Видео

His rant was correct. He just wasn't able to predict the future 100% accurately. Which makes sense because nobody can...

Same for me. I will never forget Colin being there for Greg during his cancer diagnosis and treatment yet Greg wouldn't even stand by Colin over backlash to a joke. I can't even stomach looking at Greg Miller, Tim Gettys, or Nick Scarpino again after what happened.

@@nkw1985 well said, man

Like a year ago i watched all the morning shows leading up to the election. Shit was gold and it was obvious that he was the only one that had a clue what he was talking about.

Colin was wrong about Roe v. Wade getting overturned, and we saw the Republicans get very cozy with the idea of making gay marriage illegal again. And let's not forget what happened on Jan 6th. Shit got way worse than he predicted it would. I think he's right that half of voters being treated like deplorables is a bad thing. And I love the guy, I listen to Sacred Symbols every week. So don't get me wrong. It's interesting to come back and see how adamant he was and then to see how he's softened more recently.

Thank you baby! Now if we could only get you to post some videos....

That's who they started catering to when Colin left

Me too.

Honestly I hoped him winning would wake up liberals and realize that they need to change. Power corrupts and liberals bassically had power through the entire connected age. Their messages were being spread at a speed never seen before and those messages were unchallenged. They had no boundaries nothing pushing back against the growing radical ideas. To me that's more terrifying than anything Trump can do.

If you legit 50 million people who voted for him are all stupid, then im sorry your the stupid one

You're wrong

I'd appreciate links/sources to the things you're referring to for greater context. You packed a lot of claims into this comment and some I can understand what you are referring but others I'm lost.

Be specific and I can point you in the right direction ... if you are THAT unaware of the things I mentioned then perhaps venture outside the echo chamber? For example...just this morning Mr Trump threatened to withhold subsidies to the insurance companies to force the Dems to the table about repealing Obamacare... that is holding peoples HEALTH to ransom... even though they pay their premiums... now that WILL effect his voters NOT just Dems since we now know a great many red states that voted for him rely on Obamacare... Now I know many will rationalize this with "Dems fault" but think about it this way... when a kidnapper holds a person to ransom ... whose at fault ? "We do not negotiate with terrorists"

That first line comes off a little condescending. You're operating under the assumption that I keep myself within a specific umbrella of thought that is only of my own, which I don't appreciate. If that were the case why would I ask you to provide information to back up your claims? Wouldn't that be stepping out of the echo chamber? I'm giving you a fair shot to present your case... so don't be so smug about it. As for being more specific, that's what I'm asking you to do. You just dropped a one sentence and then moved on to the next one without really going into depth at all. The burden of proof is on you. The obamacare situation can be interpreted the way you described it which is "Trump' s holding healthcare for ransom" but the moment you pointed out that it was to get dems to come to the table on repealing, I'd imagine it was more like "Trump wants to work with dems on repealing obamacare. Dems are being stubborn and won't cooperate. Trump withholds subsidies to make a point that they need to come to the table on this and talk it out". It just depends on how you want to paint it really. I had to look up the "His actions led to the death of a Navy SEAL" claim because I never heard about it. After reading into it, seemed like a bogus claim to make as to why Trump is bad. You could easily say that about any other president in history. Seems like you were just grabbing for straws on that one. As for hateful policies... what hateful policies? Trump didn't run on social issues, and if you want to mis-characterize the travel ban and wall as hateful then be my guest. The only thing I could really think as bad move on his part is when he rescinded the rules for Transgender people using the bathroom that they identify with. I'll give you that one on the basis that I agree with people using whatever bathrooms they please. In fact I would take it one step further and say the bathrooms shouldn't be gender specific at all. I mean every argument used in favor of transgenders using either bathroom could be easily applied to both genders just using both bathrooms. Doing that from the beginning would have prevented this from even coming up.

If you had to ask about what I was talking about in any of that (all being fairly common knowledge) you can agree that it was prob not my fault to assume you may be someone who either avoids negative news on Trump or lives in the echo chamber...if you do not then I apologize ... but these are all known. Hold the fort there... so you think holding the Americans people health to ransom to REPEAL a healthcare bill that presently is working (and by all metrics will NOT explode as claimed) is the best way? Seriously? Extortion? Would you accept that in a business transaction ? It would be more beneficial for Trump to do what the GOP refused to do for six years and fix some of the problems that arose. That would be an olive branch rather that threaten them using the American peoples health. The Yemen raid was HIS call... Obama said "no" ... the military heads where against it... Trump wanted it to go ahead and and a SEAL died...and a load of Yemeni children ..now remember that was a raid...not a bomb...so those kids where more than likely shot NOT caught up in a drifting cloud of sarin... TRUMP pushed for it against all the objections so no... no straws being grasped here. Trump has put people in place in both public housing and education that have in the past said they should be gone... destroyed ... HE put them there ... Devos has already rolled back protections on student debt ... the buck stops at Trump. You cannot spend 8 years blaming "Obama" for every little infraction found anywhere in the vast US government and then not blame Trump for the crap caused by people he put in place against the wishes of most of the American people and almost the entire Democratic party ? Is that what you're aiming for?

Working and being effective/efficient are two separate things and I would argue that obamacare is only the former. Is it a system that sucks partially due to republicans constantly striking it down during proposals? Yes. But trying to fix leaky pipes to hold together a system that needs an entire overhaul won't work. The appeal to reason of holding healthcare ransom without really seeing the entire picture is the point I'm trying to make. Clearly dems are pulling the same stuff that republicans pulled back in 2010 but now they want to be able to criticize Trump for not making/allowing the system work. If dems don't even want to hear his plan out, then they're no better than the republicans before them. So Trump pulling this stunt to make a statement and to make them at least listen is probably one of the only things he could have done. In regards to the raid: I think its fair to argue/question Trumps decision to go forward with it. But in what world is there not an expectation that lives will be lost in a situation like that? Reality isn't black and white, it's really shades of gray. When I said "straws were being grasped" I was referring to the argument itself, not the context of the argument. It came off as you trying to make a sizable list of negatives things to detest Trump for but you were grabbing at any "little infraction" to make your case. As for your last point: I don't know you nor do you know me, so I can't make a case on whether you spent 8 years defending obama and not are on the attack on Trump. It would be unfair and intellectually dishonest. I will say that it goes both way though. I've never said prior to voting for Trump and even after he got elected would I defend everything he does. That does not mean I don't agree with majority of what he proposes and his actions. In my opinion he hasn't done anything as excruciatingly bad as you would like to think the things you listed are. If he had, you would certainly hear about it from the people who voted for him, and that noise would be loud. Trust me it wasn't an easy choice for most Americans to make. I genuinely think that mostly any other candidate that republicans had to offer (with maybe the exception of Carson) been their candidate for the presidency, The results would have been the same, maybe even the majority vote swinging towards the republicans.