Видео

I was an accountancy student right there where Bar Boys was shot at (San Beda), & im laughing so much 😂 the index cards, the “so mr. A is wrong, is that correct? How? Oh so Mr. A, mr. B said you were wrong, do you agree?” I’ve never had more palpitations in my life & wishing class dismissal every minute, not to be called at recit 😂 law subjects are dreadful 😂😂😂 One thing I remember from my law professors are to keep your answers concise & minimal in order to not dig your own grave 😂 the minute you say something extra (bc you’re trying to impress), its gonna be HELL for you 😂😂

I wilk become CPA in God's time..... Isang Quali pa then road to CPA na !

Ang gagaling nila lahat

The purpose of life is defeated by the greater things. Kung di ka natatalo di kana gumagalaw

Law of attraction: I will soon become a doctor and a lawyer!

😂😂😂😂😂

Hahaha, nakakamiss ang law school...nooot! Good luck sa mga aspiring lawyers!

Yung si ate girl na naka-red and trembling about taxation question made me remember a classmate sa labor law. My classmate can't remember the exact article and section and kept saying 'sec, secs'. Natawa nalang prof namin. 😂 Already watched this movie pero ngayon lang tumatak sa akin yung about sa pagbibigay diin ng prof (odette khan) on the importance ng pag-aaral ng maigi para maging mahusay na lawyer, no room for error - sa kagustuhang makasalba at makatulong sa iba. Well, maging sa ibang propesyon o trabaho, ganun din dapat.

And i just wondered how VP Sara Duterte could be able to hurdled this class during her college days?

Ohh wow! It was oddeth! 😮VERRY GOOD ACTRESS!

sana may accountancy version din T___T

Ganda ng movie na to.. ❤

I really like this movie. One of the lesson that I've learned in this movie is that, "You cannot justified opinionated answers. Go straight to the point and learn to say yes and no and what's the reason of it!"

Odette Khan carrying the whole film.

Low budget pero ganda ng content na to.

8:46 kaya ako bumalik dito dahil naalala ko sa nangyayari ngayon :') i mean not exactly the case but the sentiment remains...

iiyak nlng siguro ako sa kaba pag nandyan aq BWHWJAJAHAHAH😭😭

During my time even if I read or studied my lessons of 10 cases a day for a neophyte law students, I am still Afraid to be called in daily recitations. Everybody's business is to read books standing on the hallway, in the library, in the Chapel and even forget the name of my classmates sitting between and beside me.

Sana may movie na crim boys hirap na ngayon nga board exam sa criminology

Watching from Siargao

Am I the only one who wants to see a spinoff of bar boys, focusing on Justice Hernandez defending her farmer clients against the rich family and their lawyer?

Galing ni Ms Odette!!

Yung fave ko ang 8, at dream ko din Yun top 8😊🥰

The case of Chi Ming Choi v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 119190, is a landmark case in Philippine law that delves into the complexities of marriage and the concept of psychological incapacity, particularly in the context of sexual intimacy. It's a story of a Filipino woman, Gina Lao-Tsoi, who sought to annul her marriage to a Chinese national, Chi Ming Choi, due to his consistent refusal to engage in sexual relations. The narrative begins with Gina and Chi Ming Choi's marriage in 1988 at Manila Cathedral. From their wedding night onward, they never had sexual intercourse. Gina claimed that Chi Ming Choi consistently avoided any form of intimacy, despite her repeated attempts. He slept with his back turned towards her, avoided her on their honeymoon, and even refused to show her his private parts during a medical examination. Chi Ming Choi admitted to the lack of sexual contact but blamed Gina, claiming she avoided his advances. He presented a medical report stating he was not impotent. The case went through the trial court and the Court of Appeals, both ruling in favor of Gina Lao-Tsoi, declaring the marriage void based on Chi Ming Choi's psychological incapacity. The Supreme Court upheld these decisions, finding that Chi Ming Choi's "senseless and protracted refusal" to fulfill his marital obligation to his wife was a clear demonstration of psychological incapacity. The Supreme Court emphasized the fundamental nature of sexual intimacy within marriage, stating that one of the essential marital obligations under the Family Code is 'to procreate children based on the universal principle that procreation of children through sexual cooperation is the basic end of marriage.' The Court recognized that the constant non-fulfillment of this obligation could destroy the integrity of the marriage. It viewed sexual intimacy as a gift and a participation in the mystery of creation, essential for the continuation of family relations. The Court rejected Chi Ming Choi's claim that Gina was responsible for the lack of intimacy. His refusal to engage in sexual relations, despite being medically capable, demonstrated a deep-seated psychological incapacity that rendered him unable to fulfill his marital obligations. This case is significant because it clarified the concept of psychological incapacity, particularly in relation to the refusal of sexual intimacy. It also reinforced the importance of sexual intimacy as a core element of marriage and demonstrated the application of Article 36 of the Family Code in situations where one spouse is unable to fulfill their marital obligations due to psychological incapacity. The Chi Ming Choi case highlights the complexity of marriage and the need to consider the psychological well-being of both spouses in determining its validity. While it's crucial to respect individual choices and autonomy, the case underscores that certain fundamental aspects of marriage, like sexual intimacy, are essential for its fulfillment. This case serves as a reminder that marriage requires a commitment to both emotional and physical intimacy, and that a lack of willingness or ability to engage in these aspects can have profound consequences for the relationship.

A lot of signs talaga pinapakita sakin ni Lord na mag enroll sa law school. The last sign was from someone special to my heart. So yeah definitely next yr 2025.

Hell nah, i cannot😭😭 7:48

no explanation?

Great film....love good teachers...❤

My brother is not taking Law instead is ND and praying and hoping in God guidance maging first LICENSE ND sa buong angkan namin sa mother and father side

parang gusto ko ng mag law 😃😄

O vysalazar😂😊

🥑

Some are influenced by politicians.

After 10 yrs I'll comeback here and say "I am now an Atty.

Ms Odeth Khan would have been a brilliant law professor in reality.

This a real funny yet educative and informative film about law school.

Si Prof naka foundation. Yung foundation mas maputi sa kulay niya. Hindi matched.

Jamonds

Currently a 1st year AB Political Science Student. I'm hoping that one day, I'll come back here and say that I am now a lawyer.

Persons 😂😂😂

Manifesting maging CPA 4 years or more later❤✨

Hello.

Non-law students might say that this is an exaggeration but I'm a law student myself and trust me, the index card will make you a devout believer of the divine for the next 3 dreadful hours of your life. It's how terrifying law classes are especially if you unfortunately landed yourself a terror professor who will grill you for the cases they assigned to you. That is why there is a saying in the law profession "law school is not for the faint and weak heart". You will hear insults that will break your spirit, you will be discouraged, you will LITERALLY CRY after classes because of the humiliation. But if you remember WHY you entered law school and keep holding on to that goal as a motivation, your hard work will pay off in due diligence.

Thank's to this 😊

I remember my teacher in evidence haha

Ms Odette's performance was impeccable. Yung tipong khit nanunuod ka lng pero ramdam mo yung takot

BS. Hindi ganyang kaseryoso o daldal ang mga magagaling na prof sa law school. Unfortunately some of them could be bigots but they're too busy practicing law to take cheap shots like "I lied", or give that idealistic kind of pep talk in class that takes another hour or so of their lives after work. Law profs don't take themselves so seriously. Walang ganyang arte. Either nasagot mo nang maayos ang recit at exams o bumagsak ka o masisipa ka. Ganoong kasimple o kagulo.

A cardinal rule in law school: Nobody cares about your “opinion”

Balikan ko ni jud kung lawyer na jud ko. Incoming first year and polsci akong gi pili. I don't have the skill as a lawyer but I have this strong conviction that this course will help me and this is the only course where I envision myself na mo improve jd. Dasig lang. People really look down on me. Laban!!!

Plan to proceed with Law ❤😊