Видео

ruclips.net/video/usy1bISbldE/видео.html

ruclips.net/video/Ekg0I_hdi54/видео.html

Mufti Abu Layth is the only other Maliki I know on social media, but he’s more of a meme😭😭

Abu Layth ain't no Mufti, bruh

@@redpersiantv Why isnt he a Mufti?? he does have the knowledge.

the guy allows everything, he has no morals.

@@MadMo04 who and why do u say that? Abu Layth I could understand but this man? Idk

💀

no. that's wahabi mentality. fistful is same in hanafi too

How do you know that he trims his beard? Many people’s beards don’t grow to a fist length and stay short naturally.

Don’t assume badly about scholars

@@maen-halabi… his beard is clearly trimmed

@@gavinminty4974 not to me And even if it is, trimming your beard is halal in the Shafi’i madhhab, so maybe he takes that opinion.

@@maen-halabi ahki. Wallahi? We aren’t Jews. We’re Ahul Sunnah Wal Jamaah. Rules lawyering is not going to save anyone on the day of judgement. “Leave it alone.” Those are the words of the prophet.

You just don’t like the truth 😮

Taking one Hadith and leaving out other related Hadiths, either out of ignorance or for preference, is causing Fitna.

@@abdulbasithsg show us the OTHER SAHIH HADITH that says "PROPHET" salliallaho alaihi wasallam HIMSELF ﷺ trimmed His beard.

​@@abdulbasithsg two weeks and no Sahih hadith provided. Next time don't claim and attribure false things to Prophet salliallaho alaihi wasallam

@@shafiullahnoory2268 Sorry It's not I don't have the answer but I didn't receive notification on your reply. So stop being naive for a minute. There are many Hadiths and secondary narrations on maintaining beard. There is Fard and Sunnah. There is the way of Prophet ﷺ and his companions. This is where Madhabs helps us to understand an issue and find a ruling. Doing it on our own would only make us a part of Fitna. Marwan ibn Salim al-Muqaffa’ said, I saw Ibn Umar (May Allah Most High be pleased with them both) take hold of his beard and cut that which exceeded a handful. (Sunan Abi Dawood 2357) Abu Hanifah narrated from al-Haytham that Abu Quhafah (May Allah Most High be pleased with him) was brought to the Prophet ﷺ and his beard was dishevelled. He ﷺ said, ‘If only you would cut it.’ He ﷺ indicated with his hand, pointing to the edges of his beard. (Al-Aathaar of Imam Abu Yusuf, 1038 & Musnad Abi Hanifah 1233) The meaning is, trim from the edges of the beard - length and breadthwise - and leave the recommended amount which is a fist-length. This is moderation between the two blameworthy extremes. Namely, lengthening, without trimming and shaving, or, cutting to the extent of eradication. In the narration of al-Tirmidhi, it is narrated from (Sayidina) Ibn Umar that he (the Prophet) peace be upon him used to trim his beard length and breadthwise. (Imam Ali al-Qaari, Sharh Musnad Abi Hanifah) al-Nakhai said: I am astonished by an intelligent man with a long beard. Why does he not trim it and render it between two beards. Meaning long and short. Moderation in everything is most virtuous. (Imam Ali al-Qari, Mirqaat al-Mafateeh)

@@shafiullahnoory2268 Stop being ignorant and naive for a second. Do you see my reply or not? RUclips taking down my replies with Hadith references. Can you see the link shared?

Never heard of this. If you have then please provide Hadith number, grade and book.

​@@redpersiantvالحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وصحبه، أما بعـد: فمن الثابت في وصف لحية النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أنها كانت كثة، وقد ورد في ذلك عدة أحاديث، منها حديث البراء قال: كان رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم رجلا مربوعا عريض ما بين المنكبين كث اللحية. رواه النسائي، وصححه الألباني. وعن يزيد الفارسي قال: رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم في النوم زمن ابن عباس فقلت له: إني رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم في النوم. قال ابن عباس: فإن رسول الله كان يقول: إن الشيطان لا يستطيع أن يتشبه بي فمن رآني في النوم فقد رآني. فهل تستطيع أن تنعت لنا هذا الرجل الذي رأيت؟ قلت: نعم، رأيت رجلا بين الرجلين .. قد ملأت لحيته من هذه إلى هذه حتى كادت تملأ نحره ... فقال ابن عباس: لو رأيته في اليقظة ما استطعت أن تنعته فوق هذا. رواه أحمد والترمذي في الشمائل، وحسنه الألباني. وقال الهيثمي: رواه أحمد ورجاله ثقات. اهـ. This is from islamweb❤

In the book Siyar A’lam al Nubula by Al Dhahabi it narrates that no one had a longer beard than Ali ( رضي الله عنه) Also mentions long beards from multiple other Sahabahs

It's actually not. However, certain practices that maybe associated with certain Sufi orders can fall into the rubric of bid'ah. On the other hand, tasawwuf is more along the lines of worshiping Allah by loving Him and putting in the effort to eliminate the habits that may cause a person to fall into sin. By seeking methods that build a need in a Muslim to constantly remember Allah. In addition, by constantly remembering Allah it would take a Muslims mind off sinning thus making it possible to place effort into committing good deeds. Which results in improving his state and rank in the sight of Allah. Hope this helps!

He is a Maliki in the fiqh of Imam Malik and many others it is permissible. Just because you favor certain jurisprudence doesn’t invalidate the others

@@NoMan-pp1jq brother we have clear instructions by the prophetﷺ to leave the beard. and we also have descriptions that he had a large beard. i cannot take any preacher serious who purposely trims his beard where its barely recognizable as a beard. is he ashamed?

Then u are against malik

@@keeyz7573 im against shadee who opposes the aqidah of imam malik.

Beard is a Fiqh issue not Aqeedah

He follows maliki madhab. He explains that in this school of thought there is the opinion which means “as long as there’s something there”

@@Umair1 there's no such call in the maliki madhab don't talk when you don't know the whole ummah is ijmah on having a fist length beard then there is a differ in opinion that can we cut below it or not

@@Trickshotsaint7Dr Shadee has multiple ijaza, he is a real scholar. More than Assuim Al Hakim, more than Firas

@@Trickshotsaint7neither have ijaza

@Immortalus98 I don't believe assim al hakeem is doing something right and I don't know girls what I know is that his beard is not with the consences of the imams

Dostum, Şeyhin ne söylediğini anladın mı? Sen Sunni mi? Bu Şeyh Maliki Sunni, nasil zindiq mi?

​@@redpersiantvsalafis and wahhabis call anyanyone who slightly disagree with them zindiq and kaffar if you weren't already informed

Walaykum Salam, you don't need to be a Sufi to be a Maliki. Bidah is of two kinds, Practices within the realms of the Sharia, Practices outside the Sharia. Latter being Haram and the first not. "When will it stop?" might need a watch with buttons on it.

Maliki madhab is one of the four great madhabs. The 4 imams were Athari in Aqeedah and were not those who allowes bid’ah. The Sufis have hijacked the madhabs to inject their false innovated beliefs into them. Follow the madhab but do not follow Sufism. It will lead you down a path of bid’ah and shirk in some cases

@@user-hc1fm9vh8t alhummduillah thanks for the reply but I need evidence that all four imams were believing in the athari aqeedah and they didnt allow bidah??

@@hamzamedina146 No problem akhi. Read below. Because If you say to a sufi that Allah is above the Arsh (in a manner which befits him) they will likely tell you it’s a deviant belief of Salafis. Then they proceed to either misinterpret or ignore or weaken the narrations that are presented to them. 1. *Imam Abu Hanifa* Imam Abu Hanifah: Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله was asked of his opinion of the one who says ‘I do not know whether Allaah سبحانه وتعالى is above the heavens or on the earth’ Imaam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله replied: “He has disbelieved, because Allah سبحانه وتعالى says: “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne”, and His Throne is above His seventh heaven.” He was then asked “What if he said that Allah سبحانه وتعالى is above His Throne but he does not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or on the earth?” Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله said: “He has disbelieved because he has denied that He سبحانه وتعالى is above the heavens” [Quoted in Al-Uluww of Adh-Dhahabi, also quoted in Sharh Aqeedah At-Tahawiyyah of Ibn AbiI-‘lzz AI-Hanafi] 2. *Imam Malik* Imam Malik: lmaam Malik رحمه الله said when replying to the one who asked “How did Allah سبحانه وتعالى make lstawa? (Allah’s Rising Above the Throne)” He replied “Al-lstawa is known and its how is unknown. To have faith in it is obligatory, and to question it is an innovation.” Then he said to the questioner, “I do not think except that you are an innovator” and he ordered him to be expelled from the gathering. [Quoted in AI-Asmaa wa Sifaat’ Page 516] 3. *Imam Ash-Shafi’i* Imaam Ash-Shafi’i رحمه الله said: “The belief that I am upon, and I saw Our Companions, the Ashab-ul- Hadith (People of hadith) to be upon is: Affirming the testimony that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah سبحانه وتعالى, that Muhammad ﷺ is the Messenger of Allah, and that Allah سبحانه وتعالى is above His Throne (‘Arsh) (which is) above the heavens. He comes close to His creation howsoever He Wills, and He سبحانه وتعالى descends to the lowest heaven howsoever He wills.” [Quoted in ‘Awn aI-Ma’bood’ (13/41), and Ibn Abu Ya’la reports it in ‘Tabaqaat aI-Hanaabilaa‘ (1/283) with a chain of narration going back to lmaam Ash-Shafi’i. Also quoted in Al-Juyush al-Islamiyyah, Ibn Al-Qayyim, p.93) Imaam Ash-Shafi’i رحمه الله said: “To Allah سبحانه وتعالى belong Names and Attributes that occur in His Book and His Prophet ﷺ informed to the nation. It is not possible for anyone to refute them. So the one who contradicts this after the evidence has been established against him then he is a kaafir (disbeliever), and as for before the establishment of the proof then he is excused due to ignorance, because the knowledge of that cannot be attained through the intellect. So we affirm these Attributes and we negate ‘Tashbeeh’ (likening Allah سبحانه وتعالى to his creation) as Allah سبحانه وتعالى negated it by saying (in the Qur’an), ‘There is nothing like Him.’” [Quoted in ‘Siyar A’Iaam an-Nubalaa’ (10/80)] 4. *Imam Ahmad* lmaam Ahmad رحمه الله was asked: “Is Allah سبحانه وتعالى above His ‘Arsh, above the seventh heaven, separate from (all of) His creation, and is His knowledge and power encompassing everything in every place?” He رحمه الله replied: “Certainly. (He is) above the Throne and His Knowledge is in every place.” (Quoted in Sharh Usool l‘tiqaad and in Al-Juyush al-Islamiyyah, Ibn Al-Qayyim, p.123]

Allah is not physically above the throne with his essence, that's kufr due to Allah created time and space. He does not change nor is he like His creation. Regarding Istawa, we Asharis afirm the attribute but don't define it because it would liken Allah to his creation. We leave the meaning to Allah. Defining it would lead to an rational impossibility and kufr. Imam Tahawiyyah states in Aqeedah at Tahawiyyah, “He [Allah] is not contained by the six directions” [Al-Tahawiyy, Aqidatul Tahawiyya]. So, the Imams of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jammah stating Allah is above the throne has nothing to do with direction rather it's His supremacy, sovereignty and subjugation over the entirety of creation. My advice to anyone studying the religion, go with the majority not the minority when in reference to the Aqeedah of the Muslims, however one can differ on Fiqh, but the creed (Aqeedah) of the majority of the 1400 years has always remained the same. Link to the Tahawiyyah - attahawi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sharh-al-tahawiyya-fahim-hoosen.pdf

BTW, I'm not Iranian. The current topic discussed is related to the on-going genocide in Gaza and how the country that proclaims to be the defender of human rights the most is aiding and abetting an individual who not only is bombing non-combatant civilians to Paradise but is actively engaged in genocide. If you get sentimental over your nation-state being called out on that, it just goes to show how weak and insecure you are. Furthermore, about being men, we're not the ones confused about gender, nor do we engage in homosexuality. We tend to marry and procreate more with than one woman; each one of our wives tends to have at least four kids each. Just keep that in mind for whenever you feel like you wanna discuss things about being a man, keeping things together or even accountability.

@@redpersiantv Joan Donoghue, the ICJ president who ISSUED the ruling said just yesterday "[The court] did not decide, and this is something where I'm correcting something that's often said in the media" "the court didn't decide that the claim of genocide was plausible" nor "that there's a plausible case of genocide." It was explicitly said in live video. The court ruled on the status of Palestinians as a group and the media shamefully ran with the incorrect framing. Learn to think critically. Learn that you can't just redefine words to fit your narrative. Something can be horrific without it being a genocide. Though I’m sure you know that. Regarding gender confusion, the only people confused are your leftist buddies. It is nice to see the most morally bankrupt of society getting together. Cheers.

Donoghue wasn't live yesterday, did you get high off your own supply? Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur stated “There are reasonable grounds to believe that the threshold indicating the commission of the crime of genocide…has been met.” Want me to spell things out further for you?

@@redpersiantv On the BBC website: “Former head of ICJ explains ruling on genocide case against Israel brought by S Africa” “She said that, contrary to some reporting, the court did not make a ruling on whether the claim of genocide was plausible.” Google is free. Stop it. Francesca Albanese or her husband, Massimiliano Cali (former economic adviser to the Palestinian Authority’s ministry of national economy in Ramalla) doesn’t have the authority to make that call. You and your pathetic activists bore me. 🥱

@@redpersiantv On the BBC website: “Former head of ICJ explains ruling on genocide case against Israel brought by S Africa” “She said that, contrary to some reporting, the court did not make a ruling on whether the claim of genocide was plausible.” Google is free. Stop it. Francesca Albanese or her husband, Massimiliano Cali (former economic adviser to the Palestinian Authority’s ministry of national economy in Ramalla) doesn’t have the authority to make that call. You and your activists bore me. 🥱

Welcome buddy. I understand that concept. PBD also talked about how he saw Iranian's call for death of America when he lived in Iran. My take is most of these non-Muslim commentators have a problem with Muslims in Muslim lands expressing the sentiments for political Islam, in order to beat around the bush they misconstrue statics in order paint Muslims as backward Ignorami. In fact, if it wasn't for Muslims there would no democracy in the West due to the fact Muslims translated Greek texts into Arabic which later got translated into Latin until they became the cause for the renaissance. Concluding, I do understand what PBD said however it view from a totally different lens. Thank you for comment, buddy!

I think you’re missing the point again. Take care.

@@Peacethroughstrength123 he's pointing out that P was saying he's ''pro-iranian people'' but that he personally saw those same iranian people chant ''death to america (marg bar amrika)'' which he then criticised them for. so which is it, do you love the people but hate the government, or do you dislike the people(or at least their attitude)? This is what Red PersianTV was trying to say.

I think he doesn’t like government of Iran and people who support that government. It’s theocracy. It’s like loving German people and not liking Germans who support nazi party. I hope this this time it will make sense

Evidently, PBD is a Christian he's not going to support sentiments for political Islam in Iran. Regarding theocracy, there's plenty Christian Nationalists in America. It already made sense, I was reading between the lines. Furthermore, the reason for people in Iran chanting "death to America" is because they have been wronged by America in the first place. Firstly, by instigating regime change by removing Mossadaq, then installing the Shah (who had no problem allowing Iran's natural resources to be usurped by a foreign oil consortium), and then having a tyrant called Khomeini placed on them. If that doesn't convince you, they have been sanctioned to kingdom come for the past couple of decades. What do you think the Iranians are going to like America after what it has done to them?

I'm sure Khomeini and his crew didn't do any favours for the common Iranian either. From their estranged understanding of Islam to their oppressive treatment of its people, that caused further secular anti-Islamic sentiments amongst Iranians. Resulting in atheism and agnosticism becoming common among the youth. The land of Persia has faced an onslaught from both foreign hegemony and fundamental ideologues who have acted for self-interest at the expense of its people, culture, and correct religious understanding.

Don't forget Africa and every other country in the middle East.. that was raped before WWI.. I'm Puerto Rican.. and my Island has suffered because we are " Commonwealth" like Somoa, Hawaii and other little islands, the West is a bully.. and now it has its "BOYS" BEHIND IT .. NATO.. THIS HAS TO STOP., I REFUSE TO GIVE A BULLY MY LUNCH MONEY.

I'm sorry to hear that and I totally agree!

You shouldn't, as I know of.

Better than adhering to a seventh century ideology and blaming all your problems on other people. Maybe it’s not a good idea to have half of the population of a country only be partial participants in society. That could have some things to do with it along with the slew of other issues but no, boo hoo America. Next you’re all going to start blaming America for the fact that the Arab slave trade went on even past the transatlantic slave trade. Yeah, America forced you to have slaves up until the 80s.

America did not destroy Korea and split it into two. Even then the death to America from North Korea was more about it declaring its bonafides as a revolutionary communist state that was going to be in solidarity with Russia and China but still maintaining a lot of its sovereignty. Both these things weren’t exactly present in other communist satellite states.

@@UserUser45654 America did do that. You can point out that it wasn't initially America alone that set up the parameters for that. You had a contrived situation in which occupation of the nation after being liberated from the Japanese was divided similar to East and West Germany but more half and half. At this point it was a single country but as though occupied half and half by two countries which were meant to be responsible for resorting the nation and rebuilding sharing the burden. It was a precarious set up to begin with but it was ultimately the USA who supported disintegration having their half of the nation become a separate nation onto itself while at the same time quasi abandoning it. This created a situation that is akin to being asked to look after something and then deciding to keep it. That warrants forcibly taking it back. North Korea did this with very little bloodshed. When the USA came in and reversed it returning to the status quo it didn't stop there. It then decided to instead conquer North Korea for South Korea. This resulted in a Holocaust for the North Koreans. The USA miscalculated at several key major steps including believing that it was going to be easy. When it turned out not to be rather than giving up they refused to let it go unleashing the full might of their military apparatus resulting in a campaign of total war which was massively asymmetric. If you ask people about that time and look at the actual historical record there was a lot of frustration between the violent thugs in the US military and various politicians. You have cases time and time again where the military promises it will be a walk in the park, it would be a quick war, few casualties and that China won't get involved and so on. I suggest you actually bother to read the history. You media is propaganda and it is not free. I do find it amazing how quickly Americans just forget things across the generations.

As a Persian, all I see is bombs being dropped on innocent women and children who have nothing to do with Hummus. Get out your echo chamber and think with your head, you self-entitled brat!

Narrated Abu Talha: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Angels do not enter a house that has either a dog or a picture in it." Sahih al-Bukhari 3322 - sunnah.com/bukhari:3322 The following link might explain further - islamqa.org/?p=171345 Wa Assalamu Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh

But is it makruh then? If angels dont enter the house. JazakAllah khair

It's Makruh to pray Salah where there are pictures of people hanged up. However, regarding the Angels, the previous was reference to the Angels of mercy, so sorta employing reason, it would probably be good idea if the Angles of Mercy did descend upon the homes of Muslims. It's gonna increase Barakah, whether that in Rizq or other things. In order for the Angels of Allah to enter a Muslim's house, One should recite; the Quran, Salawat upon the Prophet ﷺ and try not to commit sins. JazakAllah Khairan

Glad it was helpful!

The Quran doesn’t address every single issue , we must follow the sunnah of our prophet and not deviate from it

@@zidan9069 na'uthubillah 🔥 your the deviant! Your saying the Quran is not clear! Keep being wahabi!

if you deny the sunnah, you are a kaffir

The Quran also doesn’t state what the male awrah is. If it’s not stated as haram directly from the Quran than why don’t you go out naked or offer salah naked, is this somewhere where hadeeth contradicts Quran? Quran didn’t make it haram, but hadeeth did. Please use your intellect my brother in Islam. May Allah guide the muslim ummah today.

@@Anim3Panda16 are you alright? Clearly your deviants haven't got any commun sense do you really need a verse to be clothed 😂🤣🫵 just how blindly you Munafiqs follow such stupidity!