Видео

I prefer this version...

Pinte una mona lisa más bella cuando quiera se la muestro

RUTIL QUE MILAGRO TENIA COMO 2 MESES SIN VERLA QUE CAMIONETOTA FORD RENUEVE LICENCIA PASA QUE YA EMPEZO A FALLAR EL ACERO MIENTRAS FABRICO EL NUEVO PROTEJASE PASA QUE MATARON A LEO DISCULPE LO GROCERO DIJERON AQUI HAY PAN EN ABUNDANCIA Y QUE LE TRAGAN A SUS MUSAS SABE COMO ESTA COMO EL SENIOR FARAON DE EGIPTO EL QUE CUENTA LA BIBLIA QUE ERA MALDITO SIN PIEDAD NO FUE UNA MUSA FUERON COMO CASI TODAS LEO DICE DENTRO DE SI HARE LLOVER ORO HIRVIENDO EN LOS OJOS DE MIS ENEMIGOS HASTA QUE SUS CUENCAS QUEDEN HUECAS Y QUEMADAS PARA SIEMPRE LEO TRABAJO 25 MILLONES DE CICLOS ES JUSTO Y VERDAD SUS IDEAS

الاصبع هناك خطأ

Boring painting. Never liked it. The background sucks too.

Any. Good artist could paint. The Mona Lisa.....but you did it better then he did ......he. Just painted it first......

Although a good painting in its own right, it doesn't hold a candle against the original in its subtleties or tones

Very interesting, I actually attempted the same thing, but I missed the coppery greens. ruclips.net/video/ywlSM63QEGk/видео.html

I. Like your. Mona Lisa better then. ...the original one ...

Do you sell prints of this?

Hi. If you care for Mona Lisa's Portrait. I want to tell you something about it .After deep study I reach to that , we can not see the Original of Mona Lisa's Portrait , unless we play in our visions , I mean via saying that, that we play in our looks in terms of the portrait .We can not see the main shape of it by a complete eyes , we try to close our eyes and see little and then step by step we start to open our eyes attentively (focusing on the Portrait by our eyes) .The hall must be dark the light only on the Portrait to focus carefully. By this way dear we can see the Original of Mona Lisa's Portrait. Why I don't tell you the Original of the Portrait, for I saw a person ,Who is he I don't know him indeed instead of Mona Lisa's Portrait. YOURS SINCERELY T.YASSER AUTHOR U.OF ARTS

First of all, my congrats for the endeavour in making this piece and the extensive research around it. Also, it's no subject of discussion the hue , chroma, etc , due time and the odissey this painting suffered. I just have one question to do: where is the Leonardo's "signature" here? Where is the SFUMATO? It's just a question. Thanks

Have to say she does not make sence with the red pigment on the sleaves, as you can see the same red used in the skin tones on the original painting. If the sleaves faded then the skin tone red would fade too, as there the same pigment?????. This is a good interpretation of her impression of the old masters but not an exact interpretation.

My Father is a landscape artist/oil painter in his mid 60's. I've always admired art history and the avant-garde of the art world. I love your in depth explanation and work done on this aged masterpiece brought to new life and light. Well done.

Where can i find a book she mentioned much research had been done, and I am sure there good photos of this painting.

for the love of god dont keep your mic so close to your mouth

Une copie de plus, très réussie cela dit. L'une des toiles la plus copiée au monde...

I’ve enjoyed everything about this video 👍

And that’s why Masterpieces are best left alone….

Jenness do you not have any social media to share with your audience? Thank you for your contributions to the art community. You make history interesting.

Probably the most accurate copy from Leonardo, but with new materials. Is beautiful well done !

Lets try to tell baumgardner about the monalisa

The color is beautiful. The layers look a little "broken" ,that probably because of the turpentine quantities ,and not enough drying time. The strokes are visible,and not fully blended. So ,this looks very modern .

Very interesting.

ruclips.net/video/rDcCeeSe5EY/видео.html

Shows how badly it needs to be cleaned and restored

Very interesting!

If you listen to this with earbuds it’s SO relaxing like ASMR

Overrated painting.

More filled with colours and brighter I love your drawing my friend and I’ll promise you that I’ll subscribe😊

Completely different painting now.

I enjoy hearing the back story on the Janness Cortez paintings.

The Maestro painted two versions of Mona Lisa. The one in the Louvre is actually the second version believed to be painted in 1513. The first version, which is on canvas, shows Lisa appearing to be about 10 years younger than in the second version. I read about this a few years ago, the original version is called the Isleworth Mona Lisa.

Thank you Jennes for sharing your knowledge and immense talent. I can only imagine the hours of study, planning, and painting that went into your beautiful work. #historychannel, #smithsonian

this is interesting series . thank you for sharing regards from bicol. keepsafe.

Very nice explanation. I like ur mona lisa reimagine.. Here is my video taking about great Indian artist raja ravi varma ruclips.net/video/6beaKrP-eic/видео.html

Beautifully articulated, intelligently described, increases understanding and appreciation of both Hockney and Cortez

What book are you referring to? I would love to read up on the research done!

Is that Bob Ross's girl friend🤔🤔🤔

Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation

Very well done, video, Jenness. Discovered your video series in this morning's edition of ArtNews Daily. I decided to view this video first because of my recent fascination with Jean-Michel Basquiat and the works he made with Warhol. The Detroit Institute of Arts just acquired a very large work by Hernan Bas titled "Sorting Out Andy." I think you would enjoy it if you haven't seen it. I would be very happy to email you photos I took if you are interested. We also have on loan from a private collector, Basquiat's "Rusting Red Car in Kuau." Thanks for the video. Will check out the rest in your series. By the way, I really like your "15 Minutes of Fame."

Wow

Thank you for your explanation of your art works.

This series looks so interesting and absolutely beautiful. I’ve shared this introduction video with my son and daughter who have both an interest in fine art and art history. Thank you Jennes Cortez for sharing your gifts with us!

Very good

Shes cool

I think this interpretation is amazing and, thanks to science, is a lot closer to how the original painting would have looked when freshly painted 500 years ago. Her features are closer to the "Isleworth Mona Lisa" which appears to be an earlier version, or was perhaps the version Leonardo was reluctantly forced to give to his patron Francesco del Giocondo (Lisa's Husband) even though it was unfinished. If I had a chance to view in real life all three paintings, I would view Jenness Cortez's Mona Lisa first, followed by the Isleworth Mona Lisa next and lastly the Louvre version. The order of this list indicates most want to view, to least want to view. I think the Cortez and Isleworth versions are much better paintings, with much more life in them than the Louvre one. Thankfully we have multiple digital and film recordings of those two so the won't be lost to history.

Does no one realize all the first comments are looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong

Excellent copy! Like it was when first completed - as near as that can be envisioned! sttgaegoaktd

Very good attempt to duplicate Leonardo’s Mona Lisa and beautifully done but no one could ever successfully duplicate the original because the original was painted with many layers of glazing, which only Leonardo knew how. The softness is missing. And the hands are too small.