit so neatly into an idealized model. For instance, maintaining automated factories requires workers with higher education, which pushes up wages for those workers. If the workers have specialized skills, it is easier for them to negotiate with the employer - especially if they are unionized. Also, it may be that a portion of the increased corporate profits is taxed and spent on programs that improve the quality of life for the workers, who may then be able to afford a higher standard of living.

automation is good, increasing human productivity is good. with more automation the pie is bigger and we can have more stuff or work less hours. allowing capital owners to leverage automation to enrich themselves while making everyone else poorer is bad. but this is not a law of nature. this is a choice we made, and are continuing to make, as a society. we vote on the mayor, the police chief and the governor. but the economy is run by a cabal of petty dictator/oligarchs, and regular people get to choose which terrible asshole they will serve in exchange for things they need for survival. why do we give control over automated machines to unaccountable selfish unelected dictators? along with control over our land, water and other natural resources? not sure. everyone just seems to think it's a really good idea for some reason, inspite of all the evidence to the contrary, and so here we are.

The WHOLE POINT of technology & automation is to bring wages down. It always has. Technology & automation commoditizes tasks and will not stop until ALL jobs are removed. Your interests are to hold on as long as you can and have the other guy lose his job. Better him than you.

Je wish banking. They do insider trading with their friends in The Banks, Media, Politicians and Too Corporations. Pretty easy to collude from there. Just start with media. ADL Stock Market = WWII Ask Mr 8,8

It's kind of paradoxical when you think about. A free marketing creating neo feudalism. It Seems like humanity is stuck between a rock and a hard place because communism is just as bad if not worse, that's if automation takes over almost all jobs.

Automation SHOULD be good for society, but you do need a system to redistribute this wealth amongst the people. At the moment we have a growing parasite class (Gov / Big corporates) which feed off the productive. The extra wealth from automation should be allowing for significantly less work to provide the bare essentials of survival, currently we see the opposite. They want the peasants toiling away on largely BS jobs just to survive... perhaps to keep us busy. This need not be 'communism' , and anyone claiming that the current system is a pure 'free market' is deluded.

You ask for the New World Order because you see the yummy stuff. But you do not ask, who controls and runs the New world order and what freedoms do they allow you to have? Also, why do they get to decide how free you are? Why are you asking another human who you are equal to in existence, what kind of freedoms will you allow me to have? Lead yourself. Stop trusting Governments and religions. They do nothing but try to control you and trap you into their systems where its always the 1% ruling over the 99%. We need systems that are not controlled by a leader or leaders who eventually just get corrupted by power. All they do is try to trap us into illusions.

Crazy idea : What if all weath is a result of energy consumption . More energy . More weath . You can use that energy to power humans or machines , but in the end you are just turning energy into goods and services .

Discovered your channel, underrated gem

Holy crap. I thought this was a joke at the start. You can't be serious dude. This is how you create a slave society.

Holy crap. I thought this was a joke at the start. You can't be serious dude. This is how you create a slave society.

Money is a quantifiable and universal history of transactions ( Money =/= work done.) Now that we understand the idea of money. The real value in money is time. . . The finite resource is the product produced. Automation if a machine can x100 the rate of a person, it adds that much value in time to itself. The workers' time value is decreased. Thats why. (Humbly, a cable guy)

I don't understand your weird way of thinking : automation makes products cheaper so your purchasing power increases as a conumer. For example factory produced trouses or shoes are a lot cheaper than trouses shoes which were ordered from the craftsman so you can buy hundreds of trouses or shoes now for your salary. It means that your salary increased comparing to the value of trouses or shoes.

Automation doesn't necessarily reduce pay. H1B visa is a massive issue. Corporations are incentivized to import what amounts to indentured servants to lower the pay for the work that isn't automated. Even that aside what automation does is allow for increased output from the same labor pool couple that with the the H1B visa issue and you have wage stagnation and a decrease in long term earnings, but maybe not a flat out pay reduction.

Sadly, I think it's true. As an employee however, I know I will get a bump in pay if I automate a task. So, I guess it's a fight or flight situation for me :D

I work as a freelance real estate photographer. So I guess "real estate photography" would be my market space. In the past, if I took a drone shot and there was a car in front of a garage door (or a moving "pod")... it would take nearly and hour to clone out that car. Because the little square patterns on most garage doors are quite difficult to recreate...because the photos are almost always taken at an angle and they are not "squares" then in the picture...they are just polygons of different shapes that have to be individually recreated and have their light/shadow proportions fixed. So yeah...up to an hour...per photo..to fix that photos by hand. And I don't get paid extra to do it. And usually there are three front photos of the house. When Adobe came out with their AI "Generative Fill".... I was mind-blown. 80% of the time you just lasso a selection around the car and punch that button (not even adding any words to the prompt) and it get's it bang-on right. Maybe 5 to 10 minutes of tweaks. So the efficiency is through the roof on that for that form of automation. And no...wages are not going doing because real estate photographers have access to that tech. Also... your overall premise is wrong if you look at the macro economy. You acknowledge that the workers who lost their jobs went on to get other jobs...but then move to discount that by saying that the universe of workers had lower wages. But you need to be willing to zoom ALL the way out. And that would mean just looking at average wages overall for the whole economy. Are wages overall going up? Or are they going DOWN? Because for your premise to be true...they would need to continue falling. All the time. And not just "adjusted for inflation they are lower"...we should see wages literally start to go down. But even McDonald's in my area is advertising $15 an hour...when the minimum wage in Michigan is $7.50. So it's going up...not down. If wages are going up...then at the macro level...automation isn't causing wages to go down when everything comes out in the laundry. Furthermore...who cares if wages go down? That itself doesn't exist in a bubble. We just always assume prices will go UP. But in theory...they could go down. So If my wages were to go down 1% per year....but the cost of everything I have to buy was to go down by 2% per year...I would take that deal. So you have to figure that in as well. Does the overall quality of life increases given to us by automation net out any supposed drop in wages? Because if it does.....then falling wages wouldn't be a problem. Except in our mind. Because we psychologically can't really get cozy with the idea of earning LESS and being better off. It's possible in the real world for that to happen...but it's not possible "in our minds".

But because mavhine dont crwate value. The value come from human labour as it is biological living Beings protected by laws, those technologies will decrease in price exponentially in time therefore increae competition and prices of products will go down.