Видео

Thanks man!

I would recommend the 102 first if you want a short barreled 556 AK. The Krink is just way way to short for normal useage. The Krink is going to be a lot louder, shoot giant fireballs, and get less performance out of the ammo. The 102 will perform better and even suppress better while being less damaging to the suppressor.

@@Fauxknight Agree 100%. The 102 really is a much better firearm than the Krink. However, I would not recommend either one as a "starter gun". Find yourself a good 10/22, some eye and ear pro and a range with experienced shooters willing to teach you the basics of firearms and safety first. You gotta crawl before you walk.

@@DiamondbackArmoryLLC No argument there. For a starter-starter rifle a 10/22 is the absolute optimum choice.

Thank you. Just completed a course earlier today where I had a former law enforcement student with bad ammo put on a masterful display of the tap, rack and bang procedure. It was impressive as that person still managed a perfect score despite repeated failures to fire.

The issue was not the sights, the issue is my eyes. I am extremely far sighted. But thanks for the comment.

Thanks man! It really is a very good and affordable build. Premium PSA parts are the way to go in my opinion if you want to save and still have a quality rifle. My initial goal was to replicate my 2008 LE6920 for a lot less.

@@DiamondbackArmoryLLC Yeah. PSA is a good route to go specially with premium parts for a decent build while saving you some dough!

Entirely up to you. I am in the process of actually putting together my next video where I compare a PSA AK47 to the AK-101.

@@DiamondbackArmoryLLC sounds good

Go with zastava , I own a psa gf3 and a zastava. The zastava feels like it’s much higher quality. Also the psa lost its magazine release after 330 rounds. Not a big deal it was an easy replacement. But quite annoying. Other than that psa still going strong, just makes me wonder if anything else is gonna rattle off.

@@ringadingbaby4332 thx

Zastava. Built like a tank and will hold value because it's an import. Both are good though

Exactly. I have a Saiga 223 and the bolt and carrier has ever so slightly different geometry and the front trunnion has that bump rivet.

Its an AKS-74N. The real AK-100/74M series have a 'bump rivet' which these do not. The PSA rifles also use a 4.5mm hinge pin where the 100/74M series use a 5.5mm pin. Hope this helps!

Just get both. Shoot 7.62 when it's cheaper or shoot 5.56 when that is cheaper

​@@luketimmer6108the "cheaper" days are over

Private.

The US definitely has the ability to produce the best products in the world courtesy of resources and an abundance of people with the necessary skills. However, the previous combloc countries that are known for producing quality AK's poured millions if not billions into their production facilities back when they prioritized their weapons production. That resulted in an excellent product at the time. As tooling has worn though, foreign AK quality has diminished. I also agree with you that PSA needs to add a 5.56 chrome lined barrel to their AK production. That would seal the deal for many folks still on the fence.

USA can make the worlds best AK but it is going to cost a lot of money to do so.

Your comparison is comically all over the place. This is peak soviet era weaponry when thats basically all they were good at. The us will never touch REAL ak quality

@@MrEvilTag lmao Soviet Union collapsed, and their peak tanks are launching turrets into space. Again combloc Ak lovers have no real reasoning.

@@MrEvilTagBecause the US already surpassed it with the AR platform. The AR was already future-proofed for accessories unlike the AKM platform.

Thanks!