Видео

Handsome throughout

USA 14 subs X 24 missiles each X 8 warheads each missile = 2688 warheads. Each warhead is equivalent to 32 hiroshima bomb. But wait there’s more. UK 4 subs X 16 missile each X 8 warheads each = 512 warheads for the total of 3200 warheads. And that is just half of what US and UK have in their closets.

A message to Russian aggression don’t.

NATO biggest best and strongest in whole world.

Russia brags about how good there missile is this is the same things no different don't hear the uk bragging about there missiles

Let's make peace not war

He’s a democrat its in his DNA lol

Oh no . this missile can strike any target in the world😭.

good job

Homenick Meadow

Emmerich Shores

Phoebe Fields

Lesch Forks

Wisozk Unions

again ?

Jaskolski Coves

Steuber Circle

874 Denesik Square

One of them is being faster than RS-28 Sarmat.

Diamond Underpass

O'Reilly Mount

Floy Stravenue

Way more Minuteman IIIs have been launched than Tridents. Like 600.

Brayan Fields

Esmeralda Vista

Larson Cliffs

Elisa Branch

Hackett Rest

Hamill Cliff

A emotional-less description of some of the most evil weapons designed. Utterly sick. Man is evil.

Dixie Skyway

Rosendo Haven

Cormier Mall

Kamron Estates

Except for HIMARS, ATACMS, and cheap suicide drones. Lol.

All Russian weapons are junks! They are only look good on paper and videos, not in real battles!

These things are verified pieces of shit lmfao

Oh...by the by... ALLEGEDLY...n.c. Long ago...they detonated...One re-entry body...of the 50 KT...CLASS IN THE NEVADA DESERT...DEEP...UNDERGROUND... RESULT...50 KT...ACTUALLY...EQUALS...500KT... 10 TIMES POWER... ALLEGEDLY...N.C. :((((

...Bong...bong... bong... bong....MAN BATTLE-STATIONS MISSILE...FOR STRATEGIC LAUNCH...X 2... AWEPS TO LAUNCHER...ASAP...WITH E.B.W. KEYS!!... ALLEGEDLY...N.C. :((((

QUACK!.. DUH HUH...

I've seen them explode by a $200 drone

Problem with Russian equipment is there is way too many different systems, variants, technologies all jumbled together, including legacy hardware that they can’t deprecate or retire because of costs or production or just politics. Based on their war performance it seems even most of their experts have hard time driving efficiency out of all of these systems leaving huge gaps in both defense and offensive outcomes. Many of the systems are engineered for redundancy which actually points to lazy engineering. Like double Gatling guns instead of just one that is much higher quality. They also double up or increase “volume” (ie 12 short range missile launchers instead of just 4 like other countries similar systems) also due to gaps in quality. Which actually makes the overall platform more costly and more expensive than if they focused more on quality in the first place.

Yeeeeaaaaa, new pieces of shit for our ATACMS to turn into the largest Coastal Debris Field in Eastern Europe! I hope Russia really likes this system, cause unless they give them away, no one is buying it. The Russians haven't come up with anything new since the Soviet Era, so you know it's just an S400 in a new box, it's what Russia always does....pretends and lies. Good Luck with it ladies......cause if you haven't noticed.....Ukraine doesn't have a Navy! Hahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!

It's potential is far outclassed by it's faults and failures on the battlefield.

Not unstoppable, for sure. They tend to get a rapid unscheduled disassembly in the Ukrainian front.

It is the only working part of the Russian space program. Sending turrets into space wherever it goes.

The worst CIWS in the world. It failed on land and sea. In Ukraine it is constantly burning.

Seen it burn in ukraine

Another spawn of MilitaryTVs content farm. You guys have to be transparent about the fact that you get funded by the UAE.

Funny 😂😂😂😂