Видео

what?

Oh, they will! Trust me: you don't want a centralized AI!

♾♾♾🚀🚀🚀

every ICP holder will be!

♾♾♾🚀🚀🚀

♾♾♾🚀🚀🚀

thanks mate!

♾♾♾🚀🚀🚀

Thank you so much mate! I really appreciate!

it takes much study and experience to see the future!!!

thanks mate, I'll consider making a video on it!

none paid for this

Dfinity doesn’t pay for shilling their biggest shillers on RUclips couldn’t even get a grant from them. Say what you want about icp but almost everybody knows they put barely any money into advertising.

@@miked2425 Right mate. None pays for videos about ICP

xrp sucks, icp doesn't

never share your seed

to the moon!

🚀🚀🚀

yeah, that talk was incredible!

no coin will ever flip btc. Scarcity is just one piece of the puzzle. There is no token which is as secure and as decentralized as btc

right ahahah

💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣

you're welcome Tom! Thanks for watching as always!!!

many people still need to discover its power!

🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

thanks mate and thanks for watching!

right mate!

so where is all the users? Check their DAU it's a ghost chain, I woukdnt buy it that's for sure

@@FarBeyondDriven2 Not a ghost chain at all. Watch the full video!

🚀🚀🚀🚀

the future of crypto!!!

thanks mate!!!!♾♾♾♾

Same here

Love you guys! Thanks for being part of my community!!!❤❤❤

@@tomtom8308 ❤❤❤

before it explodes!

♾♾♾♾♾

Thanks for watching!

🚀🚀🚀

🚀🚀🚀🚀

yes, token burns typically produce scarcity and therefore contribute to price increase

where did you get this text from?

@@fred-crypto ruclips.net/video/siTxzRCe4Ao/видео.htmlsi=a1XQc63Nqb31ykTS

@@fred-crypto ruclips.net/video/siTxzRCe4Ao/видео.htmlsi=6GQydMs6PlmRoswS They have used tree instead of DAG so that there are no arguments!

@@fred-crypto In the tailstorm architecture, miners issue partial-proof-of-work blocks (we call them sub-blocks) in a DAG, starting from the "summary block" (today's nexa average 2 minute blocks). To continue with the terminology, there are a minimum of K-1 subblocks and 1 summary block, resulting in K total blocks. So the DAG "collapses-to-a-blockchain" every time a summary block is found. Then the process begins again. The Nexa "DAG" is therefore very briefly-lived compared to "blockDAG" architectures, where no collapse happens. Personally, I like the collapse architecture better, but I'm sure there will be twitter battles about "true" DAG, etc, which I am not interested in getting dragged into 😊. Note, if miners reference the subblocks in the summary block, they get to use the work (proof-of-work work) contained in the subblocks as part of the work needed for the summary block. This has another useful property, which is that it makes the time to find the summary block much more reliable (this is the "bobtail" part of the tailstorm architecture). Similar to how 1 Bitcoin block may be found very erratically, but a bunch of them tend to come in every 10 minutes, if we build a summary block out of K-1 subblocks, we will get a much more reliable 2 minute block time. But when miners do this referencing, the summary block's transaction set must contain all the subblocks' transactions, with conflicts deterministically resolved. This means that the summary block can be used for SPV proofs, and is "miner consensus". However, the subblocks cannot be used for SPV proofs, and suffers from "client consensus" issues. This is fine IMO because it collapses approximately every 2 minutes. The value of a DAG and subblocks is primarily on the tip - to gain early indications of the likelihood of transaction commitment. By looking at subblock contents, wallets can determine how much hash power is trying to include their (or a doublespend) transaction. From this, wallets can come up with a probability of transaction inclusion (this is the "storm" part of tailstorm). Note that, like traditional mining, since real work (aka energy) is put into making subblocks, anyone who is making them is spending money - so an attacker that wants to make fake subblocks to trick a merchant, must spend real resources to do so, and there's a probability of success/failure that is therefore follows the doublespend analysis in the bitcoin whitepaper pretty closely. Search Nexa tailstorm

AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

😅😅😅

🚀🚀🚀

jasmy to zero

@@fred-crypto I'll hit you back in 6months🤣

@@lb9013 waiting for it

that jasmy is going to zero

Just like it did last time.....​🎉@@fred-crypto

Data is correct: you can double check. Btw, I'm a crypto expert with almost 10 years of experience in the field. Who are you? How long have you been in crypto?

if you want to lose money